Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By David Montaigne
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

50 Years Later and Still Hiding the Truth?

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Above: Apollo 11 – projected on the Washington Monument – to celebrate the 50th anniversary of July 20, 1969′s moon landing


July 20, 2019 is officially the 50th anniversary of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin first setting foot on the moon, and it prompts me to revisit the conspiracy theory question (as I wrote in a previous article on BIN) – “…if we really did land on the moon as we are told, why have we not returned in almost 50 years? Are we supposed to believe there is no technological benefit to having a scientific base on the moon? Are we supposed to believe NASA’s excuse that “we forgot how to do it”? Or is it more likely that there is some kind of conspiracy?”

There are only a few possibilities:

1 – They really landed on the moon as the US Government described and there is nothing interesting there – just craters and dust.

2 – They really landed there, but they didn’t tell the public the interesting stuff

2A – They found evidence of previous advanced human civilization and technology on the moon because humans made it into space before the last catastrophic pole shift

2B – They found evidence of aliens observing us, using the moon as their base

3 – They never made it to the moon at all, it was just propaganda

“If we actually found evidence that aliens had observation bases on the far side of the moon, would we report it? If we found evidence that a previous, lost human civilization like Atlantis had risen and fallen and been to the Moon thousands of years ago, leaving behind evidence and technology equal to or more advanced than our own – would we re-write history, or hide and study their technology?”

If we do have alien evidence/artifacts/contact – how many decades of gradual acclimation to their existence does the public need before the government finally offers disclosure?

I went on about the theory that Stanley Kubrick confessed to faking the moon landing during his filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey.  Maybe he did, maybe he didn’t.

But a recent article on Motherboard also just got my attention with: “NASA confessed [in 2006] that it likely reused 45 tapes containing original footage of Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin’s iconic July 20, 1969 moonwalk. Even today, the specter of the Apollo 11 tape blunder still looms over the agency.”

So the original moon landing tapes – the most important, most historical, and most controversial footage NASA ever took – was accidentally taped over?  On 45 different tapes?  I’m supposed to believe that was an accident?  Much more likely to me, they were under scrutiny, and could be proved as forgeries, so they were conveniently wiped clean like a Hillary Clinton email server.

Then in 2015, it was found out that someone had saved about 300 data reels of NASA tapes from 1969-1972 and stored them in Pennsylvania.  Unfortunately, the owner was secretive about them, and the person who found them turned them over to NASA, who said that none of them had anything to do with the Apollo missions.  Sure they didn’t.

My best guess is that we found evidence that mankind had visited the Moon before – thousands of years ago – and that we are denying the truth so we can back-engineer ancient VIMANA technology and understand cycles of terrestrial destruction without re-writing history or alerting the masses.

I am not arguing that we never landed on the moon – just that the public has been shown meaningless edited photographs, while the truly interesting finds have been kept secret.

Watch 2 minutes of this video, from about the 26 minute mark to the 28 minute mark, showing very clear photographic editing:

[youtube]Neil Armstrong should have been a sought after public speaker.  The first man to walk on the Moon could have been rich beyond his wildest dreams merely speaking motivationally to graduating classes and anyone else… Instead he stayed out of the limelight.  25 years later he compared the astronauts to parrots.  Which don’t fly high, but they do repeat what is said to them.

[youtube]Tell me NASA isn’t shutting up the astronaut to prevent revealing something in this clip:


Article by David Montaigne, author of many books including:
















Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 2 comments
    • Real Expert

      I think your points in the 1 and 2 range above are probably most accurate. Let me throw out a few things
      for your consideration. First and foremost, Stanley Kubrik’s Daughter worked with her father for most of
      his projects in the time period in question. She gets really upset when you think her father had made a
      fake moon landing film. She says that he would never do that, because he loved his country so much and
      that he would never have done such a thing, and that she was with him working alongside of him during
      that whole time period and they did NOT make any moon landing films. She is quite adamant about saying
      that it is an insult to her and her father’s memory to even say such a thing. My next point of consideration
      is that the whole project itself was great on the first landing, but even after the second landing, American’s
      were losing interest in it.. Apollo 13 gave them a slight re-interest boost via the drama of saving 3 astronauts
      from certain death, and beat the odds by bringing them home safely. My point being that the whole project
      turned into a “no big deal” attitude in short order. We collected all of the rock samples that we needed,
      and had no reason to go back at all. People were happy to have the money redistributed to their favorite
      causes, instead of flying around to dead planetoids.

    • Don - 1

      At the end of this video, Buzz Aldrin confesses he has never been on the moon. It was all a hoax.

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.