Trump Wants Review Of Wacko Climalawfare Manual

The minute the liberals call something “non-partisant” you know they’re full of BS

Trump demands review of scientific manual used by federal judges

President Donald Trump has called for a review of a longstanding reference manual designed for federal judges handling complex scientific or technological issues, claiming the nonpartisan analytical handbook had been politicized.

Alluding to recent changes to the manual’s section on climate change, the president argued the government-backed handbook was “totally discredited” and claimed it had been used to improperly inform recent rulings on environmental issues.

Writing in a post on his social media platform Truth Social on Sunday evening, Trump said he had ordered “federal suspension and debarment officials” to review the National Academy of Sciences’ “Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence,” a decades-old publication produced in partnership with the Federal Judicial Center and aimed at assisting federal judges on issues of science and technology.

The president claimed the National Academy was “run by Radical Left” Democrats and that the nonprofit organization “published fraudulent, biased and misleading manuals on climate change.”

The latest edition of the judicial reference manual, published late last year, included a chapter on climate science and climate change. The section explained to judges the mechanical processes of climate change — such as the greenhouse effect, feedback loops and ecological tipping points — but also provided context on sources of climate research, including peer-reviewed studies and consensus reports.

In other words, the manual used Cult Of Climastrology dogma which has determined that there is no other cause for a minor uptick in global temperatures than the actions of Mankind, primarily the output of greenhouse gases. Hence, if judges begin from that point than most climalawfare suits will prevail, using the court system to enforce said cultist dogma on Everyone Else.

But in February, the Federal Judicial Center, the government’s education and research agency serving federal courts, said it had removed the climate science chapter from its version of the reference manual. The move came just days after a group of Republican state attorneys general penned a letter to Congress arguing the handbook presented a “highly biased, agenda-driven view” of climate change targeting oil and gas companies.

Because it is highly politicized.