The Highly Suspicious Circumstances and Timing of the Pathway Home Standoff

“I think the most important thing was what I saw as an open mind to listen, and some receptivity to certain ideas. He said, I think we should take the guns away before a court order, or before the process. And I think it was a bit difficult to sort out, but I [have] hope.”

Here she talks about the mental hygiene laws that Bloomberg and Sheriff Israel have been promoting. Stripping people of their second amendment rights and the right of DUE PROCESS. Fascist to the core

What’s in the works in the Senate about Russian meddling in elections?

“We’re about to introduce a bill on collusion. I think that what the Russians are doing has got to be stopped. So we’ve written a bill that will hold people responsible if they monkey around with the Internet to divide people, to mess with elections, that kind of thing.”

Criminally responsible?

“This is civilly right now. It’s a work in progress, still…”

So she is looking to enact legislation that will punish people,  “PEOPLE” not “RUSSIANS”, for “monkeying around with the Internet” and dividing folks like they claim the Russians did on various websites during the general election last year. Totally, 100% FASCIST assault on FREE SPEECH.

When asked about California’s issues with the Federal government regarding illegal immigration this was part of her response:

“And I think it’s pretty stupid to say, I’m going to have law-abiding people picked up… We’re the biggest agricultural producer in America. All of the employment comes from the undocumented. I have tried with bills to provide a way to create a blue card for agricultural workers which would enable them to legally continue to work agriculture…”

Then she went on to talk about California’s growing homeless problems, never making the connection between the two:

“We’ve got a huge homeless issue, I think they have over 40,000 homeless in L.A .and 7,000 in San Francisco and Oakland. [The figure for Los Angeles city and county is more than 57,000.]”

Diane Feinstein is up for re-election this year and the progressive base of the California Democratic Party simply isn’t endorsing her and her seat is in jeopardy:

We’re seeing millennials and Gen-Xers outvoting baby boomers. They did in 2016. So the Democratic electorate is changing. Certainly in California it’s moving to the left. You saw that here with your non-endorsement by the state Democratic Party.

“…But I never expected to be endorsed. And my strength, if I have a strength, is in the general population. I think there’s a certain amount of pragmatism in the general electorate. They listen. I think they want people who can solve problems. I think I’ve shown that I can do that.

Diane Feinstein seems like she intends to run on the Republican side of the Democratic Party with help from “pragmatic” independents and perhaps Republicans who register as Dems for the primaries. She say “THEY” listen as opposed to the real progressives in Cali’s Democratic Party. Notice how she uses Republican talking points to shoot down even something as tame as a “public option”?

—

Sanders Won’t Endorse Feinstein as She Fights Left-Wing Primary Challenge – March 9, 2018

“Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) has refused to endorse his Senate colleague Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) in her primary campaign.

The 84-year-old Feinstein seeks to retain her seat in the face of progressive challengers, and Sanders declined to endorse any candidate in the race, The Hill reports. The California Democratic Party was split on the race, and Sanders said he would leave the matter of who to nominate up to voters in the Golden State.”

So while the fake progressive Bernie Sanders refused to endorse Feinstein in the primary, he also refused to endorse her progressive challenger.