Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

Lies of The Roman Catholic Church - Part I; The Pope Has No Apostolic Authority

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Once upon a time, in the first century A.D., there were Christians who assembled to worship the Lord in a pagan and idolatrous place called Rome.  The congregations of these early Christians were trying to follow what they had been taught by others who knew of Christ, and appear to have been meeting in the homes of a few families.  So, the early Christians in Rome had small house church assemblies.  But, then something happened along the way to consolidate and empower a single church in Rome.  Centralization is always a bad move.

The Catholic church teaches that they are a continuation of the early Christian community established by Jesus on the day of Pentecost, and that Peter was the first bishop of the church at Rome.  The Catholic church claims that the Pope is the sole successor to “Saint Peter”,  who they claim was the head of the church which he ministered in Rome, and that the Pope is thus the head of The Church on earth and is the Vicar of Christ.  They claim that their bishops are successors to the Apostles of Jesus Christ, and stand in place of the Pope and thus for Christ for each of their parishes.  

Ahhh… dreams of power.  All of these claims by the Roman Catholic church for apostolic authority are false!  There is no relation between the Roman Catholic Church and the first century Christians who congregated in Rome.

There were Jewish communities in Rome during the first century A.D.,  as some had been taken captive in earlier times.  Though they obtained Roman citizenship when they were freed, they maintained separate lives from the Romans and were still adhering to their laws of Judaism.  The Roman historian Suetonius tells that a certain Caesar named Claudius banished all the Jews from Rome around 49 A.D. because they were constantly rioting over someone named “Chrestus.”  Luke’s record of the arrival of the converts Aquila and Priscilla at Corinth from Rome in Acts 18:2 supports Suetonius’ account. 

 We do not really know who preached the gospel first to the Jews living in Rome.  It may be that many of those converted on the day of Pentecost had traveled from Rome, and took the message of the gospel back home.  Others who may have heard one of the Apostles  in another area may have written to those in Rome.  But a certain Jew, named Paul, a tentmaker by trade, and an Apostle of Christ, wrote a letter to the those Christians meeting in Rome while he was working in Corinth, most probably during the winter of 56-57 A.D.

During Paul’s third missionary journey he decides that he must “see Rome“. (Acts, 19:21.)  He is concerned over the Christians who are living and congregating there.   In his letter to the Romans, those Christians meeting in Rome, he tells them of his desire to come to them to be able to impart some spiritual gift that they may be established (Rom 1:11) and that he had wanted to come to them many times before so that he could have some fruit among them as he had with other Gentiles, but was prevented from doing so. (Rom. 1:13)

The Apostle Paul does not go to Rome until after he is imprisoned, and appeals to Caesar, sometime around 59 or 60 A.D.  By that time, he had spent two years in prison in Caesarea in Judea under Gov. Felix’s reign.   After arriving in Rome, being held under guard three days, he calls together the chief of the Jews that are in Rome.  The Jews tell Paul (Acts 28:21-22) that they had no report concerning him but wanted to know more of “this sect”  which was everywhere spoken against.   The statements of the Jews to Paul at Rome recorded in Acts 28 are proof that Peter never preached in Rome before Paul arrived under guard in A.D. 60 and thus could not have established nor ministered to the congregations at Rome.

Jesus instructed Paul to go to the Gentiles.  (Acts 9:15; and Acts 18:6).  In Matt. 10:5-23, Jesus told the twelve disciples  (Simon Peter, his brother Andrew, James and John, the sons of Zebedee; Phillip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the publican; James the son of Alphaeus;  and Thaddaues; Simon, the Cananaean, and Judas Iscariot who betrayed him….) to go to the “lost sheep of the house of Israel.” 

That means that Peter was preaching the coming of the kingdom to the Israelites.  1 Pet. 1:1, “Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the elect who are sojourners of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,  (ASV)   or,  ”Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the choice sojourners of the dispersion of Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,´ (Young’s)   and, ” Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,  (KJV). 

These twelve disciples were commissioned by Christ for the lost sheep of Israel.  They were not to go to the Gentiles, nor to any city of the Samaritans; only to the cities throughout Israel.  And, as the Jews in Rome told Paul that they wanted to learn about this sect spoken against by everyone, they had not heard of Christ from Peter!

Neither would Peter have gone to the Gentiles to establish a church in Rome.  Paul’s writings show that a congregation of the brethren of Christ were already meeting in Rome by the time he arrived in 59 – 60 A.D.

Paul was held under house arrest for two years in Rome, during which time he wrote many of the letters to the churches. (Acts 28:30)   In 63 A.D. Paul was freed for a little while and he traveled to other towns as he relates in the various epistles including Corinth, Miletus, Troas, Colosse, and Nicopolis. 

So, Paul could not have been instrumental in establishing the first century church of those Christians who were meeting in Rome.   This is confirmed by his statement in Romans 15:20, “…yea, making it my aim so to preach the gospel, not where Christ was already named, that I might not build upon another man’s foundation; (ASV)

We must also consider the use of the word “Israel” in Matt. 10:6, & 23 … not Judah, but Israel.   The question is then, did the Lord’s reference to “Israel” include the dispersed 10 northern tribes which were taken into captivity initially by the Assyrians in 734 BC?  While a remnant of 50,000 Judeans (Jews) were allowed to return and rebuild Jerusalem in 538 B.C. after the Babylonian captivity, the 10 northern tribes were still dispersed.   Those of the northern 10 tribes taken into captivity in the Assyrian empire eventually spread throughout the Medo-Persian empire across modern day Turkey, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, parts of Egypt and the Arabian peninsula. 

If the Jews who were living in Rome maintained separate communities from their captors, then most probably the dispersed northern tribes living throughout Asia did the same.  These communities were probably known to the Council in Jerusalem, and thus to the twelve Apostles sent to the house of Israel.

As Jesus told the twelve disciples  to go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, that probably included the lost tribes spread throughout the various parts of Asia.  Is this possibly why the Holy Spirit hindered and constrained Paul not to go into the northern parts of Asia, because the twelve Apostles were already working there? 

Acts 16:6-7,  6Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia,  After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not.”

Peter’s letter is addressed to the brethren in Asia and Bithynia, among others in that area.  So, Paul’s journeys were held to the southern parts of Asia and the Mediterranean.  No wasted effort.

Therefore, neither Peter nor Paul established THE church at Rome.   The Roman Catholic Church has no similarity, and no relation to the early Christians who were meeting in Rome in the first century A.D., nor have had for centuries.  As those house churches in the first century A.D. were surrounded by Roman paganism and idolatry, odds are good they fell into apostasy early on. And, we can see from Irenaeus’ writings that they had help.

It was Irenaeus who, in the second century A.D. in his book Against Heresies proposed and taught that Peter and Paul had established the church at Rome.  Irenaeus was jealous for the church at Rome, and wanted it to be the epicenter and authority of Christianity.  His desires for the preeminence of the Roman congregation above all others led him to state in his Book III, Chapter 1 that, “Peter and Paul were preaching at Rome, laying the foundations of the Church.” Irenaeus then adds to his imaginings when he stated in Book III, Chapter 3 that “of the very great, the very ancient, and universally [catholic] known Church founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul;” and, “For it is a matter of necessity that every Church should agree with this Church, on account of its preeminent authority.” 

The lust for power and authority overcame the desire to follow after God.  There is now no relation between the Roman Catholic Church and the teachings of the apostles as recorded in the Bible, as the Catholic church has twisted the word of the Lord beyond recognition.  They in fact teach that the Pope’s pronouncements come before God’s word, as the Bible is last in their consideration, and is not on the same level of authority as that of the Pope, an earthly man.  Many Catholics will tell you that they have been taught that the Bible is not reliable, and many do not read it at all.  They do not know what it says.

 The Catholic church has published a fairy tale to persuade many lost souls that they have Apostolic authority where none exists!   They have made false claims, and have lied.  As all liars are children of Satan (John 8:44), and as God considers all liars the same as murderers (John 8:44, as explained in my post Liars and Murderers……), the Roman Catholic church is an apostate organization, and thus a synagogue of Satan!  For this, and for many other lies they teach that lead people away from God, the Roman Catholic Church has no authority from God.  It is imperative that all who are in caught in that synagogue of Satan come out from it and be separate.

Part II of this series will examine in detail why Peter is not the Rock upon which the church and the body of Christ was built.  All posts are also at


Bible: King James Version, American Standard Version, Young’s Literal Translation.

Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 888-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 888-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 8 comments
    • Amminadab

      True. Peter never went to Rome.

      The ROCK is Jesus.

      • Damien

        The ROCK is Babylon. And it is a SHE.

        1 Peter 5:13

        She who is in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you her greetings, and so does my son Mark.


        And so, one day, Jesus took his twelve disciples, most likely all of whom were in their teens or early twenties (but that’s a story for a different day), and said “we’re going to Caesarea Philippi” (if he even told them where they were going).

        he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”

        They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”

        “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?”

        Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” (Matthew 16:13-16)

        Nymph NicheNow, we don’t know for sure where they were standing in the Caesarea Philippi region, but Jesus’ next statement gives us an idea that they may have been standing within sight of the Rock of the Gods.

        Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. (Matthew 16:17-18)

        Jesus continues his short lesson, ‘calling’ (the greek literally meaning shouting at the top of his voice) to the crowd and his disciples.

        Then he called the crowd to him along with his disciples and said: “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it. What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul? If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father’s glory with the holy angels.” (Mark 8:34-38)

        This begs a few questions: What crowd did He call to him? Could it have been the Pan worshippers? Any crowd from this region would NOT have been religiously Jewish. Was the last statement aimed at his disciples, who might have been embarrassed at the spectacle Jesus was creating?

        So What?

        The Catholic tradition has taken Jesus’ pronouncement in Matther 16:18 to mean that Jesus was declaring that the church was to be built on the authority of Peter and the other disciples. It is true that they led the early church, so this would be a possible interpretation.

        The Protestant tradition has taken Jesus declaration here to say that His church was to be built upon the confession recognizing Him as the Messiah and the Son of the living God. This is a valid interpretation, as well, and is a practice supported by other scriptures.

        Pan ShrineRay VanderLaan and other Hebrew contextual scholars suggest a third interpretation which may be just as – if not more – powerful as the others, based on the context. Why would Jesus choose this place, the filthiest (morally) place within walking distance of his earthly region of ministry?

        Might it be possible that he took his talmidim to the most degenerate place possible to say to them “THIS is where I want you to build my church. I want you to go out into the repugnantly degenerate places, where God is not even known. I want you to go out to places that make Caesarea Philippi look tame, and THAT is where I want you to build my church.”

        • Damien

          The ROCK is Babylon. And it is a SHE.


          The Church built on it is a SHE rather. The idea of Christ presumably being that you go to the rock through HIS Church. HIS mother.

    • Amminadab

      Conclusions Evident with Additional Facts:

      The Roman Catholic Church (Papal Rome) is the beast from the sea of Rev 13, the woman of Rev 17 and the Babylon of Rev 18.

      The Papacy is the Antichrist of Rev 13, whose number is 666, and he is the little horn of Daniel 7 and 8. His mark of authority is Sunday worship (the mark of the beast).

      The Protestant churches derived from the Catholic Church are considered harlots. This is because they still adhere to much of the Catholic inspired false doctrine (like the dead go immediately to heaven or hell) and bear it’s mark of authority (Sunday worship). It can be shown that U.S. based Protestantism is in fact the False Prophet of Revelation, as well as the image to the beast, the beast being Catholicism.

      The power behind the Papacy of the Roman Catholic Church is none other than Satan. He first attempted to use Rome to kill the infant Jesus. He also used the Roman empire to try to exterminate the early Christians. This just forced Christianity underground, even in a literal sense, yet it still flourished. So Satan changed tactics and infiltrated the church through Pagan practices and began to persecute those who clung to true doctrine, by using the church itself as the exterminator. This era of papal power began in 538 A.D. and ended in 1798 a period of 1260 years. This is the period referred to as 1260 days, 42 months, and 3 1/2 times in the Bible.

      In all this, is there any good news? Yes, most definitely.

      Rev 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
      Rev 18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.

      It is clear that God has people that are now in Babylon. Everyone still has an opportunity to escape the wrath of God as manifested in the final 7 plagues. But in order to do so, you have to know who and what spiritual Babylon is. You must know the Antichrist and what the mark of the beast is and what the seal of God is. You have to be able to discriminate between true and false doctrine. You do all of this with the Bible. While Roman Catholicism is specifically evident as Babylon in scripture, it is actual broader than that. Spiritual Babylon is really a kind of corrupted religion, not just one denomination. Are you in Babylon? There is still time to get out of spiritual Babylon if you are in it – but it may not last much longer. Can you afford to wait? Would you bet your life (eternal) on it?

    • Jay

      So their wasn’t any Christians around until Luther decided to improve on the Bible by dropping the deuterocanonical books and by his divine will set up Lutheranism in place of Christianity .

      • Truthseeker

        Jay please do not use logic around Catholic’s they get very upset. Use the word “mystery” instead. Everything is a mystery to them.

        Martin Luther is just another ‘daughter’ that will very soon return to the Mother.

        • Damien

          Luther wanted to be with his mommy. He was devoted to her.

          • CAPTAIN CHAOS!!

            Damn straight he was. He was in her service from the beginning to the end.

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.