Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

Lawrence Krauss Spilled the Beans on Jeffrey Epstein's Private Island

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


The earth is but a pale blue dot in a vast cosmic arena right? We are in no particular place, of no particular significance to the universe, correct? Well Lawrence Krauss and a number of scientists meeting on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island in 2006 were talking about the implications of the odd alignments found in the Cosmic Microwave data with the ecliptic and equinoxes sent back from the WMAP satellite a few years earlier. Expounding on the nature of the implications, Lawrence Krauss stated:

“…when you look at CMB map, you also see that the structure that is observed, is in fact, in a weird way, correlated with the plane of the earth around the sun. Is this Copernicus coming back to haunt us? That’s crazy. We’re looking out at the whole universe. There’s no way there should be a correlation of structure with our motion of the earth around the sun — the plane of the earth around the sun — the ecliptic. That would say we are truly the center of the universe.”

Lawrence Krauss believed their may have been something funny about the data or the WMAP mission as he stated in the documentary The Principle in 2011 when asked about this quote. The scientist who actually first elucidated the alignments, Max Tegmark of MIT, also was interviewed in 2011, and also felt that the WMAP team may have made some errors leading to this apparent alignment with the earth. Max Tegmark appears in The Principle again in a second interview filmed after the Planck satellite verified the alignment in 2013, and was troubled by the alignment. He no longer felt it could be dismissed, and even the ESA (who operated the Planck mission) stated the some new physics may be necassary! [translation: We have dark matter, dark energy, inflation, and now we need yet something else undetectable to keep our theories alive]:

“Our ultimate goal would be to construct a new model that predicts the anomalies and links them together. But these are early days; so far, we don’t know whether this is possible and what type of new physics might be needed. And that’s exciting,”

This is but some of evidence indicating that the Copernican Principle (that the earth occupies no special place in the universe) is invalidated, and the Copernican Principle no longer should be used a philosophical underpinning of our cosmological theories.

This evidence, compounded by the Planck results, was so powerful that the scientists who interviewed for The Principle freaked out when the trailer was released in 2014, when they realized what they have told the world! They thought in 2011, that Planck would resolve the issue, but it not only did not resolve it, it indicated beyond a doubt that the earth is in a special place in the universe.

The scientists invlolved in The Principle all cashed their checks, then when the movie came out and they realized their mistake, they wanted to be sure that you would never see the film and learn the truth!

Another possible factor in the reaction of Lawrence Krauss (who was the first to come out swinging at the Principle) was his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. At the time the film came out a lot of bad press was being written about Jeffrey Epstein, and perhaps he did not want to get pulled further into it.

The scientists in The Principle include Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku, George FR Ellis, Max Tegmark, John Hartnett, Julian Barbour, Ronald Hatch, John Byl, and Bernard Carr. Kate Mulgrew (“Captain Janeway”) narrated the film.

Is it a conspiracy?




Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 6 comments
    • Snowball

      So Lawrence Krauss likes little boys ?

      • JohnQPublic

        I suspect not, but do not know.

    • LifeIs

      *grinds teeth* The claim that the CMB radiation is from a “big bang” is based on one thing, and one thing only.

      It did NOT have the predicted wavelength/temperature. Which was 3 or 4 times hotter.

      It was claimed to have uniformity. And it does not. It is local. It is local. It is local.

      They can’t admit this, because it is one of the TWO legs that the “big bang” myth stands upon. The other is the idea that redshift equates to distance. And Halton Arp disproved THAT in 1971. And since.

      Plasma causes redshift. Light from the edge of the Sun’s disk is more redshifted than light from the center, because it has to pass through more plasma.

      Quasars are redshifted by plasma in and around them. They are ejected from relatively nearby galaxies.

      The Universe is not expanding, and is not expanding “at an accelerating rate,” and was not small once.

      The people who claim otherwise pretend to be smart, but people who will not think are as stupid as people who cannot think.

      If the Universe were smaller in the past, we would see the inverse of what we see now. If “more distant” meant “smaller universe,” lines of sight would converge on the big bang itself. You could point your telescope in different directions, and see the same objects, if you were looking into a smaller, and smaller field of view.

      Distant objects would occupy a larger part of the field of view. They would appear magnified.

      These guys have no idea what they are talking about.

      • JohnQPublic

        When did you see THE PRINCIPLE? Or did you?

    • Wheezl

      I bought the film and it is a great documentary. The scientists and the voice actress have absolutely zero fuqin integrity. Man up and own your statements or pack your sh1t up and leave academia. The CMB measurement was performed twice and both results were the same. Larry had to bring up his multi-verse boosh1t to escape the narrative. It takes more faith to believe that infinite universes pop into existence all the time from nothing and we just happen to inhabit the one that can support life. It’s a low level academic fraud of a theory.

      • JohnQPublic

        Glad you enjoyed the doc. I agree on the multiverse. As Martin Selbrede said, it is the multiverse or God.

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.