NASA Pseudoscience Mind-Kontrol: The Vacuum Of Space

By The Modern Gnostic

Pseudoscience is the collision of science and political science in order to miseducate the public to create a power differential for the NWO. As my other posts reveal, (see below) NASA was heavily into MKULTRA/Monarch programs first developed by the German OSS and then brought into the CIA under Bill Donovan and Alan Dulles.

It wasn’t until the mid 1970’s that we found out some information on some of the other things these Nazi scientists were secretly working on with the CIA. In fact, we were never supposed to know about these interactions with the CIA as the former director had all the files destroyed. However, a bunch of boxes were unknowingly stored in another location and were discovered years later and turned in before the CIA could destroy them. So, we only know a fraction of what really went on and that is disturbing enough.

The goal of Operation Paperclip was not the V-2 rocket scientists and Werner von Braun’s intellectual assets, but the vast reservoir of Mind Kontrol technologies and methods pioneered by Himmler’s OSS to create the NASA illusion in 1958. 

Space Vacuum — $199 at SEARS[/caption] Without the OSS-CIA MKULTRA programs operating in the background, NASA’s true intentions would have been sniffed out long ago. In short, NASA would never have come into being without the mass deployment of MKULTRA programming to anesthetize the public. Unfortunately, NASA has been one of the largest incubators of pseudoscience in order to obscure the simple and glaring fundamental issues that NASA has built it’s vaunted “brand-name” upon.

****

We are told by the deities of NASA that space is a virtual vacuum and their approximation as to where this vacuum starts and the atmosphere stops is called the Karman Line which is estimated at 62 miles. However the Wiki [5] says “no clear boundary exists between earths atmosphere and space, just a decrease in density or fewer gas molecules”. Its important to note that the whole concept of space travel is driven by two concepts, (1)gravity and the (2)vacuum of space we call the universe.

Here is the Wiki for Outer Space;

[5]There is no clear boundary between Earth’s atmosphere and space, as the density of the atmosphere gradually decreases as the altitude increases. There are several standard boundary designations, namely: The Fédération Aéronautique Internationale has established the Kármán line at an altitude of 100 km (62 mi) as a working definition for the boundary between aeronautics and astronautics. This is used because at an altitude of about 100 km (62 mi), as Theodore von Kármán calculated, a vehicle would have to travel faster than orbital velocity in order to derive sufficient aerodynamic lift from the atmosphere to support itself. The United States designates people who travel above an altitude of 50 miles (80 km) as astronauts.

So the Karman line is approximately 62 miles up and then you enter the partial vacuum of space, poof!, you’ve become weightless. That is what the Freemasons of NASA want you to believe and it’s total BS.

[6]Vacuum is space void of matter. The word stems from the Latin adjective vacuus for “vacant” or “void”. An approximation to such vacuum is a region with a gaseous pressure much less than atmospheric pressure.^[1] Physicists often discuss ideal test results that would occur in a perfect vacuum, which they sometimes simply call “vacuum” or free space, and use the term partial vacuum to refer to an actual imperfect vacuum as one might have in a laboratory or in space.   The principal environmental characteristic of outer space is the vacuum, or nearly total absence of gas molecules. The gravitational attraction of large bodies in space, such as planets and stars, pulls gas molecules close to their surfaces leaving the space between virtually empty. Some stray gas molecules are found between these bodies, but their density is so low that they can be thought of as practically nonexistent.

So as stated above, the term partial vacuum “refers to an imperfect vacuum as one might have in a laboratory or in space.”Since a laboratory or space are two places we could look for imperfect vacuums, let’s look at the laboratory versions.

They all have an envelope/glass dome to offset the inward pressure as air is pumped out. Without some type of rigidity they would collapse in on themselves. So if the laboratory can create an equally good imperfect vacuum shouldn’t examples in space have the same types of attributes? One would think so but it’s not the case. A vacuum in the lab is created by sucking out the gases/matter, but in space the same vacuum is supposidly created and maintained by the paradoxical expansion of the universe. Imagine exhaling into a balloon (expansion) and then inhaling the air back out (vacuum) they are two different processes but yet NASA says it yields the same result. Sorry not buying it. By the way the supposed expansion of the universe was just recently recorded by NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope and it was…

74.3 plus or minus 2.1 kilometers (46.2 plus or minus 1.3 miles) per second per megaparsec (a megaparsec is roughly 3 million light-years) “Space itself is pulling apart at the seams”

The measurements of the expansion of the universe of course are complete nonsense since The Spitzer Telescope only exists on the hard-drives of NASA’s production department. . As I’ve stated numerous times, just show us real images and video of earth and satellites and we’ll call off the dogs. But true to their colors as accomplished liars, there’s always another lie to cover another truth. In space a new set of principles seem to apply allowing the envelope/dome/boundary to be semi-permeable and objects can gradually enter into and out of the vacuum. Because of this very reason space cannot be considered a vacuum as compared to it’s laboratory brethren. There is obviously something wrong with the assertion that there is a “vacuum of space”.

The only proof offered that a vacuum exists in space are fake asstronot images or videos7 of either the Apollo, Space Lab, ISS/Shuttle hoaxes. “The only proof of the Vacuum Of Space is the illusion of weightlessness” and without the illusion of weightlessness in space, it would reveal the farce and canard that NASA calls the Vacuum of Space. One cannot have a vacuum next to a non-vacuum and have interplay between the two, it’s impossible and paradoxical.

****

The framework or scaffolding that space travel is real was born out of the crucible of science-fiction and fantasy long before it was purportedly confirmed on July 16, 1969 with Apollo 11. Below is the editorial section of the New York Times called Topics Of The Times to professor Robert Goddard’s statement that a rocket can function in a total vacuum in the New York Times from an article published Jan. 13, 1920. The first paragraph states

”That Professor Goddard, with his ‘chair’ in Clark College and the countenancing of the Smithsonian Institution, does not know the relation of action to reaction, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react — to say that would be absurd. Of course he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.”

Here you see the editorial mocking the absurdity that a rocket can work in a vacuum on its own. The second paragraph was the official retraction 49 years later on July 17, 1969. The Freemasons never miss an opportunity to do-it right in plain sight. Apollo 11 was launched July 16, 1969 on the 4 day journey to the moon. What are the odds?

Further investigation and experimentation have confirmed the findings of Isaac Newton in the 17th century and it is now definitely established that a rocket can function in a vacuum as well as in an atmosphere. The Times regrets the error.

Here is an excerpt from Professor Goddard released by Clarke University after his findings were ridiculed by the New York Times;

Dr. Goddard gave another reaction to the New York Times editorial in front of an assembly of Clark University undergraduate students a few years before his first rocket launch. As described by one of the students who was there, inside a glass bell jar Dr. Goddard put “a spindle at the top of which was rigged a .22 caliber revolver loaded with a blank cartridge. The latter was electrically wired to explode at a given moment. After exhausting as much air as practically possible from the bell jar, thus creating an airless vacuum analogous to the medium outside the earth’s atmosphere, and after quoting The New York Times pejorative comments, Dr. Goddard touched a key, the cartridge exploded, and the pistol spun briskly around making four complete revolutions. Dr. Goddard knew that Isaac Newton’s Third Law, viz., that every force has an equal and opposite reaction, had never been repealed; that it operates universally whether in or out of a vacuum; and therefore whether in or out of atmospheric space. This experiment as repeated for us was highly dramatic and, of course, quite conclusive. As the pistol spun around, Dr. Goddard dryly observed, ‘So much for The New York Times.’”

This is the absurd proof that Goddard uses to prove that rockets work in a vacuum. First and foremost, how much removal of air does “practically possible” mean? Inside a bell jar, even a small amount of gas would be sufficient to push against because of the containment rigidity of the bell jar. And it’s certainly possible that no air was removed and the demonstration was slight-of-hand trickery (science certainly has no shortage of frauds and charlatans in the history books). In space that same amount of gas would not be contained but rather dispersed since no bell-jar exists in the first place.

In a bell-jar pressure waves reverberating off the glass will also further distort the proof, but the vacuum of space has no such limitations. Furthermore, stating it’s analogous to space is a theory on top of a theory since no direct proof existed of space or its contents at the time (1920). The bell-jar therefore cannot be considered analogous to space since the “vacuum of space” was unverified and only speculative. There was and has been no scientific verification just mathematical and half-baked pseudoscience examples like the above. But the powers that be said it’s so, so then it must be. The University Of Illinois Champagne – Urbana Physics Dept. States:

So the answer really depends on what you mean by vacuum. If you mean what’s left when all the atoms etc. are pumped out, yes it still has a temperature of electromagnetic radiation. If you want, though, you could choose to only call that a vacuum if the temperature is zero. By the way, the third law of thermodynamics says nothing can ever get to zero temperature, so by that definition there wouldn’t be any vacuums.

The below video details the NASA Vacuum Chamber located in Ohio. Listen to this NASA representative talk about the uses for the vacuum chamber and she highlights that it’s been used for making movies such as Armageddon and Future World. So not only is this a vacuum chamber it’s also a movie set, should we be surprised, no. NASA is already proven to be a Freemasonic Satanic Jesuit Hollywood hoax machine. Also notice the extreme construction of the chamber, replete with interlocking steel doors to deter the crushing effects of attaining a vacuus state. What would happen if a rocket tried to pierce the vacuum chamber or it’s analogous twin the Karman Line?

According to NASA pseudoscience, a rocket can magically move in and out of the vacuum of space, despite the impermeable nature of their own vacuum chamber. This is in direct contradiction to the semi-permeable “Karman Line” as depicted by NASA’s so-called brain trust. But don’t worry about this intractable paradox, NASA has the keys to the cosmos and whatever they pontificate has to be true. Welcome to NASA’s MKULTRA pseudoscience programming.

****

As a side note, Robert Goddards main financier was Benjamin  Guggenheim who was murdered along with John Jacob Astor and Isador Straus on the R.M.S. Titanic in 1912, which was owned by Jesuit Rothschild bag-man J.P. Morgan Chase. All three men were in opposition to the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia and Jesuit takeover of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Remember Nikola Tesla and what J.P Morgan Chase did to him?

Even in the early 1900’s the Jesuits were whacking people and bulldozing their way to financial control of the United States. To reward Professor Robert Goddard’s Jesuit obedience, The Goddard Space Research Center was created in his memory and he was eventually relocated to Roswell N.M. of all places in 1931 to continue testing rockets. In 1947 Roswell was the center of the world. You just can’t make this stuff-up.  

See also:

The Occult Roots Of NASA And The Ongoing Fraud: Part 1

The Occult Roots Of NASA And The Ongoing Fraud: Part 2

Satanic Freemasons Of NASA Caught Watching Child Porn!

Operation Paperclip Was Heavily Involved In OSS-CIA MKULTRA Programs, Not Space!

NASA’S Greatest Space Hoaxes 1956 -2015 The True History And Purpose Of NASA: To Lie and Deceive

NASA Logo Embedded In Morgellons Nano Fibres NASA Is A Government Military Operation: Subjugating Humanity To Artificial Intelligence

NASA Admits to Chemtrails and Lithium Test

Sources:

https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=1046 http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-new-york-times-1920-editorial-mocking-space-travel-remains-a-classic

http://www.themoderngnostic.com/?page_id=52011

http://www.themoderngnostic.com/?page_id=55474

http://www.themoderngnostic.com/?page_id=56426