How Governments Control The Masses With The 'Hegelian Dialectic'

Although this story is great in that it raises awarenes of the dialectic process, it is not an entirely accurate representation of the process, or more specifically how it is actually being used. A more accurate explination would be that specific events are exploited to push the populace toward a desired mind set (fear, panic, euphoria, etc.). This is the thesis. As a force of nature there is inevitably a counter force or reaction. This is the antithesis. As the thesis and antithesis is resolved you are left with the synthesis or solution. The trick in manipulating the dialectic outcome is in how extreme the thesis difers from previous sythesis or normal. You also need to be able to predict the synthesis through multiple dialectic processes. Lets look at Obamacare as an example. I would argue that Obamacare is not and never was the true objective. The idea was that Obamacare would create a new extreme (thesis) with both a predictable antithesis and sythisis. I would argue the desired sythesis in this case is actually failure by the collapse of private health insurance. in any case, a new normal has now been establish and a new thesis can now be created resulting again in a predictable antithesis and synthisis. In this case I would predict if the desired 1st sythisis truely is failure the new thesis will be a single payer system. Because the new normal has been pushed closer to the desired outcome this 2nd synthisis will be easier to achive, because the populace will have already been conditioned to the new normal. The best visual representation of the process would be a statistical chart that shows the positive and negative extremes and the mean (normal). The mean (normal) is always a product of the relative positive and negative deviation. The deviations are the thesis and antithesis.