A Perfect Theology

I really hesitate using “God” type words, like “theology” in my heading.  BUT it is what it is.  If I say that Jesus died for ALL sins, then in effect, it’s what He did.  Most any kind of theologian would agree with this.  But for most Believers there is a caveat.  It’s being remorseful for sins committed.  Salvation can only be dependent on one recognizing one’ sins and being remorseful about such sins.  But the difference between myself and MOST Believers is that I say then that there are two sins God will NOT forgive.  Now, when I claim my Angels told me this, I struggled with what they were saying, not because I rejected such thinking, but because I knew most any Christian Believer would reject such thinking.  If I say then that my Angels told me that the ONLY exclusions to God’s forgiveness is murder and suicide, then there has to be salvation to begin with.  Atheists murder and commit suicide.  And this would be true across the religious spectrum of every kind or religion and non-religion too.  So, if salvation is dependent on what we do NOT do, then in essence we have to be saved already to lose it.  So, this brings me to the point where I say that EVERY person is born saved because not only did Jesus die for the seed of Adam which all are inheritors, but that Jesus died for EVERY potential sin that EVERY person will commit.  This simply means that no one is allowed by God to intentionally take a Human Life including that of one’s own life. 

So, if Human Life is all that matters to God, we can turn to the Bible and see all the Old Testament saints who will NOT be in heaven.  This is why I don’t put much stock in the Bible except for the four Gospels of the New Testament.  I say that Jesus understood perfectly what I have just stated here.  And if I say that Jesus understood what I am saying, then in effect that would make what I claim my Angels told me a “perfect” theology.  But I am making claims that I can only prove by how I interpret the Bible from cover to cover.  But I say that if you remove salvation from all those who have intentionally taken Human Life in the Bible, then there is nothing in the Bible one can’t understand.  If one says that NOTHING is more important to God than every single Human Life, I claim that the Bible makes perfect sense. 

But this gets back to the issue of salvation and being remorseful for one’s sins.  How can one be remorseful if there is no need for it in terms of salvation?  Is there a need for guilt?  I don’t know how to answer this question except by saying that regardless of what a person has done, he or she has no choice but to live with one’s sins.  That is about all there is to it.  People will judge.  Courts will judge.  In fact, society judges.  How we choose to live with our sins is up to us.  We can say we are forgiven regardless of what anyone thinks.  And we need to understand that disobedience to laws has consequences.  But we HAVE to live with our sins.  Remorse can lead to suicide.  And that would be my fear about ANY person regardless of what sins he or she has committed.  And anger can lead to murder.  If we can live without anger, fear, and hatred, we defeat the tools that Satan can use against us.  How each person lives his or her life is up to that person and no one can dictate as to how a person should live.  We simply do NOT take a Human Life and we do NOT commit suicide.  Peace.  I am Brother Ralphie writing for my Angels from The Angels of Life Institute.  Brother Ralphie works from his study for the promotion of Peaceful living and inner Peace with God. He calls this the “Sanctity of Human Life Movement.”