Author: Stanley Bolten

Bad News!!! Judge Timothy Kelly denies Owen Shroyer’s motion for “Release Pending Appeal” by a memorandum order. It was denied on FRIDAY the 13th, October, 2023, on the month of Halloween. Retrieved from PACER.GOV and uploaded to CourtListener, we have the document and are exclusively releasing to the general public on our own costs. The Court refuses to protect Owen’s first amendment right to freedom of speech as it has NOW BEEN CRIMINALIZED. FREE SPEECH IS NOW A CRIME and the CORRUPT Judge is basically saying that in his memorandum order. Will we be arrested next??? Maybe with our criticizing of state and federal judges on this blog, we may be imprisoned next for our freedom of speech. This is very dangerous and is the end of our Constitutional republic. This is not a joke. Wake up America. Red Dawn is here now, communism is being operated in the United States Courts.

JUDGE: Again, it is hard to imagine how the relevance of Shroyer’s statements to an appropriate sentencing factor could be plainer. In May 2021, with months to reflect on what happened on January 6, Shroyer publicly derided the idea of expressing remorse for what happened that day. See ECF No. 46 at 1, 14. True, he later expressed remorse at sentencing, at least sufficiently for the Court to conclude that he had accepted responsibility for the offense to which he pleaded guilty. But the Court properly considered his public statement that shed light on the timeliness and cast doubt on the completeness of that remorse. Simply put, Shroyer cannot have it both ways by urging the Court to consider his statement at sentencing purportedly showing remorse but also urging it to disregard statements reflecting otherwise. And again, it does not matter that this statement had political overtones. As Dawson and Mitchell show, the First Amendment does not prevent courts from considering speech and associations that are otherwise protected when assessing relevant sentencing factors. (Footnote 9)
Footnote 9: Shroyer’s motion also reports that his appeal will compare the Court’s consideration of his speech to a court’s consideration of acquitted conduct at sentencing. See ECF No. 52 at 5. That comparison to acquitted-conduct sentencing is puzzling for at least two reasons. First, a sentencing judge in this Circuit may consider acquitted conduct. United States v. Settles, 530 F.3d 920, 923–24 (D.C. Cir. 2008); United States v. Khatallah, 41 F.4th 608, 651 (D.C. Cir. 2022) (Millett, J., concurring) (recognizing that Settles remains good law). But to be clear, the Court did not rely on acquitted conduct here—Shroyer pleaded guilty and does not deny the facts on which the Court relied. Second, it is far from clear that the questions of whether a sentencing court can consider acquitted conduct and whether it can consider expressive conduct have anything to do with one another. Shroyer’s motion does not hint at the basis of his comparison.

Page 10 to 11 of Memorandum Order.

None of this makes any sense. Owen didn’t destroy any property and he didn’t ask anybody to destroy property. He did make some hyperbolic statements but many make such statements without actually encouraging a crime or even meaning it. This judge has basically argued that political free speech is nothing but facts for his sentencing to punish him and imprison him, meaning that your political speech CAN NOW BE A CRIME, FREE SPEECH IS A FEDERAL CRIME NOW. If you are arrested for anything including jaywalking, they can use your political speech against you to enhance your sentence. Now you cannot call Joe Biden a pedophile or any term that could make him and the Department of InJustice angry. Otherwise off to prison you go.

Courts are normally supposed to be courts of law. The U.S. Constitution said that Congress cannot abridge the freedom of speech and neither of the free press or even to peacefully assemble. Owen didn’t do anything violent, so he had peacefully assembled while he was part of the live streaming for The Alex Jones Show (which is news reporting, reporting what is happening) even while there were those who did get violent, but Owen wasn’t violent on January 6, 2021. So they are punishing him for his anti-Biden speech. Anyways, the Constitution made it clear that Congress does not have the legal authority under any law-making or statute to abridge the freedom of speech. Courts do not have any lawful jurisdiction to abridge peaceful assembly and freedom of speech. It doesn’t matter that a minority of the over one million of people there went into the U.S. Capitol building on January 6, the rest were still peaceful. Owen was peaceful. Yet the Federal Courts are acting outside of jurisdiction. This CORRUPT piece of crap Federal THUG Judge Timothy Kelly who acts like a NAZI in a black robe (watch for us to be arrested next for calling out this thug judge!!!!!) has made the decision that the first amendment no longer applies to peaceful assembly and freedom of speech. Owen was only convicted of “Knowingly Entering or Remaining in any Restricted Building or Grounds Without Lawful Authority” (18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1) and (2)). Any journalist could easily receive a criminal charge like this. CNN and MSNBC were in the U.S. Capitol building, corporate media covered January 6, they had committed the offense of “Knowingly Entering or Remaining in any Restricted Building or Grounds Without Lawful Authority”. The corporate mainstream media who were inside the U.S. Capitol building on January 6 also violated 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1) and (2). So why are they not being arrested??? Why is it that only certain people such as alternative journalists are being arrested??? Because the Federal Judges are corrupt and likely blackmailed. Usually if a journalist is caught on “Restricted Building or Grounds”, the jail time would be relatively small or at first the police would order the journalist to leave the restricted grounds because of the implications of imprisoning a journalist would violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The same CORRUPT Nazi-THUG Federal Judge Timothy Kelly had illegally blocked Brian D. Hill’s sentencing letter from even being filed but it was done in such a way where it had vanished. Brian Hill had attempted to file a sentencing letter twice and both times it was signed for by A JONES and was vanished. The court is refusing to answer Brian’s question on receiving Brian’s sentencing letter. The judge does not like Brian’s sentencing letter because it establishes Owen Shroyer as a news reporter or journalist under penalty of perjury by Brian Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News. This corrupt judge does not wish to have anybody file a sentencing letter establishing facts which encompass Owen Shroyer as a protected member of the alternative media and thus the First Amendment would apply to him. This corrupt judge blocked Brian’s sentencing letter from ever being filed on the docket. What a cowardly man Timothy Kelly is. He is a traitor JUST LIKE JUDGE SCHROEDER.

See the articles and learn that THEY ARE OUT FOR BLOOD AGAINST JOURNALISM. They are out to get Owen Shroyer. On Friday 13, that was the day when the religious Knights Templar’s were murdered by the thugs who act like it was justice to kill the Knights. So they are symbolizing killing journalism by imprisoning Owen Shroyer for his freedom of speech. See article: Why Friday the 13th Spelled Doom for the Knights Templar: The much-feared day was the beginning of the end for the powerful warriors. (History.com). This judge may likely be Illuminati or a Mason. Check and see if this judge belongs to the FreeMasons and if you find any proof, then this further proves that the secret societies are out to get Owen Shroyer. The Deep State, the Shadow Government. That is why I recommend that you read the articles about how the judge and his clerk are blocking the sentencing letter of Brian D. Hill from ever being filed when it is favorable to Owen Shroyer. I recommend you also watch the documentary: The DEEP STATE can Frame You – the Documentary. The thug federal judges are sending a message that COMMUNISM is here to stay in the USA.

Also it should be noted that the Mayodan Police had planned to have Brian arrested or maybe even disappeared on Friday 13, December, 2013. See affidavit page 52 (Document 37) at https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4304407/37/united-states-v-hill/. Brian’s federal case was the same way. They ruined Owen Shroyer’s chance to stay out of imprisonment pending appeal on Friday 13th. They were planning to walk Brian into a trap in the Mayodan Police Department on Friday 13th. They could have murdered Brian in the small town of Mayodan. Who would know in a small town right??? This same style tactic was used in Brian’s case. So Owen Shroyer’s federal case and Brian’s federal case have similarities in the type and style of persecution. Using what they consider as important days such as “Friday 13”. Do your research, learn the truth.

• Brian D. Hill refiles/mailed sentencing letter again in Owen Shroyer J6 federal case, asks Clerk to notify Brian if it is approved to be considered as timely filed around September 11, 2023 a day before Sentencing hearing #FreeOwen – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
• URGENT/BREAKING: Phone Call recording with Judge’s Clerk proves sentencing letter in Owen Shroyer (Infowars) case was COVERED UP and CONCEALED by chambers #FreeOwen @allidoisowen – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
• Truth Social post: “At this point, with the cover up in the Owen Shroyer case, the sentencing letter is gone, disappeared, likely thrown in File 13. Likely was paper shredded.” #FreeOwen – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
• Public post to Owen Shroyer (Infowars) at Truth Social: I am getting thousands of people to see the sentencing letter affidavit calling you a professional & a good person asking for a reprieve for you. – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
• U.S. District Court still not filing sentencing letter in Owen Shroyer January 6 (J6) criminal case, not responding to Brian D. Hill or his family in inquiring on that timely filed letter #FreeOwen – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
• Donation to news reporter Owen Shroyer of Infowars for the good things he did for Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News #FreeOwen #FreeOwenShroyer – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
• U.S. Attorney deletes emails with J6 defendant Owen Shroyer sentencing letter prepared by Brian D. Hill, formerly USWGO Alt. News as they do not care about J6 defendant Owen being a “professional” journalist and a “good person” – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
• U.S. District Court still has not filed on PACER or made a decision on Owen Shroyer sentencing letter by Brian D. Hill filed by Express Mail and was received on September 11, 2023 (day before sentencing) #FreeOwen @allidoisowen – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
• Brian D. Hill (formerly USWGO Alt. News) writes sentencing letter for J6 defendant Owen Shroyer of Infowars, asks for a reprieve for him at the sentencing hearing, filed with defense attorney Norm Pattis and U.S. Government – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News