Dr. Fauci has a Conflict of Interest with Remdesivir, - See his Financial Disclosure below

Do you have questions on COVID-19?

Hard-to-find answers are below.

There is a cure for most with COVID-19 

Dr. Fauci, 
Director of theNational Institute of Allergy 
and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), 
was Wrong 

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) DOES Work 

Smoking Gun: Dr. Fauci is pushing vaccines and the drug Remdesivir instead of HCQ, and he has financial holdings in Gilead Sciences, 
the maker of Remdesivir, via Edgewood Growth Fund

 

                                                                  

image credit

 

Vaccines Are Not the Answer

Sadly, our state health department will hold to the questionable strict CDC guidelines and whatever they want to be implemented in the state!

“The only means to fight the plague is honesty.” 

– Albert Camus, 1947

We just hope and pray that our legislators will take the time to read through this and click the links. Dig deep into this. Dear reader, please hang in there to the end of this article. If you’ve been researching, here is more data and source files that you can include in your own files.

Dr. Vernon Coleman wrote an article entitled “Just a Little Prick – The Bill Gates Story” where he describes Bill Gates’ push for vaccines, along with his connection with Imperial College in London, Monsanto, the Cornell Alliance for Science, ID2020, and surveillance. (Here is the link to Part 2 of that article.) Click here for the main Vernon Coleman page. (From Part 2, Coleman notes: “Obviously, the term `little prick’ refers to what happens when you have an injection and is naturally in no way meant in a pejorative way. Heaven forbid. If I were to be rude about Mr Gates his subsidised friends at The Guardian and the BBC would doubtless need to be revived with smelling salts.”)

You may be surprised at the warnings, forecasts, and predictions Dr. Coleman made back in the 1970s that have since come true… 

For those who are hopeful that we can all build up a lasting immunity, here’s a study which shows how quickly COVID-19 antibodies disappear.

From the article:

July 17, 2020 — When the coronavirus crisis first began, there was a lot of hope that at least those who survive the disease will develop immunity to it and won’t have to worry about catching it again. However, it has become painfully apparent that it doesn’t work that way at all. In fact, a trio of studies that have been released recently illustrate just how fleeting the immunity offered by coronavirus antibodies truly is.

 

The same story comes out of London, where COVID-19 patients’ immune responses were analyzed. The researchers discovered that the levels of antibodies that could kill the virus dropped quickly after peaking a few weeks after the patients first exhibited symptoms. At the peak of their battle against the disease, 60 percent of the patients had a “potent” antibody response; two months later, however, only 16.7 percent of them had such a response.

Scientists found that more than 90 percent of people in both groups experienced deep declines in their antibody levels two to three months after the onset of their infection. Among the asymptomatic group, According to this, 40 percent tested negative for antibodies just eight weeks after being released from isolation.

As per usual, vaccines are being promoted as “the cure”.  However…

Vaccines aren’t the answer.

 How could vaccines be the answer if they fiddle with our RNA? And based on the fact that this most recent coronavirus mutates fairly quickly, then we would need to be vaccinated multiple times per year. That’s ridiculous! How far down the vaccine rabbit hole do “health experts” want to take us in their misguided and prideful endeavor to play God?

It’s important for us to stay up to date, as best we can, on objective truth regarding this coronavirus. Here are some facts about COVID-19 as of July 2020:

Fully referenced facts about Covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment. 

 A few snippets from the article:

• According to the latest immunological studies, the overall lethality of Covid-19 (IFR) is about 0.1% and thus in the range of a severe influenza (flu). For people at high risk or high exposure (including health care workers), early or prophylactic treatment is essential.

• The virus test kits used internationally are prone to errors and can produce false positive and false negative results. Moreover, the official virus test was not clinically validated due to time pressure and may sometimes react positive to other coronaviruses. 

• Several medical experts described express coronavirus vaccines as unnecessary or even dangerous. Indeed, the vaccine against the so-called swine flu of 2009, for example, led to sometimes severe neurological damage and lawsuits in the millions. In the testing of new coronavirus vaccines, too, serious complications and failures have already occurred.

 

So, what is really needed right now?  We need objective science, so doctors and scientists will have to determine with their colleagues the best course of action and not blindly follow the biased CDC. 

Dr. Fauci with NIH, NIAID, CDC, FDA, WHO, Big Pharma and Bill & Melinda Gates were determined from the very beginning  to make sure the clinical trials using Hydroxychloroquine would fail. That drug is being suppressed. You have to ask: why didn’t the clinical trial use the same protocol of what the French and many other doctors around the country were using to cure the COVID-19 patients? Even the Lancet, an independent, international weekly general medical journal can’t be trusted.  The Lancetretracted a major COVID-19 paper that raised concerns about malaria drugs hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine. It was retracted because the paper made claims that the drugs were ineffective against Covid-19 when, in fact, they are effective. See this article for more information.

We cannot help but wonder: who got to The Lancet to lead them to publish a false statement in the first place? 

Below is a chart that shows COVID-19 cases in countries where HCQ was Allowed and Encouraged vs where HCQ was Banned or Discouraged. Note that the USA was in the group that banned or discouraged the use of HCQ.

credit

After looking at this chart, don’t you wonder how many people could have been saved if Dr. Fauci and his NIH, NIAID, CDC and FDA organizations had allowed the use of HCQ on the COVID-19 patients?  

We believe that the failed Clinical Trial of HCQ, along with the big push for a worldwide mandatory COVID-19 vaccination, is being driven by the billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates. Gates has Dr. Fauci, WHO, CDC, FDA, NIH, and NIAID in his pocket due to the millions and millions of dollars he has donated to their organizations. Now, the U.S. has pulled funding from WHO, BUT this actually ends up helping Gates and his organizations, such as GAVI, making Gates the top funder of the World Health Organization. Remember, since 2010, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has called for a Global Vaccine Action Plan. There was a virtual Global Vaccine Summit in June 2020 in which countries got together and committed $8.8 billion dollars to GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization), a Public-Private Partnership (PPP). In a PPP, governmental bodies partner up with private companies, and this is dangerous.  So GAVI, through Gates, has WAY more money than WHO would’ve had.
 

Keep in mind — this is taxpayer money.  We are funding our own destruction! And to our detriment, Gates dominates global health policy. In the U.S., this is executed through the CDC which has a huge stronghold. Many people do not realize that the CDC is a self-policing monopoly.  It would be nice to be able to rely on them for accurate, unbiased information… but sadly, we cannot. 

In the British Medical Journal, Jeanne Lenzer wrote this editorial which summarizes comments made after physicians are informed that the CDC has significant financial dealings with biopharmaceutical companies.  Remember: Fauci also has financial interests in a vaccine. He owns patents that would be needed to develop a coronavirus/Covid-19 vaccine. (How can he own patents on government funded work?) If a vaccine were to be developed and made mandatory, he — and Gates — would stand to make multiple billions of dollars! The CDC and NIH would also benefit financially.

Snippets from the editorial linked above: 

Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.

Marcia Angell, former editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, told The BMJ, “The CDC has enormous credibility among physicians, in no small part because the agency is generally thought to be free of industry bias. Financial dealings with biopharmaceutical companies threaten that reputation.”2

Industry funding of the CDC has taken many doctors, even some who worked for CDC, by surprise. Philip Lederer, an infectious diseases fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, and a former CDC epidemic intelligence service officer, told The BMJ he was “saddened” to learn of industry funding.

The credibility of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health should be questioned after all that has transpired throughout 2020. Just look at the scandalous article below that was released in June  2020.

Fifty-four scientists have lost their jobs as a result of NIH probe into foreign ties

Here’s an excerpt:

In the vast majority of cases, Lauer reported, the person being investigated has been an Asian man in his 50s. Some three-quarters of those under investigation had active NIH grants, and nearly half had at least two grants. The 285 active grants totaled $164 million.

NIH is so corrupt that lying comes naturally to this organization!

The CDC, WHO, and NIH stand to make loads of money off the questionable vaccine racket. Click here for a better understanding.

This whole pandemic has been well planned out for many years. ”The Great Reset“ of humanity is in full swing now. And sadly, there is more to come! 

Here’s a link from the 2020 World Economic Forum that is very damning. Yet again, we see governments participating with businesses, and global policies are determined by high profile society figures, such as Gates. These global sycophants would eliminate all possible cures to Covid-19 if possible… by any means possible. And yes, they can take the law into their own hands. We have seen them do so, over and over. It is high time we wake up! 

Many of the COVID-19 patients could have been saved if treated with Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), Azithromycin, and Zinc. The restricted use of these drugs were political and not science-based. Dr. Anthony Fauci needs be fired or put in a job where he can never harm another person ever again. 

On June 17, 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that the hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) trials for an effective treatment for Covid-19 be stopped. Investigators made the decision based on evidence from the Solidarity trial, UK’s RECOVERY trial, and a Cochrane review. Who are these people, anyway? Looking at the Cochrane, we found this article, Cochrane – A sinking ship? Cochrane, a British International Charitable Organization and a Non-Profit (NGO), is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the World Health Organization (WHO). For a complete list of funders, click here.

It appears that the government health agencies such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID),   and the National Institutes of Health (NIH)  are basing their decisions on politics and the amount of money being donated to them by Big Pharma, Bill & Melinda Gates, and socialist pressure from the deep state (known as The Pilgrims Society). What happened to true science? 

Our FDA, CDC, Governors, and State Medical Boards are making it appear that “off-label” prescriptions for Hydroxychoroquine (HCQ) in COVID-19 is illegal or fraudulent. “Off-label” simply means a new disease use different from the one originally approved.

EXPLOSIVE – About All These “New” Positive COVID Cases – State Health Departments Manipulating Data, Changing Definitions.

According to the new guidance, anyone who comes into contact with a person who tests positive is now also considered positive. 

“Are public health agencies deliberately manipulating data to inflate cases and cause hysteria? It sure seems that way.” 

But again — we remind you that Hydroxychloroquine has been shown to lower the death rate in Covid-19 patients.  Here are a few more articles: 

Treatment with Hydroxychloroquine Cut Death Rate Significantly in COVID-19 Patients, Henry Ford Health System Study Shows – July 02, 2020

From the article:

DETROIT – Treatment with hydroxychloroquine cut the death rate significantly in sick patients hospitalized with COVID-19 – and without heart-related side-effects, according to a new study published by Henry Ford Health System. 

In a large-scale retrospective analysis of 2,541 patients hospitalized between March 10 and May 2, 2020 across the system’s six hospitals, the study found 13% of those treated with hydroxychloroquine alone died compared to 26.4% not treated with hydroxychloroquine. None of the patients had documented serious heart abnormalities; however, patients were monitored for a heart condition routinely pointed to as a reason to avoid the drug as a treatment for COVID-19.

 

Treatment with Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Combination in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19; July 01, 2020 from International Journal of Infectious Diseases

 Hydroxychloroquine provided a 66% hazard ratio reduction, and hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin 71% compared to neither treatment.Thus a reduction in COVID-19 associated mortality.

 

Why is our state health department restricting the use of Hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 patients? HCQ could have been a lifesaving treatment for some…

The following is a restrictive directive from the Arkansas Department of Health (ADH) with no date, but you will find similar statements like this in other states as well — since their orders come from the CDC and WHO. This article shows that ADH is attempting to restrict the use of an old and known drug Hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Many of the patients that died may have been able to have been saved if the doctors had access and was able to use Hydroxchloroquine with no interference from state health departments.

 

ADH Guidance on hydroxychloroquine

  (restricts the doctor from use of HCQ)

 

From the article:

As current efforts are underway to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, a recent concern has been the reported issuance of prescriptions by physicians for and dispensing of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine by pharmacies for prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Pharmacists should exercise caution dispensing these medications in a community setting. 

 

NOTE: There should be no restriction to the pharmacies or the doctors in prescribing hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19.

Why should humanity be manipulated and not allowed access to the proper drugs? Why should anyone fall victim to this? The virus is over 99% survivable.

The following is a restrictive directive from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS):

 

UAMS Guidelines for the Use of Hydroxychloroquine

April 10, 2020 (restricts the doctor from use of HCQ)

April 10, 2020 (restricts the doctor from use of HCQ)

Taken from the article:

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) received a supply of 100,000 tablets of Hydroxchloroquine for distribution to UAMS other Arkansas hospitals for patients with COVID-19 infection and to patients in the State with Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis that have lost access to this drug as a result of supply limitations,

Ambulatory setting (out patient)

• Hydroxychloroquine will not be approved for use as prophylaxis for Healthcare workers or any other persons in Arkansas

• Hydroxychloroquine will not be approved for the treatment of COVID-19 patients in an outpatient setting in Arkansas

• Hydroxychloroquine outpatient prescriptions will be limited to the continued treatment of patients with Systemic lupus erythematosus or Rheumatoid Arthritis

 

Inpatient setting

• Hydroxochloroquine may be considered for use for COVID-19 hospitalized patients based on eligibility criteria as defined by the COVID-19 UAMS Targeted Treatment Considerations for Patients Admitted with COVID-19 Infections guideline (see attached)

• • • Mild to Moderate Disease: Admitted with minimal oxygen requirement
                  Hydroxychloroquine therapy not indicated unless requiring

                                                supplemental oxygen or if high risk criteria present

 

• High risk criteria includes:

                                 Age > 60 years

                                                                     BMI >35

• Chronic Medical Conditions such as pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, transplant, DM (Diabetes Mellitus), HTN (Hypertension),
  CVD, cardiomyopathy, biologic immune modulators (many), other immunosuppressive medications including chronic corticosteroid treatment >20 mg oral prednisone daily, HIV, pregnancy

• Laboratory abnormalities with ALC <1,000, LDH> 1x ULN, AST (Aspartate aminotransferase) or ALT >2 x ULN

• High risk criteria includes:

 

• Severe Disease: Admitted with any of the following: Sp02 <94% on room air, RR >30 bpm, Pa02/Fi02 300 mm Hg.  Hydroxychloroquine may be considered for treatment in this category

• Critical Disease: ICU care with mechanical ventilation, shock, or other organ failure. Hydroxychloroquine may be considered for treatment in this category; consideration to discontinue therapy if the patient’s condition deteriorates

 

These directives put out by the Arkansas Department of Health and UAMS are EXTREMELY restrictive and controlling. We believe doctors should be allowed the freedom to determine what to prescribe for their patients, especially in this case where quick action is needed to stop the spread of the virus in ill patients. 

HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND AZITHROMYCIN AS A TREATMENT OF COVID-19

results of an open- label non-randomized clinical trial

Conclusion:

Despite its small sample size our survey shows that hydroxychloroquine treatment is significantly associated with viral load reduction/disappearance in COVID-19 patients and its effect is reinforced by azithromycin.

 

However, despite the promising results of Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and zinc, trials are being conducted for new drugs:

REMDESIVIR INVESTIGATIONAL TRIALS IN COVID-19: A CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL

Please note that Remdesivir is Dr. Anthony Fauci’s drug of choice to treat COVID-19.

From the article:

results of an randomized controlled trial

Conclusion:

The authors indicate that they cannot draw any conclusions based on their data as to the potential efficacy of remdesivir in the treatment of COVID-19

 Abstract: During outbreak of emerging disease, the most important aim is to discover an effective drug to save life. Consequently, a lot of effort are generally made by the industry to promote clinical trials with new drugs. Here we review evidence of the 8 most recent reports including 3 randomized controlled trials on the clinical efficacy of remdesivir in treating COVID-19 patient. We conclude that it is far too premature to identify remdesivir as a curative or life-saving intervention.

 

This begs another question:  does Fauci or his wife, Christine Grady have a financial stake in Remdesivir or Gilead Sciences, the company which produces it? 

The answer is yes. (See below.)

You may recall — Fauci and Birx promoted the use of this drug during the Ebola outbreak... Are they trying to get a return on their investment?

See below — NIAID Director Dr. Anthony S. Fauci along with his wife Christine Grady’s Financial Disclosures:

Click here for the Executive Branch Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Report: Periodic Transaction Report (OGE Form 278e) from March 2014

Click here for Revocable Trust Transactions 2019

Click here for Defined Benefit Plan Transactions 2019

Click here for Contributory IRA (One of Fauci’s holdings Edgewood Growth Fund holds Gilead Sciences, Incorporated which produces the drug Remdesivir). This should be a conflict of interest, since Dr. Fauci is the one that is pushing Remdesivir as the drug to use for treating COVID-19.)

Click here for Spouse (Christine Grady) Revocable Trust (Notice the redaction)

Click here for Spouse (Christine Grady) IRA Contributory (Notice the redaction)

Dr. Fauci is cunningly stating that we are likely to see another, even more severe, pandemic affect the world! Moreover, we could be in for a bad Fall 2020 or that the Coronavirus could come back in cycles. Do NOT be surprised to see a mutated version of COVID-19 or a COVID-20, as Dr. Anthony Fauci owns several  U.S. patents that contain a key glycoprotein (HIV Component) used to create COVID-19. And don’t be surprised if Fauci stole the research papers from scientists to do it. Wasn’t he, as part of Robert Gallo’s team, involved in stealing research papers from French scientists on HIV and claiming the discovery of the virus as their own?

More money-making schemes:

 

From left to right:  Bill Gates and Bill Clinton
image credit

 

In Covid-19 War, Drugmakers ‘Deserve to Make Money Out of the Process 

SVB Leerink analyst Geoffrey Porges has an Outperform recommendation on Gilead stock (ticker: GILD) and a $94 price target for the shares—which were trading at $77 Wednesday morning. His buy rating is based in part on his belief that the drug company can hit annual sales of $7 billion on its product remdesivir by charging Americans $5,000 for a course of treatment against Covid-19.

Grants & Funding from NIH for Clinical Trial for Remdesivir.

• Emergency Awards: Research Projects in SARS-CoV-2 Serological Sciences (U01 Clinical Trial Optional)

• Emergency Awards: SARS-CoV-2 Serological Sciences Centers of Excellence (U54 Clinical Trial Optional)

• Notice of Special Interest (NOSI): Availability of Administrative Supplements & Urgent Competitive Revisions to NCCIH Grants for Natural Product Research on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) & Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

 
A Tale of Two Drugs: Money vs. Medical Wisdom

Approximately $70 million in U.S. taxpayer funding began Gilead’s partnership with the U.S. Army, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and National Institutes of Health (NIH) to develop remdesivir. Initially for treating Ebola, it failed to show benefit and was shelved. If remdesivir is used to treat COVID-19, Gilead shareholders, not the taxpayers, will profit.

Gilead’s own press release revealed the side effect of acute respiratory failure in 6 percent of patients in the remdesivir 5-day treatment group, and 10.7 percent of patients in the 10-day treatment group, clearly ominous findings with a drug designed to treat respiratory failure caused by COVID-19.

 

EYE OPENING! Infant Deaths Decrease 30% During Lockdown, Coinciding with Sharp Drop in Vaccinations

From the article:

An analysis of US mortality data by Mark Blaxill and Amy Becker shows that the weekly number of deaths among infants during the pandemic lockdown dropped by about 30%. “Starting in early March, expected deaths began a sharp decline, from an expected level of around 700 deaths per week to well under 500 by mid‐April and throughout May.” The unexpected survival of 200 babies per week precisely corresponds with a drop in vaccination.

Lower infant deaths associated with stopping vaccinations in babies also was noted by a doctor in Italy in a letter to Robert F. Kennedy of Children’s Health Defense. Dr. Antonietta  M. Gatti wrote that during the lockdown there were no sudden-infant-death syndromes. After the lockdown, baby vaccination started again, and there was a dead baby in Turin, and another child and two twins died.”

 

Remember, NIH is part of the deep state and appears to be heavily involved with deception to mislead our leaders and the American people. We are getting closer to total dominance of global governance.

Read about the NIH clinical trial of investigational vaccine for COVID-19

The vaccine is called mRNA-1273 and was developed by NIAID scientists and their collaborators at the biotechnology company Moderna, Inc., based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) supported the manufacturing of the vaccine candidate for the Phase 1 clinical trial.

 

You may recall that Cambridge, Massachusetts is where Bill and Melinda Gates have their Medical Research Institute…

Follow the money… again!  New Docs: NIH Owns Half of Moderna Vaccine

Some snippets from the article are below:

New documents obtained by Axios and Public Citizen suggest that the National Institute of Health (NIH) owns half the key patent for Moderna’s controversial COVID vaccine and could collect half the royalties. In addition, four NIH scientists have filed their own provisional patent application as co-inventors. Little known NIH regulations let agency scientists collect up to $150,000.00 annually in royalties from vaccines upon which they worked. These rules are recipes for regulatory corruption.

NIH’s stake in the jab may explain why mobster type Anthony Fauci moved Moderna’s vaccine to the front of the line and to let Moderna skip animal trials despite the experimental technology and the inherent dangers of Coronavirus vaccines. Every prior coronavirus vaccine has proven problematic and can be lethal to animals due to COVID’s unique penchant for “pathogenic priming.” Death occurs only after a vaccinated animal encounters the wild virus. Depending on how deep you want to go, here’s more information.

 

NOW watch Fauci’s slick maneuvering… The article goes on to say:

Public health advocates and scientists criticized Fauci’s decision to skip animal trials as reckless. It may also explain why Anthony Fauci arranged a $483 million grant to Moderna from a sister NIH agency, BARDA, despite the fact that Moderna has never brought a product to market or gotten approval.

From left to right: NIAID Director Anthony Fauci, NIH Director Francis Collins, and billionnaire philanthropist Bill Gates
image credit

 

Click here for the documentation and proof of ”Jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna”. (Remember that NIAID is part of NIH.) The original agreement between NIAID and Moderna was signed in November 2015, and this agreement has been renewed six times via an Amendment Agreement. The latest was Amendment 6, signed in February 2020. People, this was all planned under the cover of darkness.

Did you see the date that agreement was signed?  Please make sure you don’t miss it! Sneaky!
 

*Another smoking gun! This is a game-changer! In 2015, did Dr. Fauci, under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Obama Administration, give Communist China Wuhan Laboratory a grant for 3.7 million dollars?

Yes! 

• Here’s a letter to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Minority Leader Charles Schumer from Senator Martha McSally and Member of Congress Matt Gaetz addressing concerns about funding “sent—directly or indirectly—to China’s controversial bio-agent laboratory the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).” This NIH website shows that it was under Project # 2R01AI110964-06. From the letter:You may be aware that the WIV is the only facility in China designated as a biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) laboratory, meaning that it handles extremely deadly pathogens and biological agents. According to peer-reviewed research publications, the NIH has funded research at the WIV in recent years that involves capturing and handling coronavirus-infected bats from the same caves COVID-19 is believed to have originated from. In some cases, infected bats were killed and transported to the WIV for lab experiments. The research studies state that they were funded by an active NIH grant that has received $3.7 million in taxpayers’ money to date.  

• Here’s a letter to NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins from Senator Martha McSally and Member of Congress Matt Gaetz.

Snippet from letter:
We are writing to express our deep concerns regarding the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) past and current relationship with China’s controversial bio-agent laboratory the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and to ensure no additional U.S. tax dollars are directed to this notorious institution.

 

Click here for the article from Member of Congress Matt Gaetz’s website entitled “Gaetz, McSally Urge House, Senate Leadership to Prevent Funding of Dangerous Wuhan Laboratory”.

The US was Concerned About Wuhan Research Two Years Ago —

The US National Institute of Health, a government agency, also gave a $3.7million research grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) to carry out research on bats from caves in Yunnan, more than 1,000 miles away. Scientists have traced the sequencing of the COVID-19 genome to Yunnan, the Daily Mail revealed on Sunday, April 12, 2020. It’s not clear when that grant was given. 

 

Doctors are seeing the truth and are speaking out.

Attention, doctors and medical workers! Linked below is a list of studies from AAPS, the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, https://aapsonline.org/, showing that HCQ lowers morbidity and mortality in Covid-19.  Several are from other countries, and one is from Johns Hopkins. Click here to open the list. The drug must be prescribed correctly, however.  See here for more information: Researchers Overdosing COVID-19 Patients on Hydroxychloroquine, States Association of American Physicians & Surgeons (AAPS)

From AAPS’ own motto omnia pro aegroto, meaning everything for the patient, you can tell who AAPS is working for:  the patient. Physicians follow the Hippocratic Oath that says: “First, do no harm.” It is time for all Physicians and Surgeons to support the AAPS organization and drop their AMA membership.

 

In closing:  Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Azithromycin are not the only solution, but they should be available, as they ARE saving lives in our country and around the world⏤in countries with less sophisticated medical infrastructure and capability than we have in America. Remember to take zinc with it, also: Hydroxychloroquine makes the cell membrane more permeable and prepares the cells to receive the zinc, and the zinc prohibits the virus from replicating. This is also how patients were able to get well so quickly and avoid the awful cytokine storm.

We don’t have time to waste. People are dying, and we need to have ALL medication avenues open! Doctors need more tools in their toolbox. Our economy has taken a fatal blow, businesses are closing or going bankrupt, and people’s livelihoods — and lives — are at stake. 

Let’s get politics and playboy philanthropists out of this narrative and use true science.

Lastly, we thank the doctors for fighting for their patients and for their specialized assistance with our articles. We greatly appreciate you. 

As always, you can find our email articles posted on our website: SecureArkansas.com.  The Search box is a handy tool.  

For more information about any topic, such as Coronavirus, just type it into the Search box on our website, and click Enter!

Securing the blessings of liberty,

Secure Arkansas
securetherepublic.com/arkansas
[email protected]

---

Disclaimer:

Legal Advice is Not Provided

The material in our emails/alerts and on our websites is only intended to provide general information and comment to the public. We make an effort to ensure that the information found in our emails/alerts and on our websites is accurate and timely, but we can’t and don’t guarantee that. Nor do we guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information contained on websites to which our websites or emails provide links.

Information found in our emails/alerts and on our websites should not be taken as legal advice. Legal matters can be complicated. For assistance with a specific legal problem or question, please contact a knowledgeable lawyer for assistance.