‘This Is an Extinction-Level Event & Palantir Just Got Exposed - CIA Whistleblower Sounds the Alarm’, Given June 26th, 2026

There are actually two stories associated with this, one posted in 2022 after the CoVid got started, and this one today. They are both about government surveillance and control of the population. The first one looks into how the MRNA Vaccines (which are not a vaccine) imitate a person’s thinking process and get a person to think what the system wants, and not what the person’s real self, connected to God, wants. People become zombies, “cyborgs”, as Yuval Harari has said. This one looks more into the control aspect, and only lightly touches the the vaccine aspect, of chemically altering what a person thinks and their ability to think apart from the system.

Redacted Host with James Martinez

06/26/2026

Redacted Host: Well, we told you about the extinction level event that is coming and now we have our clearest sign yet that it’s being accelerated. But some brave individuals are trying to stop it. A new groundbreaking lawsuit, arguably one of the most important lawsuits in history, has just been filed against one of the most powerful and secretive technology companies in America, ‘Palantir Technologies’, along with its billionaire founder Peter Teal, CEO Alex Karp, and the CTO Shyam Sankar.

Now, the plaintiffs are listed anonymously in this complaint, as John Doe and Jane Doe, but it’s way bigger than just these names. They allege that Palantir has crossed a Constitutional Rubicon, if you will.. Using its artificial intelligence systems to surveil, profile, and manipulate the American public without our consent. According to this 43 page verified complaint that I’ve read in federal court, Palantir software, the same tools that are used by the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, and intelligence agencies, are allegedly being deployed domestically to monitor U.S. citizens, harvest our biometric data, censor online speech, and even interfere with elections.

And it goes much deeper than all of that. The plaintiffs are accusing Palantir of developing what they call ‘synthetic intelligence’, technology that merges machine reasoning with human behavior prediction, pre-prime, minority report style stuff, effectively trespassing into the human mind. They claim it violates basic rights in privacy, free speech, cognitive liberty… Cognitive liberty! ..It’s a new phrase, a term gaining traction among digital privacy advocates, and I’m glad we’re going to have this discussion.

James Martinez is an MK-ultra whistleblower. He received information about this lawsuit a long time ago. Um, and we had him on to discuss this extinction level event that is coming. And I was just speaking to James a few minutes ago who said, “This is an accelerant. This is speeding up this extinction level event.” And James joins us once again here on the show. James, great to have you back on the show. Thank you so much. And I have to say, your first appearance on our show was mindblowing. People around the world, millions of people have seen that interview and are just stunned by what you revealed. But this takes it to the next level, now with this lawsuit?

James Martinez: Yeah, it does. Um, because of certain technological advancements in the brain-computer interface community. Um what we’re seeing now is multiple states are starting to begin legislation to protect brain data. Now Palantir is a a a collection uh company. It basically uh surveils and enters- checks and takes all your data and synthesizes it to create a picture about a person, a place or a thing. Now, um since this is um now very public um in terms of what the company intends to do. It’s been slowly preparing the public, and that was quite apparent when uh they- the presence was known at a very well-watched event that happened recently, uh during the Charlie Kirk um funeral, where Palantir was on the wall right next to the stage as if they were sponsoring the event. which I found uh uh–

I saw that as, yeah it’s a funeral; it’s a funeral for everybody.. uh, based upon the media ecological effects of what technology does when you insert it and begin to use it. And when I’m um talking about um ‘media ecological effects’, that’s a word that came from um, was kind of coined by Marshall McLuhan which basically says, “what happens when you introduce technology and how it affects the sensory balance in the brain, between the senses, and how you create your reality.” Uh like for instance the mediaological effect of um a fork would be to accelerate the amount of food you could get into your mouth.

That that would be an effect with this technology. Its effects uh will basically they’ll have access to all your data, and then be a model of who you are. You won’t have uh authority over it, unless you’ve done some very serious things in the courtroom. And uh, it’s going to eventually create complete paranoia because you’ll have absolute zero privacy. We haven’t had privacy uh um for a while because of Google. But this at this time, is an accelerant on top of all of it, that is going to uh violate most of um, if not all our uh cognitive liberties, because now we’re into uh predictive models of behavior, human behavior. And what is that going to mean in court?

What’s it going to mean when uh you have- You create the data off of somebody that’s profiling that is a criminal, and the data which is digital can be broken into and changed. You have all these ethical problems and legal potential problems that are going to exist as an effect of this technology. Uh there’s just been recently um uh a bill, I was made aware of, that the Democrats have drawn up to protect the first uh, it’s a ‘Brain uh Data Protection Act’ essentially.

Um and the point of this is this.. When I came on and spoke about the extinction level event because of the fusion of brain and computer and quantum, and what that does.. What that ultimately is going to do.. Uh this- the acceleration of this company, as it was- as I was contacted from people that are out there, that are under- already suffering enough from um weapons.. ‘neuro-cognitive weapons’ being used against the public in the U.S. right now. I get more email about that than you you would ever imagine.

Then we have.. this is one of the effects, is from this company as it accelerates, you’re going to see the biggest uh mental health breakdown in the history of history, because people won’t know what’s real and what is not. And what can be faked. Because when you’re screwing around and creating future predictive models on human behavior um.. Now you can be charged by intention, of the algor algorithm that says, “You hate your neighbor because they’re some color,” and you can be profiled.

Not to mention that you- that all this data they claim, with all these gigantic uh bills that they’re having on multiple states, that they’re going to protect your brain data. Really? They’re going to protect our brain data?..No. No. No. No… No, no bill law has ever been made that’s stopped anybody from doing anything… So, so this this lawsuit here, is an invitation for the entire human civilization to have a very serious talk about its future, and the cutting off of our ‘human spiritual uh component’, that makes us human. And we’re not- we’re not turning into machines, until we have the big talk, with everybody. Because that’s what really all of this is about.

This lawsuit uh brings up all sorts of uh legal issues having to do with just privacy, not to mention uh theft of data. And they’re presuming with all the data that they’re stealing- identity stealing and spying on everybody.. that that data is theirs. When they’re going to argue that they’ve- we’ve voluntarily complied to go for all this. This is the problem with these big technology companies that are just way out of hand, and who these guys are working for, because it- they- it’s already become highly politicized because of what’s happened um in Israel, where they were using Palantir Technology there um with the genocide and everything.

So what does this mean? We’ve got people testifying about extraterrestrials in Congress. You’ve got genocide going across- on the other side of the world. You’ve got ah complete riots all over the United States right now. You’ve got, I mean a whole ton of major activities are going on, whilst the real end of the show has to do with free speech, because they’re already starting to legislate that. And this is going to be part of a tool that that makes that legislation enforceable.

See, it’s it’s over. It is over, unless people uh get involved with this. Because it- the the plaintiffs may be John Doe and Jane Doe, but it’s you, you the person that’s watching this, you the host, everybody, because this is this is the one battle that you can’t walk away from and just like, “Oh, he’ll take care of it. He’s doing it over there.” No, no, no. you you’ve got to uh be prepared for this, because in Europe right now uh, now they’re requiring biometrics to go anywhere. So the digital prison is coming out, and this and this is part of it because it- this is this is going to be uh used as a behavioral tool to control populations because they don’t really want you here anyway..

Because the World Economic Forum, as many of your people in your audience know, this is just a tool to take down uh humans, and put them into um the fusion bases with machinery, and essentially that kills you. You’re not- you’re no longer human. So that’s that’s the that’s the issue with this.

Redacted Host: Well, and people, I think, are becoming far more aware of this now, when they’re seeing- they’re seeing the chaos. They’re seeing the discontent. They’re seeing people fighting each other online. They’re seeing people fighting each other on the streets in Portland, or wherever it happens to be, sewing this discontent. And we’ve been trying to point out here on the show; we had uh Colonel Towner-Watkins um on the other day, and she’s making the point that people are missing the 30,000 foot story here.. Is that this is all in an effort to sew discontent and of course to bring us, as you point out, under this biometric surveillance state, that controls everything we do.

So while we’re down here fighting over little things, they’re up here with a sort of master plan to move us into this. And I think this is what some of the lawsuit says. And there’s some big allegations in here. I want to go through the allegations in this lawsuit against Palantir: “The Palantir enabled systems are being used to enforce health mandates, control access to services, influence beliefs through algorithmic nudges basically.” So control our beliefs, influence our beliefs so that the government I guess presumably has control. … Hey, flip this switch on, flip this switch off. Control our belief systems.

James Martinez: Yeah. Because you can do it through the electric environment, through the internet. It’s already been demonstrated very well in the last three weeks. We saw one thing, but it actually wasn’t. And then we were lied about it. I don’t even need to explain what that is, because everybody knows what that is. It’s one of the biggest.. It was the one of the biggest psychic events in US history.. and most examined. But now that that there’s cameras everywhere, it’s going to be more and more difficult for people uh to um have a sense of um uh ‘cognitive privacy’.. of paranoia.

Th this is going to- If you have a problem with somebody, you can go think about it in your house, and yeah, “I’d love to shoot that guy”, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to shoot that guy uh, or commit a crime. You’d like to commit a crime, but something takes over and you don’t. This was the the the basis of um ‘Minority Report’ – the film.. the the the the legal argument about that. And uh basically building a data stream on a person that may be a criminal or not, and then by predictive algorithm uh, and their behavior, tying them- or accusing them of a crime. So all these effects are going to happen. It won’t run smoothly.

Redacted Host: Maybe we can even step back a little bit. So if someone’s new to this, they’re like, “I thought Palantir was just a technology company. It seems fine.” You know, they they cavort with President Trump. Peter Teal is friends with President Trump, and they’ve they’ve donated to JD Vance’s campaign and all of that. Like they, “It’s all fine.” So what specifically is this lawsuit really alleging that Palanteer has done here?

James Martinez: They’ve kind of stepped over the line into an area where they’re going to be using the tools and the effects of this, uh to induce cultural control and behavior modification – same thing. Uh it’s kind of- it’s, it’ll be used in conjunction with uh Larry Ellison’s statements about “making people behave,” because all this is a tool. For the real agenda behind the scenes, is depopulation and get everybody out of here. But it makes it a lot easier if you can control the behavior uh of mass amounts of people, and psychology as well.

Redacted Host: And they’ve told us that the lockdowns and COVID was a trial run, basically. they’ve told us that this was the test. How can we control everyone? keep them locked inside?

James Martinez: Yeah.

Redacted Host: You’re not driving cars, you’re not using any kind of carbon- based, you know, automobiles, anything like that. You’re at home. You’re ordering all of your food. You’re compliant. We can do it all. And it was really a test for that. Do you see it that way?

James Martinez: Uh, yes. But things are so far advanced uh now. Um..

Redacted Host: ..That that was like the prehistoric that was like the stone age?

James Martinez: Yeah. Yeah. actually.. Yeah. I mean, that that the- We’re we’re at such a uh crossroads for the human race as a species, because of the advanced- these, all these advanced technologies coming in on us, as well as new realizations and other things that [we] have never even uh understood is going on, are being revealed now. So most people know that we’re we’re wa-a-a-y past the technological advancement that we’ve been told. And all of that veil is going to be lifted.

It’s because it’s starting now, because of uh what’s happened kind of behind the “national security line” that was put in place in 1947. So all of these technologies are going to collide, while they’re creating agitation, warfare and violence, and everybody’s been misdirected – All that that keeps everybody really occupied. Meanwhile, they’re they’re doing this and and encroaching in um our right to exist essentially.

They don’t see that when they when they talk in public, they talk about their technology as a commercial service, and what they’re doing, but they don’t talk about the effects of the technology. That’s the key, because nobody called you or me, when they decided to put these cell phones out, about what the effects were going to be. They were just saying, “This is a phone, you can- now you can be mobile and call your wife whenever..” It’s- they provided, as a service, and sold it as a service, but they didn’t- never talked about the technological and media ecological effects on the brain and our culture.

They didn’t say it would destroy social space. They didn’t say it would change your central nervous system. They didn’t say it would ruin your sleep at night. They didn’t say all these things. They don’t- they don’t- Technology companies and inventions and things like, they never talk about the effects of the technology um, before it comes out. They just put it out, right? They don’t talk about what the effects do.

And these are some of the effects they’re going- that are going to happen. Nobody’s going to trust anybody with anything. It’ll c- it’ll create hyper paranoia and distrust of all institutions.. Period.

Redacted Host: And you know, I I just saw this.. I want to get more back into all the details of Palantir here, and what what what this lawsuit says, but I don’t know if you’ve seen this over the past couple of weeks. It’s becoming more and more apparent: all these NFL players.. that you would normally see them running on the sidelines wearing Bluetooth headphones. They’d wear the wireless Bluetooth headphones and they’d be warming up before the games or they they’re showing up off the buses wearing all these Bluetooth headphones and earbuds.

Now they’re not. They’re all wearing wired headphones now. And this is very strange. Like it’s they’re not wearing those Bluetooth wireless ones.

James Martinez: That- that’s what they’ve done is the micro-escalation. Micro-escalation is the key to to self-suicide. Uh the the cell phone, with the the step prior to the cell phone being put in your hand, was get getting the public to put something on their body. And long ago, the first step to the uh mobile fund was actually the pager. People had pagers. “Call me on my pager,” and you’d have that thing attached to your device. So that was training wheels for having a mobile hand unit. So when these companies do this- things like this, they’ve already pre-trained their um uh culture – all their buyers to interface with machinery on the body already.

And now it went from headphones to buds and now it’s turned into the next thing, and eventually they’ll go right to the brain. I mean they- Now that ‘X’ has put out uh uh tools to do that. Um they’ve already advertised it. Uh something that is uh calculating between the mid here [in the brain]. Um they’re going to be- they’ll start to legislate consciousness. That’s what they’re doing at the same time. That’s why the big issue is about freedom of speech, and whether or not you can talk about somebody or not. They’re going to legislate all that stuff.

But they can do it technologically – onto you, without your permission. And they are, if you participate. Everybody’s going to have to rebut, and they’re going to have to completely re-declare who they are related to the courtroom, and there’s going to be.. If they think this is the only lawsuit they’re going to get. It’s- there’ll be loads more when people figure out uh what the situation is, because this- this is over.. this has gone way over the line. Way over the line!

Because just the way the uh founders are speaking about it, as a a political tool.. with Israel, which they’ve done frequently, uh..

Redacted Host: the founders of Palantir.

James Martinez: Yes Mr. Karp did. He was quite vocal about it. And now you’ve got uh Peter Teal, um who’s in crisis in my opinion. If you’re going to advertise yourself talking about the Antichrist to a Christian nation and you’re not sure your role in that. But uh uh people are saying, “Well, aren’t you and your relationship between Palantir now going to become something of like the Antichrist?” And him uh having a deep moral issue with the concept, and now he’s put on I think four or five speaking engagements about this. It’s about him and the effects of this company,

Redacted Host: Right. The..

James Martinez: ..before he even got into it. ..Yes. Yes. Yes. I

Redacted Host: People they, should they changed their name from Palunteer to ‘Mark of the Beast’. I mean that it’s really at the center of this.

James Martinez: Yes. It’s a lot of it, and they are uh discreetly um discussing that. The problem is is uh the public is not um fully engaged with the situation yet, because they’re totally misdirected and uh their attention has been put elsewhere. Because you know one of the things they’ve done when the internet came through and everybody started to have a screen in front of their face for eight hours a day, is the uh completion: ‘the total attention economy’. It’s more important to get attention. You have to. Your digital node is your money now.

And all these algorithms that are controlling your digital node as you spend eight hours a day in front of a screen. Uh that’s all part of this too, because people are already- they’re already uh almost merged with computers already. It’s it’s there already, but the public hasn’t totally moved into it.  When you mention the NFL thing with the with players, uh, that’s the first time I’ve heard that, but it doesn’t surprise me. They they they’ll be the first to suicide out, meaning that..

Redacted Host:  They’re moving away- they’re moving away from this Bluetooth technology on their heads, like Aaron Rodgers has openly talked about it, and having this, you know, electromagnetic technology right in your head. So, they’ve moved back to like wired earbuds now. You’re seeing all of them getting off the buses now using wired earbuds again, which is a technology we basically gave up. But um you know, that might just seem like a band-aid on a on a gaping wound at this point, um given the fact that they still have a phone in their pocket. And I mean who knows? But I just thought it was interesting.

Um let’s get back to the lawsuit, James, if we can because the complaint uses this phrase. I mentioned it off the time- the top: “this synthetic intelligence”. Um can you explain what this means? How it differs from what we know of as–

James Martinez: Is AI synthetic intelligence? ..It’s an extension of the human creation. It’s an extension of human creation. But we’re using AI which is a creation and it’s digital. And their live human intelligence is quite different. I think synthe ‘synthetic intelligence uh refers to uh AI and its effects.

Redacted Host: They also say that these systems, in the in the complaint, specifically are being used without public consent. So, what evidence points to that? I mean, is is an example like the Charlie Kirk Memorial where people showed up at this event and they were being digitally tracked. We know the company TPUSA has admitted that they were being digitally tracked. 277,000 people digitally tracked and monitored and all of that with this massive like geo-fencing operation.

So, what is it? How often are we publicly consenting to this? And does that get them off the hook? I mean, these long terms-of-service agreements that people sign up for, but they don’t even read them because they’re hundreds of pages long.

James Martinez: Well, that’s the problem. Nobody rebuts anything. I mean, I I I confess, I’ve done all of the mistakes. And when people- when you- when everything goes to a court of law, well, let’s– everything goes ba- into basic contract law. And if you’re agreeing to all of these things, tacit agreement, uh whatever, uh written or any of that, in a court of law, you’ve agreed to it. You have the choice of reading all the updates on all your apps, but nobody does.

And it’s the same thing with credit card agreements. Nobody reads those. So, we’re not even versed in basic contract law in this country, at all, as consumers, because we’ve voluntarily complied to agree to all these shitty contracts that we get all the time that are not uh um for us really. They’re they’re they’re, to uh distort our perception. So, people need to rebut all of this stuff. Now, there’s going to be a huge wave of people in the future. They’re going to just start dumping all their phones. They’re not going to have any mobile devices. It It will be fashionable not to have them soon. It’s already started in anyway.

Redacted Host: I I know. I get your feeling on this. I really do. And it’s I think it’s going to I think you’re right about this. I just got chills on to be honest with you. That’s like spirit – that’s like God telling me you’re right. Like this is coming and this is perhaps- and I I’m feeling like overwhelmed, like I I hate to be like kind of cheesy about it, but I just got like- I don’t know I just- Something hit me just now when you said that. Um and I, you know, again I’m not trying to be cheesy or dramatic here. I just- when you said that I just got like an overwhelming like spiritual hit in my body when you just said that. I almost I almost wanted to cry. Like I just got tears in my eyes about it, because I feel like we’re heading there. People are going to-

James Martinez: Yeah, this is- this is..

Redacted Host:  like they were burning records back in the day. They were burning.. People are going to take these phones and they’re going to throw them away, and they’re going to be done with it, and they’re going to say, “You know what? You’re going to- you can reach me on my landline going forward if you want to call me.”

James Martinez: I’ve I’ve already had people call me about getting rotary phones, getting ham radios, CBS. They’ve just- they’ve had it. they’ve had it. And these are people that are fairly informed, uh that have families and businesses, and everybody uh is is planning on decentralization in some form because this technological uh crossroads that we’re at. It’s a crossroads and the conversation about- the people that, at the crossroads, that are creating the crossroads like Palantir and other companies like them.

Uh we haven’t uh really uh had the proper discussion in public yet really. We see little promotional pieces on the internet all the time and news stories about Palantir etc. Um but the uh bottom line is that the Constitution is how we structure our freedom in this country, is- It’s gone now already but this will permanently alter it entirely. And there needs to be uh extensions to the Constitution in my opinion, uh and that should be a a primary directive of the White House to introduce this, because they’re going to hear about this lawsuit. Uh I can assure you that they’ll know about it, and other people are going to know about it as well.

Because it’s going to- um it’s it’s basically uh an invitation for this company to have uh a more uh grounded talk about the effects of what they’re doing, since most of their clients are- it’s defense industry related and CIA related. That’s where their base is: they have that that the government version, and they have a public version. So, but it’s all contract law and nobody’s rebutting anything. Yeah!

Redacted Host: I want to maybe drill in a little bit more deeply here on this cog- the violations of cognitive liberty. I know we’ve kind of touched on it a little bit, but maybe we can be just concise here. Essentially, your freedom of thought. How can this Palantir Technology and what they’re doing, basically trespass into the human mind so that we we don’t have any liberty?

James Martinez: People are going to be- people are already hooking hooking themselves up to the internet through the brain anyway. That’s already started. All the health, HEALTH companies uh when they bring out their BCI [brain-computer interface] technology uh now we’re in a completely different territory of law. And uh Palantir will have access to all that information if they want it. They can get it if they want it. They’re going to try and protect all these brain data rights, but they have ‘intrusion rights’ onto you. And what does that mean legally? What does it mean spiritually? What does it mean liabilitywise?

Because none of it is going to run perfect. And there’s going to be- This lawsuit is nothing, there’s going to be loads. It’s going to be loads. It’s going to be non-stop because this is really going to affect people’s lives. now at this point.

Redacted Host: ..

James Martinez: So, it interfaces with somebody’s data that’s already online in a server, being saved or being utilized for something. Not to mention what it’s going to do with uh um, in warfare. It it it all- it renders uh warfare kind of obsolete at this point, because you you can’t- you can’t really do anything except uh fry the servers of of everything, to deal with this type of thing. It’s really it’s really um nothing..

Redacted Host: Think about the future of modern warfare. I mean what is it going to look like? We talk about drones.

James Martinez: Well, it’s nonhuman. It’s all going to be robots and drones and that type of thing. It’s already interfacing with all of that anyway, and using en- enhanced forms of warfare with the brain already. Um, now all your DNA, your uh body parts, all of that stuff, depending upon where you stand legally, um, that may be the government’s property.

Most people that have had uh injections into the body with patented material uh unknowingly, um that patented material is inside their biology and that ultimately um doesn’t make them human to begin with. And now that they’re actually in the trans-human stage, even if it’s a form of um uh for R&D, it’ll be used for research and development until it’s perfected. Um, that’s what they’ll do. So, they they if they have access to data and information and we’re already wired into the internet anyway through our senses, or through uh the BCI interface, they can have that information.

So, people can no longer trust these tech companies at all anymore – what they- what they’ve done. They’ve reached way past, way past, which is why Palantir is flexing in front of China in the White House with Trump.

Redacted Host: Why? Why do you mean?

James Martinez: Because uh China, we set them up to be our big enemy. Because when they were going to initiate and create world government, it was going to be headed out financially through China. And now since the whole thing’s falling apart, uh.. China has double crossed most of the world and is responsible for theft of intellectual property and trying to kill us with all their drugs that they put in the country, and god knows how many other violations. Uh, so um, it changes warfare entirely, and it’s going to be used um, and is being used probably while we’re talking uh, in other countries.

Redacted Host: We look at the plaintiffs here. Um and I don’t know how much you can reveal about Jane Doe and John Doe and how much you can talk about it. I know you know the individuals involved in this, or the individual involved in this. Um, is this one of those, first of all, I guess, when a judge looks at this, is a judge is going to like laugh this out of the courtroom and just dismiss it. Because that’s a big- that’s a big, that’s always a concern, right? The judge is going to look at this and just not even understand it

James Martinez: Oh!

Redacted Host: ..and say like this sounds like science fiction. Dismissed. And then what kind of plaintiffs are we talking about here? Do they have some real weight behind them?

James Martinez: Uh, they do as of about 24 hours ago. Uh yeah, they do because help um, and somebody that knows the courts very well and knows the commercial courts very well and knows jurisdiction very well. Uh this is going to be something different uh than these guys have had to deal with, because you know they’ll send it to their billionaire law firm that represents them. It’ll be a paper war. They’re going to put a ‘try motion’ to vacate the whole thing and throw it out. Um and um should.. There’ll be enormous um arrogance associated with it because they’re just going to try and get the whole thing thrown out in a couple rounds, but lawsuits aren’t aren’t fought the same way anymore because AI is involved, which is why it’s going to obsolete the entire legal trade.

They know it, too, because I’ve talked to attorneys about it. they know if the decisions are being made with AI, and how people uh send their paperwork back and forth. So, all of this tech is affecting all the industries around it tremendously. And we’ve not really seen the real um uh effect of it as of yet. But people are talking about it very quietly, very quietly. And I’ve talked to several- many lawyers both uh in the US and in Europe, and some of them uh doing work for the ‘World Court’. Um it’s not good for the future for lawyers. It’s not a..

Redacted Host: Well I mean because a judge.. Will a judge.. I guess at the heart of this a judge will still have to decide whether to dismiss this or actually allow this to advance to discovery phase, and then move forward with a potential trial. Um is- are judges going to be pushed out of this process and AI will make those decisions for these judges? Because how at the end of the day do we know if a judge has read this 43 page complaint and made a decision? Like, can they put it in AI and say, “Hey, I’m a judge. Um, let me know. Should I dismiss this or just move forward with this?” We don’t know.

James Martinez: Yeah. I mean, I can take the suit, as a judge, plug it in to AI, give me all the critical data on this, this, this, this, cite these laws and these authorities and whatnot, and let me take a look at it. Yeah, they can do that. Anybody can do that. You can do any any suit and then have- then have the AI system synthesize and look at the strengths and weaknesses of the case just in a legal sense. So, uh yeah, I think there’s going to be uh.. How how the business of law is conducting itself is forever changed now.

Redacted Host: So bottom line for us, James, um, how big a deal is this, do you believe? Um, and to someone watching right now who’s like hearing about this for the first time and they’re like, ‘Oh, this this sounds like science fiction right now.” I mean, you’re an MK Ultra whistleblower. You’ve seen it in action. And people like to really compartmentalize stuff. They’re like, “Ah, I got to take my kids to dance this afternoon. I- Really? The government is targeting weapons against me to control my mind, and having me angry about Charlie Kirk’s murder, and they want me to be upset about black people, or they want me to be upset.. really? I just got to take my kids to dance class right now.”

But it’s it’s affecting all of us in a big big way and I I– I think people need to wake up. So I know.. I’ll give you the final thoughts here on this and how big a deal this really is.

James Martinez: Well, when I was with Walter Bowart while he was alive – the guy that wrote ‘Operation Mind Control’, and when we were working together before his death, he knew the endgame– we both knew was a complete total tra takeover of the brain, which is the high ground for warfare. That’s what it is. But you don’t hear much about it at all. It’s all going on secretly. And the technology companies are aiding and embedding the acceleration of that, uh through the ‘brain computer interface’ which is going to change the structure of law, money, information, memory, uh crime, uh data store, everything. It’ll affect everything.

Um and it’ll affect all um uh future future communication permanently. Permanently. So, this lawsuit uh with Palantir is um a step into having the public examine uh what it means to be human. That’s really what this has to be, because I think uh if the the defendants uh really understood what was going on, which I don’t think that they do, uh in terms of how this uh is an extinction level event for humans, uh they they might- they might um be apt to do something or or reel back what they’re doing. Um but we’ll see.

I think that um some big changes are going to occur very very shortly that are going to even up the ante on this situation, because the the um Europe is uh not going to allow the- I just heard today and I’ve got to verify.. they’re not going to allow Americans to come in to Europe if they don’t have biometric identification and everything. So all the technological gridlock prison is- it’s coming in like this. And meanwhile everybody’s distracted with everything.

But this is what’s really going on because you’re not going to have any rights at all. Cognitive rights means your right to your thinking, your opinion, how you formulate your day, how you formulate your emotion even, and how you formulate and make interpretations of what is going on in reality, as it pertains to news.

Redacted Host: The other piece of this, I guess, uh, before I let you go, I just have so many questions, James. I’m just trying to wrap my head around all of this.. But the idea that we would all get rid of our cell phones, that we would all say, “Enough is enough.” You- you’d in many ways be you’d be marginalized in society. I mean, there was a video going around last week or two, a couple of weeks ago about the Brit card, you know, the new digital ID that’s uh right..

James Martinez: Oh.

Redacted Host: Being rolled out in in the UK, and it was kind of a meme meme video. but it showed an old woman, she couldn’t get on the bus, and they said, “Sorry, you need your digital ID Brit card.” And she said, “But I don’t have a smartphone.” And the bus just drives away.

Like, it’d be great, if we-

James Martinez: Yeah, we.. (inaudible)

Redacted Host: ..get rid of all the smartphones, but we’re not.. You’re going to be said, “No, you need to get the app.” “You need to download the app”. “You need the digital ID which is on your phone.” Sorry, like you’re going to- What’s going to happen to these people who say, “We don’t want this personal liberty. I don’t want to have a cell phone. You can’t make me buy a cell phone”.?

James Martinez: Right. Right. That’s where it is. There, that’s that’s the new messaging is, “You will be left out, left behind and punished for not modifying your behavior – to the technological overlords. It’s it’s it’s the digital feudal system uh putting its stake in the ground, and it ha- it has to be uh discussed on a way way way way way way bigger level than just these little random talks that these guys do at these conferences and so forth. The public’s got to engage these people.

Redacted Host: Well, it’s like Obama, remember the “Obama phone’? Obama..

James Martinez: Yeah.

Redacted Host: ..was giving out cell phones and you could go to these like little kiosks around, in like poverty-stricken areas- like you can’t even get food. You know, your kids don’t even know how to read, but you can get a cell phone, thanks to Obama. ..Oh, he’s just being so generous, right? It’s just being so generous.

It’s about being able to track and control all of us, make sure that we’re all into this digital ecosystem right now. It’s terrifying. It really is terrifying.

James Martinez: Yeah. But that’s- it’s it’s ultimately about whether we’re going to ascend as a species or not. And this is part of it.. is part of it. You have a right to exist in your normal organic uh self, uh separate from any um infrastructure: digitally, hardware, anything at all. I- We weren’t created to be machines. That’s it.

Redacted Host: And they want us that way for total control. .

James Martinez: Yep

Redacted Host: James, thank you for this. Thank you for bringing attention to this lawsuit which has just been filed against Palantir. Massive lawsuit. We will see what comes of it. What kind of chicanery and tricks Palantir tries to to, you know, to employ to try to avoid this. Um, but uh we’re going to, we’re going to continue to stay on this story and thank you for all that you’ve done, James, to bring awareness to this and hopefully help people wake up. Thank you so much.

James Martinez: All right. Thanks so much.

Redacted promotional: Thank you so much for watching ‘Redacted’. We’d love for you to subscribe to the channel. It’s totally free if you want to follow us or subscribe. And if we brought you any value at all, please consider sharing this video with a friend or a loved one on social media.

Thanks so much and we’ll see you next time.

 

 Patents-

‘WO2020060606 – CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA’
MIcrosoft Technology Licensing LLC
filing: 06/20/2019
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606

‘Method and apparatus for transmitting power and data using the human body ’
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
filing: 04/27/2000
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6754472B1/en

‘System and Method for Testing for COVID-19’
Richard A. Rothschild
filing: 05/17/2020
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200279585A1/en

‘Dr Lorraine Day, swab test concerns’
12/16/2020
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Nr038F6p2e0u/

‘How nano technology hyjacks a person’s thinking process, and how to detox the graphene and heavy metals’
by Dr Ana Mihalcea with Maria Zeee
/spirit/2022/12/how-nanotechnology-hyjacks-a-persons-thinking-process-and-how-to-detox-the-graphene-and-heavy-metals-by-dr-ana-mihalcea-and-maria-zeee-november-10th-2022-with-transcript-2521567.html

Video-

‘Self-Assembling Quantum Tech in Jabs for Hacking Brains; How to Detox | Maria Zeee, Dr. Ana Mihalcea
https://rumble.com/v6sjl5f-self-assembling-quantum-tech-in-jabs-for-hacking-brains-how-to-detox-maria-.html