Was the Newtown Killer A Secret Front For Something More Sinister?

Problem, Reaction, Solution. The line of events coined by David Icke say that for a government or entity to use stronger force to repress its citizens or base, there must first be a problem. Yet these problems are typically engineered in some way or another.

That’s the headline of a Guardian article describing in two sentences just how plausible it is that Adam Lanza–who was real–was used by someone or something else (or a group of one of these) to continue prepetuating a “problem.”

“With retrospect some of his then classmates have said perhaps he had autism or Asperger’s syndrome –that is what has been reported in local media to be what his brother has told the police. Lanza had no criminal record and no history of his causing trouble in the past, either at school or in his affluent neighbourhood of Newtown, some 90 miles from New York City. Some of his former classmates had trouble remembering anything about him at all.”

Adam Lanza. (AP)

Two other sentences point to potential gaps–first, the reliance on his brother, and second, some of his former classmates have trouble remembering him at all. In fact, his brother was first suggested as the killer by some media.

There are other holes as well, including a former classmate saying they could never imagine him doing it.

This is not to say that he wasn’t real, but it is to suggest that if classmates describe him thus; “I never saw him with anyone,” then wouldn’t it be easy to draw such a young man into a net construed by darker forces? 

These forces, of course, want to rid everybody they can of guns–except for themselves. 

A New York City Council Member live tweeted from Obama’s address. Obama asserts he will “use whatever power this office holds.”

Meanwhile, the Mayors Against Illegal Guns released a statement saying “now is the time for a national policy on guns that takes the loopholes out of the laws.”

And a New York post editorial debates the point behind gun control and gun rights. At one point it says “Still, given the mass shootings of recent years — from Columbine to Virginia Tech to Aurora to the Oregon mall nightmare just last Tuesday — it’s hard not to wonder whether the nation’s patience with powerful firearms isn’t wearing thin.”

And “We know that guns don’t kill, people do.

But we also know that it is extremely difficult to justify the presence of high-volume-of-fire, military-style weaponry in modern society.”

But is it today military-style guns and tomorrow more? And, if the military is allowed to have them–they have had their fair share of people going AWOL and shooting others–maybe the root problem should be addressed instead of individual’s freedoms?

The root problem part you can figure out for yourself.

This is all food for thought, after all. 

*Read a related story: The Media Were Wrong–Again–With the Connecticut Murders