Liberals Want Socialism, But Still Can’t Define What Socialism is

Many times, I have pointed out how liberals want socialism, but can’t define the term. When liberal claims they know how to define it, they stutter and spout off some crazy definition. One even claimed it is the “ability to socialize. As sad as this sounds; if CNN were to claim it was best if they all jumped off of a cliff, the “liberal horde” would do so–no questions asked!

In a piece written by Richard M. Ebeling for The Future of Freedom Foundation, he brings up a book, titled, “The Socialism That America Needs Now.” In the article Ebeling highlights:

❝The latest manifestation of this appeared on August 24, 2017, in the New Republic online in an article by John B. Judis on, “The Socialism America Needs Now.” He is heartened by the wide appeal, especially among younger voters, that Bernie Sanders received during the 2016 presidential contest. He thinks that this may herald a rebirth and a renewed possibility for a socialist alternative to the current American political and economic system.

Very often bad and failed ideas do not die, they simply reappear during periods of supposed social and political crisis in slightly different intellectual garb, and offer “solutions” that would merely help to bring about some of the very types of crises for which they once again claim to have the answers. Socialism in its various “progressive” mutations represents one of the leading ones in our time.

The latest manifestation of this appeared on August 24, 2017, in the New Republic online in an article by John B. Judis on, “The Socialism America Needs Now.” He is heartened by the wide appeal, especially among younger voters, that Bernie Sanders received during the 2016 presidential contest. He thinks that this may herald a rebirth and a renewed possibility for a socialist alternative to the current American political and economic system..❞

MUST SEE FULL ARTICLE: Liberals Want Socialism, But Still Can’t Define What Socialism is