Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By breaking news stories
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Mandatory Vaccine Law Passes Congress Homeland Security will ensure any individual traveling on a flight is fully vaccinated against COVID-19

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


mandatory vaccine regulations

Congress HR 4980

Homeland Security will ensure any individual traveling on a flight is fully vaccinated against COVID-19

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4980?s=4&r=8

H.R.4980 – To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure that any individual traveling on a flight that departs from or arrives to an airport inside the United States or a territory of the United States is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, and for other purposes.117th Congress (2021-2022) | Get alerts

BILL

Hide Overview 

Sponsor: Rep. Torres, Ritchie [D-NY-15] (Introduced 08/06/2021)
Committees: House – Homeland Security
Latest Action: House – 08/06/2021 Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.  (All Actions)

Tracker:

This bill has the status Introduced

Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. To President
  5. Became Law

More on This Bill

Get more information

See Coverage Dates for Congress.gov Collections and learn about other sources.

Give Feedback on This Bill

Summary: H.R.4980 — 117th Congress (2021-2022)All Information (Except Text)

A legislative analyst in the Congressional Research Service will begin analyzing this legislation after text becomes available.

 

 



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 13 comments
    • Idiot Proof

      Which “President” signed this BS into “Law”?
      Biden? Then it is meaningless as well as UnLawful, Unconstitutional, and a violation of the Nuremberg Codes…mandatory “vaccinations” are a crime against humanity…

    • Anonymous

      this article is total bullshit—has not even been voted on you filthy lying jackass click bait mf er

    • HTLIII

      I detect a ship of fools. Lower death rate than the common flu. Absolutely ZERO evidence of any COVID-19 other than regular influenza A and influenza B. No COVID virus to test or base a vaccine on. Gates, Fauci, Lieber, and the U.S. Patent Office all lying and taking or giving bribes under the legal immunity of the queen of England. No vaccine works for a virus which does not exist. Therefore, line up congress against the back wall of The Hart Building and do what is right. These prancing, mewling parasites came to D.C. to rob, cheat, and bugger little kids. That makes them genetic slag and worthy only of prison or one way to composting duty. I knew COVID was fake just after I found out that Kirkland Washington convalescent home where 27 old folks died just after the Wuhan attack was in the middle of the strongest 5G grid in America at the time. I know biowarfare exists and I know Harvard’s Charles M. Lieber holds the U.S. Patent using 5G to free viruses from nanotubule containers. Since when do we shut down the country over a virus less dangerous than the flu. These masks do nothing to stop viruses but do increase the rate of bacterial pneumonia by 500%. Kick their ass and let us get back to life. Those micro tubes found in the Rockefeller CVS blue and white masks really do move. I drew a circle around 3 that I could see with a powerful magnifying glass. One crawled away, one got stuck in the ink of the circle, and the other crawled to a spot close to the circle I had drawn around it while it was at the center. Pirbright Wuhan(Nanchang) = Pirbright London.

      • HTLIII

        All this crap to keep the British Empire and the Rockefellers out of prison for setting up the WTCs to nuke later by mutual agreement. Had to keep the center of world finance in London, and destroy North Africa and the Middle East so the swine can go shopping at new swanky resorts. The biowarfare labs Fauci developed were British, and we are the victims. They say we all must die so they can have more. Not theory. These morons blew up FDukushima too. See ‘The Fukushima Report @ 82.221.129.208.

    • Covidbolognamyopinion

      I am prepared to prove to anyone the real Biden is long gone!!
      I speak the truth!!

    • beLIEve

      There is NO “government”…….IT is all “CORP O’RATions; operating under the CONfected fAR$E of……RULES (lures), REGULATION$
      and STATUTES. :lol:

      **
      In reference to statements, along the lines of…….the “vaccine” is authorized under…”EMERGENCY EXPERIMENTAL USE”. :idea:

      * :idea: * :idea: *

      Assessing The LEGALITY OF MANDATES For Vaccines AUTHORIZED Via :idea: An EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION. :idea:

      Efthimios Parasidis Aaron S. Kesselheim
      FEBRUARY 16, 2021 :idea:

      The FOOD and DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA) recently I$$UED TWO EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATIONS :idea: (EUAs) FOR Covid-19 VACCINES, and may soon issue a third.
      *
      Among the early groups of people receiving vaccines, reports have emerged of….FAR TOO MANY :grin: far too many PHYSICIANS, NURSES, NURSING HOME STAFF, AND FIREFIGHTERS ………DECLINING VACCINATION. :smile: :smile: :smile:
      *
      INTERPRETING THE :idea: EUA STATUTE :idea:

      The EUA provision was added to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) in 2004 to give the :idea: “GOVERNMENT” :lol: increased flexibility to respond to a chemical, biologic, nuclear, or radiation threat.

      https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20210212.410237/full/

      **
      N.B. beLIEve comment……….THREE DIFFERENT TERMS used in reference to the EUA. :idea:

      1. EUA “Authorization”.
      2. EUA “Statute”.
      3. EUA “ProviSION”.

      A “STATUTE” is NOT a “government” TOOL……..it pertains to an “administration” that is a so-called “CORPoRATion, and IF you have
      not agreed to the RULE$, REGULATION$ and STATUTES of a CORPORATION, you are…NOT BOUND BY THEM. :idea:

      • beLIEve

        Interpreting the EUA…….. :idea: STATUTE

        The EUA provision was added to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) in 2004 to give the government increased flexibility to respond to a chemical, biologic, nuclear, or radiation threat. When the pathway was created, special language was included for INFORMATIONAL DISCLOSURES FOR INDIVIDUALS OFFERED A MEDICAL PRODUCT UNDER AN….EUA. :idea:
        Specifically, under 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), EACH INDIVIDUAL MUST BE INFORMED “of the OPTION TO ACCEPT or REFUSE administration of the PRODUCT, of the CONSEQUENCES, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the ALTERNATIVES TO the PRODUCT that are available and of their BENEFITS and RISKS. :idea:

        *
        beLIEve comment…….

        1. The so-called US “government” has NO JURISDICTION BEYOND the PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES of Washinton D.C. (69 square miles :?: )

        2. The UNITED STATES “government” HAS NO JURISDICTION WITHIN ANY OF the 50 SOVEREIGN STATES OF the UNION for the simple FACT that EACH STATE IS ITS OWN SOVEREIGN COUNTRY. :idea:

        3.The non-existent US “government”…CANNOT “legislate” and or GIFT powers of “legislation”/”MANDATE”…….where the US
        “CONGRE$$” …….HAS ABSOLUTELY NO “powers” of legislation…..aka……..beyond the 69 :?: SQUARE MILES of Washington D.C.

        https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2017/12/21/cooperative-federalism-by-dr-gerald-alan-brown-an-absolute-must-read/

        • beLIEve

          EACH OF THE 50 INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN STATES OF THE UNION IS A FOREIGN COUNTRY WITH RESPECT TOTHE OTHER 49 UNION STATES AND WITH RESPECT TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. —— AN ABSOLUTE “MUST READ”

          December 21, 2017 · by John-Henry Hill, M.D., Ph.D.

          In “COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM” Dr. Brown explains the difference between the jurisdictions of the “United States” (the U.S. government in Washington, DC) and the 50 independent, sovereign “states of the Union”. He does NOT offer his opinions. Instead, he illustrates the HISTORICAL FACTS primarily through citations of U.S. Supreme Court DECISIONS. :idea:

          Each of the 50 independent, sovereign states of the Union is a FOREIGN COUNTRY with respect to the other 49 Union states AND with respect to the United States government. Therefore, unless a specific power was given to Congress in the Constitution, acts passed by CONGRESS have NO AUTHORITY..OR….JURISDICTION WITHIN the 50 UNION STATES. :idea: Such acts passed by Congress (federal statutes) apply ONLY within Washington, DC, federal territories, and areas within a state ceded to the United States government for certain purposes. :idea:

          Indeed, REGULATIONS by executive branch agencies, most RULINGS by federal courts, and :idea: even PRESIDENTIAL “EXECUTIVE ORDERS” :idea: APPLY ONLY WITHIN WA$HINGTON DC (plus U.S. government employees). :idea:

          • beLIEve

            In short, except for powers explicitly enumerated in the Constitution, the UNITED STATES “government” HAS NO JURISDICTION WITHIN ANY OF the 50 SOVEREIGN STATES OF the UNION for the simple FACT that EACH STATE IS ITS OWN SOVEREIGN COUNTRY. Likewise, EACH STATE (a sovereign country) HAS JURISDICTION ONLY……OVER the PEOPLE WITHIN THAT PARTICULAR STATE. :idea: Thus, the New York state government has NO jurisdiction or authority over a man or woman who resides in Maine or any other of the Union states OR Washington, DC. The New York state government has jurisdiction ONLY WITHIN ITS PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES. :idea:
            All other 49 states of the Union AND Washington, DC are considered “foreign states” (i.e., FOREIGN COUNTRIES). —- by John-Henry Hill :idea:

            https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2017/12/21/cooperative-federalism-by-dr-gerald-alan-brown-an-absolute-must-read/

    • beLIEve

      Do You KNOW ABOUT The ACT OF 1871 Teach this in your School :idea:

      @ 00:49 1868 Washington was CREATED in DECEPTION. :idea:

      The…TOTAL JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY & TERRITORY of The CORPORATION in
      WASHINGTON is The District of Columbia …..aka…..68 SQUARE MILES. :idea:

      :idea: It has NEVER BEEN LEGISLATED ANY DIFFERENTLY THAN THAT. :idea:

      Why is The DISTRICT of COLUMBIA RULING OVER … The States in AMERICA :?:

      :idea: THEY are USING IMPLIED CONSENT :lol: OF THE PEOPLE BECAUSE …”We ARE NOT SAYIING NO”. :idea:

      Washington HAS OPERATED in DECEPTION SINCE 1868. :twisted:

      The LAWS WERE DESIGNED…..FOR THEM…TO DECEIVE :mad: …LIE and CHEAT The AMERICAN PEOPLE. :evil:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P318bELif8

    • beLIEve

      Assessing The LEGALITY OF MANDATES For Vaccines AUTHORIZED Via :idea: An EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION.

      Interpreting the EUA……..STATUTE :idea:

      ….FIRST paragraph of this SECTION is incorporated into the POST ABOVE………..

      The EUA provision was added to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) in 2004 ………the ALTERNATIVES TO the PRODUCT that are available and of their BENEFITS and RISKS. :idea:

      Although NO COURT HAS INTERPRETED THIS PROVISION…. the first segment of the subclause SUGGESTS that MANDATES ARE CATEGORICALLY PROHIBITED…since each person must have “the option to accept or refuse.”
      But another plausible interpretation is to view segment two as a qualifier to segment one. According to this interpretation, the provision as a whole could be interpreted to dictate that, ALTHOUGH A PERSON HAS the OPTION TO REFUSE an EUA PRODUCT, refusal can COME with “CONSEQUENCES.” Under this interpretation, the legality of a mandate is likely to HINGE ON how the term “CONSEQUENCES” is DEFINED. Since the term is not defined in the statute, STATUTORY interpretation PRINCIPLES dictate that the WORD should be DEFINED IN ORDINARY TERMS within the context of the STATUTE :!: :!: :idea: beLIEve comment…….STATUTE = NOT “law” :!: :wink: :idea:

      FIRST POTENTIAL MEANING Of ‘Consequences’: HEALTH Consequences ONLY

      The entire subsection of 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3(e) details conditions of…

      • beLIEve

        The entire subsection of 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3(e) details conditions of authorization for EUA medical products, including the NEED TO…ASSESS…and…DISCLOSURE :!: :!: …….KNOWN RI$KS…..and…..BENEFIT$….and….. the…..NEED to MONITOR and REPORT…..ADVERSE EDVENTS. :lol: :idea:
        There is NO REFERENCE TO…..MANDATES or CONSENT WAIVERS. :idea:
        Rather, the subsection focuses on health-related measures that are conditions of ADMINISTRATION.
        As such, in the context of a Covid-19 vaccine EUA, DISCLOSURE OF “CONSEQUENCES” FROM OPTING to REFUSE a VACCINE could be interpreted solely to include potential health consequences of refusal, such as an increased risk of acquiring or transmitting SARS-CoV-2 or an increased risk of disease burden from Covid-19. :idea:

        Second POTENTIAL MEANING Of ‘Consequences’: Any Adverse Action

        As AN ALTERNATIVE TO A….HEALTH-CENTERED INTERPRETATION, one could argue that the word “CONSEQUENCES” should be DEFINED broadly to encompass ANY ADVERSE ACTION that may be taken should a person decline vaccination. Under this interpretation, “consequences” could include health risks and adverse consequences RELATED TO WORK, access to EDUCATION, use of PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, ability to SHOP in a store…BOARD an AIRPLANE….and more.
        As a practical matter, such a broad interpretation would open the POSSIBILITY that public and PRIVATE enTITie$ could INSTITUTE MANDATES. :idea:

        • beLIEve

          IF this interpretation is ADOPTED, the FDCA would require that INDIVIDUALS BE INFORMED, PRIOR to their decision on whether to accept an EUA medical product, of ALL POSSIBLE health and non-health related CONSEQUENCES. It seems UNLIKELY THAT CONGRESS WOULD SET ….THIS BROAD DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT on health care providers who are administering products available under an EUA. :idea:

          Furthermore, if segment two of Section 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) opens the door to MANDATES, it would RENDER MEANINGLESS the OPTION stated IN SEGMENT ONE.
          Under CANONS :idea: of STATUTORY INTERPRETATION…..ONE SEGMENT OF STATUTE…….SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED TO OBSTRUCT ANOTHER. :idea:
          Rather, PROVISIONS should be interpreted in a way that makes them COMPATIBLE…NOT CONTRADICTORY. :idea:

          In sum, it is most plausible that the MANDATORY DISCLOSURES of Section 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) are LIMITED TO HEALTH RISKS OF REFUSING an EUA product during a public health emergency. THIS INTERPRETATION IS SUPPORTED BY the LEGISLATIVE HISTORY of the bill that created the EUA pathway.
          A REVIEW OF the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD…REVEALS NO MENTION OF ALLOWING the….GOVERNMENT or PRIVATE ENTITIE$…….the ABILITY ……TO MANDATE ADMINISTRATION OF….EUA PRODUCTS. :idea:

          Rather, EUAs consistently are CHARACTERIZED AS a vehicle for providing access to PROMISING BUT UNPROVEN…. medical PRODUCT$.
          As one example, Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-Louisiana) stated that..THE STATUTE :!: …..was intended to assure that “IF there is some VACCINE, some treatment under study that HA$ A LOT OF PROMI$E :lol: but has not yet been approved, that WE ARE NOT FORBIDDEN TO USE IT.” :!: :idea:

          CLICK on LINK below for FULL article…

          https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20210212.410237/full/

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.