Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

Updated 10/27/15 New Videos - Must See! Amazingly Clear Video of Unknown Planet Directly Above Sun in Sanibel, FL - Is it Nibiru/Planet X?

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Update 10/27/15 – Here are 2 more videos (more to come as I discover them) uploaded to youtube by various people hopefully providing more evidence for you on the Planet X/Nibiru Conspiracy. Enjoy.

This video was posted by saša lučić.

This video was posted by saša lučić.

Update 10/23/15 – Here are 2 more videos (more to come as I discover them) uploaded to youtube by various people hopefully providing more evidence for you on the Planet X/Nibiru Conspiracy. Enjoy.

This video was posted by saša lučić.

This video was posted by TurkeyUfoReport.

Update 10/21/15 – Here are 10 more videos uploaded to youtube by various people hopefully providing more evidence for you on the Planet X/Nibiru Conspiracy. Enjoy.

This video was posted on youtube by TurkeyUfoReport.

This video was posted on youtube by dgwilym.

This video was posted on youtube by UFOgroup77NEWS.

This video was posted on youtube by jeff P.

This video was posted on youtube by jeff P.

This video was posted on youtube by Skywatch Media News.

This video was posted on youtube by Skywatch Media News.

This video took place in Slana, Alaska and was posted on youtube by saša lučić. 

This video took place in Santa Monica, California and was posted on youtube by saša lučić. 

This video took place in Hungary and was posted on youtube by saša lučić. 

Updated 10/20/15 – Melissa Huffman’s Unknown Object video analysis using Stellarium; Date of capture believed to now be determined 9/23/15 based on moon phase in video. Mercury is the only planet in the vicinity of the Sun on that date however the positioning and size of the object captured leads me to believe it isn’t Mercury. See for yourself and let me know what you think.

Can someone identify this unknown celestial object in the sky for Melissa Huffman?

I created an account just to share this video I found after sifting through a ton of videos concerning possible Nibiru/Planet X sightings.

This incredible footage was captured by Melissa Huffman in September, 2015. The video was taken off the West coast of Fort Myers, FL, on the island known as Sanibel.

It was recently posted to YouTube four days ago, and already has received 6000+ views and 88 likes.

Please share it through social media so it can reach as many people as possible. I follow the work of Igor Kostelac (aka Seperated Society on YT) and many others; to date this is one of the most incredible captures I have seen. 

Two interesting pictures I captured on Oct. 10, 2015 @ 7;02 pm facing East show an unknown source of red light near the horizon. The sunset for this date according to google was supposed to occur at 6:56 pm.

Pic 1 Facing basically directly East

Pic 2 Facing East Southeast

In addition to the video and pictures concerning Nibiru/Planet X, I am posting some pictures I took myself in Palm Beach County, FL, revealing “Persistent Aerosols” aka Chemtrails. 

Chemtrails around Christmas – Dec. 10, 2014

Grass is scorched, lawns without irrigation systems suffer; Chemtrails reduce natural precipitation Feb. 25, 2015

Never saw chemical laden halos surrounding our Sun until chemtrails became prominent in our skies March 15, 2015

Classic tic-tac-toe patterns are sighted frequently August 9, 2015

Pic 1; The next three pictures are from the same day of the same chemtrail September 13, 2015

Pic 2

Pic 3

Multiple Chemtrails intersecting each other; resulting in a greyed sky and increased glare Oct. 2, 2015

There is a recurring theme here; these trails persist for hours, intersect each other, and widen exponentially to a. obscure our view of what’s beyond our sky, b. block a small percentage of incoming solar radiation, c. manipulate natural weather patterns, d. e. f. This covert program certainly has multiple purposes. One proven unintended consequence is destruction of the ozone layer resulting in a significant increase in harmful UV radiation. Picture was taken Oct. 10, 2015.

Another chemical halo rainbow and a freshly sprayed chemtrail Oct. 10, 2015

@DefaOmega – just for you

Thank you for reading my first article on BIN and thanks to BIN for allowing regular people to share valuable information with others.

- Troy

Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 47 comments
    • LifeIs

      Okay, Sanibel Island is on the west coast of Florida. I see water, and I see land on the horizon. Are we looking east, toward the rising sun?

      The disk is a bit to the left of the sun. So if we’re looking east, that is north.

      It is a round, bright disk. So, either it is on the side of the sun opposite us, fully illuminated by the sun, like a full moon, OR it is shining by its own power. Or, it’s a bubble of some translucent material in space, back-lit by the sun.

      It is partially eclipsed by a cloud, at the top of the disk. And, it doesn’t move or change when the camera moves. So, it is not a lens flare. And, it is not a light source below the clouds.

      It is not as bright as the sun. But it is bright. You would think more people would notice a bright disk in the sky. (Even though most of us don’t look at the sky much. I don’t look at the sky much these days.)

      As for the possibility of it being fake video, well, it’s a really short video, and the disk is in it for maybe 15 seconds or less. The disk would have to be added to several hundred frames. It’s do-able.

      That’s all I know. I hope it helps.

      • tfeeney

        No we are looking west towards the setting sun. I looked this up in Stellarium (PC) and Starchart (iPhone) and inputted the following variables. Date: Oct. 9, 2015; Time: 6:45pm; Location: Sanibel, FL and what I found was that Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and the Moon should be below the horizon and thus out of view.

        • LifeIs

          Well, we see the moon in the video. (The camera pans to show us.) The video was made in September it says above. If we had the date, we could tell if the moon’s phase is correct.

          If we’re looking west, the disk is a bit left (south) of the sun and the glare of the sun on the water. But it does look like land on the horizon, to me.

          The familiar planets are of course way too far away to be disks in that picture. So it’s a mystery.

          • Mark Brander

            This is the Revelation 12 Manchild Glory… why people not accept this is a mystery to me. Read all about it and see many more vids and photos of it at

            God’s kingdom is coming in!

          • tfeeney

            Your comment inspired me to make the follow up analytical video to this article. Your idea regarding the moon phase was spot on. Thank you for your comment.

        • thgc

          Curious if this was visible with your naked eye or only with your video device? Tks

          • tfeeney

            Melissa claims her and a friend saw this in person without the use of a camera.

    • DefaOmega

      Man this article has Planet X (Nibiru) and Chemtrails, that’s amazing.

      Let me attempt to clear all of this up for everyone:

      Nibiru – Fake
      Chemtrails – Fake

      Bam! That was crazy easy. Go back to being ‘awake’ people nothing to see here.

      • Conundrum

        I have never seen Nibiru- but you have got to have your head up your ARSE not to see the chemtrails!!!

        • DefaOmega

          Correction – You have to lack a fundamental understanding of physics to see contrails as chemtrails. The only reason this myth continues to exist is because people choose to believe what they see (influenced by their lack of knowledge on the topic) instead of real science.

          Education is the cure for 90% of the Conspiracy Industry.

          Good Luck.

          • santiago

            That’s what I always thought about the “chemtrails”…high humidity in the air-the contrails stay for long,low humidity-they diappear almost instantly.

            • frosty


              The other day it was cold and the humidity was high as I went for a long early morning walk. While walking, I noticed my breath following behind me due to the moist, warm, humid air being exhaled.

              Fortunately for me it must have been a high humidity day since, although I got lost in the woods, my contrail lasted for several hours and I was able to follow it back over the ten mile trek it took for me to find my way back home.

          • LifeIs

            DefaOmega you haven’t said anything of physics. Or fact. You only said that anything that resembles a contrail is a contrail.

            Well. The exhaust of a solid fuel rocket resembles a contrail, but it isn’t one.

            And the first weather-modification by spraying chemicals from airplanes took place in the 1940s.

            And the US government acknowledged weather modification spraying in the Vietnam war.

            I personally observed the spraying of a grid in my area, during which one of the planes very briefly turned off the spray. For like a fraction of a second. So there was tiny gap in the vapor trail.

            The whole sky had unbroken grid lines, except for the one little spot.



            Those articles are about technology that is up to 65 years old.

            We saw the global warming scam artists reduce the number of thermometers, locate them in the hottest spots, paint the boxes to make them hotter… and now we see reflective aluminum and barium sprayed into the air. Why?

            My first guess is: we know the satellites measure the irradiance of the atmosphere. That’s how they get temperature readings, and it’s how they get estimates of summer melt of ice.

            Specifically, the irradiance of the oxygen in the air, at different levels.

            Spray reflective stuff in the atmosphere, you reflect sunlight and make the atmosphere look hotter.

            • DefaOmega

              LifeIs -

              One of the better written responses I’ve received on this site. I don’t see the word ‘sheeple’ or ‘shill’ used one time, and for that I thank you. Anyway, the thing is that those programs aren’t the same thing, except I suppose conceptually. It also seems that those programs were largely ineffective as making it rain right now in California would be a pretty good idea.

              If aluminum and barium and whatever else was being sprayed into the sky, it would show up in tests on rain water, but it doesn’t. The only tests that showed any inflated amounts of those chemicals was Mount Shasta where the test was proven to have been contaminated as further tests taken from all over the area showed no inflated numbers. How can it possibly be, if ‘they’ are spraying chemicals into the sky that there is literally no evidence of it.

              The bottom half of your comment exactly reflects what is wrong with the Conspiracy Industry. You start making guesses and assumptions based on flawed information that you, with no evidence, just take to be true. If you build an idea from a flawed beginning the result will be flawed.

              The fact is, people claiming “Chemtrails” are the ones making the outrageous claims, thus the burden of proof lies squarely on them. Since they are unable to present any none contaminated evidence.

              Good Luck.

          • tfeeney

            Not to digress but.. If we believe everything we are told then I suppose that BBC announcing WTC7s collapse a half hour before it occurred is inconsequential because clearly fires took out all three buildings; a 747 struck the pentagon basically at ground level without being caught on cctv with basically no debris and left a ridiculously small hole; and in Shanksville PA the jet disintegrated away leaving no debris just an oddly shaped hole in the ground. I know that last line is a run-on sentence in case anyone wants to get sassy. Truthfully though 9/11 is the day I stopped believing everything I was told and I was only 12.

            • DefaOmega

              That’s the problem isn’t it, “I stopped believing everything I was told and I was only 12″. So now you just blindly believe the Conspiracy rhetoric that’s spoon fed to people.

              The Fire Dept. knew at around 2:00 p.m. that WTC7 was most likely going to collapse. So one news agency reporting it early isn’t significant in anyway.

              There was debris found in Shanksville, PA. I have absolutely no idea where you got that idiotic idea, but there are several conspiracy theories related to the debris being too far away from the crash site, as if an engine crashing into the ground at ~500mph couldn’t possibly end up 300 yards away from the impact point.

              It seems you need to do more research on your conspiracy theories instead of blindly spouting misinformation .

              Good Luck.

            • tfeeney

              @DefaOmega I’m sorry sir but you are one of the most gullible people I have ever met. The official 9/11 narrative is a joke. You need to revisit some 9/11 documentaries. It’s hilarious how you avoid the Pentagon missile strike and lie about the lack of evidence found at Shanksville. You keep trying to protect the bad guys embedded in our government.

              Here’s one article out of many reflecting WTC7s collapse

              On September 11, 2001, many people knew well before World Trade Center 7 collapsed that this 47-story high-rise building was going to come down. [1] There were even two premature announcements of the collapse by major television networks. How could this foreknowledge be explained?

              Advocates of the official narrative of the collapse of WTC 7 have proposed, at different times, two differing explanations – here called Account 1 and Account 2 – which can both be called official accounts.

              Account 1, the earlier explanation, was widely disseminated on the Internet and at one time received some support from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), thus making it a de facto official account. [2]

              Account 2 is the current official account of the collapse, having been put forth in NIST’s final (2008) report. [3]

              The Official Accounts
              Account 1: WTC 7 was critically damaged by flying debris from the collapsing WTC 1, which caused structural damage and fires in WTC 7. These fires were especially large and hot, being fed by diesel fuel stored in the building. [4] Seeing the structural damage and fires, fire chiefs and engineers concluded that WTC 7 was in danger of collapse. Concerns were therefore expressed and appropriate actions taken: firefighters were withdrawn from the building, and firefighters and others were told the building might come down. Accordingly, collapse predictions were rational responses to direct observation by witnesses. [5]

              Account 2: The earlier explanation of WTC 7’s collapse (Account 1) is incorrect. Impact damage from flying debris caused by WTC 1’s collapse was insufficient to put WTC 7 at risk and did not play a significant role in its collapse. [6] And the fires were not intensified by diesel fuel stored in the building. [7]

              WTC 7 came down primarily due to fire. This was the first time in history that a steel-framed high-rise had collapsed due to fire. [8] The fire triggered this collapse by means of a unique and unobserved sequence of events inside the building, including thermal expansion of floor systems, an unseated girder, and floor collapses, resulting in a cascade of column buckling. [9]

              A single column failure had caused a complete north-to-south interior collapse, which in turn precipitated a complete east-to-west interior collapse, ultimately leaving the exterior columns laterally unsupported and causing all of them to buckle in a nearly simultaneous way.

              Although the fires in WTC 7 were affecting the steel components of the building over a period of hours, the building did not actually become unstable, nor was its fate sealed, until minutes, or even seconds, before it began to come down. [10]

              The Best Evidence
              Neither Account 1 nor Account 2 fits the evidence.

              Contrary to what is often implied by supporters of the official 9/11 narrative, witnesses who expected WTC 7 to come down evidently did not reach this conclusion because of anything they personally perceived but because of what they were told. [11]

              What witnesses personally perceived most obviously cannot explain Account 2, which posits a sequence of last-minute events inside the building that was unprecedented, unpredictable, and invisible to witnesses.

              But both accounts are contradicted by the facts that

              some people were certain that the building was going to come down, that
              some of them had this certainty early, and that
              some of the major media gave premature announcements of the collapse of WTC 7.
              On the issue of certainty, MSNBC reporter Ashleigh Banfield said early in the afternoon: “I’ve heard several reports from several different officers now that that is the building that is going to go down next,” with one of them saying “they’re just waiting for that to come down at this point.” [12] And indeed, many members of the Fire Department of New York are on record as having been confidently waiting for the building to come down. [13] For example:
              Firefighter Thomas Donato said: “We were standing, waiting for seven to come down. We were there for quite a while, a couple hours.” [14]
              Firefighter James Wallace said: “They were saying building seven was going to collapse, so we regrouped and went back to our rig. We went to building four or three; I don’t know. We were going to set up our tower ladder there. They said no good because building seven is coming down. We waited for building seven to come down.” [15]
              Assistant Commissioner James Drury said: “I must have lingered there. There were hundreds of firefighters waiting to — they were waiting for 7 World Trade Center to come down.” [16]
              Chief Thomas McCarthy said: “So when I get to the command post, they just had a flood of guys standing there. They were just waiting for 7 to come down.” [17]
              Paramedic Steven Pilla said: “We walked back. We didn’t do [sic] any further because building number seven was coming down. That was another problem, to wait for building seven to come down.” [18]
              The evidence that many witnesses were certain of collapse, which is solid, [19] cannot be explained either by Account 1 or by Account 2.

              The existence of early knowledge is also well supported:
              Firefighter Vincent Massa, speaking of the firefighters waiting for WTC 7 to come down, has said: “The whole time while we were waiting — there were hours that went by.” [20]
              Massa’s estimate is confirmed by a wider study of the FDNY oral histories. The study found that of 60 firefighters who mention predictions about the collapse of WTC 7, the times of these predictions can be determined in 33 cases: in 17 cases the predictions occurred within the two hours before collapse, while in the other 16 cases the predictions were made over two hours before collapse. In six cases the predictions were apparently made over four hours before collapse. [21]
              Some reports indicate that the FDNY had been cleared from WTC 7 as early as 2 p.m. and had been told to abandon the building because it was doomed. [22] This forecast appears to have come from Mayor Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management. [23]
              How could confident and valid collapse predictions have been made so far in advance? Account 2, the current official explanation, is especially incapable of answering this question, since the unique and fatal internal collapse sequence central to this explanation was not witnessed by anyone and took place right before collapse. In any case, since no steel-framed building had ever collapsed before without being imploded, there would have been no basis for such predictions.

              The official accounts are also contradicted by premature announcements of the collapse of WTC 7 by CNN and the BBC:
              CNN announced the impending collapse of WTC 7 an hour and 10 minutes before it actually collapsed. [24] Directly after its premature announcement, and intermittently for the following hour, CNN displayed the caption, “Building 7 at World Trade Center on fire, may collapse.” Then 4.5 minutes prior to the collapse, a new caption appeared: “Building #7 ablaze, poised to collapse.” Finally, 3 minutes later there was another caption: “Building 7 at World Trade Center on fire, on verge of collapse.” At no time during these 70 minutes could viewers see evidence of any alteration in WTC 7, such as increased fire, partial collapse, or even leaning. [25]
              The collapse of WTC 7 was announced by the BBC 23 minutes prematurely. The BBC even gave a version of Account 1 to explain why it collapsed. [26] This premature announcement, along with the explanation, was especially peculiar, given the fact that a steel-framed building had never before collapsed because of fire.
              Neither Account 1 nor Account 2 of the collapse of WTC 7 can account for the certainty of many people on the scene that the building was going to collapse, the fact that some of them had this foreknowledge long in advance, and that two of the TV networks were able to announce the collapse prematurely. This foreknowledge, it would seem, must have come from people who intended to bring the building down.
              This foreknowledge corroborates, therefore, the evidence and conclusions presented in previous Points (see Consensus Points WTC7-1, 2, 3, 5, and 6) that WTC 7 was brought down through a process of controlled demolition.”

            • DefaOmega

              I’m sorry you feel I’m so gullible, let’s see if we can’t fix that.

              This copy and paste job you did here, contains some blatantly false information, which is absurd considering it’s misquoting the very document that it’s using as proof.

              The official NIST report claims that: “Debris from the collapse of WTC 1, which was 370 feet to the south, ignited fires on at least 10 floors in the building at its south and west faces” and that these fires directly lead to the collapse of the building by distorting the structural integrity of the building.

              Your Copy/Paste – Account 2: The earlier explanation of WTC 7’s collapse (Account 1) is incorrect. Impact damage from flying debris caused by WTC 1’s collapse was insufficient to put WTC 7 at risk and did not play a significant role in its collapse.

              NIST Report – No mention of how much time the building had left. Or at what point they knew the structural integrity had been compromised to such a degree that failure was imminent

              Your Copy/Paste – Although the fires in WTC 7 were affecting the steel components of the building over a period of hours, the building did not actually become unstable, nor was its fate sealed, until minutes, or even seconds, before it began to come down.[10]

              (For the record if you actually check source [10] you will find it also makes no mention of this ‘time line’ at all)

              It seems that most of the rest of the ‘story’ is based on the false assumption that the report mentions how much time the building had left. There was sagging of an entire side of the building, anyone looking at it would have been able to tell the thing was going to come down.

              This is a classic case of believing everything you see when it comes to the conspiracy industry instead of doing any actual personal research and building a whole idea on a false premise. You’ll continue to be wrong and look like a fool as long as you continue to do this.

              Do the research and figure out what you’re talking about instead of just copying and pasting articles other fools have posted. Or don’t, it doesn’t seem to be something you have enough knowledge about to do.

              I hope I’ve changed your mind about being “on of the most gullible people” you have ever met, and have shown how you are in fact the gullible one.

              Good Luck.

            • tfeeney

              @AlphaOmega Talking to you is a waste of time. You go ahead and believe what you want. You see I made up my own mind when I witnessed a symmetrical collapse of all three buildings at basically freefall speeds. I don’t need to read any articles or watch any documentaries to know that all three collapses look eerily similar to a controlled demolition. But after researching and finding out all sorts of holes in the official narrative I’m 100% convinced the US government was involved. Nothing you or anyone will post will change this particular opinion of mine. Americans were killed on that day and they deserve the truth to be brought forward and have justice served to those who concocted this “New Pearl Harbor”. USSA is a corrupt, warmongering nation seeking to maintain it’s global dominance over world resources.

            • DefaOmega

              And here we finally reach the real problem. You simply don’t care about the facts. You’ve made up your mind and no matter how much evidence proves you’re wrong you are simply unwilling to believe it. As I’ve said before the only way the Conspiracy Industry can persist is willful ignorance, which you’ve just openly admitted you are. How you can possibly feel that what you’ve “seen” is more important than scientific fact is beyond absurdity, but at least you admit it.

              “But after researching and finding out all sorts of holes in the official narrative I’m 100% convinced the US government was involved.” Except that all of these “holes” are easily plugged when rational thought is involved. Instead of just reading a single website and going, “yup that makes sense” and blindly believing it.

              Ask yourself this question, Why do they want you to distrust the government so much?

              Good Luck.

            • tfeeney


              You need to stop broadcasting how I’ve reached my conclusions when you aren’t me. I’ve researched 9/11 for 14 years. I’ve read thousands of articles and watched every documentary on the topic. In fact, I plan to author a new story on BIN with links to the 10s of documentaries out there for people to see and judge for themselves without some random guy telling his OPINIONS as if he is infallible. As I said before, believe what you want! I’m going to believe what I want. My parents are religious – I am not but we still love each other. We just have different opinions on what happens after death. You and I may never agree but we have to coexist on the same planet. So quit your incessant attempts to debunk me.

            • DefaOmega

              tfeeney –

              You said it all, honestly, when you said, “Nothing you or anyone will post will change this particular opinion of mine.” This sort of eyes wide shut closed mindedness is the problem. I don’t believe what I ‘want’ I believe what is verifiable and true plain and simple. Religion has no bearing on this conversation, but for what it’s worth I’m not a religious individual either even though many in my family are. We all get along just fine, but I still point out the stupid things they say.

              The only way I understand your argument here is if you subscribe to the ‘ignorance is bliss’ mentality. It’s the only reason you would actually get upset about someone presenting facts to shoot down the misconceptions you hold to be true. I’m not infallible, nor have I ever said or acted as if I was, but the facts are.

              Did you ask yourself the question? Have you solved the riddle, of why the Conspiracy Industry exists yet? It’s far more interesting than these debunked 9/11 theories.

              Good Luck.

            • tfeeney


              Conspiracy industry? That’s not how I would describe Before It’s News. Alternative media is a much better description. Yes, because any individual can post almost anything they want there will be deception and lies spread around as truth. However, occasionally you will stumble upon extremely significant articles that will change your perspective completely. The reason alternative news is becoming more popular is simply because almost all of the US mainstream media outlets are owned by about 7 huge corporations . This type of monopoly over our news shouldn’t exist and has lead to a narrow focus on what’s broadcast to the public. Our government can force media outlets to withhold stories under the guise that the topic underpins national security. Basically, the mainstream news will never tell the whole truth with zero bias from an objective viewpoint. Instead they report on topics that support the illegal invasion of foreign countries based on the “war on terror” our government has indirectly funded. They report on cases of domestic terrorism probably staged by the government to support a revision of our second amendment rights. The patriot act which was written before 9/11 occurred, has led to an invasion of our privacy on a scale so massive it affects every individual domestic or foreign that utilized the internet in anyway. Without the alternative media I would have never learned about a countless amount of injustice our government attempts to keep secret. Transparency in our government is almost nonexistent. The ponzi scheme that is fiat currency is something I learned through alternative media and books; something the media or our education system fails to teach us. G Edward Griffin, Michael Ruppert, Edward Snowden, Zecharia Sitchin, Robert Harrington, Kristen Meghan, Allan Buckmann, Rebekah Roth, etc. There are so many professional and educated individuals that risk their own safety by coming forward with extremely valuable information. It’s such a shame you read a government funded report and bow down to it as if it could NOT have been falsified to mislead the general public. Why did JFK get assasinated just as he was going to sign an Executive Order forever changing the power held by the Federal Reserve? Why is the Federal Reserve’s name allowed have the word Federal in it in the first place? That is very misleading. Why is our goverment currently inflating away the value of our currency by exorbitant spending beyond our means to repay? Eventually inequality is going to get so bad that living in the U.S. will resemble a 3rd world country. Take this statement into account, “since the United States was founded in 1776, she has been at war during 214 out of her 235 calendar years of existence. In other words, there were only 21 calendar years in which the U.S. did not wage any wars.” WTF? Seriously? We need alternative news; we need to maintain an open mind and address the corruption and injustice perpetrated by our leaders. No wonder why so many other nations hate us.

            • DefaOmega

              tfeeney –

              You’ve finally hit upon two points where I agree with you, even if only to a small degree. The persecution of whistle blowers and the Federal Reserve.

      • sheepwaker

        And were is your proof that each is fake ? I mean I see the video … Yet all you can do to debunk the woman is say it’s fake !

      • apache5

        NOW let me sum this UP WAM BAM, your a troll !!!go somewhwere else we don’t need you !!!

        • DefaOmega

          apache5 –

          I see why you might say that, as I’m sure it’s easier to cry “troll” and ignore someone than have to acknowledge actual science and truth. As you never add any real sustenance to a conversation I suppose I’d rather be a “troll” then whatever you call yourself.

          Good Luck.

      • TheJayWalker

        If you think chemtrails are fake then do tell what they are? They aren’t contrails, those dissipate after a short while, where as chemtrails stay all day long.

        Shill much?

        • DefaOmega

          False. Like just blatantly false.

          This is what happens when you refuse to believe real science so much that the Conspiracy Industry can literally feed you what ever it wants and you’ll blindly believe it.

          “Sometimes [contrails] are ephemeral and dissipate as quickly as they form; other times they persist and grow wide enough to cover a substantial portion of the sky with a sheet of cirrostratus“ -“A Field Guide to the Atmosphere“, by Schaefer and Day, 1981: Page 137

          There are photos of persistent contrails from at least 1969.

          Do some actual research and you’ll quickly find that atmospheric conditions play a huge part in the formation of contrails. Or don’t and continue spouting brainwashed idiocy, your choice.

          Good Luck.

    • DTS & Associates

      Sigh. Not again. Folks, there is no second Sun, Nemesis, Nibiru, PlanetX seen in this video.

      What ‘is’ being seen is the physics behind what is called ‘birefringence’. Look it up.

      And then, watch this video:

      So, if this birefringence is indeed happening, where then is the lensing glass?
      A good question. ;) It’s in the sky approximately at the altitude where the ‘so-called’ Ionosphere is alleged to be. The ionosphere is a myth. The truth of the matter is that there is a glass firmament in the sky, like the Bible and Quran tell.

      Learn the truth here:


      • djfxw

        like the dome in Spaceballs? :lol:

      • k3nw74

        While I don’t claim anything exists/doesn’t exist, “birefringence” creates a second illusion OF THE SAME SIZE. Look it up.

        • DefaOmega

          Stop it.

          Science and logical thinking have almost no place here. DTS just wants the same thing everyone in the Conspiracy Industry wants, to drive traffic to his channels and website in order to turn a profit off feeding pure lies to people that refuse to do any actual research.

          It’s the American Dream…

          Good Luck.

      • LifeIs

        If the sky were double-refracting the sun, we would have noticed before now, yes?

        If the sky were double-refracting the sun, we would see stars and planets double-refracted too, yes?

      • Warren

        Yes. Most cameras have birefringent elements built in so as to reduce aliasing.

        That is compounded by what in this case is probably inter-element reflection. Modern camera lenses are constructed of many glass and/or plastic elements, the light going through them all in series. There is reflection between each element. Each element, properly coated, transmits about 95% of the light and reflects about 5%. So, there are secondary images. Normally one does not see them because they are so faint that they are below the level of perception. But they are there. However, when some super-bright object is in the field of view, like the sun, 5% x 95% is visible in the image. More cases than not, if you take a picture of the sun at an off angle there will be a secondary image of it somewhere.

        By the way, do not ever take pictures directly of the sun with your digital camera. It will quickly destroy your image sensor. Think magnifying glass focusing sun on dry leaf.

        • tfeeney

          I take pictures of the Sun with my iPhone all the time when the planes are forming persistent aerosols (stated that way just for you). My phone still takes wonderful pictures. The only aberration usually present is a small blue dot (flare) as seen in some of the stills above.

    • frosty

      If Nibiru is now visible, the sightings should be repeatable day after day when viewed from the same location.

      • srsly1


      • tfeeney

        Planets, stars, and other celestial objects are set in motion. Download stellarium (it’s free) you can really get a good idea as to how frequently the visible objects change by the day. Planet X/Nibiru is supposedly approaching from below the ecliptic making it more difficult to spot and most of the videos on youtube claiming to have captured it often take place either just before or after sunrise/sunset. Check out Seperated Society on youtube; he posts new videos all the time from webcams all over the world. Another important thing to note is that I’m located on the East Coast of Florida; it’s becoming exceedingly rare these days to have a cloudless view of either the sunrise or sunset. Usually the horizons are obstructed by clouds. I’m not a diehard believer in anything that I cannot see for myself however I like to keep an open mind and pay attention to what’s going on around me.


      Here’s the REAL truth they are keeping from you all.

      Ask why you have not heard about the discovery of the century and its implications.

      • LifeIs

        I would say the soft tissue means something, just not what you think.

        I would say it means conditions were different in the past. Specifically, the earth’s atmosphere was almost as dense as water.

        That would explain so much. Like: layers of sedimentary rock that are bent, not broken. Dense air can’t hold much water vapor. The ground would never dry. The layers that are rock now, were a kind of mud when they were bent. And when the earth lost its atmosphere, the pressurized water expanded and seeped out, and that made the shale and limestone and sandstone porous.

        And like: coal. All coal is very old. Clearly, it formed under conditions that haven’t existed for a long time.

        And like: flying dinosaurs –in dense air, a slight wind would have enough energy to lift them like paper kites.

        And like: whales and dolphins. Their ancestors had been crawling around, low to the ground, to avoid being blown away. And when earth lost most of its atmosphere, they couldn’t support their weight on land. So they became aquatic.

        So a dinosaur is walking around, its body weight supported mostly by its buoyancy. It dies and rots, but before its soft tissue is completely rotted away, a swirling flood of mineral-saturated, high pressure water covers it with sediment. Water under pressure holds a lot of mineral in solution. That, plus the sediment, prevents aerobic bacteria from getting to the bones.

    • thgc

      Interesting link DTS.

    • Eggzactly

      In the one picture, That is the moon to the left of the sun.

    • The Ferrett

      Amazingly clear? – I don’t think so . . .

      • tfeeney

        Show me another video of an unknown object that is more clear than this footage captured by Melissa Huffman.

    • Taejay

      yes this I just dont that another Planet? and where did it Come from and surely if it is a planet! nasa knows exactly what it is and when it came i know it didnt just sneak up on use?

    • djfxw

      If it is ‘here’, then why can’t we all see it? Does it only appear to certain cities or states? I live on the East coast and can’t see anything. Does anyone know what a ‘Sun dog’ is? Do people really not know basic science?

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.