Secret Service Tweets Anti-Fox News Message

“Had to monitor Fox for a story.  Can’t. Deal. With. The. Blathering.”

Oops!  I’m sure it was a mistake, the Secret Service is looking into it, there is nothing to read into this…blah, blah, blah.  Here the tweet that you would have saw today if you did not blink:

Here is the Secret Service’s statement on the Washington Post:

Their statement: “An employee with access to the Secret Service’s Twitter account, who mistakenly believed they were on their personal account, posted an unapproved and inappropriate tweet. The tweet contained no vulgarity, security or pertinent agency information. The tweet did not reflect the views of the U.S. Secret Service and it was immediately removed.

“We apologize for this mistake, and the user no longer has access to our official account. Policies and practices which would have prevented this were not followed and will be reinforced for all account users. We will ensure existing policies are strictly adhered to in order to prevent this mistake from being repeated, and we are conducting appropriate internal follow-up.”

H/t to The Blaze

On another note, if you run a news paper that publishes an article that is favorable to a Republican you might get blacklisted!  The Boston Herald tells all:

The White House Press Office has refused to give the Boston Herald full access to President Obama’s Boston fund-raiser today, in e-mails objecting to the newspaper’s front page placement of a Mitt Romney op-ed, saying pool reporters are chosen based on whether they cover the news “fairly.”

“I tend to consider the degree to which papers have demonstrated to covering the White House regularly and fairly in determining local pool reporters,” White House spokesman Matt Lehrich wrote in response to a Herald request for full access to the presidential visit.

“My point about the op-ed was not that you ran it but that it was the full front page, which excluded any coverage of the visit of a sitting US President to Boston. I think that raises a fair question about whether the paper is unbiased in its coverage of the President’s visits,” Lehrich wrote.

Read more at Liberty Juice