Beware of Texas Driver's License - read the fine print on the application.

Dear readers (and especially those from Texas),

About a week or so ago a friend of mine took his 16 year old to get a Texas driver’s license.  Despite the normal arrogancy of administrative and law enforcement officers there, it was actually reading the fine print on the application that was incredibly eye opening. And even more curious was the fact that it  was prohibited for anyone to take the application outside of the office and that all applicants were obliged to fill it out in the presence of an officer.

Here is a downloadable version of the application:  http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/internetforms/Forms/DL-14A.pdf

After sending this application to my friend for verfication, he observed some word variations and that this application is not exactly the same thing of what is being presented there. (I would be interested to see the original)  Anyway, look closely on the first page towards the bottom. You see UNITED SELECTIVE SERVICE

United States Selective Service is Federal ….as stated in the Federalist Papers #15m written by Alexander Hamilton, the National Government has no right to requisition men or money from those in the Constitutional Republic (the individual States)….

Most American Nationals do not even know this.   Also, there is no reference to any Implementing Regulation published in the Federal Register pertaining to the government having such power over the people. You can also observe that there is no definition for what actually is a federal statutory “U.S. citizen” as defined by the United States Code…..that is standard gamesmanship to trick Americans. 

The issues, once again, are:

The fact that the Military Selective Service Act is “legislation” and that the Supreme Court said many times that the federal government has NO LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION within states of the union.  Therefore, the Military Selective Service Act can only apply within the District of Columbia and Federal Territories. 

That the Federalist Paper 15 confirms that the federal government cannot directly requisition men or tax money from the states, but must go through the state governments and use apportionment, just like for apportioned direct taxes.

That the definition of “State” within the phrase “several States” of the Military Selective Service act refers to federal territories and not states of the Union.

That Title 50 is NOT enacted into positive law and therefore is not binding upon anyone.

That 32 CFR 1602.3b makes only federally statutory defined “citizens of the United States” subject, where the “United States” means the federal territories and the District of Columbia and NOT the states of the Union.  Where does enacted positive law also add “aliens, residents”, etc?

This article is not at all challenging the Military Selective Service Act , but its applicability within states of the Union and federal jurisdiction within STATES of the Union.  I’m not interested in opinion, but in enacted positive law and implementing regulations published in the Federal Register as required by 44 U.S.C. 1505 authorizing you to directly draft men without first going through the state governments as the Constitution requires.

This “fine print” really says that what Texas is doing is illegal in regard to the Military Selective Service Act

Please refer to this interesting publication. 

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Military/Draft/NotSubjectToDraft-Query.htm