For the New York Times, Pregnancy Is Now Right-Wing Extremism

Only the Democrats and their propaganda ministry would see life – pregnancy – as some awful rightwing conspiracy. The upside is these malevolent lunatics choose not to have babies.

New York Times Kvetches That Pregnancy Is a MAGA Fashion Statement

Oh baby! New York Times is losing its mind because Republican women are … having children | Andrea Peyser, New York Post

This isn’t pregnancy. It’s a political plot.

A full-blown, unhinged conspiracy orchestrated by the MAGA movement to take over the hearts, minds and uteruses… pic.twitter.com/XtPIXgm6fB

— Owen Gregorian (@OwenGregorian) June 27, 2026

The New York Times is famously antinatalist. It hasn’t seen an abortion it didn’t celebrate. So, with many Trump-aligned women pregnant in the White House, it had to analyze the phenomenon. New York Times: That three such prominent women in the MAGA movement were pregnant at pretty much the same time was, indubitably, a coincidence. But for an administration that has such an intuitive and strategic understanding of the power of aesthetics that an unspoken dress code in which men outfit themselves in the image of the president has developed, it has also become a telling one. Together, the women have created a notably consistent, and somewhat paradigm-shifting, picture of the White House’s family and fertility platform. If the bare-chested, muscled mixed martial arts fighters of the U.F.C. match that President Trump hosted on Flag Day were the poster guys for MAGA’s image of masculinity, then the pregnant women of Trump world are one half of their feminine counterparts. Along with the sheath-clad, lip-filled, pageant-haired Mar-a-Lago set, they offer an image of idealized womanhood that gives literal shape to the pronatalist movement. “It almost feels like a memo went out,” said Jill Filipovic, the host of the “Week in Women” podcast. “They have quite intentionally opted to present themselves as, ‘I am really pregnant, and this is what women were chosen to do,’ and they are happy to say that both with their looks and their mouths.” (New York Times.)

No doubt the existence of children is shocking among New York liberals.

Oh baby! New York Times is losing its mind because Republican women are … having children

By Andrea Peyser, NY Post, June 26, 2026:

This isn’t pregnancy. It’s a political plot.

A full-blown, unhinged conspiracy orchestrated by the MAGA movement to take over the hearts, minds and uteruses of gestating people all over the nation, one bassinet, one burp, one stretch mark at a time.

The New York Times has cracked the code. It’s Pulitzer time, baby!

In an investigation masquerading as a style piece, the Paper of Record published an unglued commentary, researched with the self-seriousness of Watergate, revealing that a whopping three women connected to the White House are preggers.

That Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Katie Miller, the wife of White House deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller and Second Lady Usha Vance should all be on the nest simultaneously isn’t just a happy mini baby boom. It is — according to the Times — a pernicious “Handmaid’s Tale”-style political plot promoting conservative child-making frenzy in an age of declining birthrates and the collapse of the Democratic Party in middle America.

It’s a cautionary fable, a warning that the dreaded GOP’s steady rate of reproduction amid a Democratic baby drought poses a dire threat to the nation.

According to the Gray Lady (now Gray Female-Identifying Newspaper) Republicans are planning to win support and ever-greater numbers of adherents by growing their own voters. One infant at a time.

It’s all laid out in the piece entitled “The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy Image.”

In it, Times chief fashion critic Vanessa Friedman writes: “That three such prominent women in the MAGA movement were pregnant at pretty much the same time was, indubitably, a coincidence.”

Or maybe not.

“But” — there’s always a “but” — “for an administration that has such an intuitive and strategic understanding of the power of aesthetics that an unspoken dress code in which men outfit themselves in the image of the president has developed, it has also become a telling one,” Friedman froths.

Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter!

Enter your email address
By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

“Together, the women have created a notably consistent, and somewhat paradigm-shifting, picture of the White House’s family and fertility platform.”

Fertility platform? Silly me. I thought the three lovelies just got themselves knocked up.

The writer also found leftist joy in taking aim at the body-hugging coral dress that the wife of Vice President JD Vance allegedly used to showcase her burgeoning bump as she grows the couple’s fourth child, a boy, due next month. To The Times, it’s not just discount maternity-wear from Old Navy. The clothes represent Mrs. Vance’s sinister method of broadcasting cuddly daddy vibes emanating from her hub ahead of November’s midterm elections.

Usha Vance mocks New York Times for drawing ‘political significance’ from her pregnancy fashion

The second lady, as well as Karoline Leavitt and Katie Miller, were the subject of a NYT fashion critique

By: Joseph A. Wulfsohn, Fox News, June 24, 2026:

Slate slammed for ‘disgusting’ op-ed on Vance pregnancy
‘Outnumbered’ panelists criticize a Slate op-ed that argues JD and Usha Vance’s pregnancy is political.

Second Lady Usha Vance had some fun at the expense of The New York Times for what she claims put “political significance” in her pregnancy wear.

Vance, who is pregnant with her fourth child as her husband JD Vance serves as vice president, was the subject of a Times piece titled “The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy Image,” alongside White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt and Katie Miller, podcast host and wife of top White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, both of whom gave birth in recent weeks.

New York Times fashion critic Vanessa Friedman began her piece by putting a spotlight on an Instagram Reel post the second lady posted commemorating Father’s Day, noting that she was “wearing a stretchy coral dress that hugs her stomach.”

placeholder
JD VANCE UNCOVERS THE HIDDEN WHITE HOUSE DRESS CODE PRESIDENT TRUMP EXPECTS FROM HIS INNER CIRCLE

Usha Vance JD Vance May 2026
Second lady Usha Vance and U.S. Vice President JD Vance arrive for a military mothers celebration in the East Room of the White House on May 6, 2026, in Washington, DC. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

“That three such prominent women in the MAGA movement were pregnant at pretty much the same time was, indubitably, a coincidence. But for an administration that has such an intuitive and strategic understanding of the power of aesthetics that an unspoken dress code in which men outfit themselves in the image of the president has developed, it has also become a telling one,” Friedman wrote Wednesday. “Together, the women have created a notably consistent, and somewhat paradigm-shifting, picture of the White House’s family and fertility platform.”

After pointing out how the trio “showcased their growing stomachs” once they announced their pregnancies, Friedman said of Vance, “as second lady, her job is also to represent and humanize the vice president. By spotlighting her pregnancy, she is doing exactly that.”

Vance offered a tongue-in-cheek response to the Times piece.

“Now that we know the political significance of my $8.75 coral maternity dress from Old Navy, can’t wait to hear what the New York Times has to say about my elastic-waistband pants and compression socks!” Vance exclaimed on X.

The second lady went on to share a screenshot of her Old Navy receipt, showing her maternity dress was marked down from $49.99 to $12.49 and had an additional $3.74 deducted in promo discounts.