Missing Workers: The Missing Part of the Unemployment Story
Updated May 2, 2014.
In today’s labor market, the unemployment rate drastically understates the weakness of job opportunities. This is due to the existence of a large pool of “missing workers”—potential workers who, because of weak job opportunities, are neither employed nor actively seeking a job. In other words, these are people who would be either working or looking for work if job opportunities were significantly stronger. Because jobless workers are only counted as unemployed if they are actively seeking work, these “missing workers” are not reflected in the unemployment rate.
As part of its ongoing effort to create the metrics needed to assess how well the economy is working for America’s broad middle class, EPI is introducing its “missing worker” estimates, which will be updated on this page on the first Friday of every month immediately after the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases its jobs numbers. The “missing worker” estimates provide policymakers with a key gauge of the health of the labor market.
Updated May 2, 2014, based on most current data available
- Total missing workers, April 2014: 6,220,000
- Unemployment rate if missing workers were looking for work: 9.9%
- Official unemployment rate: 6.3%
Millions of potential workers sidelined: Missing workers,* January 2006–April 2014
Date | Missing workers |
---|---|
Jan-2006 | 530,000 |
Feb-2006 | 110,000 |
Mar-2006 | 110,000 |
Apr-2006 | 250,000 |
May-2006 | 210,000 |
Jun-2006 | 110,000 |
Jul-2006 | 60,000 |
Aug-2006 | -120,000 |
Sep-2006 | 120,000 |
Oct-2006 | -50,000 |
Nov-2006 | -220,000 |
Dec-2006 | -500,000 |
Jan-2007 | -460,000 |
Feb-2007 | -210,000 |
Mar-2007 | -150,000 |
Apr-2007 | 650,000 |
May-2007 | 560,000 |
Jun-2007 | 360,000 |
Jul-2007 | 370,000 |
Aug-2007 | 840,000 |
Sep-2007 | 410,000 |
Oct-2007 | 800,000 |
Nov-2007 | 280,000 |
Dec-2007 | 250,000 |
Jan-2008 | -320,000 |
Feb-2008 | 220,000 |
Mar-2008 | 50,000 |
Apr-2008 | 340,000 |
May-2008 | -60,000 |
Jun-2008 | 20,000 |
Jul-2008 | -70,000 |
Aug-2008 | -90,000 |
Sep-2008 | 180,000 |
Oct-2008 | 60,000 |
Nov-2008 | 420,000 |
Dec-2008 | 420,000 |
Jan-2009 | 710,000 |
Feb-2009 | 620,000 |
Mar-2009 | 1,050,000 |
Apr-2009 | 750,000 |
May-2009 | 650,000 |
Jun-2009 | 650,000 |
Jul-2009 | 1,040,000 |
Aug-2009 | 1,320,000 |
Sep-2009 | 2,050,000 |
Oct-2009 | 2,270,000 |
Nov-2009 | 2,300,000 |
Dec-2009 | 3,120,000 |
Jan-2010 | 2,770,000 |
Feb-2010 | 2,680,000 |
Mar-2010 | 2,460,000 |
Apr-2010 | 1,940,000 |
May-2010 | 2,510,000 |
Jun-2010 | 2,960,000 |
Jul-2010 | 3,210,000 |
Aug-2010 | 2,830,000 |
Sep-2010 | 3,200,000 |
Oct-2010 | 3,570,000 |
Nov-2010 | 3,340,000 |
Dec-2010 | 3,830,000 |
Jan-2011 | 3,950,000 |
Feb-2011 | 4,080,000 |
Mar-2011 | 3,960,000 |
Apr-2011 | 4,020,000 |
May-2011 | 4,070,000 |
Jun-2011 | 4,220,000 |
Jul-2011 | 4,650,000 |
Aug-2011 | 4,130,000 |
Sep-2011 | 3,970,000 |
Oct-2011 | 4,010,000 |
Nov-2011 | 4,150,000 |
Dec-2011 | 4,230,000 |
Jan-2012 | 4,490,000 |
Feb-2012 | 4,120,000 |
Mar-2012 | 4,220,000 |
Apr-2012 | 4,690,000 |
May-2012 | 4,190,000 |
Jun-2012 | 4,070,000 |
Jul-2012 | 4,540,000 |
Aug-2012 | 4,690,000 |
Sep-2012 | 4,480,000 |
Oct-2012 | 3,840,000 |
Nov-2012 | 4,400,000 |
Dec-2012 | 4,180,000 |
Jan-2013 | 4,370,000 |
Feb-2013 | 4,700,000 |
Mar-2013 | 5,240,000 |
Apr-2013 | 5,130,000 |
May-2013 | 4,780,000 |
Jun-2013 | 4,710,000 |
Jul-2013 | 5,050,000 |
Aug-2013 | 5,230,000 |
Sep-2013 | 5,380,000 |
Oct-2013 | 6,060,000 |
Nov-2013 | 5,710,000 |
Dec-2013 | 6,100,000 |
Jan-2014 | 5,850,000 |
Feb-2014 | 5,660,000 |
Mar-2014 | 5,290,000 |
Apr-2014 | 6,220,000 |
* Potential workers who, due to weak job opportunities, are neither employed nor actively seeking work
Note: Volatility in the number of missing workers in 2006–2008, including cases of negative numbers of missing workers, is simply the result of month-to-month variability in the sample. The Great Recession–induced pool of missing workers began to form and grow starting in late 2008.
Source: EPI analysis of Mitra Toossi, “Labor Force Projections to 2016: More Workers in Their Golden Years,” Bureau of Labor Statistics Monthly Labor Review, November 2007; and Current Population Survey public data series
The unemployment rate is vastly understating weakness in today’s labor market: Unemployment rate, actual and if missing workers* were looking for work, January 2006–April 2014
Date | Actual | If missing workers were looking for work |
---|---|---|
2006-01-01 | 4.7% | 5.0% |
2006-02-01 | 4.8% | 4.8% |
2006-03-01 | 4.7% | 4.8% |
2006-04-01 | 4.7% | 4.9% |
2006-05-01 | 4.6% | 4.8% |
2006-06-01 | 4.6% | 4.7% |
2006-07-01 | 4.7% | 4.8% |
2006-08-01 | 4.7% | 4.6% |
2006-09-01 | 4.5% | 4.6% |
2006-10-01 | 4.4% | 4.4% |
2006-11-01 | 4.5% | 4.4% |
2006-12-01 | 4.4% | 4.1% |
2007-01-01 | 4.6% | 4.4% |
2007-02-01 | 4.5% | 4.4% |
2007-03-01 | 4.4% | 4.3% |
2007-04-01 | 4.5% | 4.9% |
2007-05-01 | 4.4% | 4.8% |
2007-06-01 | 4.6% | 4.8% |
2007-07-01 | 4.7% | 4.9% |
2007-08-01 | 4.6% | 5.1% |
2007-09-01 | 4.7% | 4.9% |
2007-10-01 | 4.7% | 5.2% |
2007-11-01 | 4.7% | 4.9% |
2007-12-01 | 5.0% | 5.1% |
2008-01-01 | 5.0% | 4.8% |
2008-02-01 | 4.9% | 5.0% |
2008-03-01 | 5.1% | 5.1% |
2008-04-01 | 5.0% | 5.2% |
2008-05-01 | 5.4% | 5.4% |
2008-06-01 | 5.6% | 5.6% |
2008-07-01 | 5.8% | 5.7% |
2008-08-01 | 6.1% | 6.0% |
2008-09-01 | 6.1% | 6.3% |
2008-10-01 | 6.5% | 6.5% |
2008-11-01 | 6.8% | 7.1% |
2008-12-01 | 7.3% | 7.5% |
2009-01-01 | 7.8% | 8.2% |
2009-02-01 | 8.3% | 8.7% |
2009-03-01 | 8.7% | 9.3% |
2009-04-01 | 9.0% | 9.4% |
2009-05-01 | 9.4% | 9.7% |
2009-06-01 | 9.5% | 9.9% |
2009-07-01 | 9.5% | 10.1% |
2009-08-01 | 9.6% | 10.4% |
2009-09-01 | 9.8% | 10.9% |
2009-10-01 | 10.0% | 11.3% |
2009-11-01 | 9.9% | 11.2% |
2009-12-01 | 9.9% | 11.7% |
2010-01-01 | 9.7% | 11.3% |
2010-02-01 | 9.8% | 11.4% |
2010-03-01 | 9.9% | 11.3% |
2010-04-01 | 9.9% | 11.0% |
2010-05-01 | 9.6% | 11.1% |
2010-06-01 | 9.4% | 11.1% |
2010-07-01 | 9.5% | 11.3% |
2010-08-01 | 9.5% | 11.1% |
2010-09-01 | 9.5% | 11.3% |
2010-10-01 | 9.5% | 11.5% |
2010-11-01 | 9.8% | 11.7% |
2010-12-01 | 9.4% | 11.6% |
2011-01-01 | 9.1% | 11.4% |
2011-02-01 | 9.0% | 11.4% |
2011-03-01 | 9.0% | 11.3% |
2011-04-01 | 9.1% | 11.4% |
2011-05-01 | 9.0% | 11.4% |
2011-06-01 | 9.1% | 11.5% |
2011-07-11 | 9.0% | 11.7% |
2011-08-20 | 9.0% | 11.4% |
2011-09-01 | 9.0% | 11.3% |
2011-10-11 | 8.8% | 11.2% |
2011-11-20 | 8.6% | 11.0% |
2011-12-30 | 8.5% | 11.0% |
2012-01-12 | 8.2% | 10.8% |
2012-02-12 | 8.3% | 10.7% |
2012-03-12 | 8.2% | 10.7% |
2012-04-12 | 8.2% | 10.9% |
2012-05-12 | 8.2% | 10.6% |
2012-06-12 | 8.2% | 10.5% |
2012-07-12 | 8.2% | 10.8% |
2012-08-12 | 8.1% | 10.8% |
2012-09-12 | 7.8% | 10.4% |
2012-10-12 | 7.8% | 10.0% |
2012-11-12 | 7.8% | 10.3% |
2012-12-12 | 7.9% | 10.3% |
2013-01-12 | 7.9% | 10.4% |
2013-02-12 | 7.7% | 10.5% |
2013-03-12 | 7.5% | 10.6% |
2013-04-12 | 7.5% | 10.5% |
2013-05-12 | 7.5% | 10.3% |
2013-06-12 | 7.5% | 10.3% |
2013-07-12 | 7.3% | 10.2% |
2013-08-12 | 7.2% | 10.3% |
2013-09-12 | 7.2% | 10.3% |
2013-10-12 | 7.2% | 10.7% |
2013-11-12 | 7.0% | 10.3% |
2013-12-12 | 6.7% | 10.2% |
2014-01-12 | 6.6% | 10.0% |
2014-02-12 | 6.7% | 10.0 |
2014-03-12 | 6.7% | 9.8% |
2014-04-12 | 6.3% | 9.9% |
* Potential workers who, due to weak job opportunities, are neither employed nor actively seeking work
Source: EPI analysis of Mitra Toossi, “Labor Force Projections to 2016: More Workers in Their Golden Years,” Bureau of Labor Statistics Monthly Labor Review, November 2007; and Current Population Survey public data series
Roughly half of missing workers are of prime working age: Missing workers,* by age and gender, April 2014
Missing workers | |
---|---|
Men under 25 | 860,000 |
Women under 25 | 570,000 |
Men 25–54 | 1,930,000 |
Women 25–54 | 1,250,000 |
Men 55+ | 570,000 |
Women 55+ | 1,040,000 |
* Potential workers who, due to weak job opportunities, are neither employed nor actively seeking work
Source: EPI analysis of Mitra Toossi, “Labor Force Projections to 2016: More Workers in Their Golden Years,” Bureau of Labor Statistics Monthly Labor Review, November 2007; and Current Population Survey public data series
Methodology
How do we estimate the number of missing workers?
Labor force participation rate projections published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in November 2007—before the start of the Great Recession—are available in Table 3 of Mitra Toossi, “Labor Force Projections to 2016: More Workers in Their Golden Years,” Bureau of Labor Statistics Monthly Labor Review, November 2007. The projections assumed a healthy labor market over the period in question, 2006–2016, so the projected participation rate changes reflect purely non-cyclical factors (e.g., the impact of retiring baby boomers). The difference between these projections and the actual labor force participation rate is thus a good measure of the cyclical change in the labor force participation rate, i.e., the change that is a direct result of the weak labor market in the Great Recession and its aftermath. It does not count, for example, those retiring baby boomers who would have left the labor force whether or not the Great Recession happened.
Based on this logic, missing workers are estimated in the following way: The labor force participation rate projections for 2016 by gender and age group (age groups 16–19, 20–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75+) available in Table 3 of Toossi (2007) are assumed to be structural rates. The current month’s structural rates (by gender and age group) are calculated by linearly interpolating between 2006 and 2016. The size of the potential labor force is calculated by multiplying the current month’s structural rates by actual population numbers (available by gender and age group from the Current Population Survey public data series). The difference between the size of the potential labor force and size of the actual labor force (also available by gender and age group from the Current Population Survey public data series) is the number of missing workers.
Source: http://www.epi.org/publication/missing-workers/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex
HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary New Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link , or the Banner Below.
Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because...
It’s OXYGENATED
It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH
Preservative and Chemical Free
Allergen Free
Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source
Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals
Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents
Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons
Is a Full Spectrum Complex
Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials.
Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
![Report abuse](/img/report_abuse.png)