Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Meet Mimodactylus, a small ornithocheirid from Lebanon

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


Figure 1. Mimodactylus in situ from Kellner et al. 2019. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_libanensis_insitu588.gif?w=170″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_libanensis_insitu588.gif?w=582″ class=”size-full wp-image-40907″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_libanensis_insitu588.gif?w=584&h=1028″ alt=”Figure 1. Mimodactylus in situ from Kellner et al. 2019.” width=”584″ height=”1028″ />

Figure 1. Mimodactylus in situ from Kellner et al. 2019.

Mimodactylus libanensis (Kellner et al. 2019; Late Cretaceous, 95mya; MIM (no number), Lebanon) is known from a virtually complete specimen (Figs. 1, 2), with the top of the skull still buried in the sediment (Fig. 3). Originally it was considered closest to Haopterus, together comprising the Mimodactylidae. This is a pterosaur I was introduced to over ten years ago. Back then Roy Nohra, one of the co-authors, sent me photos of the unprepared slabs from which I created this bipedal reconstruction (Fig. 2) prior to the publication of Kellner et al.

Figure 1. a basal ornithocheirid, undescribed, from Lebanon. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/roy-nohra-lebanon-ornithocheirid-recon.jpg?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/roy-nohra-lebanon-ornithocheirid-recon.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-14595″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/roy-nohra-lebanon-ornithocheirid-recon.jpg?w=584&h=387″ alt=”Figure 1. a basal ornithocheirid, undescribed, from Lebanon.” width=”584″ height=”387″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/roy-nohra-lebanon-ornithocheirid-recon.jpg?w=584&h=387 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/roy-nohra-lebanon-ornithocheirid-recon.jpg?w=150&h=99 150w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/roy-nohra-lebanon-ornithocheirid-recon.jpg?w=300&h=199 300w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/roy-nohra-lebanon-ornithocheirid-recon.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 2. Mimodactylus reconstruction created several years ago, prior to fossil preparation and publication.

Here,
in the large pterosaur tree (LPT, 242 taxa), Mimodactylus nests between Yixianopterus and Haopterus — closer to Yixianopterus. So the LRT does not support the newly erected clade Mimodactylidae. Yixianopterus was omitted from the cladogram of Kellner et al. Once again, taxon exclusion is the number one problem.

Figure 1. Mimodactylus skull in situ and reconstructed. Kellner et al. misidentified the maxillary palate as the palatine. This is repaired in the reconstruction below. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-libanensis-skull588.jpg?w=283″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-libanensis-skull588.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-40900″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-libanensis-skull588.jpg?w=584&h=619″ alt=”Figure 1. Mimodactylus skull in situ and reconstructed. Kellner et al. misidentified the maxillary palate as the palatine. This is repaired in the reconstruction below. ” width=”584″ height=”619″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-libanensis-skull588.jpg?w=584&h=619 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-libanensis-skull588.jpg?w=142&h=150 142w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-libanensis-skull588.jpg?w=283&h=300 283w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-libanensis-skull588.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 3. Mimodactylus skull in situ and reconstructed. Kellner et al. misidentified the maxillary palate as the palatine (PL), apparently unaware that this was correctly identified by several authors years ago. This is repaired in the reconstruction below.

Apparently seven co-authors were not enough
to edit out the seven mistakes in the basic understanding of pterosaurs found in this long-awaited paper.

  1. The broad maxillary palate was misidentified as the palatine. This correction was made by Peters 2000 and later by Osi et al. 2010 and Pinheiro and Schultz 2012. The actual tiny pterygoids and ectopalatine (ectopterygoid + palatine) were not identified.
  2. The manual digits are aligned 1–4 palmar side down in flight in pterosaurs, not palm side anterior in flight with #3 on the top as shown in Kellner et al.
  3. All pterosaurs have 8 cervical vertebrae, not 6
  4. The brachiopatagium stretches between the wingtip and elbow, not the tail tip
  5. The feet of ornithocheirid pterosaurs, and Mimodactylus, too, are half the size pictured.
  6. The Kellner et al. cladogram (Supp Data) mistakenly includes the archosauriforms Ornithosuchus, Herrerasaurus and Scleromochlus as outgroup taxa, none of which are related to pterosaurs. Pterosaurs nest within Lepidosauria in the large reptile tree (LRT, 1611+ taxa). Also see Peters 2000, 2007.
  7. Kellner et al. wrote, “dorsal vertebrae not fused into a notarium, it is likely that it was a very young animal at the time of death, having reached an ontogenetic stage between 2 and 32.” No phylogenetic sisters in the LPT have a notarium. Kellner et al. are unaware that as lepidosaurs pterosaurs have a distinctly different ontogenetic pattern of ossification. Their cladogram suffers from massive taxon exclusion.
Figure 1. Original from Kellner et al. 2019 showing the several basic morphology mistakes made by their artist. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/original-recon588.jpg?w=194″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/original-recon588.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-40889″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/original-recon588.jpg?w=584&h=901″ alt=”Figure 1. Original from Kellner et al. 2019 showing the several basic morphology mistakes made by their artist. ” width=”584″ height=”901″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/original-recon588.jpg?w=584&h=901 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/original-recon588.jpg?w=97&h=150 97w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/original-recon588.jpg?w=194&h=300 194w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/original-recon588.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 4. Original Mimodactylus illustration from Kellner et al. 2019 showing the several basic morphology mistakes made by their artist.

The cladogram of Kellner et al.
(Fig. 5) continues several myths based on taxon exclusion of the tiny Solnhofen pterosaurs, all of which were outgroups to all known Cretaceous pterosaurs. I have colorized clades that appear in the LPT because they type size they used was way too small to read. Yixianopterus is not present here and Mimodactylus is not closely related to the istiodactylids in the LRT, contra Kellner et al. 2019. These authors simply have no idea what the tree topology of the pterosaur looks like when small taxa are included. Nor do they understand that pterosaurs arose from tritosaur lepidsosaurs, not a scattershot of unrelated and dissimilar archosauriforms.

Figure 3. Cladogram from Kellner et al. 2019. Color overlays show clades recovered in the LPT. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-original-cladogram588.gif?w=202″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-original-cladogram588.gif?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-40894″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus-original-cladogram588.gif?w=584&h=868″ alt=”Figure 3. Cladogram from Kellner et al. 2019. Color overlays show clades recovered in the LPT. ” width=”584″ height=”868″ />

Figure 5. Cladogram from Kellner et al. 2019. Color overlays show clades recovered in the LPT. If you find this difficult to read, you’re in the majority. This cladogram does not include taxa listed in the SuppData in which Anurognathus nests as the basalmost pterosaur.

A subset of the LPT
(Fig. 6) includes several pertinent taxa omitted by Kellner et al. 2019. Even so, Haopterus nests close by, but Pteranodon and kin do not. Not sure if you ask yourself this question, but I do: What does it mean when scientists refuse to test competing hypotheses for twenty years? … and continue traditions they know don’t make sense?

Figure 1. Subset of the LPT with the addition of Mimodactylus within the clade Scaphognathia. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_cladogram588.jpg?w=280″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_cladogram588.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-40893″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_cladogram588.jpg?w=584&h=625″ alt=”Figure 1. Subset of the LPT with the addition of Mimodactylus within the clade Scaphognathia. ” width=”584″ height=”625″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_cladogram588.jpg?w=584&h=625 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_cladogram588.jpg?w=140&h=150 140w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_cladogram588.jpg?w=280&h=300 280w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/mimodactylus_cladogram588.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 6. Subset of the LPT with the addition of Mimodactylus within the clade Scaphognathia.

Here’s Haopterus
(Fig. 7) a taxon closely related to Mimodactylus in both cladograms. Note the tiny feet, skull shape, robust tail, and palate morphology, all instructive with regard to Mimodactylus.

Figure 6. Haopterus is close to Mimodactylus and provides a bauplan for a bipedal stance. Note the tiny feet and palate morphology. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/haopterus588.jpg?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/haopterus588.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-1459″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/haopterus588.jpg?w=584&h=380″ alt=”Figure 6. Haopterus is close to Mimodactylus and provides a bauplan for a bipedal stance. Note the tiny feet and palate morphology.” width=”584″ height=”380″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/haopterus588.jpg?w=584&h=380 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/haopterus588.jpg?w=150&h=98 150w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/haopterus588.jpg?w=300&h=195 300w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/haopterus588.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 7. Haopterus is close to Mimodactylus and provides a bauplan for a bipedal stance. Note the tiny feet, pelvis, skull and palate morphology.

And here’s Yixianopterus
the basalmost ornithocheirid in the LPT. Mimodactylus is more closely related to this taxon than to Haopterus. Kellner et al. 2019 omitted Yixianopterus from their analysis.

Figure 2. Reconstruction of Yixianopterus. Roadkill fossils really need at least this much reconstruction to make then intelligible. And don’t ignore them in phylogenetic studies. Nothing spectacular here, which means it is more likely to be phylogenetically important. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/yixianopterus588.jpg?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/yixianopterus588.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-14607″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/yixianopterus588.jpg?w=584&h=553″ alt=”Figure 2. Reconstruction of Yixianopterus. Roadkill fossils really need at least this much reconstruction to make then intelligible. And don’t ignore them in phylogenetic studies. Nothing spectacular here, which means it is more likely to be phylogenetically important.” width=”584″ height=”553″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/yixianopterus588.jpg?w=584&h=553 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/yixianopterus588.jpg?w=150&h=142 150w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/yixianopterus588.jpg?w=300&h=284 300w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/yixianopterus588.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 8. Reconstruction of Yixianopterus. This is the basalmost ornithocheirid in the LPT. 

Believe it or not,
Peters 2009 was actually cited in this paper based on the evidence of a ‘clear articulation’ of the pteroid with the radiale and medial orientation of the free end, contra prior studies on pteroid orientation. That shouldn’t be a citation. It’s just the way it has always been.


References
Kellner AWA et al. (6 co-authors) 2019. First complete pterosaur from the Afro-Arabian continent: insight into pterodactyloid diversity. Nature.com/ScientificReports 9:17875. PDF
Ösi A, Prondvai E, Frey E and Pohl B 2010. New interpretation of the palate of pterosaurs. The Anat Rec 293: 243–258. doi: 10.1002/ar.21053.
Peters D 2000b.
 A Redescription of Four Prolacertiform Genera and Implications for Pterosaur Phylogenesis. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 106 (3): 293–336.
Peters D 2009. A reinterpretation of pteroid articulation in pterosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29:1327-1330.
Pinheiro FL and Schultz CL 2012. An Unusual Pterosaur Specimen (Pterodactyloidea, ?Azhdarchoidea) from the Early Cretaceous Romualdo Formation of Brazil, and the Evolution of the Pterodactyloid Palate. PLoS ONE 7(11): e50088. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050088

wiki/Mimodactylus



Source: https://pterosaurheresies.wordpress.com/2019/12/03/meet-mimodactylus-a-small-ornithocheirid-from-lebanon/
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Join our affiliate program and earn extra money by sharing with friends and family or by posting on your social media.

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at www.mitocopper.com


Get our Free Ebook, "Suppressed Health Secrets"  with  Natural Cures THEY don't want you to know!

APeX - Far superior to colloidal silver! Destroys Viruses, Bacteria, Pathogens with Oxygen plus Silver!

Supreme Fulvic - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

Ultimate Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Organic Hemp Extract (CBD) - Full Spectrum high CBD (3300mg) hemp extract eases stiff joints, relieves stress and more!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)


FINAL WARNING!  Diseases are EXPLODING!  Watch this Video about APeX and You'll THROW AWAY Your Colloidal Silver!  APeX destroys Viruses, Bacteria and other Pathogens with the power of Oxygen PLUS Silver!  Nobody else has a product like THIS!   See why the inventor hasn't been sick in 16 years and why you'll never hear about it on the FAKE NEWS!  Get some now and tell your friends about it too so we can reach more people!  


APeX Interview - Superior to Colloidal Silver from Lee Canady on Vimeo.


Learn about APeX Here and Get the 50 Page Report in PDF format.   Call us at 888-809-8385 to order by phone.



Report abuse
Loading...
    Loading...

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    MOST RECENT
    Loading...
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.