Doom Today: Scientists May Possibly Have Underestimated Climate Doom

If it’s so bad then why do so few Warmists practice what they preach?

Scientists may have underestimated global warming’s severity. Here’s how

Any Credentialed Media article that includes “here’s how” is not news, it’s opinion

Scientists use computer models to project how hot earth will get as humans burn more oil and gas.

But it turns out those models have a bit of a blind-spot: exactly how much of the sun’s energy gets reflected back to space from the snow and ice at our poles.

As a result, scientists may have been underestimating global warming.

National climate reporter Chase Cain traveled to Antarctica to see how tiny changes in color there can lead to big changes in temperature for the entire planet.

So, computer models and the cult reporter taking a long, fossil fueled trip to Antarctica? Brother.

Bright snow and ice reflects the sun’s energy back to space, helping earth stay a little cooler. Even though it’s a tiny change, the algae that grows on patches of ice in Antarctica alters the albedo — or the ice’s reflectivity — enough to make the planet warm even faster.

“When [the algae] are actively photosynthesizing, they have a larger impact on the surface albedo because they’re bringing extra energy into the snowpack, which dissipates as heat and causes it to melt faster,” Khan explained.

So, how does this compare to during previous Holocene warm periods? If you do not know then you have no comparison. That’s not science. But, then, none of this is science, it’s a cult.

The post Doom Today: Scientists May Possibly Have Underestimated Climate Doom appeared first on Pirate’s Cove.