Reports: Administrative Courts Acting Corruptly In Ireland

Joe Doocey and Wayne Nash have been held in remand for 7 days by judge Seamus Hughes for ‘contempt of court’. The lads had been ejected earlier when Wayne asked the judge to recuse himself from his case and asked for his case to be tried by jury and held in another jurisdiction. The judge refused all the applications that Wayne made and ordered he be removed from court.

Another man, Liam McManus, along with a number of others including myself voiced how we felt about this. The judge ordered the Gardai to arrest Liam and hold him from contempt of court. This all happened before lunch. After lunch, we all returned to court to see if we could help Liam. Joe and Wayne remained outside while I went inside.

The judge then ordered the Gardai to arrest Joe and Wayne who were still outside for contempt of court. After he had finished handling all the road traffic offences, he then delt with Joe, Wayne and Liam in that order. He asked Joe if he wanted one of the solicitors in court to represent him. Joe said no. He then said that Joe called the court a corrupt court and sentenced him to 7 days on remand for contempt of court. He never gave Joe any opportunity to purge his so called contempt.

He did the same to Wayne. As Wayne was being led away, he said this is exactly why the judge should recuse himself. He never gave Wayne the option to purge either. Finally he gave Liam the option to purge which Liam did. Would anyone blame him after what had just proceeded him? Afterwards, Wayne’s wife went to the Garda station to see Wayne before he left. We spoke with 4 different Gardai including the inspector who all said they would try to facilitate this.

After about 45 minutes, I went back in to the Garda station to ask the duty manager to facilitate the visitation and I was then informed that the lads were gone. How crazy, stupid and wrong is this? Article Taken From DUBLINSAYSNO

UPDATE: Ben Gilroy proved injustice was served inside an administrative court today. The court was acting unlawfully, and the men who were denied a jury will be able to seek lawful action against the state for the injustice served by the commercial courts malpractice. Both men will be returned to their homes.