More climate squabbling: Governments fail to set a timeline for the IPCC reports

Yet another climate conference

” data-medium-file=”https://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/snore15.jpeg?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/snore15.jpeg?w=300″ src=”https://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/snore15.jpeg?w=614″ alt=”" class=”size-full wp-image-21850″ srcset=”https://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/snore15.jpeg 300w, https://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/snore15.jpeg?w=150&h=100 150w” sizes=”(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px” />

Yet another climate conference

Another round of climate obsessives versus energy realists, as ‘Saudi, India and China led opposition against a proposal to link the IPCC’s assessment cycle with the global stocktake’. Supposed climate issues continue to be a drain on government time and resources, with attendees racking up loads of the dreaded ’emissions’ between them just to get to the latest of the endless series of venues.
– – –
Governments have failed to agree on a timeline for the delivery of highly influential scientific reports assessing the state of climate change by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), says Climate Home News.

That is after Saudi Arabia, India and China opposed attempts to ensure the scientific body would provide its assessment in time for the next global stocktake, the UN’s scorecard of collective climate action, due in 2028, according to sources present at the IPCC talks in Istanbul, Turkiye, last week.

Following “fraught” discussions that ran all night Friday, governments postponed a final decision on the timeline until the next meeting scheduled in the summer.

Swiss climate scientist Sonia Seneviratne, who is the vice chair of an IPCC working group, said she “was not totally surprised” to see opposition to the proposal.

“We know that some countries do not necessarily want climate policy to advance very fast and IPCC information will be critical for informing the global stocktake”, she added. “But I was surprised by the lack of willingness to even negotiate on these points”.
. . .
The lack of consensus led to “IPCC Chair Jim Skea half-jokingly warning that the time to leave the venue was near and further consultations would shortly have to be held on the street”, the report added.
. . .
Negotiators eventually struck a last minute compromise. The final agreement puts the IPCC’s bureau – an advisory group – in charge of proposing a timeline for the assessment reports that could be decided at the next meeting.

Full article here.