Don't Be Afraid Of Z-Bugs

Article posted with permission from the author, Karen Schumacher

Lions, Tigers, Bears, and Bugs, oh my!  Over the years, there has been a rash of ominous warnings about invading bugs and their ability to kill.  The most recent is the screwworm threat to frighten everyone.  However, along the way, there have also been Ebola, bird flu, ticks, and hantavirus, among others.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have websites devoted to warning humanity about pests.  The World Health Organization (WHO) claims 700,000 (0.0084%) lives are lost annually to vector-borne disease out of 8.3 billion, while CAS claims these diseases will only continue to rise.

There are some fanatics who actually propose to deliberately spread a disease-carrying vector for the purposes of creating a forced social change, such as spreading ticks that cause meat allergies.  These lunatics should be put away.

Why the hysteria about pests and bugs? There are more important problems to worry about.  But when the covert aim for nothing more than surveillance and control over humanity is considered, the fear-mongering does make sense.

The One Health concept began around 2007, before the WHO formally latched onto it and created the One Health Initiative in 2021, having suddenly realized there was an “interconnection between humans, animals, and the environment”, as if that were never understood.  Throughout history, it has been understood that there are diseases that result from the animal world and environment.  WHO seems just a little slow to catch on.

But no, WHO did understand this, and its initiative was an excellent reason for exploiting the concept and making it into a big brouhaha, as it was a terrific opportunity for increasing the surveillance state.  Plus, it would once again give the bogus appearance that it and the United Nations (UN) only goal was providing a safe and healthy world.  WHO itself even describes the holistic definition of One Health as an “integrated surveillance approach”.

The CDC, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Department of the Interior (DOI) joined together in April of this year, much like the Quadripartite Partners, and created its First National One Health Plan that will spread its hype across other federal agencies.  The National One Health Framework to Address Zoonotic Diseases and Advance Public Health Preparedness in the United States, also known as NOHF-Zoonoses, is the framework that is spreading this nonsense across the agencies.  While the framework offers no specifics on what it will do beyond collaborate and endorse itself, it does address the needed surveillance system on page 11.

For sure, the corporate financial gains are at the core of One Health, with a projected value of 10.2 billion gained through global collaboration.  Companies are even popping up to meet the need for surveillance that is specific to One Health.

Surveillance will include collecting data from human, animal, and environmental health, along with food systems, and, of course, includes an economic assessment.  But how exactly this will improve health is befuddling.  Perhaps sewage can provide a clue.

Since Covid-19, there has been increased support for wastewater surveillance of diseases, which now includes genomic monitoring for any genetic changes.  Now, just exactly what this surveillance costs, from the data gathering to testing equipment, to the manpower needed to collect the tests, right down to the cost of the analysis, is never revealed.  However, the cost can be calculated here and includes specific items needed for surveillance.  The erroneous belief is that the cost of surveillance is far less than the healthcare costs of a disease outbreak.  It should be no surprise that companies have emerged that will gladly do the wastewater surveillance for cities, which can be found here.  And John Q. Public is paying for it in those utility bills.

The theory is that early identification of pathogens can assist in preventing an outbreak.

Taking the one example of wastewater, then applying it to every plant and animal species, food item, human, and whatever else exists, and you have a total surveillance system over mankind and the world.  And for what other purpose than potential control, much of what was attempted during Covid-19.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) can’t be left out of the equation as a corporate money-making organization that contributes to these scams.  It has even launched a digital diagnostics initiative just for One Health to achieve part of its goals.

Threats of disease should only be viewed as another way in which to further scaremongering, encourage compliance with draconian surveillance measures, and oppress freedom while corporate profits expand.  There should be no alarm over the never-ending headlines about some bug that has caused illness.  Don’t be afraid of z-bugs.