The Sandy Hook Hoax: How we know it didn't happen

The absence of evidence that should be present and the presence of evidence that should be absent are keys to unraveling Sandy Hook. And the suppression of the new documentary, “We need to talk about Sandy Hook”, appears to be backfiring. Proof of fraud and fakery continues to mount, substantiating it was a drill and no children died.

An interesting article comparing Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing was published by A.J. MacDonald, “Sandy Hook: Hoax or Truth?” He observed that, “The Boston bombing had everything Sandy Hook didn’t: video footage of the bombing, photos of the bombing, photos and videos of the wounded, and lots of blood.” But studies of the Boston bombing reveal the use of actors, fake blood and a staged sequence of events.

“The claim that Sandy Hook was a hoax”, he continues, “is founded upon the fact that we have no video of the shooter, no photos of the shooter, no video or photos of the victims, and no blood. And it seems to me that if lack of evidence is evidence of a hoax, then the Boston bombing isn’t a hoax. I’ve written on this subject before, and it boils down to epistemology, or answering the question: How do we know anything?”

But MacDonald only has it half-right: the absence of evidence counts as evidence only if the evidence that is absent should be present. And the presence of evidence only counts provided it is authentic rather than faked. When some evidence is on both sides, the challenge is to assess their respective weight on the basis of scientific principles of reasoning. Some cases, as we shall see, are easier to appraise than others.

Remember. Given the legal principle, “Fraud vitiates everything”, if it is provably false in even one material respect, the official account has been thereby vitiated. That is untrue of attempted falsifications, however, since any number of them could turn out to be mistaken as long as others that remain are valid. And, for those who want a refresher of the dimensions of the hoax, see “Sandy Hook: Ten more proofs that vitiate the official account”. It didn’t happen.

Absence of evidence that should be present

Consider the DASHCAM footage of the Sandy Hook parking lot at the times and locations where, according to the official report by Danbury State’s Attorney, Stephen Sedensky, some 469 students (not to mention the 75 staff, teachers, custodians, administrators and such) should have been evacuated. When we look at the footage, we discover they aren’t there! And they aren’t there because no evacuation was taking place:

YouTube – Veterans Today -

The claim is often made that you can’t prove a negative. But in this case, we just did:the DASHCAM footage shows that no evacuation was taking place. An even simpler case is the claim that there is an elephant in your living room. If you go to that location and find no indications of the presence of an elephant, you are entitled to infer there’s no elephant in your living room. And if there was no evacuation, it didn’t happen.