Covid Censorship Strikes Again: "Their Actions are Reprehensible," Dr. Peter McCullough M.D., MPH

Throughout these past few years, particularly post Covid, the censorship-industrial complex has grown unabated.

My 3-part (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) investigative series for TrialSite in 2021, ‘Are the scientific journals censoring the science?’ exposed how the scientific journals had been withdrawing or retracting studies, which revealed the COVID-19 vaccines in an inconvenient light (one counter to the official narrative).

In addition, studies showing favourable results for repurposed drugs as an effective early Covid treatment were also ‘fair game’ to the agents of censorship. For my series, I interviewed Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Robert Malone and Dr Pierre Kory- who all gave their personal testimonies on how their scientific papers and/or that of their colleagues were abruptly removed, without any prior warning.

This systematic removal of critical papers by medical and scientific experts informing the scientific community and the wider public on evidence-based data, scientific observations and cutting-edge research, can easily be regarded as censorship.

Unfortunately, this damaging trend has continued. On July 5th, Dr McCullough’s co-authored paper entitled, ‘A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination’ was published on The Lancet’s preprint server. The paper’s damning findings showed: ‘A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.’

In less than 24 hours, this landmark paper was suddenly removed and a note appeared stating, “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

This is just another example of a paper with findings, not fitting in with the “very good safety profile of the COVID-19 vaccines,” being expelled from a prominent journal.

Dr McCullough commented exclusively for TrialSite about this highly concerning issue. This is what he said: “This act of medical censorship occurred after the paper met all the criteria for listing on the Lancet PrePrint Server and appears to be triggered by very heavy worldwide interest and rapid downloading of the paper. This speaks to the importance of our findings as the largest summary of autopsies after COVID-19 vaccination. Elsevier and Lancet are trying to suppress critical scientific observations on COVID-19 vaccine safety. Their actions are reprehensible.”

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/censorship-strikes-again-their-actions-are-reprehensible-dr-peter-mccullough-md-mph-b5e5407e

***********************************

My other blogs. Main ones below:

http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)

http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)

http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)

http://australian-politics.blogspot.com/ (AUSTRALIAN POLITICS)

http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)

https://immigwatch.blogspot.com/ (IMMIGRATION WATCH)

https://awesternheart.blogspot.com/ (THE PSYCHOLOGIST)

http://jonjayray.com/blogall.html More blogs

*******************************

Source: http://snorphty.blogspot.com/2023/07/covid-censorship-strikes-again-their.html