Trump's judges double down, making it easier for prosecutors to convict innocent people
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) talk with each other as Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the third day of his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill, September 6, 2018.
Donald J. Trump’s put five judges on the Fifth Circuit; George W. Bush placed four there. Two Reagan appointees are still active. Just three Obama and two Clinton judges sit on that court, which hears appeals from Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The latest reminder of what that means for our rights is a chilling one.
For the past 55 years, prosecutors have been required to share exculpatory evidence—that is, evidence they have that a defendant may be innocent—with the defendant. That requirement, called the Brady Rule or Brady Doctrine, does little to alleviate the radical disparity between prosecutorial and defense resources when defendants depend on public funding, but it’s a bulwark against the worst of abuses. The rule came out of a 1963 Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland, in which prosecutors prosecuted one man, John Leo Brady, for murder—he was sentenced to death—despite having a confession from another man, Donald Boblit, admitting he’d been the one to kill the victim.
Seems like a fundamentally sound concept, no?
The Fifth Circuit doesn’t think so, at least not as it is today—an outpost of the GOP. In 2009, it decided prosecutors didn’t have to turn over exculpatory evidence during the plea-bargaining process. Given a chance to reconsider this deviant, destructive precedent, they’ve instead produced an en banc ruling—that is, a ruling from a hearing in which all judges participated—that reaffirms it.
En banc 5th Cir. rules that prosecutors are not required to reveal exculpatory evidence to defendants before they plead guilty. pic.twitter.com/auMEGxhV8e
The case involved an altercation between a jail guard and a 17-year-old who was charged with assault. Four years after he started serving his sentence, a video of the fight “surfaced.” A state court declared him actually innocent and freed him. Prosecutors didn’t object. pic.twitter.com/D5wYfKQ2Kf
This was, of course, the outcome hoped for by the Trump administration.
The en banc majority notes that #SCOTUS hasn’t directly addressed this issue, and that the circuits are divided. pic.twitter.com/oHPiI4akQb
DOJ opposed finding that due process requires the disclosure of exculpatory information before a plea because: 1) it would “impose serious costs on the criminal justice system: and 2 it’s already doing it. pic.twitter.com/N4yxXQtSSR
The dissent is, well, sane.
Here’s the link: http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/16/16-40772-CR2.pdf …
Judge Costa dissents: “It is difficult to think of greater deprivations of that liberty than the government’s allowing someone to be held in prison without telling him that there is evidence that might exonerate him.” pic.twitter.com/9QqycMXOtr
The three dissenting judges tear the majority apart; the majority, of course, which includes just two Democratic appointees, must just not care, à la Melania.
Let this sink in: If George Alvarez had been convicted of a federal crime in this circuit, he would have served his full 10-year sentence despite eventually discovering that the government failed to disclose an exculpatory video. That is because we are the only federal court of appeals that has held that a defendant who pleads guilty is not entitled to evidence that might exonerate him.
Even Texas state law is more progressive than Trumpified Fifth Circuit law—and has been for four decades.
Fortunately for Alvarez, and for those who believe that “justice suffers when any accused is treated unfairly,” he was convicted of a state offense. For almost forty years, Texas has interpreted the federal Brady right to require the government to provide exculpatory information “to defendants who plead guilty as well as to those who plead not guilty.”
In fact, the Fifth Circuit’s call flies in the face of how every other appellate court and state supreme court to have considered this question came out.
The repercussions are enormous: 97 percent of federal criminal convictions and 94 percent of state felony convictions are the result of plea bargains.
Back to the dissent.
Because we now have “for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials,” today’s opinion reaffirming our outlier position means that the vast majority of defendants in this circuit will not have a right to relief if it comes to light after their conviction that the government suppressed exculpatory evidence.
Here’s what we have to look forward to with Trump’s growing hold over the federal judiciary: courts that cling to bad law, no matter the jurisprudential and common sense cues that dictate otherwise. Because they can.
This is also a perfect illustration of the numbers problem: Three judges dissented; in a panel decision left undisturbed, two of those could have carried the ruling. In an en banc proceeding, they’re easily outvoted.
Although in this case there’s a veneer of justification, in that the decision addresses circuit precedent—changing precedent is a valid reason to hear a case en banc—Republican-appointed judges can do this for any panel decision.
It’s not just the Fifth Circuit that Trump’s coopted.
Consider the Seventh Circuit—that’s Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin—and the Eighth—Iowa, Arkansas, Minnesota, and Missouri. Just two of the Seventh Circuit’s 11 judges were appointed by Democrats; on the Eighth, it’s just one. Trump’s seated four judges on the Seventh already; he’s gotten three on the Eighth and nominated a fourth.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
kangaroo courts is what the “justice” dept has devolved into! they make it as unfair to the defendant as possible, because expecting an even playing field is entirely too much for lying psychopathic prosecutors aren’t able to cope with FAIRNESS, FACTS AND TRUTH! It’s not enough that the prosecutor can already BLATANTLY LIE AND WITHHOLD EVIDENCE and NEVER BE PROSECUTED, nope, they have to CHEAT AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO WIN A CONVICTION!