Romeo and Mohammed

Before erasing our cultural heritage, moonbats feel compelled to defile it. Romeo and Mohammed demonstrates an attempt to bring Shakespeare into compliance with liberal ideology.

Via American Thinker:

Who says the theatre is dead? It’s thriving in England– as “Romeo and Mohammed,” a modern, queer reimagining of Shakespeare’s stuffy olde “Romeo and Juliet”— doth surely prove.

They forgotten that progressivism entails never offending Islam.

The play, now titled “Romeo and Hamed” because the play’s creators apparently want to live to see the second night’s performance, is set in London and follows two men, as you’ve probably already surmised.

We’ll see if the name change is enough to avoid drawing the attention of Muslims.

Other great works may follow:

What if, for example, Hamlet was reimagined as a modern story about a new king of Denmark, call them Kyle VIII, who is a non-binary, two-spirited, bi-polar, bisexual Muslim who gallantly comes to the defense of Greenland, Denmark’s much larger protectorate, against the bloodthirsty American president, the blatantly cis-normative Ronald Stump?

What if Othello, Desdemona, and Iago weren’t at odds, but were instead a welcoming, seen, and thriving throuple? …

What if Julius Caesar was rebranded as Julia Caesar, a lesbian Lutheran leader like no other? A person who believed in open borders and demilitarization?

These alterations might spare the Bard from ongoing efforts to cancel him.

On tips from abcanc and Brian Brandt.

The post Romeo and Mohammed appeared first on Moonbattery.