1954 Illegal Transfer of Crimea to Ukraine by Soviet Union

The transfer of Crimea in 1954 was an administrative action of the Supreme Soviet which transferred the government of most of the Crimean peninsula from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian SSR.

Decree[edit]

On February 19, 1954 the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union issued a decree transferring the Crimean Oblast from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian SSR. According to the Soviet Constitution (article 18), the borders of a republic within the Soviet Union could not be re-drawn without the agreement of the republic in question. The transfer was approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union; however, according to article 33 of the constitution, the Presidium did not have the authority to do so. The constitutional change (articles 22 and 23) to accommodate the transfer was made several days after the decree issued by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet.^[1][2]

The decree was first announced, on the front page of Pravda, on February 27, 1954.^[3] The full text of the decree was:^[4]

“Decree of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet transferring the Crimea Province from the Russian SFSR to the Ukrainian SSR.

Taking into account the integral character of the economy, the territorial proximity and the close economic and cultural ties between the Crimea Province and the Ukrainian SSR, the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet decrees:

To approve the joint presentation of the Presidium of the Russian SFSR Supreme Soviet and the Presidium of the Ukrainian SSR Supreme Soviet on the transfer of the Crimea Province from the Russian SFSR to the Ukrainian SSR.”

The transfer took place in three steps: the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation proposed the transfer, the Supreme Soviet then approved, and the Supreme Soviet of the Ukrainian SSR accepted the transfer on June 17, 1954.

There are claims^[who?] that the move was illegal as there was a requirement for a referendum which was never carried out and that the Supreme Soviet was inquorate.^[5]

Personal gesture[edit]

The transfer of the Crimean Oblast to Ukraine has been described as a “symbolic gesture,” marking the 300th anniversary of Ukraine becoming a part of the Tsardom of Russia.^[4][6][7]

Nina Khrushcheva, the political scientist and great-granddaughter of Nikita Khrushchev, the then General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union said of Khrushchev’s motivation “it was somewhat symbolic, somewhat trying to reshuffle the centralized system and also, full disclosure, Nikita Khrushchev was very fond of Ukraine, so I think to some degree it was also a personal gesture toward his favorite republic. He was ethnically Russian, but he really felt great affinity with Ukraine.”^[4] Sergei Khrushchev, Khrushchev’s son, claimed that the decision was due to the building of a hydro-electric dam on the Dnieper River and the consequent desire for all the administration to be under one body.^[8] Sevastopol in Crimea being the site of the Soviet Black Sea Fleet, a quintessential element of Russian and then of Soviet foreign policy, the transfer had the intended^{[citation needed]} effect of binding the Ukraine inexorably to Russia, “Eternally Together”, as the poster commemorating the event of 1954 proclaimed (illustration, left).

The transfer was described by some of the Supreme Soviet as a gift to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the Treaty of Pereyaslav^[1] in 1654 when the Cossack Rada apparently decided to unify with Muscovy, putting in place the eventual acquisition of Ukraine by Russia. Other reasons given were the integration of the economies of Ukraine and Crimea and the idea that Crimea was a natural extension of the Ukrainian steppes.^[9]

There was also a desire to repopulate parts of the Crimea which had suffered large-scale expulsions of its native Tatars to Siberia in 1944.^[10]

Aftermath[edit]

The transfer increased the ethnic Russian population of Ukraine by almost a million people. Prominent Russian politicians such as Alexander Rutskoy considered the transfer to be controversial.^[11] Controversies surrounding the legality of the transfer remained a sore point in relations between Ukraine and Russia for the first few years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, and in particular in the internal politics of the Crimea. However, in a 1997 treaty between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, Russia recognized Ukraine’s borders, and accepted Ukraine’s sovereignty over Crimea.^[12]

In January 1992 the Supreme Soviet of Russia questioned the constitutionality of the transfer, accusing Nikita Khrushchev of treason against the Russian people and said that the transfer was illegitimate.^[13] Alexander Rutskoy, the former Vice President of Russia, said that this was a “harebrained scheme” for which Khrushchev was famous saying that those who signed the document must have been suffering from sunstroke or hangovers.^[14]

There was confusion about the status of Sevastopol and whether it was a part of the transfer as it had a degree of independence from the Crimean Oblast and never formally ratified the transfer,^[15] although it was later mentioned as Ukrainian territory in the Soviet Constitution and the Belavezha Accords between Ukraine and Russia.^[15]

In 1994 a Russian nationalist administration took over in Crimea with the promise to return Crimea to Russia, although these plans were shelved.^[16]

Beginning on February 26, 2014, Russian forces in a swift series of movements took control of the Crimean peninsula using military equipment made in Russia, starting the 2014 Crimean crisis. In March 2014, following the secession referendum, the Republic of Crimea declared independence from Ukraine and began the process of accession to the Russian Federation.

References See Wikipedia article

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_transfer_of_Crimea

So, why does the KLA get Kosovo and the Russian Crimeans get attacked by the West with brutality worse than that involving Serbians battling with Albanian terror groups?

Why does the EU close its eyes to atrocities in Crimea and now hide the fact that Ukraine misdirected a flight and then shot it down so they and the US could falsely blame it on Russia in order to garner support for economic warfare?

Why does Ukraine refuse to release the flight data from the flight recorder?

How is it the US has satellite assets that can track troop movements, flight data of war planes, missile launches and artillery fire but now refuses to release any imaging intelligence of the shootdown?

Why is it Russia released real-time intelligence and provided a military briefing that was open to the world and yet the US will only release Tweets and Facebook nonsense?

Why is it there is no call from the US media to release intelligence considering the US wants to instigate a military buildup on the Russia border to antagonize a country that lost 20 million people during WWII, a number that is about 20 times higher that the US losses during the same war?

Why is it the people can’t be free and returned back to the country from where they and their land come?

It is obvious the US goal is to weaken and divide Russia while making Europeans suffer the consequences of the US expanding its imperial ambitions.  This is a war to punish Russia for being part of the Eurasian Trade Pact and for starting the BRICS bank to challenge the supremacy of the World Bank and IMF.

Why did the Ukraine government