Flirting with old-tyme racism. Is anyone paying attention?
There’s a fine line between this kind of typological thinking and the hierarchical ranking of groups, often been aided and abetted by the technologies of the day, from phrenology in the 19th century, which could be used to show, for example, that Africans were born to be slaves, and in need of masters, to the use of DNA markers today, which have been interpreted by some to confirm the existence of biological races, and the primacy of genes over environment in the determination of who we are. In a time when social policy is too often based on this kind of categorial thinking, with, for example, spreading belief in the evils of immigration, the inherent right of some to more of society’s goods, from education to health care to tax relief, etc., our generation’s version of “scientific racism” can land on receptive ears. We cannot assume that the gross evils of the passed are gone, and the lessons learned.
There is a long line of examples of dangerously over-simplified but cute dumbed-down categorical assertions about groups, often in the genetic era from non-anthropologically sophisticated but prominent geneticists. One from years ago was the sequence of ‘mitochondrial Eve’, in which a set of mtDNA sequences was used to infer a common ancestral sequence, and that was then attributed to our founding first woman. There was, of course, one woman in which the imputed mtDNA sequence (or some sequence like it) occurred. But the rest of that woman’s genome, her dual sets of 23 chromosomes, had genetic variation that was also found in countless contemporary women (and men); each variant in each gene found in a different set of those contemporaries, and each ‘coalescing’ as the term is, in some single ancestral individual at some time and in some place. This ‘Eve’ was only our common ancestor in her mtDNA, not her other genes, and so she, as a person, was not our ‘Eve’–our shared female progenitor a la Genesis. Indeed, among all of our genes there was no single, common ancestral time or place–probably not in hundreds of miles, or thousands of years. Each DNA segment found today has its own ancestry.
Using the ‘Eve’ phrase was a cute liberty that got the story widely circulated, and as a Barnum & Bailey tactic, it worked very well. But its reference to the Biblical Eve, a woman from whom all of us are purportedly descended, was culpably misleading even if catchily attention-seeking. And, of course, the purported common ancestral mtDNA sequence is only inferred in a statistical sense, from today’s mtDNA variation. This Eve-imagery came out of the Allan Wilson lab at UC Berkeley, a source of free-wheeling, glibly cute public claims. That sort of thing gets picked up by a media hungry for cute stories and gives it legs. So the behavior is rewarded.
More serious abuses of stereotypes
The ‘mitochondrial Eve’ characterization was cute and catchy, but perhaps harmless. But categorical oversimplifying by scientists isn’t always just cute and harmless. In my day as a graduate student, a prominent physical anthropologist, at Penn no less, Carleton Coon, said in one of his widely read books on racial variation, that “No one can express anguish more convincingly by his facial expression than an Italian. A Negro’s facial expression, on the other hand, consists largely of exposing his eyeballs and his teeth. There is good reason for this difference: the Italian’s mobile and moving communication would be lost, under most lighting conditions, on a black face.”
Yet when I was in graduate school, at about the same time as this was published, I took human anatomy at the University of Michigan medical school. When we got to the superficial facial muscles, here is the illustration of those muscles from my professor’s own, prominent, anatomy text:
From Woodburne: Essentials of Human Anatomy (4th ed.), 1969 |
This drawing, uses a black person as an exemplar of human facial muscles. They are clear and clearly identified as functional; they are not degenerate or minimalized, incapable of full expression. They are not the muscles of but one category of people: they are the human muscles.
Rumors, at least, were that the eminent Professor Coon had argued, behind the scenes, against integrating schools in the US, on the grounds that ‘Negroes’ were of intellectually inferior ability. Categorical thinking, with its typically concomitant value judgments, is nothing new, and it’s never over, but sloppy scientific thinking shouldn’t contribute to the problem.
Even without making qualitative value judgments, categorical thinking about humans, a form of racism, is historically dangerous, and everyone in science should know that. Yet, recently, there has been a simple, dramatic story of past human ‘breeding’ habits that indicates that categorical scientific racism still has legs in our society and, indeed, our most prominent journals. If not intentionally, it’s by a kind of convenient default.
Here are the cover, and one of the figures, from a recent issue of Nature. The embracing hands of people of different ‘colors’ shown as types who mated, indeed thus producing ‘hybrids’ between a Neanderthal and a Denisovan parent. This is a splashy story because these are considered to be different species. And the journal, naturally, used this as its lurid cover. The cover figure is about the 6 September story in that issue, from which we reproduce one figure that shows groups represented as regionally distributed people of different color. Is it unfair to call this stereotyping, of the old-fashioned type, even if only subliminally? Whatever the intent, the typological thinking is not subtle.
Thinking of this sort should have been long gone from Anthropology because DNA sequencing has clearly shown the internal variation and inter-group (or, better put, inter-geographic) overlap in variation. But when the publicity engines and the sensationalistic adrenalin are at work in science, whatever sells seems OK.
Even with a very long history of racism, including of course intentional slavery and genocide, we cannot seem to give up on types and categories, even inadvertent habits with no value judgment intended. But whether intentional and vicious, or merely inadvertent and de facto, this is essentially racism, and should be called out as such. And racism is dangerous, especially when voiced by scientists who should know better, or even, as I presume in this case, who are not racists in the usual discriminatory sense (that may not apply to their readers!). As a prominent colleague once said privately to me, he was not a ‘personal racist’ (he had African friends, after all)–he was just a typologist, a genetic determinist; i.e., a scientific racist.
Even if the authors of the human hybrid piece, happy enough for a cover story in a major journal, are not themselves “personal racists:, they perpetuate classificatory thinking. Countless people have lost their lives because of careless sloganeering. No matter its more polite guise, and carefully nonbiological group coloring in the figures, is this any different?
Is science heading back to those good ol’ days again?
Source: http://ecodevoevo.blogspot.com/2018/10/flirting-with-old-tyme-racism-is-anyone.html
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
Is basic IQ testing “scientific racism”?
diversity = Balkanization
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balkanization
The more “racially mixed” a country is, the more unstable it becomes because it has no common culture, no
common past, and no common background. Diversity + Proximity = War
Chris comments about his time in Brazil, “the muddy confluence of the world’s races.”
https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/05/Brazil-race-diversity.html
Our Cultural Decline Follows (((Communist))) Blueprint
https://www.henrymakow.com/frankfurt-school-satanic-judaism-in-action.html
1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Creating dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family
Take my country for example Sweden, if we would have been allowed to continue being a homogeneous people
then there would be no or very little racism. Besides every people wants their own Nation.
Diversity in Europe = White genocide. Thank you Black conquistador Pope, asshole!
When the US created New York they did not create it upon the old York, in my country we got New Sweden they
say, built upon the real-Sweden = A hidden war, I fucking hate them commies.
I know what they say, prominent Fabian Socialist said they are not communists but it could seem like it because they used the same tactics. Well they all want “us the people” living under the system of communism, austerity and dictatorship, while they themselves live as enormously wealthy “Emperors” above the law. Commie imposer or Commie believer, it is the same to me.