You Want Answers On Benghazi? Here’s the Truth

This story has been floating around since shortly after the attack. The  difference between now and 10 months ago is that the original hypothesis has  continued to gain evidence to support it. Yesterday’s conspiracy has  turned in today’s reality. This will likely be a long write-up but  for  the sake of my country I plan to tell you what I know. In the end you will  have  to judge whether you deem it as proof or at least reason for suspicion to  support this story line.

Americans are sick and tired of the media circus and the  lack of results coming from Congress. We want the truth. The  problem is that our congressional leaders don’t seem to be asking the right  questions and they are certainly not talking to the right people. On  Thursday, CNN’s Jake Tapper added to  the growing evidence of internal cover up by exposing the fact that “dozens” of  CIA agents were on the grounds and have been intimidated so they won’t talk.  They are allegedly going through routine polygraph testing to ensure they are  not talking to either the media or congress. I was ecstatic to see that come  from a left-wing media source, by the way.

The truth is that this is not about left v. right. It is about wrong  v. right.  Evidence may come out that “the right” was complicit in  this  cover up, as I believe they are. I believe that we have lots of corrupt  legislators on both sides of the aisle that are covering this up like their  life  depended on it. Because it probably does.

For Congress to spend all of this time beating a dead horse makes me think  that they are knowingly complicit or, at least, inadvertently complicit in this  cover up. They continue to ask “softball” questions of people who they know  will  be unwilling to talk. Chances are that nearly every past  testimony  is already a case for perjury but how will we ever know if we don’t  get to the  truth?

So what happened? What is this talk of a prisoner exchange?

Again, this is going to be a long article because I want to make sure that I  leave nothing out.

It all started with Mohamed Morsi and a promise…

On June 29th, 2012 The Wall Street Journal reported  that Mohamed Morsi was making some rather extreme promises to his new  constituents:

Egypt’s President-elect Mohammed Morsi made a nod to his base in a speech  on Friday when he pledged to seek the release of Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman from  U.S. custody.

Sheik Abdel-Rahman, who is better known as the “blind sheik” is serving a  life sentence at a federal penitentiary in North Carolina for his role in  planning the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York  City.

This is more than likely where the theory began. What one must ask themselves  is this…Did Morsi already have a plan in place to make sure that he  could deliver on this promise? It is my belief that he did.  Barack  Obama was a big Morsi supporter from the beginning as were his cabinet  members.  Shortly before the current revolution started John Kerry waived normal  conditions to make sure that Egypt got 1.3 billion in additional  aid from us.

When did the Egypt/USA prisoner exchange theory first gain some  credibility?

What would you rate the credibility level of a retired 4-star Admiral?  Someone who has held that position certainly understands more than you or I do  about the inner workings of Washington and the level of corruption to which it  might sink. Retired Admiral James “Ace” Lyons appeared in an  interview with Lou Dobbs back in early November to lend more credibility to the   “prisoner exchange” theory. I apologize for the quality of this  video but it was the only one I could find that didn’t cut out the excerpt I  want you to hear. That’s interesting in and of itself. Thank goodness for a guy  with a camcorder.

The benefit to Morsi is obvious, but what about Obama?

What benefit could Obama possibly receive from this exchange? The idea is  that, in what was thought to be a hotly contested presidential race, an October  release of Ambassador Stevens may have been enough to put Obama over the top. A  tragedy happens and Obama rides in on his stallion to save the day… It turns  out  that he did not need any help.

Great theory, but how can we prove anything when no one is  talking?

The thing is that people are talking, but no one seems to be listening.  Witnesses and whistleblowers have been intimidated into silence in our own  country but they are talking elsewhere. A lot of smart bloggers and journalists  have caught on to this, and even though most of these stories don’t make it to  the mainstream media, it does not mean they are not true. Now I want to  summarize four stories that I feel lend credibility to this prisoner exchange  scenario. All of them came from outside of our own borders.

Regarding the security, or lack thereof, question…

To this day I would bet that less than 10% of American people  realize that we were paying an Al Qaeda linked group to defend  our diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Why would we do that? Well maybe we  wanted to make sure that attack happened.

The February 17th Martyr’s Brigade was hired by our government to  defend the diplomatic mission in Benghazi. This organization proudly flew an Al  Qaeda flag on their Facebook page. Yes I am serious.

Two days before the attack they threatened withdrawal. A  few hours after the attack they officially disbanded. How  convenient? Does that smell anything like a set up to you? The  only  way we would have left that diplomatic mission in such bad hands is if  we wanted it  attacked or simply did not care.

Further Research: TREASON…Government Hired Al  Qaeda to Defend the Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi?

In early June there was the first big break from foreign sources to  support the “prisoner exchange” story…

The original prisoner exchange story died down until it was rekindled in June  by comments made by an Al Qaeda weapons  expert. The Washington Free  Beacon reported:

“…according to the March 14 posting on an al Qaeda-linked website,  Abdallah Dhu-al-Bajadin, the al Qaeda weapons expert, stated that Stevens was  given a lethal injection and that the injection was overlooked during the  medical autopsy.

According to Dhu-al-Bajadin, “the plan was based on abduction and  exchange of high-level prisoners.”

This was our first piece of potential evidence from abroad that the prisoner  exchange theory might have been true. The problem is obvious. Who wants to  trust  the word of an Al Qaeda operative? But in very short time we had another  source  come forward…

Further research: Benghazi… New Source Claims  Ambassador Stevens Died From Lethal  Injection 

Also in June an Egyptian journalist linked Morsi to  Benghazi…

Cynthia Farahat is an Egyptian  journalist who came upon a video which she translated to English. The  video was of the terrorists who attacked the diplomatic mission and they were  quoted by her as saying:

“Don’t shoot, don’t shoot, Dr. Morsi sent us.”

Farahat also went so far as to surmise that the dialect of Arabic being  spoken was not indigenous to Libya. Her claim is that the men were speaking in  an Egyptian dialect.

At the time I was unaware because I had only started blogging in late 2012  but Pamela Geller had already pounced on  this story long before Farahat. So it seems that at least two  translations have implicated Morsi in this matter.

Further research: Egyptian Journalist Links  Morsi to Benghazi 

At this point my personal thoughts were starting to lean in the direction of  the “prisoner exchange” theory but I was not convinced. I had one Al Qaeda  operative and one translator of Arabic in my corner. I don’t know Arabic and  didn’t know that there were other sources citing the same translation. I felt  that there was still something missing. Then it happened. At the end of June we  heard a third story to corroborate everything and the story was huge, yet very  under reported by both the left and right.

A leaked Libyan intelligence document implicated Morsi…

Raymond Ibrahim broke a story in the U.S. of a leaked Libyan intelligence document that  implicated Mohamed Morsi as a financier of the Benghazi attack. Here is a  quote from Ibrahim:

On Wednesday, June 26, several Arabic websites, including Veto Gate,  quoted the intelligence report, which apparently was first leaked to the  Kuwaiti  paper, Al Ra’i.  Prepared by Mahmoud Ibrahim Sharif, Director  of  National Security for Libya, the report is addressed to the nation’s  Minister of  Interior.

It discusses the preliminary findings of the investigation, specifically  concerning an “Egyptian cell” which was involved in the consulate attack.  “Based  on confessions derived from some of those arrested at the scene” six  people,  “all of them Egyptians” from the jihad group Ansar al-Sharia  (“Supporters of  Islamic Law), were arrested.

According to the report, during interrogations, these Egyptian jihadi  cell members “confessed to very serious and important information concerning  the  financial sources of the group and the planners of the event and the  storming  and burning of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…. And among the more  prominent  figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions  were:  Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi; preacher Safwat Hegazi; Saudi  businessman  Mansour Kadasa, owner of the satellite station, Al-Nas;  Egyptian Sheikh  Muhammad Hassan; former presidential candidate, Hazim Salih Abu  Isma’il…”

There is a similar translation from a different source in this article at WND.com.

Further research: Libyan Intelligence Confirms  Egyptian President, Muslim Brotherhood Involved in  Benghazi 

So where does this leave us? It would appear that Morsi can be as least  listed as a strong suspect. Three sources of proof have come forth to  substantiate the story of a prisoner exchange and/or Morsi’s involvement.

How can we reasonably tie that to Barack Obama and Hillary  Clinton? I can’t tell you of anything that we have thus far that might hold up  in court but just consider the actions of Obama, Kerry and Clinton.

How many times have we bent over backward in recent months (before the  revolution) to placate Morsi and The Muslim Brotherhood? The 1.3  Billion dollar gift from Kerry and his waiver of congressional restrictions is  a  perfect example. Anyone hear anything about fighter jets and  tanks? Why is this important?

It is important because I guarantee that Obama, Clinton and Kerry  knew about that Libyan intelligence report long before we ever  did. Yet they continued to support our Egyptian “allies” and went  out of their way to do so.

Why? Because they were partners in crime with Morsi and I am 99%  sure of it. If they wanted justice for Morsi’s involvement in  Benghazi they would have called for it long ago.

Rand Paul has been screaming for months about how we need to cut off aid to  Egypt and very few of his colleagues seem to listen. Why might that be?

It might  be that many of them are complicit. They are covering for  Obama.

When I hear these stupid questions about where Obama was or who gave  the stand down order I cannot easily digest them. These questions  are irrelevant to the bigger story. It seems to me that our congressional  servants are protecting the president and his staff. These people are more  informed than you or I. That is their job.

Many of them know about these reports. Again, it is their job to stay  informed and they have varying levels of security clearance and plenty of  contacts.

I get very frustrated as a small potatoes blogger. I find these stories and  report them and see the media ignore them. This includes a lot of  big right-wing news sources. It’s not just the liberal led  mainstream media outlets.

In the end it is my belief that both Hillary Clinton and Barack  Obama were involved in a deal to send The Blind Sheik back to Egypt in exchange  for Stevens. A few people on the other end screwed up the script and here we  are.

I am not really concerned with what Obama was doing during the attacks. It’s  obvious that he was gone to establish distance from the happenings of September  11th 2012. It was planned for his protection.  I am more concerned with  the  fact that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are more than  likely  accessories to the murder of four Americans.

That is how I see it. In my mind I already know, with almost 100% certainty,  what happened and it is my belief that corruption runs so deep that congress  will not do one thing about it. They will continue to ask stupid questions that  get us nowhere. Very few of them have any backbone at all and we will continue  to see evidence of that in the coming months.

So I write this not for any results to come out of it. I am just hoping that  some people will find some peace in the truth. If we could get the  truth from our own elected officials we wouldn’t have to trust Al Qaeda  operatives, Egyptian journalists and Libyan intelligence reports.

For now that’s all we have. If congress would approach this angle then the  details might begin to fall into place. Either way, unless something major  breaks to prove me wrong, I have heard what I needed to hear in regards to the  truth.

I know the road that congress should be taking and they are failing to take  it. Obama and Clinton certainly deserve their day in court because  nothing I have told you is absolute proof, but… My guess is that they will  never  see that day in court.

It’s a travesty for the families and for the American people as a whole. But  I hope you can walk away from my ramblings today and have a clearer picture in  your mind of why this senseless tragedy happened. I have a sense of peace about  what happened in Benghazi and I hope you can find the same.

All I wanted was the truth. I never really believed our government would do  anything about it.

We cling to the truth for that is all we have.

Yes, our government really is this corrupt.

Never forget Benghazi!