Judicial Watch Releases Email of Clinton and her Aides Discussing Benghazi Talking Points…on her Private Email Account

Watchdog group Judicial Watch released a new email which shows Hillary Clinton and her aides discussing how to frame her answers when she spoke to Senators about the cause of the Benghazi attacks. It also provides proof that she regularly used her private account to conduct State Department business. It was because of Judicial Watch’ efforts that we learned Clinton had been using a private email account in 2015. If the State Department hadn’t suppressed this document, they would have found out about it in 2014.

The Clinton email cover-up led to court-ordered discovery into three specific areas: whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. The court also authorized discovery into whether the Benghazi controversy motivated the cover-up of Clinton’s email. (The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”)

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton calls the email below a twofer. He says, “It shows Hillary Clinton misled the U.S. Senate on Benghazi and that the State Department wanted to hide the Benghazi connection to the Clinton email scheme. Rather than defending her email misconduct, the Justice Department has more than enough evidence to reopen its investigations into Hillary Clinton.”

Fitton adds that, “The court is considering whether to allow Judicial Watch to question Hillary Clinton and her top aide in person and under oath about the email and Benghazi controversies.”

Via Judicial Watch:

Below is an email from Jake Sullivan, then-Senior Advisor and Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton, to Clinton at her private email address ([email protected]), cc to Cheryl Mills, then-Chief of Staff to Clinton. Email was forwarded to Phillipe Reines, then-Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Strategic Communications and Clinton advisor.

From: Sullivan, Jacob J

Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 11 :09 AM

To: ‘[email protected]’

Cc: Mills, Cheryl D

Subject: Key points

HRC, Cheryl –

Below is my stab at tp’s for the Senator call. Cheryl, I’ve left the last point blank for you. These are rough but you get the point.

I look forward to sitting down and having a Hillary~to-John conversation about what we know. l know you were frustrated by the briefing we did and I’m sorry our hands were tied in that setting.

It’s important we see each other in person, but over the phone today I just wanted to make a few points.

First, we have been taking this deadly seriously, as we should. I set up the ARB in record time, with serious people on it. l will get to the bottom of all the security questions. We are also in overdrive working to track down the killers, and not just through the FBI. We will get this right.

Second, the White House and Susan were not making things up. They were going with what they were told by the IC [Intelligence community].

The real story may have been obvious to you from the start (and indeed I called it an assault by heavily armed militants in my first statement), but the IC gave us very different information. They were unanimous about it.

Let me read you an email from the day before Susan went on the shows. It provides the talking points for HPSCI [House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence] and for her public appearance. It’s from a very senior official at CIA, copying his counterparts at DNI [Director of National Intelligence], NCTC [National Counterterrorism Center], and FBI:

Here are the talking points …

–The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.

-This assessment may change as additional information is collected and analyzed and as currently available information continues to be evaluated.

–The investigation is on-going, and the US Government is working with Libyan authorities to bring to justice those responsible for the deaths US citizens.

That is exactly what Susan said, following the guidance from the IC. She obviously got bad advice. But she was not shading the truth.

Third, you have to remember that the video WAS important. We had four embassies breached because of protests inspired by it. Cairo, Tunis, Khartoum, and Sanaa. We had serious security challenges in Pakistan and Chennai and some other places. All this was happening at the same time. So many of the contemporaneous comments about the video weren’t referring in any way to Benghazi. Now of course even in those countries it was about much much more than the video, but the video was certainly a piece of it one we felt we had to speak to so that our allies in those countries would back us up.

Judicial Watch notes that it was they who uncovered the fact that the “talking points” used by Susan Rice for her appearances on five talk shows the Sunday after the Benghazi attacks, had been created by the Obama White House.

Judicial Watch filed their first request for records related to the Benghazi talking points in May 2014. In July 2014, they filed a FOIA lawsuit. Efforts to suppress this information by State Department officials kept it private for over five years. Aside from the embarrassing content of the email, it proves Clinton was conducting business regularly over her private server.

Here are some related items that Judicial Watch has learned recently from their FOIA lawsuits:

John Hackett, former Director of Information Programs and Services (IPS) testified under oath that he had raised concerns that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s staff may have “culled out 30,000” of the secretary’s “personal” emails without following strict National Archives standards. He also revealed that he believed there was interference with the formal FOIA review process related to the classification of Clinton’s Benghazi-related emails.

Heather Samuelson, Clinton’s White House liaison at the State Department, and later Clinton’s personal lawyer, admitted under oath that she was granted immunity by the Department of Justice in June 2016.

Justin Cooper, former aide to President Bill Clinton and Clinton Foundation employee who registered the domain name of the unsecure clintonemail.com server that Clinton used while serving as Secretary of State, testified he worked with Huma Abedin, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, to create the non-government email system.

In the interrogatory responses of E.W. (Bill) Priestap, assistant director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, he stated that the agency found Clinton email records in the Obama White House, specifically, the Executive Office of the President.

Jacob “Jake” Sullivan, Clinton’s senior advisor and deputy chief of staff when she was secretary of state, testified that both he and Clinton used her unsecure non-government email system to conduct official State Department business.

Eric Boswell, former assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security during Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, testified that Clinton was warned twice against using unsecure BlackBerry’s and personal emails to transmit classified material.

This email is a twofer–it shows Hillary Clinton misled Senate on Benghazi and State Dept wanted to hide Benghazi connection to Clinton email scheme. Rather than defend her email misconduct, DOJ has more than enough evidence to reopen Clinton investigation. https://t.co/UYkP7SUAqP https://t.co/pvW4CD2oBS

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) October 21, 2019

The post Judicial Watch Releases Email of Clinton and her Aides Discussing Benghazi Talking Points…on her Private Email Account appeared first on RedState.