Profile image
Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

You Are an Angel That Was Birthed into the Flesh - The Biggest Uncovered Mystery of All Time!

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


  Fallen Angels

“I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.” (Psalm 82:6-7 KJV Holy Bible)

The word ‘gods‘ is Hebrew word H430  אֱלֹהִים  ‘ĕlôhı̂ym and is defined as follows:

gods – Biblical definition

Plural of H433gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.
(from The Strongs Concordance. Hebrew word H430  אֱלֹהִים  ‘ĕlôhı̂ym  el-o-heem’)

The first declaration of the definition for the Hebrew word H430  אֱלֹהִים  ‘ĕlôhı̂ym is: angels!

► What you are looking at is the window of The World’s Largest Altar

The World’s Largest Altar

The largest altar in the world just so happens to be constructed of life-sized angels surrounding an illuminated stained glass window of light. In its central point of focus is an image of a white dove. A white dove is a common representation of your ‘spirit’.

When we bring the altar into full view, you are going to be absolutely stunned when you see what has been revealed! This larger than life altar defines the greatest mystery of all: the origin of all humanity! Even more amazing is what was brought to light in the Holy scriptures that has been sealed until this very time! In case the suspense is too much for you – here is a quick spoiler: If you were an angel, how did you become a man? You were birthed into the flesh! Presented below in an easy to follow video are all the details that will blow you away  – this is the biggest uncovered mystery of all time!

FEATURED VIDEO:

You were exiled from heaven. This is the biggest news ever! The mystery of the human race is solved.

We are all angels birthed into the bondage of the corruptible flesh. There is only one who was 100% pure. He broke the system of the flesh paradigm. He was born of a virgin (conceived by the Holy Spirit itself). He conquered sin and death and rose again to return back to the heavenly realm – He is the way out.

“Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. (John 3:5-6 KJV Holy Bible)

► How do I get set free from the bondage of corruptible flesh? You were born once into mortal flesh. Now – you must be born again, this time, of the incorruptible and immortal Spirit.


We welcome you to visit:


  Source Link:
  You Are an Angel That Was Birthed into the Flesh – The Biggest Uncovered Mystery of All Time!

 


 

Recent Headlines:

Support BeforeitsNews by trying our natural health products! Join our affiliate program
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at www.mitocopper.com


Get our Free Ebook, "Suppressed Health Secrets"  with  Natural Cures THEY don't want you to know!

APeX - Far superior to colloidal silver!  Destroys Viruses, Bacteria, Pathogens with Oxygen plus Silver!Supreme Fulvic - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
Ultimate Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!  
Organic Hemp Extract (CBD) - Full Spectrum high CBD (3300mg) hemp extract eases stiff joints, relieves stress and more!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)


FINAL WARNING!   Diseases are EXPLODING!  Watch this Video about APeX and You'll THROW AWAY Your Colloidal Silver!   APeX destroys Viruses, Bacteria and other Pathogens with the power of Oxygen PLUS Silver!  Nobody else has a product like THIS!   See why the inventor hasn't been sick in 16 years and why you'll never hear about it on the FAKE NEWS!  Get some now and tell your friends about it too so we can reach more people!  

APeX Interview - Superior to Colloidal Silver from Lee Canady on Vimeo.

Learn about APeX Here and Get the 50 Page Report in PDF format.   Call us at 888-809-8385 to order by phone.

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 59 comments
      • CTrent33

        :roll:

        • BEEF SUPREME

          You really think your architects modeling multiple structures after giant serpents is something you should be rolling your eyes at, Trent?

          • CTrent33

            The jewish invaders REmodelled the Vatican after their takeover in the early 60′s. The claim that masonic doctrine and architecture is Catholic doctrine and architecture is something I should, and do, roll my eyes at, Beef.

            • BEEF SUPREME

              You’re not really trying to sell me the notion that St. Peter’s Basilica is the work of the Novus Ordo, are you, Trent?

              The audience hall (Paul IV) was completed in 1971, so you get a pass on that one, per your argument against the Vatican II ‘invaders’.

              But what about the dragons and skulls and flies all over the place in graven images and statuary? All of it completed long before Vatican II. How about that obelisk (SHAFT OF BA’AL), Trent? Vatican II? Hardly.

      • james amen

        dear jonathan:

        PLEASE READ THIS. this is not a small matter.

        i’m sorry to be so persistent and firm with this, but if we allow even a minute’ amount of ‘leaven’ into THE WORD OF GOD, then we have failed in our good stewardship of SCRIPTURE.

        HOW, in the world is it, that as anointed and spiritually mature as you are, that you are still allowing satan to beguile you in terms of these concepts: ‘gods’, ‘judges’, ‘angels’,’being born~again’, and JESUS’ WORDS: ‘Except a man be born of water and of THE SPIRIT, he cannot enter into THE KINGDOM OF GOD. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the SPIRIT is SPIRIT ’?
        jonathan, this discernment should be LONG recognized by you by now.
        you are letting yourself be confused with this because you are just simply missing the ORDER by which these BIBLICAL
        TRUTHS apply.
        in other words, jonathan, you are erroneously applying some of these concepts, at points of GOD’S creation, where they do not belong.
        the best way to understand it is in the simplest order of occurrence:
        GOD ~ created angels ~ angels rebelled, fell ~ GOD’S six days of creation, [created man] ~ created man disobeyed, fell.
        NOW, jonathan, apply the terms you use..
        1] with THE LORD’S PLAN of redemption, HE, NOW, appoints man to,  ONE DAY, be judges with HIM. this is ‘gods’.
        2] the 2/3 of GOD’S angels, who did not rebel, have a multitude of ministering activities. those that fell, are a part of GENESIS 6 and subject to JUDGMENT. these are all the ‘angels’.  when we are raptured at the resurrection, THEN ‘we shall be LIKE the angels’: Matthew 22:30. this is where you are making your fundamental error. you think that we were ONCE ‘angels’, and then “return to be ‘angels’ AGAIN”. NO. we were created man, who, THEN, GO ON TO BECOME LIKE the angels’.
        3] before, ALL this can happen, our fallen nature has to be ‘turned~back upright’, as you correctly say: this is ‘being born~again’.
        4] before we are ‘born~again’, having been, FIRST, ‘born of the flesh’ [born of water], we remain ‘as flesh’; and, ONCE we have we have been ‘born~again’, THEN we are ‘born of THE SPIRIT’, and, AFTERWARD, on ON~WARD, we shall remain ‘of THE SPIRIT’.

        do you see it all now?
        prayers for you, and may THE LORD, please, show you this straight~forward understanding.

    • Pink Slime

      I am surprised you missed the most important verse. That we are to rule the entire universe filled with TRILLIONS of galaxies. We will need ALL eternity to do this. Growing the family of Yahuah – forever!

      Yahusha was the FIRST BORN as PROOF. :cool:

      • Morgana Le Fay

        Now that’s a scary thought….an entire universe ruled by delusional, half-baked, brainwashed nut-bags. :shock: :???:

    • james amen

      dear jonathan:
      THE LORD JESUS CHRIST continue to BLESS your work; however, HE has a decision to make:
      a] does HE stop your work from further dissemination with its not small error?; or,
      b] does HE overlook erroneously calling GOD’S children “angels”; for the benefit of all the great work with your entire Isaiah 29:15~16 revelation?
      if you have read any of my youtube comments previously, you know that i’m 100% in~agreement with ALL your work, and believe in you whole~heartedly. i KNOW THE HOLY’S SPIRIT’S VOICE; and i can CLEARLY see HIS work through you. 
      SCRIPTURE, however, CANNOT be violated; sorry, brother.
      you call yourself a ‘messenger’, which is true;..but, you are NOT ‘an angelic messenger free from error’. you are a human, an imperfect human messenger, subject to error.
      you began erroneously calling GOD’S children “angels” with Psalm 82:6: ‘You are gods’. 
      1] ‘angels’ are ONLY masculine in SCRIPTURE; there are no “female angels”. so, how do you account for human females in ‘the vortex’ if they are “angels”? 
      2] John 10:34, ‘You are gods’: the context is judges [magistrates]
      3] BIBLE Gathway: Psalm 82:6: ‘You are gods’ [b] Footnotes: [b] Psalm 82:6 Hebrew elohim, mighty ones; that is, the judges [magistrates]
      jonathan, our BIBLE is SOLIDLY RELIABLE because our original apostles NEVER got sloppy; with even a minute’ detail. if they had, then THE BIBLE would have been discredited centuries ago.
      THE ancient HEBREW scribes, if they made a mistake, they scrapped THE ENTIRE SCROLL! and STARTED OVER!
      you need to own~up to this error, please.
      if THE LORD decides NOT to allow this work to continue,
      IRRESPECTIVE OF ITS GREAT CONTRIBUTION AND ACCURACY OF DATA,
      then please do not be surprised.
      prayers, love, and blessings to you and yours.

      • Mayhem

        “SCRIPTURE, however, CANNOT be violated; sorry, brother.”

        Oddly enough, james amen, i was attempting to explain this very point to you a week or so ago but you ran off after hurling the usual insults.

        Have you met Pastor Tim…

        http://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2017/04/rapture-time-the-day-and-the-hour-revealed-2490538.html

        … he wrote his own Bible because, like you, he thinks he knows better than everyone else.

      • BEEF SUPREME

        “…‘angels’ are ONLY masculine in SCRIPTURE; there are no “female angels”…”

        Interesting and irrefutable point.

        “…John 10:34, ‘You are gods’: the context is judges [magistrates]…”

        Absolutely untrue. … Ἐγὼ εἶπα Θεοί ἐστε No textual variant among the MSS. …I said GODS you are

        “…that is, the judges [magistrates]…”

        This citation (from Bible Gateway?) is the result of an erroneous reading of the sons of Elohim (Genesis 6:2), which insists that the Old Testament phrase be taken to mean human men, when nothing of the kind should be done. Scripture is clear that the בני־האלהים from Genesis 6:2 are not men. Therefore, neither ‘Elohim’ nor ‘Theoi’ should ever be taken to mean magistrates or judges in the sense of any human agency.

        “THE ancient HEBREW scribes, if they made a mistake, they scrapped THE ENTIRE SCROLL! and STARTED OVER!”

        If they couldn’t correct the error by scraping or superimposing, Hebrew scribes disposed of the SECTION of scroll they were working on. Scrolls are composed of parchment pieces stitched together at the seams. No one ever had to toss an entire scroll – which could have taken years to produce, depending upon several factors. There are limitations even to pharisaical anal retentiveness.

        • unidentified

          there used to be female angels in ancient texts but they werent written into todays religious books

          • BEEF SUPREME

            And now we will examine the evidence for your claim…

            Where is it, please?

            • Andy

              lets examine the evidence for your claim

              what evidence have you? a self contradictory and factually inaccurate fantasy fairy-tale authored by the pagan roman emperor Constantine

              cognitive dissonance abounds with you religtards

            • BEEF SUPREME

              I’m always available to have that conversation with you, Andy…

              …and to address your criticisms, claims and concerns one by one.

              Right here.

              In front of everyone.

            • Andy

              sure, in front of everyone, as if i care what everyone thinks

              let’s start at the very beginning

              the universe wasn’t created, it has always existed, the first law of thermodynamics is not evidence but irrefutable PROOF

              there is no creator

              now, what evidence have you to prove the universe was created, that one should even consider the notion of a creator

            • BEEF SUPREME

              “…the universe wasn’t created, it has always existed, the first law of thermodynamics is not evidence but irrefutable PROOF…”

              Good, Andy. That is a premise. Now get to your argument.

              Please demonstrate the validity of your premise.

            • Damien

              Andy

              I am sure you will know very well that everyone except 19th century fundie post Zionists consider the ‘world / creation’ mentioned in the Bible to just refer to something like an ‘Age’

            • Andy

              BS
              i see this is going to go around in circles and you apparently can’t read nor answer simple questions

              the first law of thermodynamics is validation

              the conclusion is that there is no creator

              there is no argument this side, just conclusions based upon facts

              now to ask again – what evidence have you that the universe was created, that one should even consider the notion of a creator

            • BEEF SUPREME

              Apparently Andy, you are a person who needs instruction in argumentation. So? I would be much obliged to serve you in that regard. Thus:

              In order to win an argument, or even compete in one, a participant in argumentation must first table a premise. That much you have done. But beyond that, we are not, as you suggest, going in circles. Rather, we have yet to take even a single step toward the finish line.

              You wrote:

              “…the first law of thermodynamics is validation…”

              No, Andy. The first law of thermodynamics is a version of the law of conservation of energy. The law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system is constant and that energy can be transformed from one form to another, but can be neither created nor destroyed. That’s not a conclusion. And it is not validation. It is merely a starting point from which YOU, according to the confines of the argument you have yet to prove, must demonstrate a reasonable connection between premise and conclusion. Your stated conclusion is that the ‘universe’ (let us assume for the moment acceptance of that term) wasn’t created, it has always existed… and that therefore there is no creator.

              Now, if I need to illustrate the matter further to you, I will be happy to do so. But in the company of men who are capable of critical thought, you would do well to learn the difference between stating a premise and proving a premise, lest you find yourself being condemned for ineptitude of a scandalous degree.

              The floor is yours.

            • Mayhem

              Question:- what evidence have you that the universe was created, that one should even consider the notion of a creator?

              Answer:- the complexity of life precludes random origins.

            • BEEF SUPREME

              “…random origins…”

              So let me get this right.

              You DON’T believe eyes and hands and brains coalesced out of slime and dirt all by themselves aided by nothing but time?

              And what… you DON’T believe music and language architecture just sprang forth from those dirty slime creatures? Oh, wait. Not creatures. Creatures are created. Evoltures? No, that sounds too much like evil vultures.

              Damn you and such for making me question the evolutionary way. Now I’ll have lingering doubts and have to start hating God like Andy… all while denying that He even exists.

            • Mayhem

              Is that because it’s easier to believe random chance correctly flipped a coin 12 times in a row (number of components) just to create the bacterial flagellum (think fundamental building block) and how that makes way more sense than creation?

              I mean the odds are around 99.998% against coming up with the correct sequence but millions-n-billions of years right? Not to mention this is only the beginning because a bunch of bacterial flagella does not an eyeball make.

              For sure academia is unable to create life from not life but ignoring sense reason and logic science proves that anything is possible if you just wait long enough. No God required just blind faith in the impossible and then it’s do as thou wilt, guilt free, amirite or amirite?

            • BEEF SUPREME

              So ‘do as thou wilt’ or ‘thou shalt not’…

              Remind anyone of that old Honda car commercial?

              The car that sells itself?

              Just tell the people what they want to hear, stand back and watch the world light itself on fire.

              We really shouldn’t be this easy for the Enemy to manipulate.

            • Mayhem

              Yeah but the tyranny of the nanny state is infinitely more preferable than divine moral objectivity. Everyone knows this except maybe William Penn who wrote…

              “Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants.”

          • Damien

            unidentified

            there used to be female angels in ancient texts but they werent written into todays religious books

            ==========

            In Zoroastrianism. Mohammad fought with Arabs who thought angels were the daughters of God too

            – - – - –

            However, we should not try to guess the nature or form of these wings. Certainly, there is no basis in Islam, for the corrupt notion, prevalent in the west, that angels are like beautiful little girls with a pair of wings on their backs. We should also be careful that our children are not exposed to those books which contain such misleading pictures, so that they don’t grow up with an incorrect concept of angels.

            The angels do not have a gender. They do not procreate, Allah has denounced those who regard them as female. Indeed to do so is the way of the disbelievers.

            “Those who do not believe in the Hereafter, surely name the angels with female names.”

            (Qur’an 53:27)

            The pagan Arabs, for example, called the angels; daughters of Allah, despite the fact that they themselves were disdainful of female offspring, and were so ashamed of them that they were inclined to bury their daughters alive. Allah (swt) thus condemns these ignorant beliefs and practices:

            “Or has He (Allah) taken, out of that which He created, daughters, and honoured you with sons ? And, when one of them receives tidings of that which He sets up as a likeness to Allah Most Gracious (i.e. of a girl) his face becomes dark and gloomy and fill of grief….And they consider the angels, who are worshippers of Allah, to be females. Did they witness their creation ? Their testimony shall be recorded, and they will be asked.”

            (Qur’an 43:16,17,19)

            • Andy

              at least we have a different flavor of fairy-tale believer here, one who follows one of the worst criminals known to man – mohammad the pedophile

              Muhammad’s crimes:

              Genocide: Sahi Bukhari Volume 5:59:448

              Assassination: Qur’an 83:13; Abu Dawud #2680; Bukhari
              5:59:369-372

              Enslavement: Qur’an 23:5; 33:50; Bukhari 3:765; 5:512

              Rape: Bukhari 5:459; 5:637; 7:137; 7:137

              Robbery: Qur’an 8:68-69; 59:6; Ibn Hisham pg.424-425; 428

              Child sexual abuse: Bukhari 5:58:234; Muslim 3309-3311; Dawud 4915

              Greed: Qur’an 8:1; Bukhari 4:53:327

              Torture: Ibn Hisham pg 515; 980

              Mistreatment/denigration of women: Qur’an 2:223; 4:34; Bukhari 1:6:301; 1:9:493; Muslim 9:3557

              Lying: Bukhari 5:59:365; Ibn Hisham pg 519-520

              Oath breaking: Bukhari 7:67:427; 9:89:260

              and this is your “best example of a man”,,, seriously? muslims are even more indoctrination deluded than christians

            • Damien

              This shows that there were pres Islamic Semites with traditions of thinking of angels as female

            • BEEF SUPREME

              Damien isn’t an Ishmaelite, Andy.

              Perhaps if you spent as much time reading as you do talking…

        • james amen

          bs,
          please be very careful with your BIBLICAL argumentitveness [Matthew 5:39]; unless you are absolutely certain. you, however, have made multiple errors with it.
          i will show you where your assessment is inaccurate; and, hopefully, you will listen. if you have THE HOLY SPIRIT, then that will reveal itself immediately. if you are not, then that, also, will reveal itself immediately.

          my evangelism over the years recognizes the spirits of demons that revel in debate. fortunately, THE LORD counters that in SCRIPTURE with verses that hold you forever accountable if you are this way, and do not listen: Matthew 10:14~15; II Timothy 3:5 and Titus 3:9~11. people on quora, and here, have pushed
          these verses in their rebellion; and they have condemned themselves as a result.
          no way around this fact. please be a person who listens.
          1] John 10:34, ‘You are gods’ IS referring to judges; magistrates. your reference to (Genesis 6:2) has absolutely NOTHING to do with John 10:34. JESUS was quoting Psalm 82:6: ‘You are gods’; which, IS referring to judges; magistrates.

          2] (Genesis 6:2) is, of course, not men. that has absolutely NOTHING to do with my original message; except that it actually serves as further proof against jonathan’s incorrect use of “angels”. GENESIS 6 ‘fallen angels’ are NOT the same as THE LORD’S ‘fallen mankind’.

          3] to make a point of putting a “?” on the word ‘gateway’, in a day~and~age when english text has become virtually uneditable by virtue of the speed by which we now use computers and programs that do not self-edit, puts a question on whether your spirit is oriented toward being faultfinding over immaterial details that any non~confrontational and rational person would, otherwise, easily understand and overlook. interstingly, another on this forum is like this, and uses “supreme” in their name. are you that person?

          4] not ALL scrolls were stiched together. upon an error, the entire scroll WAS, in~fact, discarded. scribes NEVER used “white-out” as you infer.
          again, please reveal yourself to be a person who listens, and corrects their means, and not as those JESUS described as ‘that do not listen, and perish for their hard-hearts’.

          • BEEF SUPREME

            James wrote:

            “…you, however, have made multiple errors with it.”

            Good. Then let us get down to work.

            “…if you have THE HOLY SPIRIT, then that will reveal itself immediately…”

            You will either make a sound argument from Scripture, or you will not. Those are the options in this case. And that alone will determine whether or not I concede any of your points of contention. Do try to be a bit less smug, eh James?

            “…my evangelism over the years…”

            Couldn’t wait to get that in, could you. I mean, you actually survived a few posts on this page without bragging to anyone that you’ve been doing what you do for seventeen years now. Smug, James. Very smug.

            “…please be a person who listens.”

            I’ll say it again in other words – I will listen to you. I will hear you. But I will ONLY agree with you if you can show the superiority of your position by using the Word of God to prove your argument. No one cares a whit about your opinion or about your private interpretation. But I do care what you can prove from Scripture.

            “…‘You are gods’ IS referring to judges; magistrates. your reference to (Genesis 6:2) has absolutely NOTHING to do with John 10:34. JESUS was quoting Psalm 82:6: ‘You are gods’; which, IS referring to judges; magistrates.”

            Let us see. Here, then, from Psalm 82…

            God has taken his place in the divine council;
            in the midst of the gods he holds judgment:
            “How long will you judge unjustly
            and show partiality to the wicked? Selah
            Give justice to the weak and the fatherless;
            maintain the right of the afflicted and the destitute.
            Rescue the weak and the needy;
            deliver them from the hand of the wicked.”

            They have neither knowledge nor understanding,
            they walk about in darkness;
            all the foundations of the earth are shaken.

            I said, “You are gods, sons of the Most High, all of you…

            אני־אמרתי *אלהים אתם* ובני עליון כלכם…

            *ELOHIM YOU ARE*

            (…and to finish the passage…)

            …nevertheless, like men you shall die, and fall like any prince.”

            SO. James. What happens now is you prove to me the biblical usage of the Hebrew term ELOHIM anywhere in Scripture, which bears any connection to judges or magistrates – because HERE it most certainly does not. Not, that is, based upon the evidence available to us in the passage in conjunction with the definition of ELOHIM already provided for us by the Old Testament by the time we arrive at the Book of Psalms. NOTE: This passage very clearly differentiates between ELOHIM and MEN.

            “…(Genesis 6:2) is, of course, not men. that has absolutely NOTHING to do with my original message…”

            I referenced Genesis 6:2 because the connection you are trying to make between the word ‘ELOHIM’ and ‘magistrates’ very often finds its root in that verse when other men attempt to draw the same connection.

            “…‘fallen angels’ are NOT the same as THE LORD’S ‘fallen mankind’.”

            This is a point where you and I agree. The Scriptures tell us very specifically what mankind is, and we are NOT fallen angels. Johnathan Kleck seems to have based his entire theory around a design aspect of the altar at Saint Peter’s Basilica. But he finds nothing in Scripture canon to support his notion that mankind are fallen angels, so he draws attention to extra biblical sources.

            “…and programs that do not self-edit, puts a question on whether your spirit is oriented toward being faultfinding…”

            You mistake the ambiguous for the pedantic. Don’t expect anyone to assume what you are talking about when you haven’t taken the time to communicate your ideas thoroughly and sufficiently. Try proof-reading, James. Don’t lay blame at the feet of another for your shortcomings. I thought you meant Bible Gateway, which is why I included the question mark. For a man who presumes to CORRECT everyone he meets, you had better do a good job at composing your communication material. Don’t provide a substandard effort and then balk when someone questions the insufficiency of that effort.

            “…any non~confrontational and rational person would, otherwise, easily understand and overlook.”

            Again, you assume. Try allowing other folks to do their own thinking for themselves, eh? That way, your penchant for correcting every detail you find flawed might be somewhat easier to contend with. Just a suggestion, of course.

            “…interstingly, another on this forum is like this, and uses “supreme” in their name.”

            Yes. That is me. I am also Cintus Supremus. Try Googling before you judge my screen names again. Where you see arrogance is nothing of the kind. Who are these creatures, SUPREME and Supremus?

            “…not ALL scrolls were stiched together.”

            Oh? You are aware that parchment cometh from ANIMAL skin… are you not? And are you aware of the LENGTH of even a Torah scroll? to say nothing of the Prophets and the Writings. I’m sure you can do the math in your head and realize that there is no way for you to be correct in this instance. Never the animal has been created that provided a scribe with enough skin to stretch out a scroll without seams. A Brachiosaur… MAYBE. But where were they when the scribes were doing their work?

            “…upon an error, the entire scroll WAS, in~fact, discarded.”

            Prove it, Jimmy. I grow well tired of your assertions. I don’t care that you imagine yourself a teacher who should be HEEDED unquestioningly at every word he utters. Much of what you utter is vanity and error. To wit:

            “…scribes NEVER used “white-out” as you infer.”

            First of all, the word you are looking for in this instance is ‘imply’ – not ‘infer.’ One infers from another’s implication. Secondly, I implied no such thing. By correcting I meant to imply that a scribe would, if he could, SCRATCH the offending ink from the parchment. If the scribe could do so without leaving any indication of a correction, then the scribe would continue using that same sheet of parchment. If he could not, then the sheet was discarded and the work on that section began anew.

            “…again, please reveal yourself to be a person who listens, and corrects their means…”

            Why, James? Why is it I who must do the heeding and not you? For how long have I been a student of God’s Word? How is it you assume when you meet another Wayfarer that YOU are automatically the person in the superior position concerning sound doctrine and understanding? Why are you so audacious as to even think you know better than EVERYONE you meet? Is that the Spirit of Humility working in you? Or is it something else. By what metric do you measure your grasp of all things biblical against another man’s grasp? Is it your seventeen years? What? And why do you dare surmise the other man is always behind you in such things? Answer if you dare.

            Take your own advice, friend. Your hubris has gotten the better of you to a stunning degree.

      • james amen

        DEAR LORD JESUS:
        YOU declared in YOUR WORD that YOU hold SCRIPTURE even above YOUR NAME: Psalms 138:2.
        YOUR WORD COMMANDS that children~of~GOD are accountable to other children~of~GOD: Proverbs 27:17; Matthew 18:15; I Corinthians 5:12; I Timothy 1:3,5 and II Timothy 3:16.
        jonathan kleck has declared openly, and repeatedly, that he “does not have to be held accountable to ANY man”.
        i, hereby, use this forum to serve as witnesses in obedience to Matthew 18:15 and II Co 13:1; [after having already gone to jonathan 'in~private', as best as i could, on a number of occasions].
        if jonathan does not repent of his unwillingness to listen to this child~of~GOD’S BIBLICAL counsel regarding “angels”, with the great work YOU fostered and cultivated in jonathan’s entire Isaiah 29:15~16 revelation, then LORD i, hereby, ‘hand jonathan over to satan for the destruction of the flesh [that being pride and lofty self-aggrandizement], so that his spirit may be saved on THE DAY OF THE LORD’: I Cor 5:5.
        prayers for jonathan so that he has FULL, BIBLICAL ACCURACY with his entire Isaiah 29:15~16 revelation for ALL to benefit from.

        • BEEF SUPREME

          Not to be outdone by himself, James will now address the LORD Himself while carelessly and incompetently (to be kind) wielding the Scriptures.

          So James:

          “YOU declared in YOUR WORD that YOU hold SCRIPTURE even above YOUR NAME: Psalms 138:2…”

          So the Word of God (from that very verse, Psalm 138:2):

          “…for you have exalted above all things your Name AND your Word.”

          Is there even any similarity to what you teach, Jimmy, with what the Word of God teaches?

          “YOUR WORD COMMANDS that children~of~GOD are accountable to other children~of~GOD…”

          So? Submit yourself to the men of God right here on this page, Jimmy. Lead by example. He who will be greatest in God’s Kingdom must first be least in the world of men.

          “…if jonathan does not repent of his unwillingness to listen to this child~of~GOD’S BIBLICAL counsel regarding “angels”…”

          Is that how it works, Jimmy? Or doesn’t the Apostle Paul teach plainly to LET every man be convinced in HIS OWN mind? Doesn’t Mr. Kleck seem convinced to you? He seems pretty convinced to me.

          “…i, hereby, ‘hand jonathan over to satan for the destruction of the flesh [that being pride and lofty self-aggrandizement], so that his spirit may be saved on THE DAY OF THE LORD’…”

          Wow. What stunning hubris. You have a few very painful lessons on deck, friend. And the sooner the better. For your own good.

          “…prayers for jonathan so that he has FULL, BIBLICAL ACCURACY with his entire Isaiah 29:15~16 revelation for ALL to benefit from.”

          Yeah, I think you’ve disqualified yourself from praying for Mr. Kleck, pal. But no matter. The rest of us will still pray for him: We ask for STRENGTH and for PEACE and for GRACE and GOOD WILL from our Lord for our brother in Jesus Christ. May God make His FACE to SHINE upon our brother Jonathan and bless and keep him in all that he does. This we ask in the Name of our Great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

          Amen.
          Not to be outdone by himself, James will now address the LORD Himself while carelessly and incompetently (to be kind) wielding the Scriptures.

          So James:

          “YOU declared in YOUR WORD that YOU hold SCRIPTURE even above YOUR NAME: Psalms 138:2…”

          So the Word of God (from that very verse, Psalm 138:2):

          “…for you have exalted above all things your Name AND your Word.”

          Is there even any similarity to what you teach, Jimmy, with what the Word of God teaches?

          “YOUR WORD COMMANDS that children~of~GOD are accountable to other children~of~GOD…”

          So? Submit yourself to the men of God right here on this page, Jimmy. Lead by example. He who will be greatest in God’s Kingdom must first be least in the world of men.

          “…if jonathan does not repent of his unwillingness to listen to this child~of~GOD’S BIBLICAL counsel regarding “angels”…”

          Is that how it works, Jimmy? Or doesn’t the Apostle Paul teach plainly to LET every man be convinced in HIS OWN mind? Doesn’t Mr. Kleck seem convinced to you? He seems pretty convinced to me.

          “…i, hereby, ‘hand jonathan over to satan for the destruction of the flesh [that being pride and lofty self-aggrandizement], so that his spirit may be saved on THE DAY OF THE LORD’…”

          Wow. What stunning hubris. You have a few very painful lessons on deck, friend. And the sooner the better. For your own good.

          “…prayers for jonathan so that he has FULL, BIBLICAL ACCURACY with his entire Isaiah 29:15~16 revelation for ALL to benefit from.”

          Yeah, I think you’ve disqualified yourself from praying for Mr. Kleck, pal. But no matter. The rest of us will still pray for him: We ask for STRENGTH and for PEACE and for GRACE and GOOD WILL from our Lord for our brother in Jesus Christ. May God make His FACE to SHINE upon our brother Jonathan and bless and keep him in all that he does. This we ask in the Name of our Great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

          Amen.

          • BEEF SUPREME

            Speaking of insufficient communications…

            Please forgive the double post.

            I blame BIN and its glitching system!!!

            (Even as God smacks me in the face for being so forceful about crisp communications!!! Ouch.)

          • james amen

            dear bs:
            THE LORD gave me permission to write this final message to you; for, i was COMMANDED by HIM before, regarding you, ‘that you only have a form of godliness, but deny THE POWER, thereof; and to have nothing to do with you, and those like you’.

            THE LORD JESUS CHRIST told me to give you this message; for, which, i bear NOT false-witness of this:
            THE LORD JESUS CHRIST says this to you:

            ‘you do NOT speak for ME, you do NOT speak for MY WORD, and you have NO AUTHORITY in MY eyes; for I DO NOT KNOW you’. REPENT, as my servant as declared onto you; lest you shall surely be cast from ME’.

            • BEEF SUPREME

              “..dear bs…”

              You think you’re cute, don’t you Jimmy.

              “THE LORD gave me permission to write this final message to you…”

              No He didn’t. You just lied again. You see, Jimmy – nothing you say is true. I mean, we can PROVE right here on this page alone that you misquote Scripture because you don’t know the word of God. What YOU say and what GOD says are not the same, and this is provable according to the simplest understanding of language. Our opinions have nothing to do with the matter. You are the one in error and you are the one selling lies about what God has told you to do or say. Again, this isn’t a matter of debate or opinion, as any fool reading this page can see plainly for himself.

              “…i was COMMANDED by HIM before, regarding you, ‘that you only have a form of godliness, but deny THE POWER, thereof…”

              I bend the knee before my Great God and Savior Jesus Christ. His Word is pure and His Word alone is true. Your word is false and you are a liar. I am not denying God, Jimmy. I am denying you. Learn the difference, O Mountain of Hubris.

              “…and to have nothing to do with you, and those like you’.”

              Jimmy, you say that only because you can’t stand in the light of God’s Word. You know it. I know it. Mayhem knows it. Mr. Kleck knows it. And that’s why you would never dare to engage any of us in a frank conversation about the Scriptures before an audience of readers. You would have nothing left to say for yourself in very short order, because what YOU SAY does not accord with what GOD SAYS. Do we have to wonder about such things? No. We have but to compare your words with the Bible verses you are silly enough to reference. You can fill your posts with spelling errors and little squiggly jots and tittles, but you will not ever manage to confuse that issue. You have no right to be teaching ANY man and you have no right to be correcting ANY man. You are a babe in Christ and you do not know the Word of God.

              “THE LORD JESUS CHRIST told me to give you this message…”

              I rebuke you for lying in the name of our Lord.

              “…‘you do NOT speak for ME, you do NOT speak for MY WORD, and you have NO AUTHORITY in MY eyes…”

              Hey Jimmy? I was quoting the Bible. That’s what I was doing. Word-for-word. So take your lies someplace else. Learn a little humility. Then go and actually do some profitable Bible study. And stop speaking for the Lord when the Lord has not spoken.

              You may consider that your final warning.

            • Mayhem

              You make this too easy, james amen, because even those who hate us (Beef and myself) must admit they’ve never seen us presume to speak for God or pass on messages from The Almighty.

              “Listen”, did you really say that all the while ignoring all other arguments? Think on that; you don’t mean the brethren are accountable to each other, you mean the ignorant masses are accountable to you.

              Twist it any way you like, james amen, but that’s the way it reads to me and i’m confident others can see that for themselves.

    • CTrent33

      :roll: :roll: :roll:

    • Anonymous

      The line of discussion assumes they are demonic science experiments, like homunculi, possessed by demons — not humans with angelic souls.

    • Gordon

      He who looks intently at the deception present in counterfeit religion is destined to start his own.
      You would do better to measure your faith and your ministry by Christ alone.

    • goastdale

      123’s of true Christianity v popular & damnable heresies
      (simply because you “confess” it does not mean you actually are, the devil has deceived many of his own children to believe they are Christians 2Tim 3:5)
      #1 “ONE” not triune: THE ANTI CHRIST….WHERE? WHERE?….EVERYWHERE!!! …..IT”S YOU O TRINITARIAN!

      “WHO” it was (what person) that came “IN THE FLESH”, IS THE DETERMINING FACTOR IN WHAT IT MEANS TO BE “ANT-CHRIST”! Even Islam claims Jesus was the Jewish messiah/Christ who was to come in the flesh) they all deny “WHO” it was (what person) that came (to be the Christ) in the flesh!?!…….To deny the father is to deny the son because they are one and the same person that came in the flesh! https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-6-anti-christ-where-everywhere-allen-daves?trk=mp-reader-card

      JOHN 14: 8-20 where Christ specifically identifies himself (his person as the person of both the father and the HS; the only distinction is in “location” and “method of manifestation” …….Note Isaiah 9:6. For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: …: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, … the everlasting Father ….The son, father/Holy Spirit are all the same person, NOT like two different persons working together even as “one flesh” ….The “oneness” between Christ and the father is not comparable to a man & his wife, for only a fool would say “When you have seen me you have seen my wife, how sayest thou then, Shew us your wife?” Notice they asked to see THE FATHER and the response was Jn 14:9 ..“HAVE I BEEN SO LONG time with you, and yet hast THOU NOT KNOW ME, Philip…..Now image some fool trying to claim that statement if you asked to see his wife!?!!? You want to see the FATHER but have I been with you but you don’t know me!?!?! https://www.scribd.com/doc/305367608/The-Trinity-Heresy

      Jn 14 continued….…………..17. Even THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH; (Jn 14:6 I AM the way, THE TRUTH,) whom the world cannot receive, .. for HE DEWLLETH WITH YOU, (present tense/standing next to them in the flesh) and SHALL BE IN YOU… (future tense “In them”) 18. I will not leave you comfortless: I WILL COME TO YOU (future tense “In them”) Note: The spirit of Christ is the sprit of God and the holy spirit that is why Christ said “I will come to you” (to comfort them, because Christ is the comforter). The spirit was standing next to them in flesh… ….latter it would come to them to be inside of them (inside of their flesh as the spirit we are given)…..that is why. he would send the spirit…… However, Jesus himself here makes the point that the same person who was the HOLY SPIRIT that would come was standing next to them but lets them know “I will come to you again to be Inside of you”

      The whole point to Gal 3:20.a mediator is NOT A MEDIATOR OF ONE, (HEIS) but GOD IS ONE. (HEIS) again, point blank, identifies the number of persons of God! The “but” points out the contrast between multiple persons in a mediation party v the “one” of God. God is not like a mediation party with multiple different persons. …..”the express image of his person” ( the person of God; singular not plural).Any attempt to lay claim otherwise is willful ignorance and delusional nonsense https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-1-echadechadmy-godgod-echad-allen-daves?trk=mp-reader-card

      NOTE: don’t be that one in prov 26:12 over my use of the word “fool” here prov 18:13 (https://www.scribd.com/presentation/322007258/Fools ) “But but, the gospel of John…the Gospel of John …look look…” which is quite ironic since the gospel of John does not leave ANY room for multiple different persons of Jesus and father. However the gospel of John does leave a few verses that facilitate God’s promise in 2 Thess 2:11/ Isaiah 66:4 (take note of “HAND” in verse 2,14..You just can’t make this stuff up…God is surely laughing at these fools; Ps 2:1&4)

      ……Mark 12:28…Which is the first commandment of all? 29. …Hear, O Israel; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD: 30. And ………..this is the first commandment….. 31. And the second is…..
      JESUS IS GOD AND IS THE FULLFILMENT OF ALL THE LAW AND PROPHETS SO IF YOU CAN’T GET THIS “FIRST OF ALL COMMANDMENTS” RIGHT, ALL THE REST OF YOUR “FAITH” AND PREACHING ON SIN IS MOOT

      TRINITARIANS CONFESS JESUS /THEY ARE NOT POLYTHEIST BUT ARE MONOTHEIST LIKE A LIAR & THIEF WHO “CONFESS” THEY DO NOT LIE OR STEAL The simple fact is that just because you confess or deny that you are in an adulterous relationship and denounce all forms of adultery has nothing to do with whether or not it is in fact adulterous! .. …A rose by any other name is still just a rose AND calling it a water lily does not change the definition of what a water Lilly or a rose is either!…No, Trinitarians confess & preach literally …”ANOTHER JESUS” 2 Cor 11:4

      https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-2-pgs-91-101-chapter-eight-lets-talk-us-allen-daves?trk=mp-reader-card

      - Like a thief in your house caught stealing your things insisting he was not there stealing “I CONFESS I am NOT stealing”. You just do not “properly understand” what he is doing/saying. Further, since you never had a “proper understanding” of what he is doing/saying you have no business accusing him since you do not even know what you are talking about in the first place. It is with and in your own ignorance that you base your “false accusations” & “ad homonym attacks” against him…… Ridiculous of course it is ……2Thess 2:11; Titus 1:16; 2Tim 3:5;

      - A Favorite tool for pathological liars is to use incongruent definitions or create oxymorons out of synonyms such as “a person” and “a being” so as to claim that your god is THREE DIFFERENT PERSONS but ONLY ONE BEING: Which is (1) no different then trying to claim that “THREE DIFFERENT CARS” is “THE ONE VEHICLE” (2) blatant demonstration of the dishonesty & sorcery these children of hell will employ with “a strait face” (which is in part what it means to be a pathological liar)
      ……but, ah i remember how this game is played… “God is three in one” (or 1in 3 or 3in one et al) should have given you a hint, harking back to Satan in The garden…God said you will die…Satan comes along and states no you will be more WISE……today .God said He is one; but Satan’s children come along and say no three is more WISE and humble in the face of God’s grandeur only “a mystery” that can be understood “in faith”. God uses head and right arm to explain the distinctions between father and son.. However, the Trinitarian heretics say to the effect: “NO, that is just a figure of speech, or that is not what God really means. What God is really saying is that God is three different persons”. Fools, hypocrites and blind guides, God said he was One and by your traditions and vain imaginations have taken the words of God and made them of no effect, refashioning God into your image!

      You can download the complete FREE book from
      https://www.scribd.com/doc/305367608/The-Trinity-Heresy
      OR
      https://www.academia.edu/23463667/THE_TRINITY_HERESY

      http://www.scribd.com/user/249756770/Allen-Daves

      independent.academia.edu/AllenDaves

      https://www.linkedin.com/today/author/0_0wXAPxHFpV6o3_6erj3ZFe?trk=prof-sm

      #2 SECOND COMING Thou Fool! “I come quickly” so “Hold fast
      till i come”… NOT …“in another 2000 yrs I might be coming soon any time now, so hold fast”!?! …those that deny the second coming of Christ in the war of AD70 are practicing a damnable heresy in denying the lord that bought them ( 2Peter 2:1-2 ;2Tim 4:8/ you cant love an appearing you deny& the context is the 2nd coming not the first)… Mat 7:23..”I NEVER KNEW YOU” …..Mat 10:33. But whosoever shall deny me before men……..sound familiar?…. If I said I am coming to your house in this generation when these things happen but no one knows the day or hour what fool would think I might be coming in 2000 years latter!?!? ..2 Tim 4: 4. And
      they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be TURNED UNTO FABLES.
      2Thess 2: 11. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12. That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

      DOWNLOAD FREE THE ENTIRE 480PG BOOK AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS
      https://www.scribd.com/doc/305366745/Revelation-the-First-Gospel-of-the-Kingdom

      or

      https://www.academia.edu/23464127/REVELATION_THE_FIRST_GOSPEL_OF_THE_KINGDOM

      #3 There is a sharp contrast between THREE groups :

      (1) “PREDESTINED DAMNED” who were NEVER written in the book of life ………..Rev 17: 8 WHOSE NAMES WERE NOT WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, …as contrasted …EPH 1: 4. According as he hath CHOSEN US in him BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD

      (2) “MANY CALLED”= ONLY and ALL SAINTS (those who come to Christ) are written in the book of life … Philippians 4:3… ……Rev 21:27; (Only saints are Called and elect; Rom 1:6-7 et al) This is THE CHRUCH and ONLY these can have their names blotted out of the book of life ….….Heb 12:23 to the general assembly and CHURCH of the firstborn … WHICH ………are WRITTEN in heaven,

      (3) THE FEW CHOSEN: Those saints who were alive in group #2 who are now physically dead. They died “faithful” these are the FEW that were chosen faithful…….Rev 3:5. ……; and I
      will not BLOT OUT HIS NAME OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE, (Ps 69:28) …. These are the FEW that are CHOSEN and now that they have died and are saved then “once saved THEY CAN NEVER BE LOST”

      Predestination….its true..its all true…download here

      https://www.scribd.com/doc/306868420/Most-True-Christians-Go-to-Hell

      https://www.academia.edu/25217564/Most_True_Christains_Go_to_Hell

      • b4

        above is a collection of the most insane small tiny brains that gather on bin-great entertainment with all their bullshit–what a bunch of whackos,fools,idiots–good [email protected]!!!

    • dj dawg

      Can you call my parol officer and tell him I am an angel that would really help me out thanks

    • Andy

      out come the insane fairy-tale believers with their insane fairy-tales

      then to read the comments section and see the loonie toons debating the specifics of fantasy fairy-tales like the bible

      you people are certifiable

      • BEEF SUPREME

        Any time, Andy.

        Put on your big boy pants and come to the table.

        I always have time for you, friend.

        Sincerely.

        • Andy

          you have nothing as hundreds of others before you had nothing – you’d like to think you do, but you don’t

          all you’ve got is a man-made fairy-tale, authored by a pagan roman emperor, 325 years after the “fact”

          why call me friend? i don’t befriend religious adherents, anyone who believes man-made fairy-tales are real has gotta be 99 cents short of the dollar

          just so you know, i was born n raised christian, got my ass born again when i was 18, studied the 7 major religions of the world for 3 decades and found it’s ALL BULLSHIT written by the ignorant and used by the powerful as a means of control

          lets see how you go up above

          • Mayhem

            You say that, Andy, but you fled rather than put up evidence of a missing link when challenged to do so in regards to Evolution. Which, lets be real, is the only alternative to the creation account that’s gained any traction.

            Then there was the debate over evidence for Jesus where it was argued the evidence for Him outweighed that of almost any other historical figure of note. You muttered something about not caring if Alexander the Great ever lived so long as you could scoff at very credible evidence for Jesus.

            Just like you refuse to acknowledge the 2nd law of thermodynamics absolutely precludes the possibility of order from chaos therefore making intelligent design a prerequisite. Even Richard Dawkins allows for intelligent design, Andy, are you not up with the latest and merely regurgitating what you’ve gleaned from anti God sites?

            Need i remind you, Andy, the fossil record attests a global flood in accord with sense, reason and logic?

            • BEEF SUPREME

              To which BEEF has nothing to add.

              Your turn, Andy.

            • Andy

              Mayhem
              typical switch and bait tactics i’ve seen a million times before – i don’t care if evolution is correct or not, i KNOW the universe wasn’t created and natural law proves it – there can be no creator

              you offered NO evidence for jesus other than your fairy-tale, you tried switching and baiting again with the alexander thing – nobody claims alexander is GOD so i don’t care if he lived or not

              the 2nd law (entropy) is nothing more than natures recycling system, because “no matter nor energy can be created nor destroyed” is has to be recycled – in no way does this preclude order from chaos, and what evidence have you there was chaos anyway? the universe has always existed and always was ordered

              i’m regurgitating my own decades of personal research – you’re regurgitating a fantasy fairy-tale

            • Mayhem

              The evidence for chaos, seriously, is that your big bad question? Look around, Andy, everything is decay. Everything. So how does a natural tendency for decay sustain life, or give rise to life, without intelligent design?

              According to the second law of thermodynamics disorder increases and energy/matter tends to devolve into an indistinguishable state.

              Even Richard Dawkins admits intelligent design…

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pckg3Kud8_A

              … and just like you he’s prepared to clutch at any straw so long as God isn’t holding on to the other end.

              Yes, yes, you don’t care, you’ve said that many times but obviously you do care or you wouldn’t be here. The only reason you feign indifference is because you know your arguments won’t stand critical analysis.

            • BEEF SUPREME

              “The only reason you feign indifference is because you know your arguments won’t stand critical analysis.”

              Oh, but there is another reason.

              He’s more than a little scared he might be wrong.

              Because Andy…

              …we cease to exist at the time of our death? Really?

              You should be so lucky.

              You repress the knowledge of God and you are without excuse.

    • BungalowBud

      We are not angels but Jesus said we would be like angels in heaven and not marrying.aldo, we are Gods but that means good or bad? Now, a third of angels rebelled then the other 2/3 rds are Ok . is that us. Angels are to protect us? Who have you all protected? How about the verses, God makes his angels ministering spirits. That means the other 1/3 can too? Here is the human battleground. Just concentrate on being in the last revival called the Sons of Gods ministry like Jesus. Also, later we are to judge Angels. I think you all better drop this debate as you sure all bring distracted. Ill have a link to a sermon that will blow your mind next week.

    • A servant of G-d in heaven

      Revelation 12:14 14The woman was given the two wings of a great eagle, so that she might fly to the place prepared for her in the wilderness, where she would be taken care of for a time, times and half a time, out of the serpent’s reach.

      • Andy

        poor eagle,,, wtf is it supposed to do without wings?

    • Buck

      Angel
      H4397
      מַלְאָךְ
      mal’âk
      mal-awk’
      From an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically of God, that is, an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher): – ambassador, angel, king, messenger.

      Gen_3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man hath become as one of us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he should put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

      There you go, I’m an angel !

    • Buck

      Michael
      H4317
      מִיכָאֵל
      mı̂ykâ’êl
      me-kaw-ale’
      From H4310 and (the prefixed derivation from) H3588 and H410; who (is) like God?; Mikael, the name of an archangel and of nine Israelites: – Michael.

      Jud_1:9  Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

      Rev_12:7  And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

      Dan_12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince who standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.

      Rev_22:11  He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.

      The Archangel Michael is the only begotten Son of God, Jesus Christ

    • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

      LIES! LIES and SLANDER!

    • james amen

      dear jonathan:
      i !pray! to THE LORD that you get this message..
      warning! i have just discovered and learned something Very bad that has infiltrated your ministry, and can alert you to it;
      PRAISE THE LORD!

      you have a false-brother within your immediate circle.

      here is the proof: go to the medium.com forum where you have posted this same article. there you should find my reply to you;
      however, you will see that it has been responded to by something that has infiltrated your ministry.
      read what i wrote, and then read the response.
      find whatever did that response and you will find what is working against your ministry behind your back.
      prayers for you.

      • Air Quotes Shill Air Quotes

        It’s the little girl from The Exorcist.

        She’s back and she’s PISSED!

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.