Experts Address 'Fake News,' Fairness, Access, Economic Issues

Stay alert and accessible — and treasure fairness — was the consensus message of expert media speakers to journalists at a conference held on April 25 at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

Voicing those themes was luncheon keynote speaker Brian Stelter, the chief media correspondent for CNN Worldwide and anchor of “Reliable Sources.” his network’s weekly Sunday morning show analyzing media performance on news stories.

His remarks followed a morning session featuring a dozen other media, academic and legal experts from diverse U.S. institutions who similarly explored themes of the conference, which was entitled: Speech, Free Press or Free for All? Social Media and the First Amendment.

Stelter, shown at left in this editor’s photo, began by praising social media from a general and personal standpoint, noting that it had facilitated his rapid rise in journalism from being a blogger at Towson University to a New York Times job and that he had met his wife via Twitter.

He noted also a downside that includes vast amounts of deceptive and hate-filled social media traffic that he, his colleagues and the public must evaluate with few tools.

He, like many previous speakers at the conference primarily organized by the University of Missouri School of Journalism, advised as the best course for journalists and audiences to implement standard practices, such as fairness, accuracy, critical intelligence and avoiding personal opinion, except in situations where it is clearly labeled.

He illustrated these views by describing how he had recently engaged in a long and (from his viewpoint) productive on-camera interview with a video crew from the InfoWars radio show of Alex Jones, whom Stelter described as promoting a highly negative, long-running campaign that has demonized Stelter, his shows and his networks as “fake news” in similar manner to President Trump’s insults against CNN.

Jones uses so little evidence and so much partisan bombast in his on-air screeds that he has been blocked by a number of major social media platforms and been forced to apologize or undergo defamation litigation by some targets.

Among those obtaining belated apologies are the owner of a Washington DC pizzeria that Jones (shown at right) falsely accused of participation in an apparently non-existant pedophile ring (which Jones and his political allies called “Pizzagate”) and parents of 2012 shooting victims at a school shooting massacre in Newtown, Connecticut. Some of those parents are currently deposing Jones in a lawsuit showing what appears to be his extremely reckless charges, as reported here, among other places: How Alex Jones and Infowars Helped a Florida Man Stalk Sandy Hook Families.

Such major violations of the journalistic practices and other elements of the public trust have prompted many CNN journalists and others to label him as a “conspiracy theorist,” a smear term that journalists commonly apply also to many other advocates of unpopular theories thought to be undocumented. These “theories” include research that finds fault with such public tragedies as the 1960s assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., and 1968 Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, the brother of the late president “JFK.”

As editor of the Justice Integrity Project that reports on such matters, I reflected on whether and how to pose productive questions on certain of these issues to Stetler and other expert speakers, who are all listed below. Almost any attempt to raise super hot-button issues in a public forum runs the strong risk of seeming to grandstand, putting the speaker on the defense and thereby foreclosing an exchange of meaningful information.

In this instance, I chose to approach the speaker after his public remarks — and, unlike many journalists and others speaker in a similar situation, he chose to respond in what I regarded as a thoughtful, open mutually productive manner congruent with his public remarks. Details are below.

Brief Background

Stelter, shown on his photo of his Twitter site @BrianSteller, had been introduced at the luncheon by famed journalist Barbara Cochran, who is retiring this spring after serving as the Curtis B. Hurley Chair in Public Affairs Journalism and Director of the Washington Program of the Missouri School of Journalism.

Previously, Cochran had held such major positions as managing editor of the Washington Star, executive producer of NBC’s Meet the Press and then vice president and Washington Bureau Chief of CBS News. She currently chairs the National Press Club’s Journalism Institute, a co-sponsor of the day’s forum.

As part of her introduction, Cochran (shown on C-SPAN at the club last December in a file photo) praised Stelter’s extraordinary achievement in using social media to become known as an expert in network news coverage by those like her when he was a freshman at Towson in Baltimore.

He created the website TVNewser as a freshman and then leveraged that student-era expertise to earn a staff reporting post at the New York Times in his first job out of college. He has worked there until he joined CNN in 2013 

He writes a nightly e-newsletter about the media. Insider tip: He told the audience Thursday (about a hundred journalists, students and others interested in free press issues, that he often gets story ideas and on-air guests from Twitter, with his reading efforts sometimes prioritized to read first the emails of those who follow him.

What Else We Learned

Readers here know that we often pursue the evidence about themes disparaged in the mainstream media, such as facts about the aforementioned JFK, MLK and RFK murders and that we publish also a near-daily collection of news and commentary about media issues here.

We undertake commentary also, as well as curating others’ work. One example relevant to Thursday’s discussion was our 2014 column, Don’t Be Fooled By ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Smears, which focused in part on perceived shortcomings at CNN and elsewhere in covering the 50th anniversary of JFK’s murder. Anchors at those networks made (and still do)  frequently describe as “conspircy theorists” researchers who differ from the Warren Commission’s1964 report that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in killing Kennedy. 

Yet public opinion polls consistently show that most Americans do not believe the Warren Report, fostering a huge divide between the establishment media and the public.

Worse, non-experts are emboldened against supposed media experts because declassified documents from recent years have proven that the term was popularized in 1967 by the CIA with the specific intent of smearing journalists and academics investigating JFK’s murder unless they were regarded as Warren Report supporters. Here are details from our 2014 opinion column on this:

As a way to understand such varied messages, I urge readers to evaluate evidence with an open mind — and regard with special suspicion those commentators who slant their coverage with the loaded smear words “conspiracy theory” without citing specific evidence.

No one has time to investigate everything without preconceptions. For efficiency, we rely in part on slanted commentary by our favorite sources. But if the stakes are high and we want to be honest we should admit (at least to ourselves) that our preliminary conclusions should be subject to change based on new data. 

My suggestions follow the spirit of the Justice Integrity Project’s JFK Assassination “Readers Guide” last fall. That multi-part series began with a catalog of books, archives, reports and videos. Then it proceeded to assess various theories of President Kennedy’s 1963 murder.

By now, we know from declassified documents that the CIA undertook a massive secret campaign to smear critics of the Warren Commission with the label “conspiracy theorist.”

The campaign used members of mainstream media friendly to the CIA, for example, to discredit New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, shown below in a photo by Lynn Pelham. Garrison was prosecuting New Orleans businessman Clay Shaw in what Garrison alleged was a conspiracy to murder Kennedy. Shaw, an OSS liaison to high-ranking British officials during World War II, founded a major regional trade mart in New Orleans shortly after the war. Garrison alleged that Shaw met with rightist opponents of JFK to plan the death.

A 50-page CIA memo, known as “CIA Dispatch 1035-960,” instructed agents to contact their media contacts and disparage those, like Garrison, criticizing the Warren Commission findings that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK and acted alone. The 1967 document is here in the original, and here in reformatted text of its summary.

Minutes of CIA meeting that same year indicated CIA fear that Garrison would win a conviction.

But a jury promptly acquitted Shaw following more than a dozen deaths (including suicide) of potential witnesses and an intense smear campaign against Garrison by the national media. NBC News hired a former high-ranking Justice Department official, Walter Sheridan, who had been an early recruit to the super-secret NSA in the 1950s. Publicly an investigative reporter, Sheridan was involved also during his work at NBC in operational efforts to undermine Garrison, declasssified documents now indicate.

More generally, Operation Mockingbird was the CIA’s secret program to plant stories in certain prestigious news outlets.  

“With this [CIA] memo and the CIA’s influence in the media,” author Peter Janney wrote in a guest column on our Justice Integrity Project site in 2013, “the concept of ‘conspiracy theorist’ was engendered and infused into our political lexicon and became what it is today: a term to smear, denounce, ridicule, and defame anyone who dares to speak about any crime committed by the state, military or intelligence services.”

Janney, whose late father Wistar Janney had been a high-ranking CIA executive, continued: “People who want to pretend that conspiracies don’t exist — when in fact they are among the most common modus operandi of significant historical change throughout the world and in our country — become furious when their naive illusion is challenged.”

What He Said

With that background in mind, I left the public Thursday’s Q&A to others, and enjoyed the learning opportunity from hearing the eminent speakers and audience members. The experts listed below described the real-world challenges for journalists in trying to uphold reasonable professional standards while their employers are making drastic layoffs and other financial cuts, while at the same timeanry voices are populating social media with both legitimate and phony complaints.

Then I approached Stelter after his talk as the conference ended. In the spirit of accessibility, he had stayed to talk with all who approached one on one.

After thanking him for his thoughtful remarks I referenced briefly the history of the term “conspiracy theory” described more fully above and asked what he thought of its frequent use by his CNN colleagues and others.

He seemed surprised at this history and asked for an alternative to the term.

My response was “evidence,” either good or bad evidence examined on a case by case basis.

As one example,I noted how two of Robert Kennedy’s children, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend (Maryland’s former lieutenant governor, shown in a file photo at left) and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., were among those who signed a statement this year stating that they do not believe the official verdict finding that Sirhan Sirhan killed their father. That statement is reported, among other places, here (Kennedy and King Family Members and Advisors Call for Congress to Reopen Assassination Probes). 

Similarly, the still-living Los Angeles County Medical Examiner in 1968, Dr. Thomas Noguchi (shown below with one of his statements), has always maintained that Kennedy was killed from the rear in Los Angeles that year, whereas Sirhan was in front of the victim, according to witnesses.

I offered the further suggestion to Stelter during our conversation that those family members and that medical expert likely had more incentive than the average on-air news reporter to dig deep into this kind of complicated matter  — and so, I asked, whether it might be best to avoid a loaded term like “conspiracy” that thwarts any logical discussion because the term when used by reporters pre-judges the evidence and the news subjects.

Stelter said he would consider the matter in the future and try to read about it.

To this observer, that sounded reasonable, somewhat unexpected and highly congruent with Stelter’s and others’ suggestions throughout Thursday’s conference..

More generally, let’s just imagine what the world would be like if lots more opinion leaders acted in conformance with the high-minded words in their public speeches and low-minded “fake news” providers were required to produce their evidence, or lack thereof. 

Contact the author Andrew Kreig

Related News Coverage

April 25, 2019

National Press Club, Event: Speech, Free Press or Free for All? Social Media and the First Amendment, Missouri–Hurley and Price Sloan Symposium Staff report, April 25, 2019. Is the First Amendment still relevant in the age of social media? How can we be sure that what we’re reading and watching is true? What can social media platforms do to curtail the spread of misinformation and lies? How can journalists make the best use of social media to enrich their reporting and to gain more audience while at the same time protecting themselves from harassment?

The Missouri–Hurley and Price Sloan Symposium on Thursday, April 25, at the National Press Club, will explore these questions and more with journalists, social media experts and legal scholars. The event is sponsored in partnership with the National Press Club Journalism Institute.

The keynote luncheon speaker will be Brian Stelter, the chief media correspondent for CNN Worldwide and anchor of “Reliable Sources,” a weekly program that examines top media stories and journalism practices. Stelter reports for CNN Media and writes a nightly e-newsletter. He is a former New York Times media reporter and is the author of the best seller, Top of the Morning: Inside the Cutthroat World of Morning TV.

Legal Panel

• Anupam Chander, Professor of Law, Georgetown University
• Andrea Matwyshyn, Professor of Law and Co-Director, Center for Law, Innovation and Creativity, Northeastern University
• Jerry Ellig, Professor, The George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center
• Jeff Koseff, Assistant Professor of Cybersecurity Law, U.S. Naval Academy’s Cyber Science Department
• David Vladeck, former Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection at the Federal Trade Commission, A.B. Chettle Chair in Civil Procedure, Georgetown University
• Moderator: Sam Halabi, Director of the Center for Intellectual Property & Entrepreneurship and Associate Professor of Law, University of Missouri School of Law

Journalist Panel

• Manuel Garcia, Standards Editor, Gannett
• Angie Holan, Washington Bureau Chief, PolitiFact
• Cecilia Kang, Technology Reporter, New York Times
• James Warren, executive editor, NewsGuard, former chief media writer, Poynter Institute
• Hannah Wise, Audience Development Editor, Dallas Morning News
• Moderator: Barbara Cochran, Curtis B. Hurley Chair in Public Affairs Journalism and Washington Program Director, University of Missouri School of Journalism

April 11, 2019

Justice Integrity Project, RFK’s Collected Works Provide Powerful Lessons For Today, Andrew Kreig, April 11, 2019. The inspirational words and actions of the murdered 1968 presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy came alive once more during a book lecture on April 10 by his eldest daughter Kathleen Kennedy Townsend and biographer Richard “Rick” Allen at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

The speakers, drawing from RFK: His Words For Our Times, a 480-page book republished last year, provided a compelling and entertaining discussion of why the senator exemplified leadership qualities of enduring value to the public.

March 29

New York Times, How Alex Jones and Infowars Helped a Florida Man Stalk Sandy Hook Families, Elizabeth Williamson, March 29, 2019. Mr. Jones and Infowars gave Wolfgang Halbig airtime, a camera crew and help raising money to harass Sandy Hook shooting victims’ parents. In the world of conspiracy theorists, Alex Jones and Wolfgang Halbig fueled each other’s darkest tendencies.

Soon after the Dec. 14, 2012, mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., Mr. Jones, right, the right-wing provocateur, began spreading outlandish theories that the killing of 20 first graders and six educators was staged by the government and victims’ families as part of an elaborate plot to confiscate Americans’ firearms.

Many of the most noxious claims originated in the mind of Mr. Halbig, a retired Florida public school official who became fixated on what he called “this supposed tragedy” at Sandy Hook. Court records and a previously unreleased deposition given by Mr. Jones in one of a set of defamation lawsuits brought against him by the families of 10 Sandy Hook victims show how he and Mr. Halbig used each other to pursue their obsession and promote it across the internet.

Over several years, Mr. Jones gave Mr. Halbig’s views an audience by inviting him to be a guest on Infowars, his radio and online show. Infowars gave Mr. Halbig a camera crew and a platform for fund-raising, even as Mr. Halbig (shown in his photo on Twitter in an account the service has disabled because of his abuses of the service) repeatedly visited Newtown, demanding thousands of pages of public records, including photos of the murder scene, the children’s bodies and receipts for the cleanup of “bodily fluids, brain matter, skull fragments and around 45 to 60 gallons of blood.”

Given practical support and visibility by Mr. Jones, Mr. Halbig hounded families of the victims and other residents of Newtown, and promoted a baseless tale that Avielle Richman, a first grader killed at Sandy Hook, was still alive.

The deposition and its details about Mr. Jones’s operation and his interactions with Mr. Halbig were made public on Friday, days after Avielle Richman’s father, Jeremy Richman, killed himself in Newtown’s Edmond Town Hall, where Avielle Foundation, a nonprofit organization dedicated to brain science that the family established in their daughter’s name, had an office.

Jan. 22, 2019

Justice Integrity Project, Kennedy and King Family Members and Advisors Call for Congress to Reopen Assassination Probes, Andrew Kreig, Jan. 22, 2019. An unprecedented coalition of family members, researchers, film makers, and former law enforcement and other government officials is calling for a new investigation of the four iconic 1960s assassinations.

May 26, 2014

Justice Integrity Project, Don’t Be Fooled By ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Smears, Andrew Kreig, May 26, 2014. CNN and Newsweek recently launched dubious tirades against what they called “conspiracy theories.”  As a way to understand such varied messages, I urge readers to evaluate evidence with an open mind — and regard with special suspicion those commentators who slant their coverage with the loaded smear words “conspiracy theory” without citing specific evidence.