Heads Explode: Andrew Sullivan Exposes The Left Is Anti-White

Andrew Sullivan has written an incendiary article about Sarah Jeong, The New York Times and what this episode reveals about the leftwing view of anti-White racism:

“Is the newest member of the New York Times editorial board, Sarah Jeong, a racist?

From one perspective — that commonly held by people outside the confines of the political left — she obviously is. A series of tweets from 2013 to 2015 reveal a vicious hatred of an entire group of people based only on their skin color. If that sounds harsh, let’s review a few, shall we? “White men are bullshit,” is one. A succinct vent, at least. But notice she’s not in any way attacking specific white men for some particular failing, just all white men for, well, existing. Or this series of ruminations: “have you ever tried to figure out all the things that white people are allowed to do that aren’t cultural appropriation. there’s literally nothing. like skiing, maybe, and also golf. white people aren’t even allowed to have polo. did you know that. like don’t you just feel bad? why can’t we give white people a break. lacrosse isn’t for white people either. it must be so boring to be white.” Or this: “basically i’m just imagining waking up white every morning with a terrible existential dread that i have no culture.” I can’t say I’m offended by this — it’s even mildly amusing, if a little bonkers. (Has she read, say, any Shakespeare or Emily Dickinson?) But it does reveal a worldview in which white people — all of them — are cultural parasites and contemptibly dull. …

The editors of the Verge, where Jeong still works, described any assertion of racism in Jeong’s tweets as “dishonest and outrageous,” a function of bad faith and an attack on journalism itself. Scroll through left-Twitter and you find utter incredulity that demonizing white people could in any way be offensive. That’s the extent to which loathing of and contempt for “white people” is now background noise on the left. What many don’t seem to understand is that their view of racism isn’t shared by the public at large, and that the defense of it by institutions like the New York Times will only serve to deepen the kind of resentment that gave us Trump. Last night, for instance, Fox News made the most of the Times’ excuses for race-baiting.”

How many Buzzfeed employees hate white people? This is third one we’ve found in 24 hours lol. https://t.co/MaGC4FXKDm

— Gab.ai (@getongab) August 3, 2018

The article hit the target. White Nationalists have long argued that “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.” Bob Whitaker’s Mantra was the original Alt-Right meme.

By hiring Sarah Jeong, The New York Times is conceding that the charge is true: anti-racism is now by definition anti-White because only White people can be racists. The charge of “racism” has nothing to do with morality. It is okay to be vicious, violent, hateful and bigoted, engage in racial discrimination and use the charge of “racism” as a political tool to bludgeon your enemies so long as the target is a White person. The term is now purely an indictment of White people.

This is why President Trump gets so much applause when he calls them “the enemy of the people.” They aren’t “journalists.” They are anti-White political activists who persecute ordinary White people and organize social media lynch mobs to destroy them while exempting themselves from the same taboos. They are engaged in nothing but fake moral posturing.

New York Magazine

andrew sullivan’s newest column is complete garbage and i’m embarrassed to be even tangentially associated with it

— brian feldman (@bafeldman) August 3, 2018

The Atlantic

Whoever told Andrew Sullivan being a hee-hawing contrarian would make him interesting must be brought to account.

— Andy Kopsa (@andykopsa) August 3, 2018

Deadspin

one of the things about andrew sullivan is that on top of being an undisguised white supremacist he’s also just an incurious dull-minded mediocrity and an extremely shitty and slovenly writer

— Albert Burneko (@AlbertBurneko) August 3, 2018

Huffington Post

A GoFundMe so Andrew Sullivan will stop writing.

— Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) August 3, 2018

that anyone as intellectually bankrupt and un-self-aware as andrew sullivan has a platform like @NYMag is a national embarrassment pic.twitter.com/qeZ6vszFBQ

— Claire Fallon (@ClaireEFallon) August 3, 2018

The New Republic

Here’s a suggestion for Adam Moss: your magazine employs a few Asian-Americans. Ask them what they think of Andrew Sullivan’s latest column. It’ll be an interesting experience.

— Jeet Heer (@HeerJeet) August 3, 2018

Buzzfeed

This is where Andrew Sullivan is at now – sharing Gateway Pundit posts about Sarah Jeong being The Real Racist pic.twitter.com/BPNBwfba6C

— Tom Gara (@tomgara) August 2, 2018

New York Times

god, andrew sullivan is an embarrassment to writing

how does NYMag still publish this guy

— ?_? (@MikeIsaac) August 3, 2018

Splinter News

how many people could ny mag hire for whatever they’re paying andrew sullivan

— aleksander chan (@aleksnotalex) August 3, 2018

The Guardian

Andrew Sullivan thinks that satirizing the bell curve is racist, and advocating against immigration by non-whites out of fear of “demographic change” is not. pic.twitter.com/40eTTAH0dQ

— Julia Carrie Wong (@juliacarriew) August 3, 2018

Mic

That Andrew Sullivan piece is stupid because reverse racism doesn’t exist, but it’s also stupid because he managed to slip in the “socialism only works in all white countries” anti-diversity argument. pic.twitter.com/9c3oEY50yo

— Jack Smith IV (@JackSmithIV) August 3, 2018

Vox

Don’t sleep with anyone who speaks fondly of Andrew Sullivan. https://t.co/VhEUMCaJps

— Carlos Maza (@gaywonk) August 3, 2018

Village Voice

it seems cruel for all the nice people at nymag to make them share space with andrew sullivan and steve bannon https://t.co/GjUpjeiElI

— Talia Lavin (@chick_in_kiev) August 3, 2018