Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.

By Light In The Dark Place
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Two Accounts of Creation? Genesis Mystery Solved!

Saturday, April 1, 2017 7:27

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

1. First Account: Genesis 1(KJV Holy Bible)

Genesis 1: 26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

in our image – Biblical definition

From an unused root meaning to shade; a phantom, that is, (figuratively) illusion, resemblance; hence a representative figure, especially an idol: - image, vain shew.
(from The Strongs Concordance. Hebrew word H6754 צֶלֶם tselem tseh’-lem)

THIS IS MAN IS AN IDOL

2. Second Account: Genesis 2(KJV Holy Bible)

Genesis 2: 7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

a living – Biblical definition

From H2421; alive; hence raw (flesh); fresh (plant, water, year), strong; also (as noun, especially in the feminine singular and masculine plural) life (or living thing), whether literally or figuratively: – + age, alive, appetite, (wild) beast, company, congregation, life (-time), live (-ly), living (creature, thing), maintenance, + merry, multitude, + (be) old, quick, raw, running, springing, troop.
(from The Strongs Concordance. Hebrew word H2416 חַי chay khah’ee)

THIS IS MAN IS A LIVING SOUL

►Not only is one man an idol and the other man a living soul, there is also a major difference between “God” and the “LORD God” - You need to see this!

Comments

Total 16 comments

Firmament Does Exist

There is no lord god in original scripture only Je$uit translations that replaced all the true Hebrew names.
Bereshith/Genesis 1:26-27
26 And Elohim said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the heavens, and over the livestock, and over all the earth and over all the creeping creatures that creep on the ground”
27 And Elohim created man in His image, in the image of Elohim He created him – male and female He created them.
Bereshith/Genisis 2:7
And YHWH Elohim formed man out of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils breath of lives. And man became a living being.
GalatiYAns 5:16-17
16 But I say, walk by His RUWach and you will not fulfill the lust of the flesh.
17 For the flesh fights against His RUWach and His RUWach against the flesh and these are contrary to one another, that you may not do the things that your flesh alone desires.
RomaniYA 8:5-9
5 For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to His RUWach YAHUWAH, set their minds on the things of His RUWach.(Spirit of YAHUWAH)
6 For the mind of the flesh is death, but the mind of RUWach YAHUWAH is life and peace,
7 because the mind of the flesh is hostile towards Almighty Loving YA of All Creation for it is not subject to Almighty Loving YA of All Creations’s law, neither indeed can it be.
8 Those who are in the flesh cannot please EL YAH of All Creation.
9 But you are not in the flesh but in His RUWach, if it is so that His RUWach of Almighty Loving YA of All Creation dwells in you.Yet if any man does not have YAHUWAH’s RUWach, the Eternal King of The Family in YAH, Nevis not His.

Apr 1, 2017, 12:06 pm -2 Reply
- Mayhem
  
  “Are you dishonest, or just lazy? Maybe it’s a lethal combination of them both.” Cintus Supremus
  
  /prophecy/2017/03/unbelievable-pope-francis-shocking-plan-for-2017-indeed-all-roads-lead-to-rome-video-2489907.html#comment_445061
  
  Apr 1, 2017, 3:23 pm 1 Reply
Mayhem

Here we go with the Documentary Hypothesis nonsense.

Sure there’s differences between the Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 accounts but they are reconcilable once perspective is taken into account at which point all supposed contradictions vanish into thin air.

Genesis 1 speaks to the chronological grand plan.

Genesis 2 topically addresses man and environment.

This method of narration (“technique of recapitulation” – Gleason Archer – A Survey of Old Testament Introduction – page 118) is also found in the New Testament writings, for example, Mark’s account of the ministry of Christ is more chronological while Matthew’s is more topical. Further more in his book Archer references other examples, of this literary technique, found in extraneous Semitic writings.

For the argument, that there are divergent creation accounts, to hold up one must accept that Jesus was wrong to combine quotes from Gen 1 & Gen 2, in a single sentence, when He said in Matthew 19:4-5…

“He who made them from the beginning made them male and female (Gen 1:27), and said, For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife; and the two shall become one flesh (Gen 2:24).”

… which begs the question is it more likely that Jesus was wrong or the documentary hypothesis is wrong?

Apr 1, 2017, 3:20 pm 1 Reply
- Mayhem
  
  Here we go with the Documentary Hypothesis nonsense.
  
  Sure there’s differences between the Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 accounts but they are reconcilable once perspective is taken into account at which point all supposed contradictions vanish into thin air.
  
  Genesis 1 speaks to the chronological grand plan.
  
  Genesis 2 topically addresses man and environment.
  
  This method of narration (“technique of recapitulation” – Gleason Archer – A Survey of Old Testament Introduction – page 118) is also found in the New Testament writings, for example, Mark’s account of the ministry of Christ is more chronological while Matthew’s is more topical. Further more in his book Archer references other examples, of this literary technique, found in extraneous Semitic writings.
  
  For the argument, that there are divergent creation accounts, to hold up one must accept that Jesus was wrong to combine quotes from Gen 1 & Gen 2, in a single sentence, when He said in Matthew 19:4-5…
  
  “He who made them from the beginning made them male and female (Gen 1:27), and said, For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife; and the two shall become one flesh (Gen 2:24).”
  
  … which begs the question is it more likely that Jesus was wrong or the documentary hypothesis is wrong?
  
  Apr 1, 2017, 3:21 pm 1 Reply
Cintus Supremus

Mayhem asked:

“…is it more likely that Jesus was wrong or the documentary hypothesis is wrong?”

I think it might be a bit more like Jesus is lying to us. I mean, He would have to be, if Mr. Kleck’s theory holds any water at all. Pre-Adamic man? Really?

Thus sayeth Jesus:

The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field.

Job finished. Next:

But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away.

Hmmmm… Seems to be a reversal of order here.

When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared.

Now, Lightinthedarkplace…

You can do as you like — you can follow Johnathan Kleck and his many fantastic assertions about the order of things and the nature of things, or you can believe what is written in the Word of God.

You cannot do both.

Kleck has it that we’re all fallen angels?

Scripture tells us precisely what we are — and it isn’t that.

GOD WORKS FIRST. Always. Then the enemy (Darkness) comes along and sows confusion, distortion and abomination. There are no exceptions to this maxim anywhere from Genesis through Revelation.

(You might also consider how many times God is referred to in Old Testament Scripture as YHWH ELOHIM. You might also consider His words to us in the Ten Commandments. You might also consider not relying so heavily upon the teaching of a single man — ANY single man in this world; living or dead.)

Apr 1, 2017, 3:52 pm 2 Reply
- Mayhem
  
  Of course, Cintus, if you ask your favourite search engine that very question, “light precedes darkness”, you’ll get swamped with Gurus, Joos, Sacred Texts, Twitterati and Books that all have it the other way round.
  
  No surprises there, huh?
  
  Apr 1, 2017, 4:30 pm 1 Reply
  - Cintus Supremus
    
    But, but…
    
    …there was EVENING and there was MORNING, the First Day!!!
    
    There it is right there. Right? Darkness comes FIRST!!!
    
    (Except, no. It doesn’t. Not unless you just completely ignore the DAY that came before the evening, that is. This whole rectilinear time thing can be so confusing. If we listen to the words of men over the Word of God, that is.)
    
    Apr 1, 2017, 4:38 pm 1 Reply
    - Cintus Supremus
      
      OKAY, smart alec (the objection goes)…
      
      In Genesis 1 Darkness comes before LIGHT!!!
      
      In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and DARKNESS!!! was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.
      
      Uh oh. But wait, there’s more…
      
      1 Timothy 6:16
      
      …who alone has immortality, who dwells in unapproachable light, whom no one has ever seen or can see. To HIM be honor and eternal dominion. Amen.
      
      Who is the HIM Paul writes about here? That same GOD which was there, In The Beginning, creating the Heavens and the Earth.
      
      Before there was Darkness, there was LIGHT.
      
      Always.
      
      Apr 1, 2017, 4:44 pm 1 Reply
      - Mayhem
        
        Absolutely and yet i’m not at all surprised that the god of this world has that truth buried several pages into the search engine results other than it being found deep within a single page 2 web site.
        
        Apr 1, 2017, 5:42 pm 1
YahoodyMafady

Thank you for sharing the truth. For those with eyes to see and ears to hear.

Apr 2, 2017, 6:41 pm -1 Reply
- The Clucker
  
  Begone ye, turd touching plebber. Begone from this place and returneth not. (It’s weird to praise your own articles under a different screen name. Just take a look at Corey DeFrancesco and you’ll see what I mean. If my insult has reached you in error I don’t care, whatsoever.)
  
  Apr 3, 2017, 4:35 pm 2 Reply
  - Cintus Supremus
    
    “If my insult has reached you in error I don’t care, whatsoever.”
    
    The Clucker has spoken.
    
    Apr 3, 2017, 6:12 pm 1 Reply
desertspeaks

sigh, what tangible, factual, personal firsthand, irrefutable evidence do you have that proves any of this occurred? answer = NOTHING

But you’ll regurgitate it as though it has some basis in reality.. what a rube!

Apr 17, 2017, 6:08 pm 0 Reply
- Mayhem
  
  How about stumping up the evidence for your version, desertspeaks, and lets see if it’s based in reality.
  
  Apr 17, 2017, 6:14 pm 0 Reply
james amen

dear jonathan:
you know when you REALLY have it wrong, when theologians, who have no true, personal relationship with JESUS ['they do not
know HIM, and HE does not KNOW them'], managed to understand THE BIBLICAL CREATION account better than you have.

you have now gone So far down your track of original thinking here, coupled with all the hours of videos you have dedicated
to this belief of yours, that it is Very doubtful if it can be resolved. that is the inherent danger of beginning something that is not 100% accurate; as time passes, it only grows worse. who knows,..’with GOD all things are..’

read below where the following is explained:
‘Genesis 1 speaks to the chronological grand plan.
Genesis 2 topically addresses man and environment.’
this is precisely right. the comparison to THE GOSPEL accounts is perfect BIBLICAL support to this accurate explanation; that
you, otherwise, have [not deceptively] but, INADVERTENTLY, superimposed onto THE BIBLICAL text.
in other words, jonathan, i love you in~CHRIST, THE LORD did a brilliant work in your Isaiah 29:15~16 revelation, but,
facts are facts.. you blew it on this hypothesis. sorry, brother.

if you read further in the comments, another BIBLICAL TRUTH is identified: ‘LIGHT ALWAYS precedes darkness’. again, jonathan,
the theologian wins over you in this point. there is no getting around this fact. you either retract your belief, or else, unfortunately, it is you that completely misses an absolutely SOLID BIBLICAL principle that is ‘from GENESIS to REVELATION’.
prayers and THE LORD BLESS you. i know you are of THE LORD; but, even in our moments of giving HIM our 100%, we make mistakes. hey,..it’s ok.. GENESIS 50:20.

May 6, 2017, 1:06 pm -1 Reply
allendaves

Pay attention to #3 in light of #1&2………2Thess 2:10..because they received not THE LOVE (Agape)of the truth, that they might be saved. 11. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

123’s of true Christianity v popular & damnable heresies

#1 “ONE” not triune: ……PART 4 & 5 HOW MANY GODS ARE THERE FOR THE ONE GOD TO TALK TO?? Who was Jesus praying to??!?…. The real question should be … How does having multiple different persons keep this one God/being/entity from praying to himself?! (The trinitarian “schizophrenic” “god-head”) The Trinitarians want to have their cake and eat it too as the saying goes. On the one hand they need to say they only worship one indivisible God being/ entity but on the other hand they feel the need for some reason to keep Jesus or God from praying and talking to himself by dividing him up into different persons!?! It never occurs to them that that since there is only one indivisible God to pray too and Jesus is that indivisible God come in the flesh that he would need to talk to himself as to show us how to live, suffer, pray and die for our/ flesh) benefit not his!?!….. So while Trinitarians are quick to complain that God was not talking to himself at Christ baptism or in Gen “let us” they ignore the logical demands of their own theology! If Jesus is the ONE GOD in flesh and the Father is the SAME ONE GOD in heaven then Trinitarianism demands THE ONE GOD is talking to HIMSELF the same “being”! Claiming that God is multiple different persons as the reason for why God is not talking to himself (because God is three different “selfs”) only demonstrates that what they really worship is in fact not a ONE GOD who talks to himself but three different god “selfs”/ and they all talk to each other! When they speak about who God was talking and praying to, they are quick to say “the other person, NOT HIMSELF!” But if you ask them how many gods do they pray to then they will say “ONLY ONE”!?! They expect you to believe that those three different persons are THE ONE GOD-BEING” which is like calling three different cars “THE ONE VEHICLE” (they are text book examples of prov 26:12)
Mark 12:28…Which is the first commandment of all? 29. …Hear, O Israel; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD: 30. And ………..this is the first commandment….. 31. And the second is….. IF YOU CAN’T GET THIS “FIRST OF ALL COMMANDMENTS” RIGHT, ALL THE REST OF YOUR “FAITH” AND PREACHING ON LOVE & SIN IS MOOT

PART 6: THE ANTI CHRIST….WHERE? WHERE?….EVERYWHERE!!! …..IT”S YOU O TRINITARIAN!
“WHO” it was (what person) that came “IN THE FLESH”, IS THE DETERMINING FACTOR IN WHAT IT MEANS TO BE “ANT-CHRIST”! Even Islam claims Jesus was the Jewish messiah/Christ who was to come in the flesh) they all deny “WHO” it was (what person) that came (to be the Christ) in the flesh!?!…….To deny the father is to deny the son because they are one and the same person that came in the flesh!
JOHN 14: 8-20 ….Note Isaiah 9:6. For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: …: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, … the everlasting Father ….The son, father/Holy Spirit are all the same person, NOT like two different persons working together even as “one flesh” ….The “oneness” between Christ and the father is not comparable to a man & his wife, for only a fool would say “When you have seen me you have seen my wife, how sayest thou then, Shew us your wife?” Notice they asked to see THE FATHER and the response was Jn 14:9 ..“HAVE I BEEN SO LONG time with you, and yet hast THOU NOT KNOW ME, Philip…..Now image some fool trying to claim that statement if you asked to see his wife!?!!? You want to see the FATHER but have I been with you but you don’t know me!?!?!
Jn 14 continued….…………..17. Even THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH; (Jn 14:6 I AM the way, THE TRUTH,) whom the world cannot receive, .. for HE DEWLLETH WITH YOU, (present tense/standing next to them in the flesh) and SHALL BE IN YOU… (future tense “In them”) 18. I will not leave you comfortless: I WILL COME TO YOU (future tense “In them”) Note: The spirit of Christ is the sprit of God and the holy spirit that is why Christ said “I will come to you” (to comfort them, because Christ is the comforter). The spirit was standing next to them in flesh… ….latter it would come to them to be inside of them (inside of their flesh as the spirit we are given)…..that is why. he would send the spirit…… However, Jesus himself here makes the point that the same person who was the HOLY SPIRIT that would come was standing next to them but lets them know “I will come to you again to be Inside of you”
The whole point to Gal 3:20.a mediator is NOT A MEDIATOR OF ONE, (HEIS) but GOD IS ONE. (HEIS) again, point blank, identifies the number of persons of God! The “but” points out the contrast between multiple persons in a mediation party v the “one” of God. God is not like a mediation party with multiple different persons. …..”the express image of his person” ( the person of God; singular not plural).Any attempt to lay claim otherwise is willful ignorance and delusional nonsense
TRINITARIANS CONFESS JESUS /THEY ARE NOT POLYTHEIST BUT ARE MONOTHEIST LIKE A LIAR & THIEF WHO “CONFESS” THEY DO NOT LIE OR STEAL The simple fact is that just because you confess or deny that you are in an adulterous relationship and denounce all forms of adultery has nothing to do with whether or not it is in fact adulterous! .. …A rose by any other name is still just a rose AND calling it a water lily does not change the definition of what a water Lilly or a rose is either!…No, Trinitarians confess & preach literally …”ANOTHER JESUS” 2 Cor 11:4
- Like a thief in your house caught stealing your things insisting he was not there stealing “I CONFESS I am NOT stealing”. You just do not “properly understand” what he is doing/saying. Further, since you never had a “proper understanding” of what he is doing/saying you have no business accusing him since you do not even know what you are talking about in the first place. It is with and in your own ignorance that you base your “false accusations” & “ad homonym attacks” against him…… Ridiculous of course it is ……2Thess 2:11; Titus 1:16; 2Tim 3:5;
…… should have given you a hint, harking back to Satan in The garden…God said you will die…Satan comes along and states no you will be more WISE……today .God said He is one; but Satan’s children come along and say no three is more WISE and humble in the face of God’s grandeur only “a mystery” that can be understood “in faith”. God uses head and right arm to explain the distinctions between father and son.. However, the Trinitarian heretics say to the effect: “NO, that is just a figure of speech, or that is not what God really means. What God is really saying is that God is three different persons”. Fools, hypocrites and blind guides, God said he was One and by your traditions and vain imaginations have taken the words of God and made them of no effect, refashioning God into your image!
You can download the complete FREE book from
https://www.scribd.com/doc/305367608/The-Trinity-Heresy
OR
https://www.academia.edu/23463667/THE_TRINITY_HERESY
or
http://www.globethics.net/gtl/10920799 THE TRINITY HERESY

#2 SECOND COMING Thou Fool! “I come quickly” so “Hold fast
till i come”… NOT …“in another 2000 yrs I might be coming soon any time now, so hold fast”!?! …those that deny the second coming of Christ in the war of AD70 are practicing a damnable heresy in denying the lord that bought them ( 2Peter 2:1-2 ;2Tim 4:8/ you cant love an appearing you deny& the context is the 2nd coming not the first)… Mat 7:23..”I NEVER KNEW YOU” …..Mat 10:33. But whosoever shall deny me before men……..sound familiar?…. If I said I am coming to your house in this generation when these things happen but no one knows the day or hour what fool would think I might be coming in 2000 years latter!?!? ..2 Tim 4: 4. And
they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be TURNED UNTO FABLES.

Christ promised that only HIS PEOPLE would see him ….John 14:19. Yet a little while, and THE WORLD SEETH ME NO MORE;….. [2 Cor 5:16 Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ AFTER THE FLESH, yet NOW HENCEFORTH KNOW WE HIM NO MORE….(here the Context of John 14 is his second coming)…..continued…..but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also. 20. AT THAT DAY .. 21. He that hath my commandments, and KEEPETH THEM, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and WILL MANIFEST MYSELF TO HIM……(again taking note “as he is” or 1Jn 3:2)

22. Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, HOW IS IT THAT THOU WILT MANIFEST THYSELF UNTO US AND NOT UNTO THE WORLD? 23. Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, HE WILL KEEP MY WORDS: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.( Rev 3:20) 24. He that loveth me not.. (1Cor 16:22)…. KEEPETH NOT MY SAYINGS: ( REV 9:16-20)

REVELATION 1:7. Behold, HE COMETH WITH CLOUDS; and EVERY EYE SHALL SEE HIM, …. There are two point to be made here (1) this is a partial quote from OT (Zech 12:2&10; also note Rev 16:15-17 & Zech 14:1-3 with Joel 2:28-3:1,2,12,16 et al) note the context it IDENTICAL to Mat ch 24/ Lk 21/ Mark 13 et al….you know, where Jesus described his second coming with the destruction of Jerusalem!?!?!!?…. (2) there parallel here with ………….Exodus 24:10. And THEY SAW THE GOD OF ISRAEL : and there was under his feet as it were a paved work of a sapphire stone, and as it were the body of heaven in his clearness. 11. And upon the nobles of the children of Israel he laid not his hand: also THEY SAW GOD, and did eat and drink………..But Christ said….. John 1:18. NO MAN HATH SEEN GOD AT ANY TIME; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. A person can see with their understanding and or see with their eyes…. It can see “seen” for certain that everything that Christ described was seen by the folks of that day in His coming but do they perceive that was him? …So what Christ said is true every eye saw him but the world does not see him….. With the eye they and folks still today can see everything Christ described to have taken place, but they do not “keep” ( believe and understand) his words as such they do not see him nor shall they ever.

The saints who have physical died faithful in the flesh (every man in his own order) are changed in the blink of an eye & caught up to sit on that Great white throne ( this congregation of the saints is the body of Christ that folks will answer to at the judgment and these saints will judge all men who cannot see Christ along with the rest of the world……Folks think they are waiting to see Jesus but they will NEVER see Jesus himself they will only see the body of Christ condemn them the saints judge the world (Rev 3:21; 1 Cor 6:2 et al) the saints are the body of Christ…that is the only part of Christ they shall see….only the saints shall see God face to face…..most peoples idea of the second coming & day of the Lord and the judgment is completely wrong

https://www.scribd.com/doc/305366745/Revelation-the-First-Gospel-of-the-Kingdom
or
http://www.globethics.net/gtl/5455069 Revelation The First Gospel of The Kingdom
or
https://www.academia.edu/23464127/REVELATION_THE_FIRST_GOSPEL_OF_THE_KINGDOM

DAY OF THE LORD”/ YEAR OF THE LORD – does NOT last for 24 hours!?!..Also means the day of resurrection & judgment do not last for one hour or one day either! They only begin (NOT END) in a certain hour & on a certain 24 hour day ….”SUN OF RIGHTEOUSNESS to arise”…..NOT..”come & get (your new resurrected body) it while it is still hot, only 24 hours of solar power left”!?!

https://www.scribd.com/doc/308485609/Day-of-Lord-Not-24-Hours-I-Come-Quickly

2Thess 2: 11. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12. That they all might be damned …

https://www.scribd.com/doc/305366745/Revelation-the-First-Gospel-of-the-Kingdom
or
http://www.globethics.net/gtl/5455069 Revelation The First Gospel of The Kingdom
or
https://www.academia.edu/23464127/REVELATION_THE_FIRST_GOSPEL_OF_THE_KINGDOM
978-1-4907-0590-3 (SC ISBN)

#3 There is a sharp contrast between THREE groups :
(1) “PREDESTINED DAMNED” who were NEVER written in the book of life ………..Rev 17: 8 WHOSE NAMES WERE NOT WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, …as contrasted …EPH 1: 4. According as he hath CHOSEN US in him BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD
(2) “MANY CALLED”= ONLY and ALL SAINTS (those who come to Christ) are written in the book of life … Philippians 4:3… ……Rev 21:27; (Only saints are Called and elect; Rom 1:6-7 et al) This is THE CHRUCH and ONLY these can have their names blotted out of the book of life ….….Heb 12:23 to the general assembly and CHURCH of the firstborn … WHICH ………are WRITTEN in heaven,
(3) THE FEW CHOSEN: Those saints who were alive in group #2 who are now physically dead. They died “faithful” these are the FEW that were chosen faithful…….Rev 3:5. ……; and I
will not BLOT OUT HIS NAME OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE, (Ps 69:28) …. These are the FEW that are CHOSEN and now that they have died and are saved then “once saved THEY CAN NEVER BE LOST”
Predestination….its true..its all true…download here
https://www.scribd.com/doc/306868420/Most-True-Christians-Go-to-Hell
http://www.globethics.net/gtl/10920800 Most true Christians go to hell
https://www.academia.edu/25217564/Most_True_Christains_Go_to_Hell

Sep 7, 2017, 8:27 pm 0 Reply

Online:
Visits:	1,603,946,370
Stories:	8,133,163