Presidential Executive Orders Are Not Laws and Only Have Authority Within the Executive Branch of Government. EOs Can Only Be Used Under a State of Emergency/War Powers Act

Presidential Executive Orders Are Not Laws and Only Have Authority Within the Executive Branch of Government. EOs Can Only Be Used Under a State of Emergency/War Powers Act

This Applies to Governor’s E.O.’s as Well

QUESTION AUTHORITY AT EVERY LEVEL

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS ONLY GRANTED AUTHORITY BY THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED

WE THE PEOPLE ARE AMERICA, NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

# The President does not have any Power or Authority to Create Law. Executive Orders and Memoranda must conform to Law and the Constitution
 

# Executive Orders are binding legally ONLY on members of the Executive Department of the Federal government. Everyone else in the United States of America doesn’t have to pay any attention to them at all – that is, isn’t “bound” by them in any way.
 

# Any President or Governor that issues an Executive Order that claims to have the full force of law, this is actually a  violation of multiple parts of the Constitution.
 

ABOVE ALL, IT MUST BE NOTED:

Due to the fact that most of our modern US Law is based upon Statutes and Admiralty Law; the Debate Over What is Legal is a Moot Point.

The fact of that the Entire United States Government is a Foreign Owned Corporation means that our Entire Federal Government is ILLEGAL.

So this discussion about the Legality of Executive Orders must be put in the context that our Laws and Government are Legitimate. THEY ARE NOT.

ANY LAW THAT DOES NOT ABIDE BY THE CONSTITUTION AND COMMON LAW ARE EXPLICITLY ILLEGAL

EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

They can only be used in a State of Emergency

Unfortunately America has been Under a State of Emergency Since Abraham Lincoln. And EVERY President since then has Renewed this State of Emergency under the War Powers Act.

This is also how the Criminal Federal Government has Replaced Constitutional Common Law with Admiralty Law, Based Upon Statutes. 100% Unconstitutional.

COUNTLESS ACTS OF TREASON HAVE BEEN COMMITTED UNDER THE FALSE PRETENSE OF THE WAR POWERS ACT

They are so Horrendous, that if the Masses Knew the Full Truth they would Revolt Overnight.

The Admiralty Court Exists Because the U.S. is Under Martial law

https://i-uv.com/the-admiralty-court-exists-because-the-u-s-is-under-martial-law/

SUNDAY, 22 SEPTEMBER 2019

# This Awareness indicates that when Lincoln was assassinated, no one thought to put an end to this declaration of martial law because of the Civil War and because the martial law has continued up to this time, from the time of the Civil War, the nation can be directed by what is called Admiralty Law or martial law by simply a command of the President or the authority of the land or his agents.

It is not even required by Admiralty Law that Congress conduct proceedings to make laws.

# The Admiralty Law can provide statutes, which are called statutory laws, while the country is under Admiralty or martial law.

But the Admiralty or martial law must come to an end eventually, in which it must either end or be reinstated. Thus, entities will find a new effort to create martial law in this country again. It may be martial law against what is termed a crime wave, even though crime has decreased two years in a row and has not increased much in the past several years.

“A country cannot be both ignorant and free…”  Thomas Jefferson

US Under Martial Law – War and The Emergency Powers

For example, they may find that a crisis lets them circumvent rules or laws that are protected by Constitutional principles so that they break the Constitution by following procedures in the activity of a disguise of helping out in a crisis.

#The emergency acts often set aside laws and once a law is set aside for an emergency, it may be left sitting aside.

# For example, Abraham Lincoln  declared martial law during the Civil War. Martial law has not been lifted yet from his declaration of martial law, over a hundred years ago.

# This Awareness indicates that any time entities in power want to do something that is illegal under the Constitution, they go simply ahead with it under the principle of the martial law declared by Lincoln.

# That is how the Executive Orders are presented. They are Executive Orders based on martial law that has not been lifted. This is also referred to as admiralty law.

Thus you have, in one period, a war on poverty. A few years later you have a war on drugs. And there are more and more of these wars occurring every two years.

# Otherwise, Martial Law would have to be canceled and you would be back under the Constitution, and your freedoms could be restored. You could then plead Constitutional Rights in courts of law.

# However, at present, the courts of law are following Admiralty Law, and therefore, if you plead Constitutional Rights in court, you are not likely to get anywhere.

# Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency. In fact, there are now in effect four presidentially-proclaimed states of national emergency: In addition to the national emergency declared by President Roosevelt in 1933, there are also the national emergency proclaimed by President Truman on December 16, 1950, during the Korean conflict, and the states of national emergency declared by President Nixon on March 23, 1970, and August 15, 1971.
http://www.rallye-pointe.com/em_powers.htm

The admiralty law, like any military law, has its own set of rules. This Awareness indicates it is also likened unto a corporation, which has its rules or laws, and when the laws of a corporation affect an entity in a way that is contrary to his or her Constitutional laws, then the entity can sue the corporation and rely on the Constitution, but this is often ignored by the corporations and most entities do not have the funds necessary to follow through to sue a corporation in order to have the Constitutional rights adjudicated.

# The Federal Government in D.C. a Corporation from England

# This Awareness indicates that likewise, the corporation that is the Federal government in Washington D.C., which was incorporated in the last century in London, England, which the Freeman have pointed out has its rules; these are the Federal statutes and so forth; and these too are designed for certain purposes but are required to follow the Constitution and if entities feel their Constitutional Rights have been violated by a Federal statute, they have the option of suing the Federal government and the statute for a constitutional ruling in the Supreme Court.

This Awareness indicates however, the ability to follow a case through the Supreme Court to test a Federal statute is not always easy, nor is it inexpensive. It is very costly, and very difficult and may take years.

# This Awareness indicates that for these reasons, the Federal statutes are extremely difficult for entities to overrun, and by carrying on the martial law in this country and using the Federal statutes as law, the Constitution becomes less and less effective, because it becomes more and more expensive to use, and therefore, gradually, over periods of time, more and more statutes and more and more corporate rules had their effect over the masses to the point where entities begin to feel that they do not have any rights, and whereby even judges in courts of law dismiss and refuse to allow constitutional points of law to occur in their courts.

# The Judicial System is Really to Protect the D.C. Corporation

Why should they allow constitutional points of law in their courts when they are actually military courts? This Awareness indicates that most entities think the judicial system is there to protect the rights of entities according to the Constitution, the law of the land, the Bill of Rights and so forth, but they are really there to keep order in society and to protect those who have the power and the money and to assure that no one disturbs the infrastructure of the corporation being promoted from London or the state rules and those that are promoted by the courts as military organizations.

(See Full Article For More)

Now. Let’s take a look at the Legality of Executive Orders within the framework of our Fraudulent Illegal US Government.

@OratorBlog  11-18-2022

See more Top Quotes by our Founding Fathers at the Bottom

More Great Videos on Admiralty Law, Statutory Law and Common Law at the Bottom

Executive Orders vs. The Law

STATES HAVE ALSO SURRENDERED THEIR AUTHORITY, AND CONTINUE TO BOW TO THE VAST MAJORITY OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS
Here is a thought experiment: What if the segregationist, George Wallace, had won the Presidential Election of 1964 and attempted to use an Executive Order to excuse the south from the provisions of the 13th Amendment? Would this action be any different than drafting an Executive Order which affects the 2nd Amendment (or any Amendment) in an attempt to change the Constitution? Executive Orders are not binding law and do not apply to the American People.

What are Executive Orders? [No. 86]

See the full video series at the Federalist Society

 

# The Bloated Collective of Federal Laws and Regulations of today are very largely  Unconstitutional and represent gross Government Overreach of Power.

# The more Laws there are, the more Executive Orders can be used to Circumvent Legislation and Exert Powers that were never meant to be exercised by the Executive Branch of Government.

How do executive orders work? – Christina Greer

1,099,955 views Sep 18, 2017

# Our Government only works when the 3 Branches of Government follow the Constitution and Keep Each Other within the Bounds of  Constitutional Law.

When Executive Orders Exceed their Authority, the only way to challenge them is through the Courts.

But this most often requires that Politicians are the ones who are practicing this oversight.

THE PROBLEM IS, ALL 3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT ARE CORRUPT

POLITICIANS AND EVEN THE SUPREME COURT WANT UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS AND EXECUTIVE ORDERS TO BE ENACTED

AFTER ALL. THE US GOVERNMENT IS A CAPTURED OPERATION
 

ONE OF THE MOST TREASONOUS EXECUTIVE ORDERS IN HISTORY

What Is an Executive Order?

ConstitutionUS.com

Executive orders can be a pretty controversial topic. The common idea of the executive order is that the president can make any laws they want without the approval of Congress, but is that true?

In reality, executive orders have a long, complicated history that can’t be explained in a couple of sentences.

What is an executive order?

An executive order is a directive made by the president or a state’s governor that doesn’t need approval by Congress.

As per the separation of powers, the approval of Congress is required for a law to become official. However, an executive order circumvents this process, allowing for a directive to be made to manage the operations of federal or state governments.

How are executive orders different from laws? Are they a modern development in the executive branch? Professor Ilan Wurman explains the nature and scope of executive orders, and whether the usage of such orders has changed over time.

EXECUTIVE ORDERS THAT CREATE OR NULLIFY LAWS OUTSIDE OF THE EXECUTIVE BRACH OF GOVERNMENT ARE COMPLETELY ILLEGAL

THEY ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Presidents who push Executive Orders and try to pretend they are in Legitimate Laws are Committing a Crime and we an Act of Treason
 

Abraham Lincoln Suspended the Constitution and used Executive Orders to Assume the Powers of a Tyrant.
 

Presidential Executive Orders Are Not Law

There is no explicit definition in the U.S. Constitution of executive orders, proclamations and presidential memoranda. Thus, there is no provision authorizing their issuance.

Roger Oberbeck: The Right Stuf

https://www.dailyrepublic.com/all-dr-news/opinion/local-opinion-columnists/the-right-stuff-presidential-executive-orders-are-not-law/

Article I of the U. S. Constitution says, “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress . . . ,” and Article II says, “The executive power shall be vested in a president . . . .” To most of us it is clear that the legislative branch should do all legislating and the executive branch should do enforcement of laws. However, there is an unsupported opposing school of thought that believes presidential executive orders and memoranda have the power of law.

In a Supreme Court majority opinion (Youngstown v. Sawyer, 342 US 579, Jun 1952), Justice Hugo Black stated, “The president’s power to see that laws are faithfully executed refutes the idea that he is to be a lawmaker . . . executive orders stem either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself.”

Executive orders are not in and of themselves law. They may carry the weight of law, but only as follows: 1. They are directed to a department or other government entity under the constitutional authority (Executive Branch) of the president; 2. The orders do not violate the Constitution or local, state or federal statutes, which lawfully derive its authority from the Constitution.

The president does not have any power or authority to create law. Executive orders and memoranda must conform to law. Deferred Action Childhood Arrivals (DACA), originated by a Barack Obama executive order, was ruled illegal by the 5th Circuit Appellate Court, July 2021.

President Joe Biden, acting like a king, has issued the following executive orders:

• Preventing all drilling for oil on federal lands and closing the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
• Canceling the congressional-approved Keystone Pipeline Project.
• Terminating the addition of more fencing to our country’s southern border.
• Removing penalties against sanctuary cities that disregard lawbreaking by immigrants who are in the country illegally.
• Mandating that undocumented immigrants be counted in the Census.
• Requiring travelers to wear masks in airports and when traveling on planes and buses.
• Restoring the Mexico City policy that had forbidden U.S. financing of abortion in foreign countries.
• Reinserting the United States into the Paris Accord dealing with international environmental rules.
• Reopening Deferred Action Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
• Reversing a travel ban on some Middle East countries without vetting capability.

President Biden’s executive order for Covid vaccinations, or testing mandate for large businesses, was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, saying it would represent a “significant encroachment into the lives and health of a vast number of employees.”

(See Full Article For More)

What’s the difference between Executive Order and Executive Action?

Apr 8, 2021

FILL THE GAPS IN LAWS?
CIRCUMVENTING LAW IS MORE LIKE IT

With President Biden executing an Executive Action for gun control, our viewers are asking what the difference between that and an Executive Order.

Constitutional law professor discusses executive orders, Biden’s out of control use of Executive Orders

GET IT? CONGRESS AND THE IS SENATE HAVE SURRENDERED THEIR AUTHORITY-

ALLOWING PRESIDENTS TO EXERCISE ILLEGAL TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL USURPATION OF LAW

BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL COMPLICIT AND IN CAHOOTS TO SCREW AMERICAN CITIZENS

What is the difference between a law and an executive order?

Jan 1, 2021

A law requires Congressional approval before finalization, at both the state and federal level. Laws can be repealed by Congress, which is not the case with an executive order. However, if Congress wishes to overturn an executive order, it can be accomplished in an indirect way, for example, by cutting off the funding for enforcing the order.

THAT MEANS THAT THE WHINY CRY BABIES IN CONGRESS AND SENATE THAT SCREAM FOUL, YET NEVER TRY TO OVERTURN EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE COMPLICIT IN THERE ILLEGAL ENFORCEMENT

 

There is something even more disturbing than Executive Orders: P.E.A.D.s

How about Suspension of the Constitution?

Declaration of Martial Law?

The Suspension of Habeas Corpus?

What is Habeas Corpus?

The “Great Writ” of habeas corpus is a fundamental right in the Constitution that protects against unlawful and indefinite imprisonment. Translated from Latin it means “show me the body.” Habeas corpus has historically been an important instrument to safeguard individual freedom against arbitrary executive power.

Presidential Emergency Action Documents. They are like Executive Orders, but they are COMPLETELY SECRET, and only ever seen by those receiving the Orders. And they are Never Require to be Made Public.

This is a threat to our Freedom and National Sovereignty.

EVERYTHING THE GOVERNMENT DOES SHOULD HAVE TRANSAPARANCY AND OVERSIGHT. EVEN SECRETS NEED CHECKS AND BALANCES

Secret Unconstitutional Emergency Power Actions

TheWarAgainstYou

These Secret Laws Have Been Enacted by Every President Since Eisenhower. This Should Make You Very Concerned
 

How the USA Was Stolen by the D.C. Corporation-How Our Constitution and Common Law Was Replaced by Maritime Law and How Every US Citizen Was Enslaved. Hardcore Documented Proof

@OratorBlog
Sunday, February 27, 2022

THE SECRET POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ALL LAWS AND COURTS ARE ILLEGAL, BASED UPON FRAUDULENT JURISDICTION AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTES 

D.C. Corporate Law vs Constitutional Law. How Corporations Have Replaced Constitutional Government Courts Jurisdictions

The Act of 1871 – Two Constitutions – The U.S. turned into a Corporation – District of Columbia D.C

US Run by Secret Corporate Masters Since 1933

Executive Orders: What Are the Constitutional Limits?

This is video is for Edification Purposes only

It is clear these Ivy League Professors  are extremely biased. And it should not be overlooked that one of the most prominent Constitutional Lawyers said Mandatory Vaccines was Constitutional. FFFF NO THEY ARE NOT

Apr 9, 2021

Executive orders have gained prominence under recent administrations, with incoming presidents issuing flurries of such orders as their administrations begin. Legal scholars Michael Paulsen and David Strauss will evaluate how the Trump administration leveraged executive orders, how they are being used under the Biden administration, whether this use is good policy, and the overarching constitutionality of this practice.
 

EXECUTIVE ORDERS ONLY HAVE THE POWER TO UPHOLD AND ENFORCE IT EXISTING LAWS

NOT TO CREATE LAWS OR REMOVE THEM

HUGE NEWS: Executive Orders Are NOT Binding Laws

February 1, 2017 • by DailyClout

Dr. Naomi Wolf

https://dailyclout.io/huge-news-executive-orders-are-not-binding-laws/

Wow! There is no specific mention of Executive Orders in the Constitution… the power to issue an Executive Order is implied, Presidents argue, by Article 2 of the Constitution: ‘the executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States’ is one quote they cite:

‘The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’ is another. And finally: ‘He shall take care that the laws shall be faithfully executed.’

Wow again! Though Presidents have claimed that these phrases give them power to do what they want with Executive Orders, these orders technically don’t have the full weight of laws, which only Congress can pass.

Many people are getting the impression – including us, until we looked more closely – that an Executive Order was a way for the President to short-circuit Congress. It turns out, that’s far from true.

Rather, Executive Orders are binding legally ONLY on members of the Executive Department of the Federal government. Everyone else in the United States of America doesn’t have to pay any attention to them at all – that is, isn’t “bound” by them in any way.

So, President Donald Trump can’t say, for example, via Executive Order that immigrants from certain countries aren’t allowed in the US. He can only say via Executive Order that members of the Executive — that is, the Executive Departments of the Federal government — have to do what they can to keep immigrants from those countries out of the US.

# If he (or any President) issues an Executive Order that claims to have the full force of law, this is actually violation multiple parts of the Constitution.

# Executive Orders are not legislation! An Executive Order issued by the President can only help enforce laws already passed by Congress. He can’t use them to make up laws. They aren’t laws.

So for sure, people mobilizing locally to create ‘sanctuary cities’ are not bound by Executive Orders – as they don’t work an Executive Department of the Federal Government.

Wherever you stand politically it is good to know how your laws are made, what powers each branch of government really has (or doesn’t have), what your Constitution actually says, and what you can do as a citizen about supporting laws you like and changing laws you don’t!
(See Full Article For More)
 

Executive orders are not laws
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/may/5/executive-orders-are-not-laws/

OPINION:

COVID-19 has shined some important light on the tendency of government to do as Founding Fathers warned — stretch and reach and overreach, and tread into places it doesn’t belong. And as the executive orders come fast and furious from governors’ mansions around the nation, it’s high time for a reminder: Orders are not laws.

# They should be challenged by the people. They should be held to constitutional muster. They should be challenged and debated and fought over because they threaten the very foundation of America’s free society

# America is not a kingdom but rather a system of limited government where rule of law, meaning, the Constitution, guides — not mob mentality, or worse, fear — and public servants are just that: beholden to the citizenry.

Executive orders bypass that system. They are not duly passed laws by elected representatives of the people. They are not pieces of legislation that are openly debated and discussed and voted upon in ways that keep the elected accountable to the people.

They don’t give the voter the chance to express yay or nay; they don’t allow the people to hold the ultimate power.

# Truly, really, if viewed through the lens of Founding Father intents with the Constitution, they hold little legal weight — in fact, they are outright blots to this system of limited government America is supposed to represent.

# And guess what: Nobody knows that better than the very government sources issuing these orders. The whole executive order system relies on a complicit and cowed citizenry being too blowed over by government to question, challenge or fight.. (See Full Article For More)

Obama’s Executive orders are actually “Stealth changes in the LAW” that tilts the country slowly towards a Federal Socialist Oligarchy

February 10, 2015

The Take Care Clause of the Constitution in Article II commands each president to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” So long as he issues orders specifically directing his subordinates on how to administer or enforce some aspect of federal law, he’s fulfilling his constitutional duty.
But two things executive orders cannot do: They cannot make law, and they cannot stop laws from being carried out. This is where Obama is taking what may be unprecedented steps in violation of the Constitution

WHEN IS IT TIME TO RESTORE AMERICA TO A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC? IT IS TIME RIGHT NOW! READ AND SHARE!

ARE YOU WAITING FOR PROVERBIAL “TRIPWIRE” OR THE “ARCHDUKE FERDINAND MOMENT” FOR A REVOLUTION IN AMERICA? THAT IS A FOOLS WAIT.

September 13, 2022

The “Enemy Within” has learned from History that a sudden ACT against the nation could mobilize a Fearsome Patriot Force into action and Take back America. That Force of Patriots with their 300 Million Guns AND with the support of over 75% of the Military excluding the soft bellied “General Class” who KowTow to the Military Industrial Complex and the Government

So what would be the tripwire resulting in open rebellion by American Patriots? Hard to tell because the current crop of “Sunshine Patriots” are too timid to actually take a stand and fight.

“Do not fight” these Sunshine Patriots say, ”That is exactly what the Feds want you to do so they can arrest you. Instead vote them out in 2022 if that doesn’t work in 2024.”

These fools do not realize that the embedded Bureaucracy cannot be voted out. They are not politicians. They are the enemy that has been planted within the foundation of America to take it down. The only way to restore America is to Improve the Constitution and give it TEETH to punish the enemy within.
Examining the Bill of Rights, and considering EXISTING laws only, and not failed attempts, you will find that every clause in the Bill of Rights has already been violated. A small act here  and another there has been violated to one degree or another. THE FBI AND THE IRS HAVE OVERSTEPPED THEIR CHARTER AND AUTHORITY AND HAVE BECOME TOOLS OF THE ILLEGAL GOVERNMENT. Yet Conservatives and Regular Americans fear for their own survival and do nothing.

Dead In The Water Maritime Admiralty UCC

Admiralty/Maritime law, Common law and the Sovereign

From the film Kymatica. I am posting this for educational purposes only. Our society is run by lawyers, our politicians are lawyers, they write our laws. Our judges are lawyers, our presidents are lawyers. They are above us, do you suppose they want you to understand the law? These are the witch doctors of the current age, ruling over us with their lawyer speak that we could never understand. We do understand though that this requires sacrificing the individual for the “system”. In order to understand how to resist what is being forced upon us I think it is imperative that we educate ourselves to the multi-faceted system that is the source of our oppression. So many things we sign, and by doing so waive our rights as natural persons and willingly submit ourselves to this admiralty law. Do you think the lawyers with the contracts and the power over us are going to let us know that.

What is Difference Between Statutory Law & Constitutional Law?

Sources of Law Part I: Statutory Law

Law in the UK is sourced from common law and statutory law. The common law system is based on judge made law. Decisions draw on precedent established by superior courts in previous cases and organised around the principles of individual liberty and individual possession of private property. Parliament is the supreme law making body and source of law since the 1688 Bill of Rights. Parliamentary supremacy means that statutes are superior law and prevail over case law. Building upon our earlier discussion on the separation of powers, this series of lectures provides an introduction to the relationship between common and statutory law

Jordan Maxwell: International Maritime Law explained

Admiralty law (also referred to as maritime law) is a distinct body of law which governs maritime questions and offenses. It is a body of both domestic law governing maritime activities, and private international law governing the relationships between private entities which operate vessels on the oceans. It deals with matters including marine commerce, marine navigation, marine salvaging, shipping, sailors, and the transportation of passengers and goods by sea. Admiralty law also covers many commercial activities, although land based or occurring wholly on land, that are maritime in character. (Source: wikipedia) denomination – “a dividing of the whole” – divide and rule – dominate. The power of words. A very powerful thing.

Maritime Admiralty Law – Corporate State Jordan Maxwell, Santos Bonacci, Akari Aryaca

Jordan Maxwell – Maritime Law rules Religion and Economics

67,974 views May 14, 2010

Maritime Admiralty Law – your red pill

256,630 views Apr 8, 2010

Admiralty Jurisdiction in State Court

https://www.youtube.com/@WininCourt

Congress tied to Admiralty Law

State Courts Operating as Territorial   Tribunals to allow the Jurisdiction of Admiralty Law

The cases cited here are: New Jersey Steam v Merchants Bank 47 US 344; American Insurance v Canter 26 US 511; Ex Parte Milligan 71 US 2. Notes: Judiciary Act of 1789; “jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our laws”; Congress Interstate Commerce powers: NOT applicable in territory NO States existing to apply this power I have Constitutional Defense Documents and my NEW Anti-COVID 19 vaccine and testing documents. Information on all Constitutional Documents is available on request. You can e-mail me at: [email protected]

Common law statutory law & Admiralty law

​​​​