Modern evangelicalism owes much to the Pentecostal and charismatic movements in North America and the world. The best known leaders of Neo-evangelicalism in the 1940s and 1950s–including Carl Henry, Harold Ockenga, and Billy Graham–were not Pentecostals. In fact, some early insiders objected to cooperation with spirit-filled churches. Without the support and rapid growth of Pentecostalism, however, evangelicalism would not have reached its position of influence in the twentieth century. Today, many churches that could be considered “evangelical” emulate worship practices that were only common to Pentecostal or charismatic churches a generation ago. Even as Pentecostalism becomes more mainstream in American Christianity, a rich debate exists within the ranks of Pentecostals over whether they rightly identify with evangelicalism, or are indeed a separate and distinct movement.
Given the relative brevity of the movement, its growth and global reach is remarkable. In addition to fine monographs and studies of Pentecostal leaders, a rich resource for scholars of religion is the internal data providedannually by the Assemblies of God (AG): http://ag.org/top/about/statistics/index.cfm. These studies break down the growth of the AG by various regions and states. Further data on race and age of church adherents open new opportunities for research questions. Statistics are provided for adherents, attendance at church services and other worship practices. Scholars may also note that the steady increase in attendance and adherents is in contrast to a slight declineof spirit baptisms over the past ten years. Throughout the Pentecostal movement’s history, the gift of tongues, or glossolalia, has been one of the major distinguishing characteristics of Pentecostals compared to holiness or other pietistic groups. Spirit baptism continues to be reported in significant numbers, but there is a growth gap in the practice as compared to membership and attendance. What does the decrease in this practice mean for the AG when compared with the continued increase in numbers? And what can these trends reveal about the intersection of Pentecostals and evangelicalism?
As another example, the summary report for 2012 indicates a drop in Sunday evening service attendance by 48% over a ten year period. A number of factors may explain this, including the adoption of home-based small groups instead of evening services. But for old time Pentecostals, evening and mid-week services were a standard expectation of participating in the church. If more people are joining the AG, but fewer are experiencing spirit baptism and attending multiple services per week, there is evidence that the largest Pentecostal denomination in the country is changing. As Pentecostals slowly move away from the practices that distinguished the movement, many evangelical churches are adopting approaches to music, broadcasting, and worship styles from Pentecostalism. These changes beg for further explanation and scholarly interpretation.
The Assemblies of God recently marked 100 years since its founding in Hot Springs, Arkansas in April 1914. On August 5-10, 2014, the AG will commemorate the centennial with a celebration in its home base city of Springfield, Missouri. As it enters its second century, the movement shows no signs of losing momentum when measured by the number of people filling its churches. While this is a sign of continued growth, the practices that mark Pentecostalism are changing. Pentecostalism and American evangelicalism continue to become more similar in practice.
As observers continue to debate the death and decline of evangelicalism, the continued rise–and shifting meaning–of Pentecostalism is already shaping global Christianity for the next century.
Source:
http://usreligion.blogspot.com/2014/07/pentecostalism-growing-and-changing.html
Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex
HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary New Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting.
Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link , or the Banner Below.
Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because...
It’s OXYGENATED
It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH
Preservative and Chemical Free
Allergen Free
Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source
Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals
Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents
Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons
Is a Full Spectrum Complex
Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials.
Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
19 “Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that [by my voice] I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an [unknown] tongue.”
How can this be misunderstood or twisted? Paul a highly educated man knowing many languages would rather speak 5 words you can understand then 10,000 that has absolutely no meaning to you. The same must apply when speaking with God privately.
When speaking in “tongues” are you sure Satan is not cursing God by your voice? Do you really know what you are speaking? That is a valid question and you have no sure answer.