Stewart Best (8/10/2021): The Killing Fields of America are Here and YOU Are the Target

Stewart Best (8/10/2021): The Killing Fields of America are Here and YOU Are the Target

THE KILLING FIELDS OF AMERICA ARE HERE AND YOU ARE THE TARGET

The communist coup in America is now swinging into high gear as the American people twiddle their thumbs and stuff their mouths with burgers and hotdogs. They watch the latest propaganda on their tubes and believe every word of it. Soon the prophecies of Jeremiah the prophet will come to pass exactly as he said they would in Jeremiah 50:33-34:

³³ Thus saith the Lord of hosts; The children of Israel and the children of Judah were oppressed together: and all that took them captives held them fast; they refused to let them go.

³⁴ Their Redeemer is strong; the Lord of hosts is his name: he shall throughly plead their cause, that he may give rest to the land, and disquiet the inhabitants of Babylon.

It has always interesting to us that the prophetic scholars who run these large prophetic ministries never site the Bible prophecies when these events begin to happen. Like our borders here in America/Babylon being wide open because GOD HIMSELF opened them for the coming huge JUDGMENT upon the America people. Why? Because of the RANK APOSTASY that our so-called Christian leaders have lead the flock into with their false salvation doctrine. THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND AND THEY ARE GOING INTO ETERNAL RUIN TOGETHER, JUST AS PETER AND CHRIST WARNED.

Jesus commanded us to ENTER THE STRAIT GATE and WALK THE NARROW WAY UNTO LIFE. It is not optional. It has been refused.

As we have said before, America is under severe judgment and the cover for rounding up patriotic Americans and placing them into FEMA torture and death camps is now the HOAX CV-19 scamdemic and the new wave of the hoax Delta and Lambda mutations. If you don’t believe it, here it is in full detail, and runs with the recent release of going into the RURAL DISTRICTS to round them up as well, and it all goes back to the REWILDING OF AMERICA, as I told you long ago when I produced “UNFRIENDLY FIRE” which is free on ANGELFALL923 – a two hour documentary that shows you all about the communist United Nations Agenda 21/30/50, being voiced also by the World Economic Forum’s “YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY.” Why happy? Because of MIND CONTROL NANOBOTS already injected in millions of Americans and billions around the world.  

Read the following from the communist CDC and their fully antichrist leader who also just took over private property in America as part of the UN agenda, and still the people sleep on, totally comatose and actually deserve the death camps they are going to soon inhabit or God is not a JUST GOD!!

Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings

 

Updated July 26, 2020

This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.^1,2  

This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available. Please check the CDC website periodically for updates.

What is the Shielding Approach¹?

The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.^1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.

(This is all a being done under the fake hoax CV-19 LIE to first of all ROUND -UP and then KILL those considered HIGH RISK. High risk of what? NOTHING, it is to DEPOPULATE THE LAND per the Georgia Guidestones. This is the 4^th Reich rising up and the last cry of those who are rising up against God and Jesus Christ just before they are totally destroyed and taken down to eternal hellfire– SCB)

 

Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.³ In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population.^4,5  For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population. (Take them to FEMA camps are kill them – SCB)

In theory, shielding may serve its objective to protect high-risk populations from disease and death. However, implementation of the approach necessitates strict adherence^1,6,7, to protocol. Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.

A summary of the shielding approach described by Favas is shown in Table 1. See Guidance for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among high-risk individuals in low-resource, displaced and camp and camp-like settings ^1,2 for full details.

Table 1: Summary of the Shielding Approach¹

Level

Movement/ Interactions

Household (HH) Level:

A specific room/area designated for high-risk individuals who are physically isolated from other HH members.

Low-risk HH members should not enter the green zone. If entry is necessary, it should be done only by healthy individuals after washing hands and using face coverings. Interactions should be at a safe distance (approx. 2 meters). Minimum movement of high-risk individuals outside the green zone. Low-risk HH members continue to follow social distancing and hygiene practices outside the house.

Neighborhood Level:

A designated shelter/group of shelters (max 5-10 households), within a small camp or area where high-risk members are grouped together. Neighbors “swap” households to accommodate high-risk individuals.

Same as above

Camp/Sector Level:

A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.

One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.

Operational Considerations

The shielding approach requires several prerequisites for effective implementation. Several are addressed, including access to healthcare and provision of food. However, there are several prerequisites which require additional considerations. Table 2 presents the prerequisites or suggestions as stated in the shielding guidance document (column 1) and CDC presents additional questions and considerations alongside these prerequisites (column 2).

Table 2: Suggested Prerequisites per the shielding documents and CDC’s Operational Considerations for Implementation

Suggested Prerequisites

*As stated in the shielding document*

Considerations as suggested by CDC

• Each green zone has a dedicated latrine/bathing facility for high-risk individuals
• The shielding approach advises against any new facility construction to establish green zones; however, few settings will have existing shelters or communal facilities with designated latrines/bathing facilities to accommodate high-risk individuals. In these settings, most latrines used by HHs are located outside the home and often shared by multiple HHs.
• If dedicated facilities are available, ensure safety measures such as proper lighting, handwashing/hygiene infrastructure, maintenance and disinfection of latrines.
• Ensure facilities can accommodate high-risk individuals with disabilities, children and separate genders at the neighborhood/camp-level.
• To minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile.  Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune.
• This may be difficult to sustain, especially if the caregivers are also high risk. As caregivers may often will be family members, ensure that this strategy is socially or culturally acceptable.
• Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity.
• The green zone and living areas for high-risk residents should be aligned with minimum humanitarian (SPHERE) standards.⁶
• The shielding approach requires strict adherence to infection, prevention and control (IPC) measures. They require, uninterrupted availability of soap, water, hygiene/cleaning supplies, masks or cloth face coverings, etc. for all individuals in green zones. Thus, it is necessary to ensure minimum public health standards⁶ are maintained and possibly supplemented to decrease the risk of other outbreaks outside of COVID-19. Attaining and maintaining minimum SPHERE⁶ standards is difficult in these settings for the general population.^8,9,10 Users should consider that provision of services and supplies to high risk individuals could be at the expense of low-risk residents, putting them at increased risk for other outbreaks.
• Monitor and evaluate the implementation of the shielding approach.
• Monitoring protocols will need to be developed for each type of green zone.
• Dedicated staff need to be identified to monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.
• Men and women, and individuals with tuberculosis (TB), severe immunodeficiencies, or dementia should be isolated separately
• Multiple green zones would be needed to achieve this level of separation, each requiring additional inputs/resources. Further considerations include challenges of accommodating different ethnicities, socio-cultural groups, or religions within one setting.
• Community acceptance and involvement in the design and implementation
• Even with community involvement, there may be a risk of stigmatization.^11,12 Isolation/separation from family members, loss of freedom and personal interactions may require additional psychosocial support structures/systems. See section on additional considerations below.
• High-risk minors should be accompanied into isolation by a single caregiver who will also be considered a green zone resident in terms of movements and contacts with those outside the green zone.
• Protection measures are critical to implementation. Ensure there is appropriate, adequate, and acceptable care of other minors or individuals with disabilities or mental health conditions who remain in the HH if separated from their primary caregiver.
• Green zone shelters should always be kept clean. Residents should be provided with the necessary cleaning products and materials to clean their living spaces.
• High-risk individuals will be responsible for cleaning and maintaining their own living space and facilities. This may not be feasible for persons with disabilities or decreased mobility.¹¹ Maintaining hygiene conditions in communal facilities is difficult during non-outbreak settings.^7,8,9 consequently it may be necessary to provide additional human resource support.
• Green zones should be more spacious in terms of shelter area per capita than the surrounding camp/sector, even at the cost of greater crowding of low-risk people.
• Ensure that targeting high-risk individuals does not negate mitigation measures among low-risk individuals (physical distancing in markets or water points, where feasible, etc.). Differences in space based on risk status may increase the potential risk of exposure among the rest of the low-risk residents and may be unacceptable or impracticable, considering space limitations and overcrowding in many settings.

Additional Considerations

The shielding approach outlines the general “logistics” of implementation –who, what, where, how. However, there may be additional logistical challenges to implementing these strategies as a result of unavailable commodities, transport restrictions, limited staff capacity and availability to meet the increased needs. The approach does not address the potential emotional, social/cultural, psychological impact for separated individuals nor for the households with separated members. Additional considerations to address these challenges are presented below.

Population characteristics and demographics

Consideration: The number of green zones required may be greater than anticipated, as they are based on the total number of high-risk individuals, disease categories, and the socio-demographics of the area and not just the proportion of elderly population.

Explanation: Older adults represent a small percentage of the population in many camps in humanitarian settings (approximately 3-5%^4,5), however in some humanitarian settings more than one quarter of the population may fall under high risk categories^13,14,15 based on underlying medical conditions which may increase a person’s risk for severe COVID-19 illness which include chronic kidney disease, obesity, serious heart conditions, sickle cell disease, and type 2 diabetes. Additionally, many camps and settlements host multiple nationalities which may require additional separation, for example, Kakuma Refugee Camp in Kenya accommodates refugees from 19 countries.¹⁶

Timeline considerations

Consideration: Plan for an extended duration of implementation time, at least 6 months.

Explanation: The shielding approach proposes that green zones be maintained until one of the following circumstances arises: (i) sufficient hospitalization capacity is established; (ii) effective vaccine or therapeutic options become widely available; or (iii) the COVID-19 epidemic affecting the population subsides.

Given the limited resources and healthcare available to populations in humanitarian settings prior to the pandemic, it is unlikely sufficient hospitalization capacity (beds, personal protective equipment, ventilators, and staff) will be achievable during widespread transmission. The national capacity in many of the countries where these settings are located (e.g., Chad, Myanmar, and Syria) is limited. Resources may become quickly overwhelmed during the peak of transmission and may not be accessible to the emergency affected populations.

Vaccine trials are underway, but with no definite timeline. Reaching the suppression phase where the epidemic subsides can take several months and cases may resurge in a second or even third wave. Herd immunity (the depletion of susceptible people) for COVID-19 has not been demonstrated to date. It is also unclear if an infected person develops immunity and the duration of potential immunity is unknown. Thus, contingency plans to account for a possibly extended operational timeline are critical.

Other logistical considerations

Consideration: Plan to identify additional resources and outline supply chain mechanisms to support green zones.

Explanation: The implementation and operation of green zones requires strong coordination among several sectors which may require substantial additional resources:  supplies and staff to maintain these spaces – shelters, IPC, water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), non-food items (NFIs) (beds, linens, dishes/utensils, water containers), psychosocial support, monitors/supervisors, caretakers/attendants, risk communication and community engagement, security, etc. Considering global reductions in commodity shortages,¹⁷ movement restrictions, border closures, and decreased trucking and flights, it is important to outline what additional resources will be needed and how they will be procured.

Protection

Consideration: Ensure safe and protective environments for all individuals, including minors and individuals who require additional care whether they are in the green zone or remain in a household after the primary caregiver or income provider has moved to the green zone.

Explanation: Separating families and disrupting and deconstructing multigenerational households may have long-term negative consequences. Shielding strategies need to consider sociocultural gender norms in order to adequately assess and address risks to individuals, particularly women and girls. ^18,19,20 Restrictive gender norms may be exacerbated by isolation strategies such as shielding. At the household level, isolating individuals and limiting their interaction, compounded with social and economic disruption has raised concerns of potential increased risk of partner violence. Households participating in house swaps or sector-wide cohorting are at particular risk for gender-based violence, harassment, abuse, and exploitation as remaining household members may not be decision-makers or responsible for households needs.^18,19,20

Social/Cultural/Religious Practices

Consideration: Plan for potential disruption of social networks.

Explanation: Community celebrations (religious holidays), bereavement (funerals) and other rites of passage are cornerstones of many societies. Proactive planning ahead of time, including strong community engagement and risk communication is needed to better understand the issues and concerns of restricting individuals from participating in communal practices because they are being shielded. Failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence.^21,22

Mental Health

Consideration: Ensure mental health and psychosocial support*^,23 structures are in place to address increased stress and anxiety.

Explanation: Additional stress and worry are common during any epidemic and may be more pronounced with COVID-19 due to the novelty of the disease and increased fear of infection, increased childcare responsibilities due to school closures, and loss of livelihoods. Thus, in addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse, or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind. Shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should not be left alone. There must be a caregiver allocated to them to prevent further protection risks such as neglect and abuse.  (For Christians the “Clergy Response Teams” these traitors called “Clergy” to go into FEMA DEATH CAMPS to calm down people who have their families separated children, wives, husbands all separated for torture and death. – SCB)

Summary

The shielding approach is an ambitious undertaking, which may prove effective in preventing COVID-19 infection among high-risk populations if well managed. While the premise is based on mitigation strategies used in the United Kingdom,^24,25 there is no empirical evidence whether this approach will increase, decrease or have no effect on morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in various humanitarian settings. This document highlights a) risks and challenges of implementing this approach, b) need for additional resources in areas with limited or reduced capacity, c) indefinite timeline, and d) possible short-term and long-term adverse consequences.

Public health not only focuses on the eradication of disease but addresses the entire spectrum of health and wellbeing. Populations displaced, due to natural disasters or war and, conflict are already fragile and have experienced increased mental, physical and/or emotional trauma. While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings. As with many community interventions meant to decrease COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, compliance and behavior change are the primary rate-limiting steps and may be driven by social and emotional factors. These changes are difficult in developed, stable settings; thus, they may be particularly challenging in humanitarian settings which bring their own set of multi-faceted challenges that need to be taken into account.

Household-level shielding seems to be the most feasible and dignified as it allows for the least disruption to family structure and lifestyle, critical components to maintaining compliance. However, it is most susceptible to the introduction of a virus due to necessary movement or interaction outside the green zone, less oversight, and often large household sizes. It may be less feasible in settings where family shelters are small and do not have multiple compartments. In humanitarian settings, small village, sector/block, or camp-level shielding may allow for greater adherence to proposed protocol, but at the expense of longer-term social impacts triggered by separation from friends and family, feelings of isolation, and stigmatization. Most importantly, accidental introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission and increased morbidity and mortality as observed in assisted care facilities in the US.²⁶

The shielding approach is intended to alleviate stress on the healthcare system and circumvent the negative economic consequences of long-term containment measures and lockdowns by protecting the most vulnerable.^1,24,25 Implementation of this approach will involve careful planning, additional resources, strict adherence and strong multi-sector coordination, requiring agencies to consider the potential repercussion among populations that have collectively experienced physical and psychological trauma which makes them more vulnerable to adverse psychosocial consequences.  In addition, thoughtful consideration of the potential benefit versus the social and financial cost of implementation will be needed in humanitarian settings.

^*Specific psychosocial support guidance during COVID-19 as specific subject areas are beyond the scope of this document.

So, there you have the PLAN of the satanic communist Biden administration right out in the open and as God is now punishing the American people because of their apostasy and refusal to face the truth. As God has said He is giving the American people a DELUSION:

Isaiah 66:4-5

⁴ I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.

⁵ Hear the word of the Lord, ye that tremble at his word; Your brethren that hated you, that cast you out for my name’s sake, said, Let the Lord be glorified: but he shall appear to your joy, and they shall be ashamed.

Why are all of you who claim you are Christian leaders so afraid to show the real prophecies behind all of this? It is because you are under a DELUSION and have no real testimony of what TRUE SALVATION IS? Thus you lead your followers into eternal hellfire via fake SINNER’S PRAYER which is a CONVERSIONARY PRAYER, and has nothing to do with authentic and true SALVATION! Let’s jell this down to what this really is:

PROFESSION WITHOUT POSSESSION.

BE WARNED.

Shock executive order greenlights quarantines, involuntary commitment amid COVID fears

‘The pieces add up to a very scary picture! People need to wake up’

An executive order signed quietly by Tennessee’s Republican governor is troubling some Americans as it greenlights the National Guard and State Guard to implement quarantines and involuntary commitment of citizens “in connection with certain health care and emergency services operations,” with the governor specifically concerned about “an increase in COVID-19 cases.”

Gov. Bill Lee signed Executive Order 83 on Friday “with little fanfare” according to Tennessee Stands, an influential conservative coalition.

The group says it found some of the provisions in the executive order “exceptionally concerning,” including:

• “Discretion to utilize National Guard and State Guard members in connection with certain health care and emergency services operations.”
• “Telephone assessments for involuntary commitment cases are permitted.”
• “Temporary quarantine and isolation facilities may be constructed.”

(We have had reports these are now going up – SCB)

This bill goes along with going into the “rural districts” to test and quarantine large areas of rural America – a UN WHO/CDC SATANIC plan using a fake pandemic to bring in the UN wildlands project and depopulate the land, force all people into core smart cities.

The rural farmers are still fast asleep, not knowing what is happening to them already…

Jeremiah 51:1-3

51 Thus saith the Lord; Behold, I will raise up against Babylon, and against them that dwell in the midst of them that rise up against me, a destroying wind;

² And will send unto Babylon fanners, that shall fan her, and shall empty her land: for in the day of trouble they shall be against her round about.

³ Against him that bendeth let the archer bend his bow, and against him that lifteth himself up in his brigandine: and spare ye not her young men; destroy ye utterly all her host.

You have all been warned many, many times, and most of you, over the period of the last 30+ years have mocked it all. Your time of mocking is now over. Now you must and will face the horrific truth:

Proverbs 1:27-29

²⁷ When your fear cometh as desolation, and your destruction cometh as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish cometh upon you.

²⁸ Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me:

²⁹ For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the Lord:

WHY CALL YE A CHRISTIAN AND REFUSE JESUS CHRIST AND END UP AS A REJECTED ONE:

MATTHEW 7:21-27:

²¹ Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

²² Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

²³ And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

²⁴ Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:

²⁵ And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.

²⁶ And everyone that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:

²⁷ And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

If you cannot see or understand this, then you are one of the foolish and hell awaits, no matter what you think or say. Nothing could be plainer. Your choice, DO AS CHRIST COMMANDED or GO TO HELL ALONG WITH ALL OF THESE FAKE PREACHERS, TEACHERS, EVANGELISTS AND PROPHETIC PEOPLE WHO OFFER NOTHING BUT BROAD WAY SALVATION THAT LEADS TO ETERNAL RUIN.

—LIGHTGATE BLOGGER 

Stewart Best has been teaching the true gospel of Jesus Christ for over 30 years. His classic video, “Iron Mountain—Blueprint for Tyranny,” drew national attention (including the Wall Street Journal) and deep state scrutiny. NBC’s Dateline Show backed off when they found out he had the actual evidence of the truth and they could not control the narrative.

The “hate-mongering” SPLC deemed him a “domestic terrorist,” men with long guns showed up at his property, and a black helicopter dropped water balloons as a warning, but the Lord delivered him from it all.

In the past, he has appeared on the Art Bell Show and also on Steve Quayle’s former radio show.

Be sure to check out Stewart’s own Night Shadows Radio Show and the NightShadows Radio Member site (there is a FREE side).

At fourscore+ years of age his force does not seem to have abated one bit, still producing prolifically with his team at the LightGate ministry in Wisconsin. He was a professional aviator for many years, flying the latest corporate jets as Captain, and he also served in the military. 

Iron Mountain and many other videos are available at his YouTube channel “angelfall923“…but watch while you can! YouTube is de-channeling more and more truth-tellers every day. —FTW

He that hath ears to hear, let him hear. (Matt 11:15)

Source: https://lightgateblogger.wordpress.com/2021/08/10/the-killing-fields-of-america-are-here-and-you-are-the-target/

[The true gospel: the only way Jesus gave us was the strait gate/narrow way. Few will DO it. BE ONE!!].

Do You Know The SECRET to This Matrix World — And the WAY Out ? CLICK HERE 

CLICK HERE For A Testimony of Authentic Regeneration From a Remarkable Young Lady — This is Not Your Typical “Testimony” 

Be sure you are saved, and not just think you are. Do you have the right KIND of faith?

Matt 7:13-14:

Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: (Matt 7:13)

Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. (Matt 7:14)

→ Jesus Christ Said Few Would DO It — The True Gospel in Under Ten Minutes

→ 10-Minute Preaching: “Your Whole Entire Life Is Supposed to Get You Out of the Matrix”

→  Time is running out for mankind – even for the vast majority of Christians who think they are going to Heaven but are not – just as Jesus said. A DELUSION OF A SALVATION THAT DOES NOT EXIST.

→  The Bible is clear – only 1 in 1000 Christians is actually BORN AGAIN.

→  No Cross, No Death, No Judgment – No Crown of Eternal Life!!

→  The time is now getting so short to escape the Matrix, in truth!!

→  For more information, FREELY-download and study out while you can:

→  The Dark/Light Series (PDF) (1Cor 13:12) — A Guide to Authentic Salvation 

→  “It is the best book I have ever read outside of the word of God itself.”

→  ”Other than my Bible, it’s the best thing I ever read.” 

→  See Other Stories Contributed by “Follows TheWay”