A Diverse Momentum System Using Vanguard Allocation Funds
One of the criticisms of momentum systems is they are prone to crashes when momentum reverts. The system highlighted in this article can be implemented using any number of “life style” or target-risk funds or ETFs. The system chooses from a small number of funds that reflect a range of asset allocation models. The purpose is to employ a diverse, momentum-based asset allocation system. Rather than allocate based on momentum to singular asset classes which increases the potential for momentum crashes, we allocate to asset allocation models themselves.
The tests were conducted using Portfolio Visualizer. If you have not checked out their site I highly recommend this free tool. Also, for additional research on this topic please see this award-winning paper by Corey Hoffstein of Newfound Research which served as the original inspiration for these tests.
I ran 5 tests using Vanguard Target-risk funds and the Vanguard S&P 500 Index Fund (VFINX). The Target-risk funds used were LifeStrategy Conservative Growth (VSCGX) , LifeStrategy Growth (VASGX) , LifeStrategy Income (VASIX) , LifeStrategy Moderate Growth (VSMGX) . According to Vanguard these funds are “a series of broadly diversified, low-cost funds with an all-index, fixed allocation approach that may provide a complete portfolio in a single fund. The four funds, each with a different allocation, target various risk-based objectives.” The funds allocate different percentages to bonds (international and domestic) and stocks (international and domestic).
The tests consisted of two simple momentum systems I frequently use on Scotts Investments. The first is a simple relative strength system where the best performing asset based on trailing returns is purchased.
The seconds is a “dual momentum” system that holds the best performing fund based on trailing returns. A second filter is used, absolute momentum, to switch the best performing asset to cash if its total returns were below the risk-free rate of cash over the lookback period. This is similar to my Dual Momentum Portfolio, which is inspired by a paper written by Gary Antonacci and available on Optimal Momentum. Antonacci’s book, Dual Momentum Investing: An Innovative Strategy for Higher Returns with Lower Risk, also highlights his specific system in greater detail.
The test results for the relative momentum system is below. All tests were from 1996 – present. The first model used a single performance window of 5 months. The best performing fund was held, and trades were performed at the start of each month. For comparison purposes an “equal-weight” version each portfolio is also provided but since these are asset allocation funds the comparison is a bit redundant (equal weight is essentially a balanced fund itself):
Timing Model Assets | |
Ticker | Name |
VSMGX | Vanguard Lifestrategy Moderate Growth Fund |
VASIX | Vanguard Lifestrategy Income Fund |
VSCGX | Vanguard Lifestrategy Fund Conservative Growth Fund |
VASGX | Vanguard Lifestrategy Growth Fund |
Portfolio | Initial Balance | Final Balance | CAGR | Std.Dev. | Best Year | Worst Year | Max. Drawdown | Sharpe Ratio | Sortino Ratio | Stock Market Correlation |
Timing Portfolio | $10,000 | $51,597 | 8.78% | 8.53% | 24.22% | -10.53% | -18.49% | 0.75 | 1.14 | 0.84 |
Equal Weight Portfolio | $10,000 | $35,621 | 6.73% | 8.56% | 19.57% | -22.73% | -32.75% | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
S&P 500 Total Return | $10,000 | $48,177 | 8.40% | 15.47% | 33.36% | -37.00% | -50.95% | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.99 |
What if we add VFINX to the pool of potential assets? We would expect higher volatility with potentially higher returns since a 100% stock allocation is held at various times ( you will also see the equal weight portfolio has slightly higher returns/volatility because it is tilted towards stocks with its allocation to VFINX):
Portfolio | Initial Balance | Final Balance | CAGR | Std.Dev. | Best Year | Worst Year | Max. Drawdown | Sharpe Ratio | Sortino Ratio | Stock Market Correlation |
Timing Portfolio | $10,000 | $70,161 | 10.51% | 10.21% | 33.21% | -10.53% | -18.49% | 0.8 | 1.24 | 0.82 |
Equal Weight Portfolio | $10,000 | $38,242 | 7.12% | 9.85% | 21.35% | -25.59% | -36.63% | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.98 |
S&P 500 Total Return | $10,000 | $48,177 | 8.40% | 15.47% | 33.36% | -37.00% | -50.95% | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.99 |
Returns and standard deviation increase, which may have been expected. However, max drawdown and the worst year remained the same, so adding a 100% stock allocation did not impact our biggest loss.
Next, we test a dual momentum approach with a 12 month look back period. The top 1 fund is purchased based on 12 month returns, but only if the returns are also greater than the return on the risk free rate of cash. Testing the 4 life style funds (excluding VFINX) yielded the following results:
Portfolio | Initial Balance | Final Balance | CAGR | Std.Dev. | Best Year | Worst Year | Max. Drawdown | Sharpe Ratio | Sortino Ratio | Stock Market Correlation |
Timing Portfolio | $10,000 | $49,142 | 8.51% | 8.78% | 22.26% | -7.61% | -16.17% | 0.71 | 1.08 | 0.73 |
Equal Weight Portfolio | $10,000 | $35,621 | 6.73% | 8.56% | 19.57% | -22.73% | -32.75% | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
S&P 500 Total Return | $10,000 | $48,177 | 8.40% | 15.47% | 33.36% | -37.00% | -50.95% | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.99 |
What if we include VFINX?
Portfolio | Initial Balance | Final Balance | CAGR | Std.Dev. | Best Year | Worst Year | Max. Drawdown | Sharpe Ratio | Sortino Ratio | Stock Market Correlation |
Timing Portfolio | $10,000 | $59,952 | 9.62% | 10.45% | 33.21% | -6.73% | -17.29% | 0.71 | 1.09 | 0.73 |
Equal Weight Portfolio | $10,000 | $38,242 | 7.12% | 9.85% | 21.35% | -25.59% | -36.63% | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.98 |
S&P 500 Total Return | $10,000 | $48,177 | 8.40% | 15.47% | 33.36% | -37.00% | -50.95% | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.99 |
Finally, what is we use a 5 month look back period, like the relative strength tests, instead of 12 months?
Portfolio | Initial Balance | Final Balance | CAGR | Std.Dev. | Best Year | Worst Year | Max. Drawdown | Sharpe Ratio | Sortino Ratio | Stock Market Correlation |
Timing Portfolio | $10,000 | $62,456 | 9.85% | 9.72% | 33.21% | -4.74% | -15.38% | 0.77 | 1.22 | 0.7 |
Equal Weight Portfolio | $10,000 | $38,242 | 7.12% | 9.85% | 21.35% | -25.59% | -36.63% | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.98 |
S&P 500 Total Return | $10,000 | $48,177 | 8.40% | 15.47% | 33.36% | -37.00% | -50.95% | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.99 |
The sharpe ratio in all 5 tests ranged from .71 – .80 and in each instance outperformed an equal weight portfolio and the S&P 500. Investors looking for a simple, momentum based system that avoids “all-in” investments in single asset classes should consider a system using asset allocation funds.
Follow Scott’s Investments on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/scottsinvest
Source: http://www.scottsinvestments.com/2015/07/14/a-diverse-momentum-system-using-vanguard-allocation-funds/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).