LORD JANNER Lawyers lose high court bid over child abuse charges BBC 13/08/15 + JANNER ARCHIVE
Lord Janner lawyers lose High Court bid over child abuse charges
-
11 minutes ago
- From the section UK
Lawyers for Lord Janner have lost a High Court bid to spare him attending court to face child sex abuse charges.
The 87-year-old peer, who has dementia, must now appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Friday in relation to 22 charges spanning the 1960s to the 1980s, which he denies. The ex-MP’s lawyers had argued it was “barbaric, inhumane and uncivilised” to force him to attend as he was too ill. But judges upheld a previous ruling that the 87-year-old must be present. Lord Janner’s lawyers are now considering whether to make an application to the Court of Appeal.
But, as it stands, Lord Janner must attend court or risk arrest, said BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw.
‘Public justice’
Lord Janner’s family have strongly denied claims he used his power as an MP to abuse young boys over a 30-year period. His lawyer argued he had “virtually no language left at all” and was likely to have a “catastrophic reaction” if he attended court. The previous ruling by district judges ordering him to attend in person was “perverse”, and violated his human rights, said Paul Ozin. However, giving her ruling Lady Justice Rafferty said even if Lord Janner did have a reaction to appearing in court it would be “short lived and rapidly forgotten”. Justice should be public and court not a place of avoidable spectacle, she said.
Lord Janner, pictured here with Tony Blair, has done nothing wrong, his family say
Lady Justice Rafferty, sitting with Mr Justice Irwin, said the court had “unhesitatingly concluded” that it was in the public interest that Lord Janner attend court. Mr Justice Irwin said if Mr Ozin’s arguments were to be accepted then notorious mentally ill homicide suspects might also not have to attend court.
Who is Lord Janner?
- Greville Janner was born in Cardiff in 1928
- Served in the Army and studied at Cambridge before becoming a barrister and then QC
- Labour MP for Leicester North West and then Leicester West from 1970 until retiring in 1997, when he was made a life peer
- Served as president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews
- Diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease in 2009
- Suspended from the Labour Party but will remain a member of the House of Lords until his death or until he retires
- Described by his family as a man of “great integrity” and “entirely innocent of any wrongdoing”
The case is likely to be sent to a crown court, which will decide whether Lord Janner is fit to face a trial. Earlier this year, Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders decided not to bring charges because of Lord Janner’s health – but this decision was overturned after an appeal by the alleged victims. If a crown court judge decides the former Labour MP for Leicester is fit to plead, a full trial may take place. If not, there will be a so-called trial of the facts, where a jury will decide only if he committed the physical acts of abuse, with no finding of guilt and no conviction. Greville Janner was made Lord Janner of Braunstone in 1997. He remains a life peer, but has been on leave of absence since 2014. He was suspended from the Labour Party in April.
-
High Court to rule on whether Janner court appearance is unlawful11 August 2015
-
Lord Janner told to attend court over child abuse charges7 August 2015
-
Lord Janner: Case puts spotlight on legal options
- JANNER TO FACE PROSECUTION – SAUNDERS RESPONDS – LATE NEWS 29/06/15http://www.vid.me/wbhp
- —————————————————–
- From Michael Murrin 29/06/15:
- http://www.facebook.com/pages/Campaign-Against-Child-Abuse/621212031266307?ref=bookmarks
- THE CORRUPTION OF ALISON SAUNDERS - DPP (8)
- The other thing to note is the nature of child sexual abuse and those who engage in it and promote it. P.I.E (The Paedophile Information Exchange) functioned as a lobby group in the UK for ten years. It operated openly with support from the former Home Secretary, Roy Jenkins. The Labour politicians, Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt et al, gave support to the organisation. The National Council for Civil Liberties (Now called LIBERTY) allowed P.I.E to affiliate with it thereby giving it credibility and promoting its cause. And what was that cause? The aim of P.I.E was to reduce the age of consent to just FIVE YEARS of AGE. Those named above, in effect, promoted sexual activity between adults and infant children. The tentacles of P.I.E reached deeply into the British Establishment, the Church, the Universities, the Labour Party and the Security Services. Get your head around this. Once you have done so you might start to appreciate the effect this evil has had on British society. And it is an evil. It is an evil that was openly and deliberately promoted by the like of Harman, Hewitt and Dromey et al. The cracks are now opening up and the like of Theresa May are desperately seeking to change their position to accommodate the change in the public mood. Never forget that May acted corruptly with the aim of securing an Inquiry which was totally under her control. Don’t be fooled by this devious and corrupt woman. Time will tell whether Justice Goddard proves to be the Oike from the provinces or the crook from the colonies. If she is party to the corruption of the Inquiry then she is a crook. We know she has a liking for the high life as she swans around London flaunting her designer wardrobe and £1,000 plus handbags. Is her integrity for sale? We will see. Also note that it would now be very convenient if the paedophile Peer, Janner, were to die. Certainly the security establishment has the knowledge and the means to ensure a death that appears to be by natural causes. The nature of the corruption and evil at the heart of this issue is such that no option should be discounted. If the paedophile Peer does die before the court hearing gets underway then be assured it will not have been a natural death. THE CORRUPTION OF ALISON SAUNDERS – DPP (7) After intense pressure the discredited Director of Public Prosecutions, Alison Saunders, has been forced to reverse her corrupt decision NOT to prosecute the paedophile Peer, Greville Janner. Saunders has now failed in her attempt to deny the victims of Janner their day in court. But why was she so determined to stop Janners prosecution? Perhaps the answer lies in the fact that statements made in the witness box are immune from libel proceedings and cannot be subject to legal injunctions? Is it the content of the witness testimony that is scaring the living daylights out of the paedophile establishment? Now watch to see if a bent judge is appointed to hear the case. If reporting restrictions are issued you can bet a buck or two that the judge has been especially selected to contain the case. Whilst this little drama of the paedophile Peer and his supporters unfolds do not forget the little matter of David Cameron and his association with the alleged paedophile Derek Laud. Actions speak louder than words and this is a government whose actions clearly indicate that it is seeking to pursue the paedophile agenda of sexualizing children. They are working towards introducing legislation to lower the age of consent to as low as 13. They are also further eroding parental control over children. Be in no doubt the P.I.E agenda is still being pursued by this paedophile establishment. Alison Saunders is an assigned gatekeeper of this establishment. The scum really has floated to the top. http://www.independent.co.uk/…/lord-janner-will-face-trial-…
- THE CORRUPTION OF ALISON SAUNDERS – DPP (4) The corrupt Director of Public Prosecutions, Alison Saunders, is coming under renewed pressure to reverse her blatantly corrupt decision to block the prosecution of the paedophile Peer, Lord Janner. following press reports that he ‘abused a boy on trip to Scotland’ – see below. Allegations concerning the probity and integrity of the Commissioner of The metropolitan Police, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe are also underway by independent investigators. It has been suggested by a National newspaper that Sir Bernard was responsible for the cover-up of and investigation into a Labour Peer who was accused of child sexual abuse. Sir Bernard has also been linked by sources within The Metropolitan Police to allegations that he consorted with rent boys. Investigations continue into the relationship between David Cameron and the alleged paedophile with connections to Dolphin Square, Derek Laud. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/…/Police-new-Janner-probe-Labour…
video: Janner to face prosection – early, 29/06/15
http://www.vid.me/e/Abfs?stats=1
———————————————
Lord Janner faces historical sex abuse prosecution
Lord Janner’s family has said he is “entirely innocent”
Lord Janner will be prosecuted over claims of historical sex abuse after a review overturned a CPS decision.
The Crown Prosecution Service announced in April that the 86-year-old would not be charged because of his severe form of dementia. An independent QC has now recommended the decision be overruled. Lord Janner, MP for Leicester West for 27 years, denies any wrongdoing and his family says the peer “is entirely innocent”. The case has been listed for Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 7 August. It was reviewed under the CPS Victims’ Right to Review Scheme, which allows people to have their case looked at again no matter who in the CPS took the decision not to prosecute. David Perry QC concluded that it was in the public interest to bring proceedings before a criminal court.
‘Borderline case’
Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said: “I have always said that in my view this was an extremely difficult and borderline case because of the strong arguments on both sides. I have also always emphasised my concern for the complainants in this case. “I understood their need to be heard, which is why I contacted Justice Goddard to ensure that they could give evidence as part of the public inquiry. However, the review has concluded that this forum, albeit a public one, cannot substitute for the adjudication of the courts. “I accept the outcome of the review and will now be bringing this prosecution to allow for that adjudication to happen.” The announcement reverses Ms Saunders decision in April that Lord Janner’s dementia meant he was not fit to stand trial and so it was not in the public interest for him to stand trial, despite there being sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of convictions. Solicitor Liz Dux, who represents some of the alleged victims, said: “This is a vindication of our efforts to challenge the DPP’s original decision not to charge Janner, which was clearly not in the interest of justice”. “Our clients have waited long enough for their very serious allegations to be brought before a court. They have felt deeply frustrated by the criminal justice system.”
JANNER ARCHIVE: https://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/18/please-sign-share-petitioning-the-cps-to-review-the-decision-not-to-prosecute-lord-greville-janner/JANNER CHARGED: JANNER ARCHIVE: UPDATED: PLEASE SIGN + SHARE = PETITIONING THE CPS TO REVIEW THE DECISION NOT TO PROSECUTE LORD GREVILLE JANNER + MORE!
Posted on April 18, 2015 by butlincatPlease sign + share petition for DPP to review decision not to prosecute Janner:
https://www.change.org/p/crown-prosecution-services-review-the-decision-not-to-prosecute-greville-janner
———-——————————————————
April ’15: The rape of justice: Damning new evidence of Labour peer Lord Janner’s child sex abuse covered up by police and social workers for over 20 years
———————————————————————————————————
Lord Janner charged child sex abuse in reversal of DPP decision http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5603/lord-janner-charged-with-child-sex-abuse-in-reversal-for-dpp
——————————————————————————————————– L
ord Janner faces historical sex abuse prosecution – BBC 29 JUNE ’15 http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33310095 Video: Sky “Wright Stuff” 29/06/15: http://www.vid.me/Abfs
—————————————————————————————————
JANNER – CAMERON KNEW WHAT WAS HAPPENING – CH. 4 http://www.facebook.com/453069988176899/videos/vb.453069988176899/528472713969959/?type=2&theatre
———————————————————————————————————
Greville Janner- Two Powers of Attorney – Health and Welfare, Property and Financial – 24 June
——————————————————————————————————
Labour peer Lord Janner ‘violated, raped and tortured’ children in PARLIAMENT, claims Simon Danczuk in bombshell debate – June 23 D. Mail source:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3136208/Labour-peer-Lord-Janner-violated-raped-tortured-children-PARLIAMENT-claims-Simon-Danczuk-bombshell-debate.html#ixzz3e4RsNM4z
—————————————————————
Lord Janner could face dementia test, child abuse lawyer says Peer’s alleged victims say they will ‘take advantage of every avenue they can pursue’
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/25/janner-could-face-dementia-test-child-abuse-lawyer-says
———————————————————
JANNER REAPPOINTED TO LAW COMMITTEE 22 MAY 2015
http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5565/lord-janner-re-appointed-to-law-committee-despite-dementia
—————————————————————
Mandy lobbied Blair to give Janner a peerage AFTER sex abuse claims: Grandee said to have asked then-Labour leader about ennobling him ahead of 1997 election http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3085573/Mandy-lobbied-Blair-Janner-peerage-sex-abuse-claims-Grandee-said-asked-Labour-leader-ennobling-ahead-1997-election.html#ixzz3aXKnpLYS
—————————————————————
Child Abuse Inquiry – Lord Janner May Be Called To Give Evidence
http://researchingreform.net/2015/04/29/child-abuse-inquiry-lord-janner-may-be-called-to-give-evidence/
29WednesdayApr 2015 posted by Natasha in child abuse inquiry
—————————————————————————-
Simon Danczuk
@SimonDanczuk Apr 28Home Office chiefs ignored FOURTH warning on Janner http://dailym.ai/1bMAPeW via@MailOnline—————————————————————————————————New Lord Janner ‘child abuse’ victims come forward 25 potential victims during Operation Enamel——————————————————–Archive of press cuttings on ‘alleged’ paedophile————————————————————————–The Telegraph @Telegraph Apr 25DPP Alison Saunders under more pressure over Lord Janner abuse claims http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11562812/DPP-Alison-Saunders-under-more-pressure-over-Lord-Janner-abuse-claims.html …pic.twitter.com/tM6ZIZNtj9——————————————————————————–“Saunders [DPP] trained at the same legal firm where Janner was a QC”
————————————————————————————————–
We had proof to charge [Janner] 20 yrs ago but top brass told us to stop’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3055680/Lord-Janner-detective-proof-charge-child-sex-politician-20-years-ago-brass-told-stop.html …
#OpDeathEaters pic.twitter.com/M0cMdIelUJ————————————————————–——————-
Janner went on 20 working trips abroad after Alzheimer diagnosis
—————————————
Boris Johnson – London mayor weighs in after cross-party letter says public confidence in justice system has been damaged by decision not to prosecute over child abuse claims
‘Have we learnt anything from the mistakes of the past?’ the letter to the Times asks following the decision by Alison Saunders, the director of public prosecutions. Pressure is building on the director of public prosecutions to reverse her decision not to prosecute Lord Janner over child abuse claims after cross-party figures signed a letter to the Times.
source: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/apr/22/mps-letter-pressure-ddp-reverse-decision-lord-janner-labour-peer
——————————————-
Greville Janner’s alleged ‘victims’ sue for £100,000 each
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/greville-janners-alleged-victims-sue-5540690
—————————————————————
Janner Request To Keep Seat In Lords
http://www.wp.me/p2qaUb-5OI
——————————————————————————
WESTMINSTER PAEDO RING – WITNESS SHOWS ABUSE LOCATIONPosted on December 21, 2014
————————————————————————————Lord Janner will not face child sex abuse charges, CPS says – 16 April 2015
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leicestershire-32329924
—————————————————————————————-
“Why wasn’t Janner charged earlier?” demands man who alleges peer indecently assaulted him” April 18 2015
——————————————————————————————-
Petitioning Crown prosecution services
Review the decision not to prosecute greville janner
please sign + share https://www.change.org/p/crown-prosecution-services-review-the-decision-not-to-prosecute-greville-janner
Darren Knights Woodbridge, United Kingdom
2,185 supportersWe the public believe it is in the interests of the public to have this man in court and tried for his crimes against children, there is overwhelming evidence in the public domain against this man let alone the evidence the police and intel agency’s must be sitting on.Letter toCrown prosecution servicesReview there decision not to prosecute greville jannerUpdates“WHY HASNT GREVILLE JANNER BEEN ARRESTED YET?” + DPP STATEMENT: “THE DECISION NOT TO PROSECUTE LORD JENNER”
Why the hell hasn’t Greville Janner been arrested yet?
In September 2104, we wrote a post about child-raping filth Greville Janner. Quite unbelievably , despite witness statements from many boys, the CPS are still fucking dithering about whether or not to arrest him. Hoping he’ll ‘die‘ like his pal Leon Brittan are they? Or catch a plane back to his homeland in Israel? Pull your fingers out you complicit scum. Here’s the post in question ” Jewish peer, Greville Janner, is one of the most repulsive, twisted, slimy, pieces of paedophilic filth, walking the earth today. As chairman of Britain’s Holocaust Educational Trust, Janner has spent a lifetime ‘hunting down’ Nazis, allegedly accused of war crimes during WWII, and has often vowed to target them even if they’re elderly, frail or suffering from serious illness. So when the tables are turned on child-raping Janner, we should be just as resilient in ensuring that he doesn’t escape justice either and we should indeed hunt him down too, despite the hilarious claims that he is himself now frail and suffering from paedophilia-induced ‘amnesia’ ( what an absolute pile of cack). Of course, Janner is no ordinary, run-of-the-mill politician. Due to his links to Israel and Mossad, he could be described as one of filthy Britain’s ‘untouchables’ and has been allowed to travel the land raping young boys at will, knowing full well that he would be protected by his friends in high places. In fact a Leicestershire police officer has come forward with shocking claims that he was ordered to limit any abuse probe into Janner when he was first investigated over the rape of a vulnerable care-home boy who he buggered for over two years solid. According to the Mail: ” Police chiefs blocked a paedophile probe into a top politician 25 years ago, one of the country’s most senior officers said yesterday.Derbyshire Chief Constable Mick Creedon was serving as a detective sergeant in Leicestershire when allegations surfaced against Labour MP Greville Janner in 1989.Mr Creedon said he was ordered to limit his inquiries into the MP, now Lord Janner of Braunstone.He was forbidden from arresting the politician or searching his home, despite ‘credible evidence’ that warranted further investigation.The chief constable said the message was passed on by a superintendent, but he believes it came from higher up. ‘The decision was clear, he will be interviewed by appointment and there won’t be a search of his home, his constituency office or his office in the Commons,’ he said, adding: ‘It was a decision made by people more senior than me.’His comments are likely to fuel widespread dissatisfaction with the way allegations against Lord Janner were originally handled.The claims surfaced during an investigation into Frank Beck, the manager of Leicester children’s homes, who died in jail after being convicted of abusing boys in his care.”In 2013, we published the following post about Janner and the mysterious death of Frank Beck:” In 1994, Frank Beck died in Whitemoor prison whilst serving a staggering 5 life sentences for alleged child abuse.Frank Beck had been implicated in the abuse of boys in Leicestershire care homes. Frank Beck had always maintained his innocence and claimed he was imprisoned because he’d exposed alleged abuse by a high-profile politician. Frank Beck was appealing against his conviction and sentence. Leave to appeal and legal aid were granted in January 1993 and Anthony Scrivener QC, one of Britain’s most eminent lawyers and former chairman of the Bar, agreed to take the case. Frank Beck’s solicitor said at the time of his death ‘He was very impatient for the appeal to go ahead. His death came out of the blue. Normally the case would lapse and die with him but his family and close friends are discussing the possibility of carrying on with the appeal. This would not be unprecedented.’ Beck was convinced there was enough new evidence and material that was not put before the original court due to non-disclosure by the prosecution which would have made the original conviction unsafe and proved his innocence.’ In 2011 the following anonymous comments were left on a blog which was discussing his death: “ In 1991, after accusing Janner of paedophilic behaviour with a teenager, Frank Beck was arrested and charged with the sexual and physical abuse of children in his care over a thirteen-year period. At his trial Beck stated that: – “One child has been buggered and abused for two solid years by Greville Janner“. Immediately after this, Janner who just happens to be, ironically, a long time member of the boy scouts association, and Sir David Napley, his solicitor, went to Police headquarters in Leicester. Whereupon, the following statement was issued: “We have advised Mr. Janner that he is prevented from making any statement at this stage”. Shortly afterwards, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alan Green, let it be known that “for lack of evidence”, Janner would not be prosecuted, even though Paul Winston, who was just thirteen when he and Janner first met, was able to describe Janner‘s home, the hotel rooms they had shared, and Janner’s habits and person in detail. The Director of Public Prosecutions, himself, was arrested for kerb-crawling in Kings Cross a little while later. Green had come to the attention of the police previously for this same misdemeanour and was quietly given a formal warning. The scandal prompted his resignation from public office and the suicide of his wife. In court, Paul Winston, who was, at the time of Beck’s trial, a married man with children, stood up for him, as did several other witnesses, paying credit to his achievements and behaviour and confirming his anti-Janner testimony. He said Beck had counselled him over his relationship with the MP, and had brought the affair to an end. He also stated that he had had a beneficial effect on his life. According to Winston’s evidence, he was invited to Janner’s home near Golders Green, whilst Janner‘s wife was away, and this led to his sharing Janner’s bed where they “cuddled and fondled each other”. Thereafter Winston testified that, over the next two years, he was regularly sodomised by Janner. Beck discovered what had been going on after Winston was put into his care, at which point, he informed his superiors at Leicester Social Services. At one point, Janner visited the care home with a new bicycle for Paul but Beck denied him entry and would not allow the gift to be passed on. This was confirmed by another witness at the trial. Nevertheless, Beck was found guilty and sentenced to twenty-four years in prison, with five life sentences to run concurrently for his “crimes”. Janner was never brought to court, nor was he ever called upon to testify. Frank Beck died suddenly of a “heart attack”, shortly before his appeal was due to begin. He was, by all accounts, a fit man at the time of his death. He never stopped protesting his innocence and Janner’s guilt. His two main solicitors, who admitted to being sceptical in the first instance, believed him at the time that he was found guilty. One of these solicitors has since been killed in a road accident, and the other has been subjected to police harassment on a major scale. Frank Beck was a resident of Braunstone in Leicester when the events described above were taking place. When Janner was ennobled in 1997, he took the title, Lord Janner of Braunstone. The man responsible for ennobling Greville Janner was Tony Blair. The following very interesting comments were left : ” I was in the courtroom when beck gave his evidence in full :his death by food poisoning in custody was very convenient for all those he said he had supplied the boys to in the local area .” ” Blair had a macabre sense of humour as Braunstone is the area Frank Beck used to live in. Beck was guilty. But he almost nailed Greville Janner.” It has since emerged that the disappearance of Maddie McCann may be connected in some way to the VIP abuse ring operating in this country. The McCann’s have also received extra-special treatment from the authorities and coincidentally live in Leicestershire, where Gerry is thought to be a high-ranking Freemason. Intel agent, Clarence Mitchell was sent as their spokesman, and strangely was also one of the first people at the scene of the murder of Jill Dando. Jill knew all about the VIP paedo-ring and was silenced by Mossad and Blair because she about to blow the lid. One of Greville Janner’s close friends is Margaret Oppenheimer-Hodge, who was responsible for the Islington children’s home abuse ring cover-up which culminated in the death of Jason Swift. She also deliberately made sure children were sent to Jersey to be abused and murdered at the Haut de la Gaurenne care home by VIP filth. Quite unbelievably, her nephew Philip Edmond, was holidaying at the same resort as the McCanns’ when their daughter went missing, and he flew back to England just before the news broke of her disappearance. The Mark Warner resort in Portugal is also close to the home of Cliff Richard. Cliff was forced to befriend Jill and find out how much she knew about paedophile politicians and royals. https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/barry-george-jill-dando-jimmy-savile-bbc-paedophiles-cliff-richard-alan-farthing-nick-ross-and-britains-dirty-secrets/ On his 51st birthday, Paul Boateng, another Labour Peer, was serenaded in the House of Commons by Michael Jackson, who was on a visit to the UK, organised by Uri Geller and Greville Janner. In the 80’s a child-abuse scandal swept the London Borough of Lambeth, where thousands of children were subjected to horrific abuse in council-run care homes. The abuse was carried out with the full complicity of Lambeth social services and the police. By strange coincidence, the head of social services throughout this period was none other than Janet Boateng, the wife of Paul Boateng. Quite why she has never been investigated for any wrongdoing is a complete and utter mystery. It’s a little know fact that Cliff Richard is close pals with the Blairs: ” It’s comforting to find that beloved Christian singer Cliff Richard has friends in high places. He kindly lent his villa in Barbados to close chum Tony Blair. Cliff was so concerned that Tony was looking ‘haggard’ after starting the Iraq war that he took it upon himself to do a good deed. Tony’s wife Cherie Blair QC is also close to Cliff. She loves nothing better than to attend award ceremonies with Cliff and let the world know what a great guy he is. They’ve even been joined by another pal, TV personality Melvyn Bragg. Some voices have alleged that Cliff and Melvyn share a rather repulsive hobby that the average person would find sickening. Other voices have alleged that Cliff is linked to notorious boy-brothel Elm Guest House and used the pseudonym, Kitty. Yet others claim that Cliff is a person of interest to Operation Fernbridge officers and may be linked to the murder of Jill Dando, who knew all about the paedophile ring at the BBC. Some have questioned why Cliff recently renounced his British citizenship and is now a fully-fledged Barbadian.” Cliff once went on a fact-finding mission with child-rapist Jimmy Savile and Lord Longford: ” One of Myra Hindley’s most famous supporters was Lord Longford, who spent years lobbying for her release. Lord Longford went on a fact-finding mission in the ’70′s to investigate pornography. He took along Jimmy Savile and Cliff Richard. Jill Dando knew all about the BBC paedo-ring run by Savile and told her close chum Cliff. She was soon shot dead on her doorstep as a warning to others to keep their mouths shut. Longford was the uncle of Harriet Harman MP, who has recently been embroiled in the recent PIE paedophile scandal. Harman is in turn a cousin of Prime Minister David Cameron, who is in turn a cousin of the Queen. Another high-profile Hindley campaigner was wealthy journo, David Astor who spent 20 years corresponding with her and was close to Longford: ” Longford and Astor had known each other since Oxford. Their paths had often crossed in the beaten ways of liberal postwar Britain, and they shared an interest in prison reform. Astor was agnostic, verging on atheist, Longford a devout Roman Catholic. Both were fascinated by the idea of redemption.” By a strange coincidence, David Astor was the step-uncle of Samantha Cameron.” Times editor, Danny Finkelstein, is a huge fan of Janner. You see, the real Danny Finkelstein is what one might call a ‘great pretender’. He’s merely pretending to be who he says he is, when in fact he’s one of a small group of ‘behind the scenes’ players who despise Britain and are pushing a sickening agenda that seeks to destroy this once great nation. Danny ‘the fink’, runs the hugely powerful and influential, Policy Exchange organisation. Policy Exchange claims to merely discuss political policy-making, but in fact writes the policies that Cameron, Gove, Osbourne and IDS have so disastrously adopted. http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/people/trustees The current education minister, Michael Gove, is extremely close to Finkelstein. He used to run Policy Exchange. They both adore child-raping Labour Peer, Greville Janner. Some might call Gove, Finkelstein’s whipping boy. Gove has recently been in the headlines because he mysteriously dismissed calls for the mandatory reporting of sex-abuse claims by pupils in schools. He claimed that the idea would swamp ” child protection” officials. http://www.exaronews.com/articles/4999/michael-gove-blocks-move-to-force-schools-to-report-sex-abuse In light of the many recent scandals in private boys schools this pathetic excuse seem incredulous. Did Finkelstein have a hand in Gove’s bizarre decision not to allow abuse to be reported? The brilliant writer, Chris Spivey, has been pivotal in reporting on the huge numbers of children taken into care by social workers when their parents have done nothing wrong. http://chrisspivey.org/ These children are often then abused in care homes by VIP filth. In a recent article, Spivey exposed the links between the government’s faked austerity measures and the rise in the number of children being taken into care because their parents have been sanctioned by the DWP and they are left penniless and sometime homeless. Danny Finkelstein commissioned a report into benefit sanctions and appeared to have invented a fairer approach, but it’s actually more callous than ever. Fake-football ‘lover’ Danny wants to introduce a sinister yellow card warning system which promises much stricter punishments for anyone who deviates. http://socialwelfare.bl.uk/subject-areas/services-activity/poverty-benefits/policyexchange/160124smartersanctions.pdf This begs the question, why, oh why, would Danny Finkelstein want parents to lose their benefits and have their children taken into care? We published the following claims about Finkelstein which he didn’t take too kindly too and accused us (and our readers) of being ‘nutters’ and needing our heads examining: https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/max-clifford-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/ Between 1981 and 1990 Finkelstein was a member of the SDP and in 1987 was defeated in the Brent East by-election. It’s highly likely he came across child-raping filth, Cyril Smith MP. Finkelstein switched political allegiance and joined the Tories, where he became political advisor to bald oddity, William Hague. Hague himself is up to his neck in filth of the highest order and may have lots to tell the authorities about his links to the notorious Dolphin Square boy-brothel and the North Wales care-home scandal. He was also the toy-boy of Margaret Thatcher, who spent a staggering amount of time with close chum, Jimmy Savile. We now know that Jill Dando was shot in the head because she was about to blow the lid on the BBC paedophile-ring, linked to Savile, Parliament and the Royals. Her high-profile death was a warning to others to keep their mouth shut too. The Crimestoppers helpline, run by Nick Ross, conveniently stopped working when an appeal was made for information about Jill’s murder. Ross, who recently said he’d watch child-porn given half the chance, is married to the cousin of Esther Rantzen. Rantzen runs the Childline charity and has been accused of ignoring the victims of Savile at the BBC. Some voices claim that both organisations are used to gather and suppress reports of VIP child-abuse. According to the Spectator: ” Lord Finkelstein is closer by far to George Osborne. One senior Times writer told me three years ago that he spoke ‘six or seven times a day. probably more’ to the Chancellor. Mr Osborne once reportedly remarked that he spoke to Mr Finkelstein more often then he did to his wife. But when Mr Osborne appeared in front of Lord Justice Leveson, the following exchange occurred: Q. ‘Does he [Finkelstein] act for you as a sort of unpaid adviser and/or speech writer?’ A. ‘No, he’s just a very good friend.’ Osbourne has been embroiled in his own scandals after details emerged of his cocaine-habit and love of brothels. In 2005, the BBC held a debate in response to the 7/7 bombings: ” To the Everyman Cinema last night with Tom Brent for a public meeting on current affairs. BBC presenter Emily Maitlis chaired a brisk discussion in which Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, outshone distinguished panelists Sir Leon Brittan, Simon Hughes, and Daniel Finkelstein.” Brittan and Hughes have both been linked to sordid allegations of abuse against boys. Was Finkelstein aware of these allegations? For many years, Daniel Finkelstein ran a company called ‘The Generation of Change Ltd’ with Neil Sherlock. http://companycheck.co.uk/company/02499621/THE-GENERATION-OF-CHANGE-LIMITED/directors-shareholders Sherlock became Nick Clegg’s special adviser in his private office and his wife, Kathryn Parminter, used to work as a parliamentary research assistant for Simon Hughes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathryn_Parminter,_Baroness_Parminter Nick Clegg has been accused of covering-up what he knew about Cyril Smith and his child-raping ways. In 2012, for some unknown reason, Finkelstein wrote an article for the Times, entitled, ‘The dead can’t enter a plea of guilty’. The article appeared to cast doubt on the abuse claims made against Cyril Smith and Jimmy Savile: ” Cyril Smith may have been a monster. But until we have reliable evidence we must not rush to judgment . Can I ask you a question? How do you know, really know, that Jimmy Savile is guilty of child abuse? The truth, let’s face it, is that you don’t. You are like me. You’ve perhaps heard one or two TV interviews with victims. You’ve read the odd article including some fairly damning quotes. You’ve gathered that there is a police investigation and that, as a result, a number of famous people have been arrested, although oddly always in connection with allegations that have nothing to do with Savile. And, most of all, you’ve heard people say that he always looked a little fishy and that come to think of it it was a dead giveaway that he always waltzed around in one of those gold lamé tracksuits that paedos love to wear. And that hair. And “now then, now then”. He definitely did it.” The following anonymous comments were left on a blog, detailing the case of Labour Peer, Greville Janner: ” After accusing Janner of paedophilic behaviour with a teenager, care worker, Frank Beck was arrested and charged with the sexual and physical abuse of children in his care over a thirteen-year period. At his trial Beck stated that: – “One child has been buggered and abused for two solid years by Greville Janner“. Immediately after this, Janner who just happens to be, ironically, a long time member of the boy scouts association, and Sir David Napley, his solicitor, went to Police headquarters in Leicester. Whereupon, the following statement was issued: “We have advised Mr. Janner that he is prevented from making any statement at this stage”. Shortly afterwards, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alan Green, let it be known that “for lack of evidence”, Janner would not be prosecuted, even though Paul Winston, who was just thirteen when he and Janner first met, was able to describe Janner‘s home, the hotel rooms they had shared, and Janner’s habits and person in detail. The Director of Public Prosecutions, himself, was arrested for kerb-crawling in Kings Cross a little while later. Green had come to the attention of the police previously for this same misdemeanour and was quietly given a formal warning. The scandal prompted his resignation from public office and the suicide of his wife.” Daniel Finkelstein must have been aware of the accusations against Janner but, for some unknown reason, posted the following tweet: ” Watching Greville Janner in 1970 election prog. Attractive, incisive, intelligent, moderate. How did he not end up one of Lab’s leaders?” The two were also listed together in the JC as being highly influential in their respective fields: http://www.thejc.com/jc-power-100/the-jc-power-100-numbers-11-20 ” The highest judge in the land is Lord David Neuberger. He used to work at N.M Rothschild and Sons and is married to Angela Holdsworth. He was responsible for evicting the Parliament Square peace campaign. In May 2011, while commenting on super injunctions, he said that social media sites like Twitter were “totally out of control” and society should consider ways to bring such websites under control. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Neuberger,_Baron_Neuberger_of_Abbotsbury By a very strange twist, his wife Angela, was a BBC executive for many years and must have known about Jimmy Savile’s child-raping activities. She also worked with Nick Ross and Esther Rantzen on the controversial BBC show, Man Alive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_Alive_(BBC_TV_series) Angela Holdsworth then became the editor of another well-known programme. That programme was none-other than Crimewatch. http://www.angelaholdsworth.com/ The phone-hacking judge, Brian Levenson was involved in the trial of Barry George. Some claim the hacking scandal was a deliberate set-up to clamp down on the media. Following the death of Jill Dando, a new research centre in her name was formed: ” The UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science is the first Institute in the world devoted to Crime Science. Research is concentrated on new ways to cut crime and increase security ” . By a strange twist, the Board of the Institute is run by none other than Nick Ross and Professor Anthony Finkelstein. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdi/people/tabbed-box/board Anthony Finkelstein is Daniel Finkelstein’s brother.” We then made a shocking discovery. Jailed pervert, Max Clifford, uses the following shady business address: 11-15 Acre House William Road London United Kingdom NW1 3ER In February 2013, we were given a tip-off that Acre House is linked to less-than-kosher Conservative monetary shenanigans: https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/acre-house-11-15-william-road-london/ By a strange coincidence, Finkelstein’s Policy Exchange uses the same address. So does Tory child-pimp, Derek Laud. So does crooked Gerald Ronson. So does Leon Brittan. https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/max-clifford-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/ Quite why they all share this debauched address is a complete and utter mystery. But this shit just gets deeper and deeper. What many people aren’t aware of is that Greville Janner and his sons are all high-ranking barristers and are well aware of how easy it is for someone to avoid justice by claiming they have dementia or Alzheimer’s and would be unable to recall key facts. Well that’s not going to f*****g cut it in this case. Janner should surely be proud of our persistence in hunting him down to the bitter end. He did it to the ‘ Nazis’ so we’re merely returning the favour. Don’t worry Grev, we won’t let you down. You’ll get what’s coming to you. It’s only a matter of time… https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2015/04/09/the-weird-world-of-danny-finkelstein/
https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/03/22/greville-janner-tony-blair-madeline-mccann-margaret-hodge-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/ ( Notes: According to scholars: ” The Talmud is Judaism’s holiest book (actually a collection of books). Its authority takes precedence over the Old Testament in Judaism. Evidence of this may be found in the Talmud itself, Erubin 21b (Soncino edition): “My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah (Old Testament).” Indeed, the Talmud is the very law that Jewish followers must follow: ” The Talmud “ ” The Talmud is the comprehensive written version of the Jewish oral law and the subsequent commentaries on it. It originates from the 2nd century CE. The word Talmud is derived from the Hebrew verb ‘to teach’, which can also be expressed as the verb ‘to learn’. The Talmud is the source from which the code of Jewish Halakhah (law) is derived. It is made up of the Mishnah and the Gemara. The Mishnah is the original written version of the oral law and the Gemara is the record of the rabbinic discussions following this writing down. It includes their differences of view. The Talmud can also be known by the name Shas. This is a Hebrew abbreviation for the expression Shishah Sedarim or the six orders of the Mishnah.” Does the Talmud hold the secret to the murderous child-abuse ring that has been operating in this country for decades and has seen thousands upon thousands of innocent British children raped and killed? We haven’t got a clue. But what we do know is that some of the Talmudic texts below give an indication that in Judaism, non-Jewish children are absolute filth, not even human, and can be treated like animals ( apparently sanctioned by God): – When a man commits sodomy with a boy under nine years of age, it “is not deemed as pederasty” (Sanhedrin, 54b,55a). – Sexual intercourse with a boy under the age of eight is lawful since it isn’t fornication (Sanhedrin, 69b). 1) ” Sanhedrin 54b.: A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.“ 2) Kethuboth 11b. : When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing. 3) Yebamoth 98a. : All Gentile (Non-Jewish) children are animals. 4) Baba Mezia 114a-114b. : Only Jews are human. Schene luchoth haberuth, p 250b. : Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew as a monkey to a human. Baba Mezia, 114b (page referrals). : The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts. 5) Baba Kamma 113a.: Jews may use lies (subterfuges) to circumvent a Gentile (Non-Jew). 6) Sanhedrin 57a. : A Jew need not pay a Gentile (Non-Jew) the wages owed him for work. 7) Sepher Ikkarim III c 25. : It is permited to take the body and life of a Gentile (Non-Jew). 8) Bammidber raba c 21 & jalkut 772.: Every Jew who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God. 9) It is lawful for a girl three years old to have sexual intercourse (Abodah Zarah, 37a; Kethuboth, 11b,39a; Sanhedrin, 55b,69a,b; Yebamoth, 12a,57b,58a,60b) 10) Since all Gentiles are only animals, all Gentile children are bastards (Yebamoth, 98a). ) http://www.rense.com/general79/talmud.htm ”source: https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2015/04/13/why-the-hell-hasnt-greville-janner-been-arrested-yet/
The decision not to prosecute Lord Janner – statement from the DPP
16/04/2015
1. The CPS has concluded that Lord Greville Janner should not be prosecuted because of the severity of his dementia which means he is not fit to take part in any proceedings, there is no treatment for his condition, and there is no current or future risk of offending.
The reasons for making a public statement in this case
2. The CPS has carefully considered whether it is appropriate to make a public statement in relation to this case, explaining the reasons for this decision and has decided that it is appropriate to do so. There has been considerable public interest, and media coverage, of the fact of the investigations including identifying Lord Janner as the subject of them. Indeed, concern has been expressed publicly of a ‘cover up’. The allegations that have been made against Lord Janner are extremely serious. Those who have made them are, entirely understandably, vociferous in urging the taking of action against Lord Janner. The reasons for the decision not to do so require explanation in some detail in order to be properly understood and to avoid the inevitable speculation that would follow were no explanation to be given. As appears below, this is not a straightforward case in which the conclusion is simply that the evidence does not warrant taking further action. Moreover, the CPS considers that some of the decisions made by both itself and by the police in relation to past investigations relating to Lord Janner were wrong. This statement is also necessary in order for it to be made clear what the role of the CPS is in making this decision – including in particular to emphasise that the CPS is in no sense deciding or implying that the allegations that have been made are established or that Lord Janner is guilty of any offence. For all of those reasons, it is right in this case that there should be a public explanation of the conclusions reached by the CPS.
The most recent and past investigations in relation to Lord Janner
3. Operation Enamel was initiated in January 2013. It was a thorough and comprehensive investigation by Leicestershire Police into allegations against Lord Greville Janner of non-recent sexual abuse. It included, as part of the investigation, a review by police of complaints against Lord Janner from three previous police investigations between 1991 and 2007. As part of those investigations Lord Janner was interviewed by police in 1991. 4. In relation to Operation Enamel, more than a dozen individuals made allegations to police relating to Lord Janner. Most of them were residents in Leicestershire children’s homes between 1970 and the mid to late 1980s. The children and young people in this case were vulnerable and in a situation where they should have been looked after and protected. The allegations in this case are thus extremely serious, with a number of alleged victims and allegations of multiple offending over a lengthy period of time. The core allegation was that Lord Janner, in a position of authority and trust as the local MP for Leicester West at the time, befriended the manager of a children’s care home to allow him access to children in order to allow him to perpetrate serious sexual offences on children. 5. Evidence relating to ten individuals was developed by the police and CPS to the fullest extent possible. The investigation included a search of Lord Janner’s home in December 2013, and the recovery of material from Lord Janner’s Millbank offices in March 2014. It also included an invitation for interview – but medical concerns were raised and an independent police neuropsychiatrist’s report meant that no interview took place. Material was still being passed to the CPS shortly before Easter 2015. 6. In relation to the three previous police investigations, the complaints and the decision making by police and the CPS at the time were as follows:
- A complaint of sexual assaults by one individual who featured in the trial of Frank Beck in 1991. The allegation, in essence, was one of grooming and sexual abuse of the alleged male victim between the ages of 13 and 15. The advice given at the time by the CPS was that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute.
- Complaints by one individual during Operation Magnolia in 2002. Although Lord Janner was the subject of allegations during this Operation, which was an investigation into a relevant children’s home, it does not appear that specific allegations relating to him were referred to the CPS. It is apparent that the police decided that no further action should be taken against Lord Janner. The CPS decided at the time that no further action should be taken against any other individual.
- In Operation Dauntless in 2006, an individual made allegations of serious sexual offending around 1981 by three individuals including Lord Janner. The CPS decision in 2007 was again that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute.
The CPS’s functions in making the decisions it has
7. Before setting out the main conclusions that the CPS have reached on the available evidence, it is important to emphasise and to be clear about the CPS’s functions and the nature of this part of its decision making. 8. The CPS considers cases on the basis of the evidence available at the time the charging decision is to be taken. It applies the well-known two stage test set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors: the evidential test and the public interest test. 9. The evidential test involves an assessment, on the then state of the evidence, by the CPS as to whether that evidence provides a realistic prospect of conviction. The CPS’s function is not to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges for the criminal court to consider. The CPS assessment of any case is thus not in any sense a finding of, or implication of, any guilt or criminal conduct. It is not a finding of fact, which can only be made by a court, but rather an assessment of what it might be possible to prove to a court, in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors, a copy of which is provided here: www.cps.gov.uk/publications/code_for_crown_prosecutors/index.html
10. This assessment is based on the evidence available arising out of the police investigation and not on the evidence that is likely to be gathered by the defence, and likely to be used to test the prosecution evidence. The CPS charging decision is therefore necessarily an assessment on the basis of the evidence that is available to the CPS at the time the decision is made. CPS prosecutors must also keep every case under review, so that they take account of any change in circumstances that occurs as the case develops, including what becomes known of the defence case. If appropriate, the CPS may change the charges or stop a case. 11. The public interest test is considered if the evidential test is passed. All matters relevant to whether it is in the public interest to prosecute are considered.
The evidential test: the CPS’s main conclusions in relation to Operation Enamel and the past investigations
12. With that explanation of functions in mind, the CPS has reached the following conclusions in relation to the evidential test, as a result of the investigations and reviews undertaken in this case.
- In relation to the allegations investigated in Operation Enamel, the CPS considers that the evidential test was passed on the basis that the evidence is sufficient to have warranted charging and prosecuting LordJanner in relation to the particular charges listed below; these relate to nine individuals:
- 14 indecent assaults on a male under 16 between 1969 and 1988
- 2 indecent assaults between 1984 and 1988
- 4 counts of buggery of a male under 16 between 1972 and 1987
- 2 counts of buggery between 1977 and 1988.
- In relation to the other three previous investigations, the CPS also now considers that the evidential test was passed. It follows that the CPS judges that mistakes were made in the decision making at the time by both the Leicestershire police in 2002 and the CPS in 1991 and 2007. Lord Janner should have been prosecuted in relation to those complaints.
13. It is a matter of deep regret that the decisions in relation to the previous investigations were as they were. Had the previous decisions been to prosecute, as they should have been, Lord Janner would have had the opportunity to challenge the evidence and defend himself through the trial process, with a jury ultimately deciding on his guilt or innocence some years ago. Victims of the alleged offences have been denied the opportunity of criminal proceedings in relation to the offences of which they have complained. It is of obvious and particular concern that such proceedings did not take place as a result of what the CPS now consider to be wrong decisions. In order to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice and to seek to learn appropriate lessons, the CPS has asked retired High Court Judge, Sir Richard Henriques, to conduct a thorough and independent review into the CPS decision making and handling of all past matters relating to this case; and to make whatever recommendations he considers appropriate. He has agreed to undertake this task.
The public interest test and Lord Janner’s medical condition
14. The question that remains is whether there should be a prosecution of Lord Janner now. The second stage of the test already referred to is the public interest test. The CPS’s conclusion, for the reasons that follow, is that it would not be in the public interest to launch criminal proceedings now. 15. At the outset, it is emphasised that but for medical considerations, it would undoubtedly have been in the public interest to prosecute. Public interest factors in favour of a prosecution include that the allegations are of very serious offending; the complainants were young, vulnerable children and the allegations involve the alleged abuse of power and position. The CPS equally has no doubt that, if the correct decisions had been taken about the evidential test in relation to the previous investigations, the public interest test would have been passed and prosecution should have followed. 16. However, the public interest test now has to be considered in the light of current facts. The key facts for that purpose relate to Lord Janner’s present medical condition. They are as follows. 17. In 2009, Lord Janner was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, which is the most common cause of dementia. Alzheimer’s disease is a physical disease affecting the brain. Alzheimer’s is a progressive disease, which means that gradually, over time, more parts of the brain are damaged. As this happens, the symptoms become more severe. There is no treatment or cure. 18. Four medical experts, all experienced and highly qualified, have examined Lord Janner – two instructed by his own legal team, two by the police and prosecutors. The most recent medical report is dated 31 March 2015. The key findings are as follows:
- Lord Janner is suffering from a degenerative dementia which is rapidly becoming more severe. He requires continuous care both day and night.
- His evidence could not be relied upon in court and he could not have any meaningful engagement with the court process, and the court would find it impossible to proceed.
- On the Mini Mental State examination all four doctors were in general agreement as to the level of cognitive ability.
- The condition will only deteriorate, there is no prospect of recovery.
- Manipulation (“putting it on”) is “out of the question”
- There is no risk of future offending.
19. The CPS considers that in the light of the medical evidence Lord Janner would inevitably be found not fit to plead, not fit to instruct his legal team and not fit to challenge or give evidence in a trial. That means that a criminal trial, to determine whether or not he was guilty of any offence, could not now properly take place. 20. The CPS has considered with particular care whether it would nevertheless be appropriate to launch a fitness to plead process. In such a process, there is no determination of the criminal charge, no criminal verdict and no question of conviction or punishment. The powers of the court are “restricted to measures designed to treat, rehabilitate and support while, in the most serious cases, providing protection for the public” (Wells, Masud, Hone and Kail and R [2015] EWCA Crim 2.) 21. There are thus some cases in which such a process may be appropriate in order for example to protect the public either by a hospital order or by a supervision order. However, in this case, the CPS judges that the outcome of such proceedings would not only be without conviction, but would also result in an absolute discharge. The medical evidence establishes both that there is no current risk of re-offending identified and that there is no likelihood of the defendant recovering from his medical condition (and thus that there is no future risk of reoffending either). Balancing these factors with those in favour of prosecution, the balance is that there is not a public interest in commencing criminal proceedings in this case. 22. Lord Janner’s medical condition has been explained to all those individuals whose allegations have sufficient evidence to be tried in the criminal courts. Each of them has made it clear that they wish to tell their stories publicly. I sincerely hope that this can be achieved through the victims giving evidence before the Independent Inquiry into child sexual abuse. I have referred this to the Inquiry team which has confirmed that this case would be covered by the scope of the Inquiry and that those who have made allegations in this case would be able to give evidence to the Inquiry. They have offered to speak to the complainants to explain this. 23. The lack of a prosecution will be extremely disappointing to complainants. I have written to each of them, explaining the reasons for the decision, inviting them to a meeting with me so that Ican explain any matters to them further, should they wish. Ends
Notes to Editors
- For media enquiries call the CPS Press Office on 020 3357 0906; Out of Hours Pager 07699 781 926
- The CPS consists of 13 Areas in total, each headed by a Chief Crown Prosecutor (CCP). In addition, there are three national casework divisions: Specialist Fraud (formerly Central Fraud and Welfare, Rural & Health Divisions), Special Crime & Counter Terrorism and Organised Crime. CPS Direct is a ‘virtual’ 14th Area which provides charging decisions to all police forces and other investigators across England and Wales – it operates twenty-four hours, seven days a week, 365 days a year.
- At 31 March 2014 we employed a workforce of approximately 6237 staff (full time equivalent), including around 2226 prosecutors and 3629 caseworkers and administrators. Further information can be found on our website: www.cps.gov.uk.
- The CPS, together with ACPO and media representatives, has developed a Protocol for the release of prosecution material to the media. This sets out the type of prosecution material that will normally be released, or considered for release, together with the factors we will take into account when considering requests. Read the Protocol for the release of prosecution material to the media
- Links
[1 ] CPS http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/lord_janner/ source: https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/04/16/cps-decision-not-to-prosecute-janner/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,602,525,088 |
| Stories: | 8,147,311 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
