This is Weird: Revisited
The other day, Hank posted on the difficulty he was having reconciling why a given person’s group health insurance rate changed depending on whether they were the employee or the employee’s spouse. That post, and some back-and-forth in the comments, sparked my curiosity.
Hank said
So I graphed the data based on the original post.
1. Male employee vs male spouse
2. Female employee vs female spouse
Graph #1 addresses the first reference above (click to enlarge):
The premium rates differ in specific amounts, but the differences are not material below age 50. After age 50 the spouse rate rises above the employee rate. This insurance company apparently has data that support the higher cost for older male spouses vs older male employees. I’m guessing that older male spouses tend to have more health conditions that prevent them from working. That would show up in the experience of the pool, and its effect would likely grow as the individuals age.
Graph #2 addresses the second reference:
The main difference in this graph vs. Graph #1, is seen in ages under 35. My guess is that the female spouse rate is higher than the female employee rate through these younger ages because of marginally higher maternity liability. That difference then closes rapidly. After age 54 the female spouse again appears to be more costly. Again, I don’t dispute that the insurer’s cost data support the differences. After taking maternity into account, the result observed in Graph #2 is consistent with the result observed in Graph #1. It may well have the same origin i.e., that older female spouses tend to have more health conditions than older female employees, that prevent them from working.
Another possibility is that this insurance company’s pool includes marginally more male spouses who are employed (under age 50, anyway), and therefore represent a lesser liability to the female employee’s plan because of COB (Coordination of Benefits).
Whatever, and aside from the actual dollars-and-cents differences in rates, the shapes of the lines on the graphs seem to me consistent.
I think the actuarial correspondent is correct about the beneficial effect of selection for employees vs spouses. It’s visible in the premium rate relativities in all the other premium rate graphs I created (see PS, below). I’m surprised he did not mention (or maybe he did?) the cost of maternity for younger females, regardless whether working or not. That’s visible in the graphs, too.
In each of the questions you’ve raised. I’m not claiming I have a full explanation. While I think my guesses may be a good part of the explanation, we’re still left with questions.
“We started with one question, and ended up with many questions.” One of my profs in college (philosophy, not mathematics) often made that remark at the end of his lectures – and then always concluded by saying “What a marvelous bargain!“ I still think that insight was worth the whole semester’s tuition. At least for his class. (In 1965, the undergraduate tuition at my school for a 3-hour class was only about $150).
Which means – - this exercise was a bargain!
Source: http://insureblog.blogspot.com/2020/07/this-is-weird-revisitd.html
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
LION'S MANE PRODUCT
Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules
Mushrooms are having a moment. One fabulous fungus in particular, lion’s mane, may help improve memory, depression and anxiety symptoms. They are also an excellent source of nutrients that show promise as a therapy for dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. If you’re living with anxiety or depression, you may be curious about all the therapy options out there — including the natural ones.Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend has been formulated to utilize the potency of Lion’s mane but also include the benefits of four other Highly Beneficial Mushrooms. Synergistically, they work together to Build your health through improving cognitive function and immunity regardless of your age. Our Nootropic not only improves your Cognitive Function and Activates your Immune System, but it benefits growth of Essential Gut Flora, further enhancing your Vitality.
Our Formula includes: Lion’s Mane Mushrooms which Increase Brain Power through nerve growth, lessen anxiety, reduce depression, and improve concentration. Its an excellent adaptogen, promotes sleep and improves immunity. Shiitake Mushrooms which Fight cancer cells and infectious disease, boost the immune system, promotes brain function, and serves as a source of B vitamins. Maitake Mushrooms which regulate blood sugar levels of diabetics, reduce hypertension and boosts the immune system. Reishi Mushrooms which Fight inflammation, liver disease, fatigue, tumor growth and cancer. They Improve skin disorders and soothes digestive problems, stomach ulcers and leaky gut syndrome. Chaga Mushrooms which have anti-aging effects, boost immune function, improve stamina and athletic performance, even act as a natural aphrodisiac, fighting diabetes and improving liver function. Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules Today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
