TEA Party are racist because they attack killing innocent babies.

NORTH CAROLINA - Protestors at the recent NAACP Moral March (in which racist TEA party member were not invited because they have this stupid moral code against killing innocent babies) in North Carolina are certain that the TEA Party is racist. Most just couldn’t tell Dave Webb why. Most of the answers sounded like Jan Brewer in a gubernatorial debate.

Finally one woman spoke out:

“I think their racist against blacks, Hispanics. I think they’re racists against women.” When pressed for a reason, “The things they say about abortion.”

(Short Version)

Really? We are racist because we hate murdering innocent little babies? Could it be our warning…

…of the menace posed by the “black” and “yellow” peril.

Oh. That wasn’t the TEA party. That was:

Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

One of Margaret Sanger’s ideas:

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

Moving on, we get the opinion of another woman:

“It’s their reaction to us having a black president that makes them racist.”

There could be a few that have a problem with having a “black” president. I haven’t met any, but they do not reflect the general thinking TEA party member. Most are enthralled with Allen West though I have problems with him philosophically. Certainly not because of his race. I had problems with Bill Clinton. Does that make me a sexist? I had problems with Jimmy Carter. Does that make me Arachibutyrophobic? (Look it up. I had to!)

My problem with Obama is not because he is a “black” president, but that he is a “red” president.

The left Reverend William Barber, the leader of this little fiasco, attacked the TEA party by attacking Republican Senator Tim Scott. Apparently attacking a Senator because he is black is not racist.

Barber is quoted as saying:

“A ventriloquist can always find a good dummy…The extreme right wing down here finds a black guy senator…and then he goes to Washington, D.C., and articulates the agenda of the TEA party.”

Which is a little confusing since Barber is from North Carolina and the Senator Tim Scott is from South Carolina. Interesting that Barber has no problem with Lindsey Graham.

Later he explained:

“It’s my calling. It’s my job. The job of the NAACP to speak the truth about public policies. … And while some people may choose to get caught up on a metaphor that is a regular usage of preachers… The real indignation, the real indignation, and upsetness should be over the regressive agenda…”

So the Constitution of the United States is a regressive agenda? Well, I must admit that it really made me think the last time my preacher used the ventriloquist dummy metaphor. Like the dummies that said we need immigration reform so that they will vote Republican.

Well, anyway, the left Reverend William Barber disagrees with his followers. He says that Tim Scott can be racist, but the TEA party cannot be. In February of last year, he stated in an interview:

“Racism is when you have the power, politically or economically, to, in fact, implement and enforce, or, or, or to determine public policy in a despaired way.”

We can only be prejudice. Which, well… Is kind of a polite way of saying racist.

And Benghazi was caused by a Youtube video that nobody watched until someone said that Benghazi was caused by a Youtube video.