Right Wing Extremists Are the Happiest People in America

This probably doesn’t come as a surprise to anyone:

“WHO is happier about life — liberals or conservatives? The answer might seem straightforward. After all, there is an entire study of academic literature in the social sciences dedicated to showing conservatives as naturally authoritarian, dogmatic, intolerant of ambiguity, fearful of threat and loss, low in self-esteem and uncomfortable with complex modes of thinking. And it was the candidate Barack Obama in 2008 who infamously labeled blue-collar voters “bitter,” as they “cling to guns or religion.” Obviously, liberals must be happier, right?

Wrong. Scholars on both the left and right have studied this question extensively, and have reached a consensus that it is conservatives who possess the happiness edge. Many data sets show this. For example, the Pew Research Center in 2006 reported that conservative Republicans were 68 percent more likely than liberal Democrats to say they were “very happy” about their lives. This pattern has persisted for decades. The question isn’t whether this is true, but why. …

Whether religion and marriage should make people happy is a question you have to answer for yourself. But consider this: Fifty-two percent of married, religious, politically conservative people (with kids) are very happy — versus only 14 percent of single, secular, liberal people without kids. …

But it turns out that’s wrong. People at the extremes are happier than political moderates. Correcting for income, education, age, race, family situation and religion, the happiest Americans are those who say they are either “extremely conservative” (48 percent very happy) or “extremely liberal” (35 percent). Everyone else is less happy, with the nadir at dead-center “moderate” (26 percent). …”

The bugman isn’t grounded in anything that makes his life meaningful. He doesn’t have a faith, family or a folk. He is a miserable, rootless urbanite whose life is defined by consumerism:

A “small-souled bugman” implies that the person has been cut off from their cultural roots, and totally subsumed into the consumerist neoliberal hive.

They are totally lacking in any sort of sympathy for their ancestors folkways, higher spirituality, or passion.

If they do engage in activities that are somewhat human, they still are heavily tinged by global capitalism.

If they are a sports fan, they will participate heavily in fantasy sports (which is obsessed with statistics, ‘scientific’ analysis of performance).

If they exercise, it will be all cardio, and tracked by fitbit and then uploaded to faceberg.

Tastes in food, art, music, and movies are predetermined by review aggregator sites like yelp, metacritic or rotten tomatoes.

Political views only appeal to them if they seem ‘rational,’ and derived from the sort of conventional wisdom, economics influenced worldview, seen in works like ‘moneyball’, nate silver’s 538 blog, and ‘freakonomics.’”

These are the people who show up at our rallies and who style themselves as enemies of capitalism. Usually, they want to share their misery and depression with us:

“A bugman is your typical big left leaning city dweller. He is usually obsessed with consumerism, lining up to purchase the newest iPhone or MacBook when it comes out, and using a smartwatch/smart home speaker for longer than the week after he bought it. Chances are he owns other throwaway smart gadgets as well. All his tastes in movies, music, expensive food, art, and more are determined by what review sites and blogs say.

Everything about his personality and life is not defined by who he is, but by what he buys and his consumerist tendencies. He’ll be subscribed to at least one, maybe multiple, subscription services, he’ll happily use social media and upload all of his information to the cloud, and he’ll gravitate towards things that seem “rational” and use big words.

In fact, their social media use defines a lot about who they are, as they try to get the most likes on social media bragging about their life and viewing the lives of others who do the same.

Yet there is something big missing about their life, something that can be seen in their face. Something that can be seen the minute you strip away all the consumerist choices and realize, there’s nothing else. Their lives are empty, hollow and all about serving corporations, until they die, and this is seen in their empty insectoid stare that implies they’re dead inside, giving them the name bugmen.”

If you have followed Occidental Dissent for years now, you know the type: