Say What?

Nearly every day RINOs and left-wing loons make statements that seem diametrically opposed to statements they’ve made in the past–confusing and perplexing statements, which ought to, but don’t seem to, elicit cognitive dissonance among those making them. Unless they’re deliberately gaslighting the public, which seems likely.

Recently former Attorney General Bill Barr,

• who allegedly ordered a U.S. Attorney in PA to stand down and not investigate reports of vote fraud during the 2020 election;
• who claimed he didn’t see evidence of “fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election” (because he didn’t look for it, ignored what was reported to him, and even ordered such reports to be ignored);
• who could have put the question to rest once and for all  because he had the power and duty to investigate potential vote fraud but did not, for inexplicable reasons; and
• who therefore allowed the election to be stolen by what turns out, collectively, to have been in fact a massive amount of vote fraud in the 2020 election,

made this Catch 22 of a pronouncement:

If Americans believe the U.S. Department of Justice is creating a two-tier justice system in the United States, “the proper remedy is to vote people out of office, including the president,” said former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr to The Federalist Saturday.

If Americans have corrupt elections and no recourse from the DOJ, as led by the likes of former Attorney General Bill Barr, then how the hell will citizens be able to vote anyone out of office?

If the Attorney General refuses to look for vote fraud, refuses to investigate vote fraud, uses his power to order those inclined to look for and investigate vote fraud to stand down, and so then allows vote fraud to go unpunished and even be rewarded, thus ensuring vote fraud in perpetuity, then how the hell will citizens ever be able to vote anyone out of office?

We now have a two-tiered system of justice because Bill Barr allowed the election to be stolen by not exercising his power to stop the steal.

How, under these circumstances, will We the People be able to vote these corrupt people out of office? Can people living in Red China, Russia, North Korea or other totalitarian states “vote” their own corrupt oppressors out of office?

Next we have the hypocrisy of Democrats and mainstream media “journalists” who rant on and on about the danger of questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election and therefore the legitimacy of Biden’s presidency.

It’s beyond the pale to even question whether the election was fraudulent. It’s un-American. It’s treasonous. It’s anti-democratic. Mind you, they didn’t perceive it that way when they questioned elections.

Nevertheless, in their minds: You can’t question election integrity, even if everything points to massive fraud. They even demand that social media companies censor, even ban, anyone who disagrees with them on a variety of issues, including election “integrity”.

The very idea that one would question the legitimacy of a sitting president, they say, puts our national security at risk, as if actually stealing an election does not.

This week, however, we see that it’s fine for them to attack the legitimacy of the Supreme Court, which, when you think about it, is impossible. Every member of the Supreme Court was legitimately nominated, confirmed, and sworn in by legitimately elected representatives of We the People.

The Supreme Court itself is, well, the SUPREME court of the land. Their decisions are the “law of the land,” as liberals are wont to repeat ad nauseum when they agree with a decision.

After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the talking point that the Supreme Court is now rendered illegitimate began showing up everywhere, as evidenced by a medley put together by Tucker Carlson (starting about 5:30 mins. into this video).

No one is supposed to question “election integrity,” yet somehow it’s not treasonous, un-American, anti-democratic or a threat to national security to question the legitimacy and integrity of our highest court.

Hypocrisy. Double standards. Gaslighting.

Why can’t President Trump and his supporters (and anyone else interested in free, fair, and honest elections) question the legitimacy of an extremely questionable election, but leftists, Democrats, and their minions in the mainstream media can question the legitimacy of the Supreme Court?

Pray for our Republic.

#####