Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By sharonjorgen (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Mark, Luke & Paul who were NOT eyewitnesses NOR apostles had to discredit Matthew the publican (with a mind for precision) who wrote a detailed account of Christ's ministry

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


 

Matthew plainly states how he became a disciple and the events immediately following:

 

And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he saith unto him, Follow me. And he arose, and followed him.

10 And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with him and his disciples.

Matthew 9

 

Corruption #1  Matthew is someone else…

 

14 And as he passed by, he saw LEVI THE SON OF ALPHAEUS sitting at the receipt of custom, and said unto him, Follow me. And he arose and followed him.
15 And it came to pass, that, as Jesus sat at meat in his house, many publicans and sinners sat also together with Jesus and his disciples: for there were many, and they followed him.

Mark 2

 

 

27 And after these things he went forth, and saw a publican, named LEVI, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he said unto him, Follow me.

28 And he left all, rose up, and followed him.

29 And Levi made him a great feast in his own house: and there was a great company of publicans and of others that sat down with them.

Luke 5

 

Now maybe you’re thinking perhaps Matthew was called by a different name as some were, but not this time since the son of Alphaeus is listed as a distinct apostle…BUT LEVI IS NOT HIS NAME!!!  There is NO apostle Levi…

 

EVERY list of apostles confirms “JAMES the son of Alphaeus” Matthew 10:3, Mark 3:18, Luke 6:15, Acts 1:13

 

Also Matthew contains the ONLY list of apostles that confirms that he was the publican that sat at receipt of custom “Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew THE PUBLICAN; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus;” Matthew 10:3

 

 

Corruption #2  This former publican STILL has a house to go to…

 

“as Jesus sat at meat in THE house” — Matthew’s testimony

“as Jesus sat at meat in HIS house” — Mark’s testimony

“Levi made him a great feast in HIS own house” — Luke’s testimony

 

 

This publican MADE JESUS A GREAT FEAST IN HIS HOUSE??! After Jesus says follow me and he does…leaving ALL…now we should believe that this publican immediately has Jesus follow HIM home??!!!

 

Gosh why didn’t Christ just make that his home base since now he’s converted someone with a great party pad that will do his bidding?

 

Well like Paul Harvey used to say…”For the rest of the story…” this publican was definitely a sinner and Luke wants you to know it!

 

 

Corruption #3  After turning Matthew into Levi, make him a sinner because he was a tax collector…

 

 

ONLY LUKE places publicans (and soldiers!) with the ministry of John the Baptist [also reducing the heat on the Pharisees that "generation of vipers"] followed ironically by a genealogy that lists Levi 2x…not found in Matthew!

 

 

12 Then came also PUBLICANS to be baptized, and said unto him, Master, what shall we do?

13 And he said unto them, Exact no more than that which is appointed you.

Luke 3

 

“And the PUBLICAN, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.” Luke 13:18

 

BTW the Pharisee in this fake story is NOT a sinner, but only self-righteous!  Read Matthew 23 for the truth: Pharisees are indeed extortioners and unjust and murderers!!

 

Getting back to Matthew the publican,

Jesus NEVER called Matthew to repentance, there is no reason to assume that Matthew EVER ‘exacted more than that which was appointed to him’…a publican or collector of public taxes was not inherently evil, though it provided ample opportunity for corruption thus attracting the unscrupulous.

 

Jesus — who would OFFEND with his doctrine — nonetheless paid tribute for him and Peter from the mouth of a fish in order to NOT OFFEND.  {Matthew 17:24-27}

 

 

Luke likewise has a twisted account of Peter publicly confessing himself a sinner when the true account has nothing of the sort.

 

“When Simon Peter saw it, he fell down at Jesus’ knees, saying, Depart from me; for I am a sinful man, O Lord.” Luke 5:8

 

Luke says Jesus ”saw two ships standing by the lake: but the fishermen were gone out of them, and were washing their nets“…

…but Matthew speaks the truth “And Jesus, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea: for they were fishers.”

 

Gee how do you wash a net on shore and use it for fishing off a boat at the same time?!  At least Mark’s account generally agrees with Matthew, showing what utter hokum the book of Luke is.

 

 

LUKE IS BOTH A LIAR and a PLAGIARIST:

This ‘all night nothing, then in the morning with Jesus so many fish that the net almost breaks’ scenario has actually been lifted from JOHN’S testimony AFTER THE RESURRECTION in John 21:3-11.

 

Mark is like the Colin Powell of his day who is embarrassed to simply make up a lie to serve the purposes of his superior, but Luke is all in, spinning a fictitious tale to serve the ultimate end.  You can see it where Paul has only Luke with him (‘Demas forsook him’), but reluctant Mark must be summoned 2 Timothy 4:11 and “Paul thought not good to take him with them…so Barnabas took MARK” Acts 15:36-41.

 

One big happy face on the conspiracy to supplant the true gospel of Jesus Christ with the doctrine of Pharisee Paul:

 

“Marcus[MARK], Aristarchus, Demas, Lucas[LUKE], my fellowlabourers” Philemon 1:24

 

“Aristarchus my fellowprisoner saluteth you, and Marcus[MARK], sister’s son to Barnabas, (touching whom ye received commandments: if he come unto you, receive him;)”

 

“LUKE, the beloved physician, and Demas, greet you.”

 

Colossians 4:10,14

 

Paul has lies to sell, not mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven as revealed exclusively by the Son of God

 

For 2000 years Paul, Luke & Mark have swindled almost everyone! Since Mark was NOT an apostle he subtly turns Jesus’ true apostles into non-believers, so that Paul can then bring the ‘real truth’ that they were too blind to see

 



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 7 comments
    • Amminadab

      If Paul wasn’t a true apostle either Peter or James would have spoken against him and neither one of them does so. Nor did any of the other apostles in any of the books not even the ones that didn’t make it into the Bible.

      People like you and others on BIN do nothing but cast doubt on all Scripture.

      • sharonjorgen

        In OBEDIENCE to the Son of God, who told his apostles to “beware the doctrine of the Pharisees”, I most certainly cast doubt on the claims of Paul and those in cahoots with him…as I have shown repeatedly in these articles a conspiracy to supplant the true gospel of the kingdom.

        The resurrected Jesus Christ unto the angel of the ecclesia in Ephesus…
        “thou hast tried them which SAY THEY ARE APOSTLES, and are not, and hast found them LIARS” Revelation 2:2

        Here is the chief liar :arrow:
        “This thou knowest, that ALL THEY WHICH ARE IN ASIA be turned away from me” 2 Timothy 1:15

        WHY SHOULD ANYONE ACCEPT AS SCRIPTURE choices made by the emerging Roman [Paul's stomping grounds] Catholic Church at the Council of Nicaea in 325 :?:

      • sharonjorgen

        “If Paul wasn’t a true apostle either Peter or James would have spoken against him…” Well, when you’re being persecuted and MARTYRED it’s a bit tricky to be a scribe, unlike Paul who “dwelt two whole years in his own hired house” (Acts 28:30) :!:

        2 And he KILLED JAMES the brother of John with the sword.
        3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to TAKE PETER also.
        Acts 12

        The so-called epistles of James and Peter are inconsistent with the doctrine of Christ. With both dead, Paul was free to corrupt their words (as Mark and Luke clearly did Christ’s)…but the RESURRECTED Jesus spoke to the apostle John in the Revelation, thus confirming the true everlasting gospel.

        WHOSE TESTIMONY WILL YOU BELIEVE?!

    • they.pierced.My.hands.and.My.feet.

      The Holy Spirit bears witness to the Truth, which is “Spirit”, not words on a page.

      Bears witness to every word that is of El Shadday.

      • sharonjorgen

        Jesus was quite clear about his eternal word…If you are unwilling to eat those ‘words on a page’ then DO NOT EXPECT the promises :arrow:

        31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, IF YE CONTINUE IN MY WORD, then are ye my disciples indeed;

        32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

        36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

        51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, IF A MAN KEEP MY SAYING, he shall never see death.

        John 8

    • Bill Lyle

      Ok. I have a legitimate question, here. Where did Jesus manage to find guys named Paul, Peter, John, Paul, Matthew, and Bartholomew, IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

      Wouldn’t names like Chaim, Ezra, Amichai, and Aharon, be more prevalent in Judea, at that time? Were they white, too?

      • CAPTAIN CHAOS!!

        Paul = Sha’ul

        Peter = Cephas (Petros), meaning a piece of (the) rock – and that’s the name he was given by Jesus. Prior to that his name was Simōn (Σίμων), of Hebrew origin Shim`own (שִׁמְעוֹן)

        John = Yochannan

        Matthew = Matthaios (Ματθαῖος) from the Hebrew Matthitjah

        Bartholomew is a Greek name. Bar Tolemei (Ptolemy), Son of Ptolemy

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.