Elections Commission right-wingers and Judge Malloy don't need the law to purge voter rolls, just blind ideology!

Attorney Ann Jacobs: “What he is saying is somebody is going to go commit a felony in their own name by voting at an address. That does not get extra votes. That doesn’t change the outcome of the presidential election. We are talking about registered voters who legitimately registered to vote, who will stay on the roles, and if they have moved, they will be able to change it. If they have not, they will be able to walk in and vote.” 
(From the transcript)

And the business man Bob Spindell’s Republican response…you’ll love his blunt admission:

MR. SPINDELL: I would like to answer a question … There is also no evidence that there is no fraud going on. I think having 200,000 extra people on the rolls, which is a Democratic ploy almost everywhere-the Dems like lots of people on the rolls, the Republicans like to have th these cleaned up.  

Here’s part 2, that was already removed from Upfront, so I had to record the DVRed segment with my phone. Jacobs reveals how Judge Paul Malloy went well beyond his decision to purge voter rolls, by targeting specific election commissioners for voting the wrong way…at least according to him, setting up a dangerous and unconstitutional precedent:

Judge Malloy’s order, which includes a $250-per-day fine for the three commissioners who voted against the purge…

 Jacobs offered this shocking possibility…

“Let’s talk about the idea that a circuit court judge has held commissioners of a state body individually, not the commission, in contempt because they voted the wrong way. And what it would essentially do is allow any circuit court judge across the state to force votes that he or she individually want and do so by threatening penalties against individual commissioners. And I think that’s a shocking usurpation of the commissions, commissioners, all sorts of government entities.“ 

More Evidence of Voter Fraud Nonsense: Spindell also added this:

After the 2004 election, initial media accounts featured front-page allegations of widespread fraud in Wisconsin.[40] On February 26, 2008, the Milwaukee Police Department released a report on that election, with what appears to be a painstaking investigation of the facts, and policy recommendations offered with less care and disavowed by the Milwaukee Police Chief.[41] The department’s careful factual investigation primarily revealed administrative mistakes and, occasionally, negligence.[42] It showed that much of what had originally been identified as potential fraud was in fact due to clerical error.[43] It also uncovered several votes by potentially ineligible individuals, including some who were allegedly nonresidents, and some who had allegedly been rendered ineligible due to convictions.[44] The report revealed only one potential vote that might have involved in-person impersonation fraud, with no documentation verifying that the vote in question was actually cast.[45]