Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Bunkerville, God, Guns and Guts
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

87,000 New IRS Agents – Obama’s Civilian Security Force?

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Who believes that there are 87,000 accountants out there available to fill the positions that will be available with the “Inflation Reduction Act” about to be passed? Considering that the IRS cannot fill their positions for IRS agents now just who will be these new candidates? Setting aside a few thousand for IT it sure is a boatload of agents.

As I posted yesterday-

IRS agents are accountants. Now that the San Diego school district is giving straight A’s to every child who lives in the district, whether or not they show up at school, think any of them will be able to make it through 30 semester hours of increasingly complex accounting courses?

Forty percent of all accounting graduates opt to become CPAs, which takes them out of the running for entry-level agent positions. CPAs need a full year’s worth of credits on top of their degree, a couple of years in a public accounting sweatshop, passing all the segments of the CPA exam, and annual continuing education credits. Starting wages for agents are significantly lower than for private industry accountants.

How many of these new 30 credit accounting wonders will be even qualified to audit anyone with a tax return more than a 1040 form?

Congress in its wisdom recognizes that there are no 87,000 accountants. How do I know?

Buried in the wording is a paragraph giving the Secretary of the Treasury the ability to hire directly into the competitive service without regard for current laws that mandate publicly announcing available competitive service openings. The Secretary can ignore all federal laws that give hiring preference to veterans, the disabled, former employees (that would include those fired for not taking the co-vax), military spouses, Peace Corps volunteers, etc. That’s one way to make sure only those who meet a political smell test get to participate in this new IRS enforcement program.

So the new so-called agents will be hand-picked. No public announcing of the position. Am I the only one that thinks it odd? How about the educational backgrounds? If the IRS is going to unleash thousands of IRS agents don’t we need to believe that they are qualified ?  Or are they merely to harass the “chosen” by the administration? Just asking.

If we accept a premise that we will have tens of thousands of individuals that really aren’t qualified to examine tax returns one has to ask just what will they be doing?

If anyone thinks that the Biden regime would like to return to the halcyon days of Obama let’s look at an idea of what they could do.

How about this?

Now an IRS agent in every Church? Agrees to monitor sermons

August 1, 2014 — bunkerville

On Friday, the IRS settled a lawsuit filed in 2012 by the Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF). The Wisconsin group brought the lawsuit because it said the IRS was ignoring complaints about churches violating their tax-exempt statuses. Specifically, FFRF said many churches promote political issues, legislation, and/or candidates from the pulpit in violation of the 1954 Johnson Amendment, which requires that non-profits not endorse candidates. (One of those wink-wink set up settlements probably)

According to FFRF, the IRS has not followed a 2009 ruling requiring it to hire someone to keep an eye on church politicking. The IRS says it hasn’t ignored the ruling, but merely failed to follow it.

Today, more emails were released from Congressional investigations into the IRS scandal. You know, the one where our Dear Leader used federal agencies to target the political opposition with repression and abuse.  The Wall Street Journal reports today, in an article called “The IRS’s Foreign Policy, that now evidence has emerged that it wasn’t just American conservative groups our president was criminally targeting for special attention.  It was targeting groups supporting the Jewish State of Israel.

An IRS email unearthed in Congressional discovery asks these questions to a Jewish group applying for tax-exempt status: (1) “Does your organization support the existence of the land of Israel?” and (2) “Describe your organization’s religious belief system toward the land of Israel.”  So tell me how that issue is worthy of IRS attention?  The obvious answer is that it is not.  It’s only relevant to a presidential administration taking its cues from an anti-semitic leader.

Then there is this:

“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set,” Obama said.  “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

All Democrats voted for this bill, more than doubles the size of the IRS. It will employ more than the Pentagon, State Department, FBI, & Border Patrol combined.

IRS is to get 5000 more guns; 5 million rounds of ammo; if they hire 87k they will have 167k employees; impressive brown shirt army.  The IRS has 4,487 guns and 5,062,006 rounds of ammunition in its weapons inventory

Here is something else that is a possibility for these tens of thousands. Mark Levin 2014.

Sources from yesterday’s post:

It’s Not Just the 87,000 New IRS Agents, It’s who They Will Be – What They Will Do!

The best of the swamp.


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 5 comments
    • beLIEve

      31 QUESTIONS and ANSWERS about The Internal REVENUE $erVICE :idea:

      1. Is the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury :?:

      Answer: No. The IRS IS NOT AN ORGANIZATION WITHIN the United States Department of THE TREASURY. :wink: The U.S. Department of the Treasury was organized by statutes now codified in Title 31 of the United States Code, abbreviated “31 U.S.C.” The only mention of the IRS anywhere in 31 U.S.C. §§ 301‑315 is an authorization for the President to appoint an Assistant General Counsel in the U.S. Department of the Treasury to be the Chief Counsel for the IRS. See 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2).

      At footnote 23 in the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the IRS could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D. The Guarantee Clause in the U.S. Constitution guarantees the Rule of Law to all Americans (we are to be governed by Law and not by arbitrary bureaucrats). See Article IV, Section 4. Since THERE WAS NO ORGANIC ACT CREATING IT, IRS IS NOT A LAWFUL ORGANIZATION. :idea:


      26. Do IRS agents ever TAMPER WITH FEDERAL GRAND JURIES, and how is this routinely done :?:

      UNDER OATH……as LAWFUL :evil: EMPLOYEE$…and….”$pecial Agent$” of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT…….

    • beLIEve


      …….most OFTEN by misrepresenting themselves, under oath, as lawful employees and “Special Agents” of the Federal Government, and by MI$REPRESENTING the PROVISIONS of…SUBTITLE F …as HAVING ANY LEGAL FORCE or, EFFECT :!: :idea:
      Such FAL$E REPRESENTATIONS of FACT :idea: VIOLATE Section 43(a) of the LANHAM ACT :idea: uncodified at 15 U.S.C. 1125(a). (TITLE 15 of the United States Code HAS NOT BEEN ENACTED INTO POSITIVE LAW EITHER.)

      They tamper with grand juries by acting as if “INCOME” is everything that “comes in”, when THERE IS NO SUCH DEFINITION anywhere in the IRC. :evil: Such FALSE DESCRIPTIONS of fact also VIOLATE Section 43(a) of the LANHAM ACT. :idea:

      in the first instance, SUCH AS BANK RECORDS. :idea: Bank signature cards do not constitute competent waivers of their customers’ FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TO PRIVACY, as secured by the Fourth Amendment. :idea:
      The HIGH STANDARD FOR WAIVERS of fundamental Rights was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970).

      IRS agents tamper with grand juries by creating and MAINTAINING the FALSE and FRAUDULENT, PRETENSES that the IRC is not vague, or that the income tax provisions have any legal force or effect inside the 50 States of the Union, when those provisions do not :?:

      These are all forms of PERJURY, as well, and possibly also misprision of perjury by omission, i.e. serious federal offenses.

      Finally, there is…

    • beLIEve


      Finally, there is ample evidence that IRS AGENTS BRIBE U.S. ATTORNEYS, FEDERAL JUDGES, AND even the Office of THE PRESIDENT WITH HUGE KICKBACKS, :idea: every time a CRIMINAL INDICTMENT is issued by a federal grand jury against an ILLEGAL TAX PROTESTOR. :idea: (See the Answer to Question 25 above.) These KICK-BACKS range from $25,000 to $35,000 in CASH :!:
      They also VIOLATE the ANTI-KICKBACK ACT of 1986, :idea: which PENALIZES the payment of KICKBACKS FROM federal GOVERNMENT SUBCONTRACTORS. See 41 U.S.C. 8701 et seq. :twisted:

      As a TRU$T DOMICILED IN PUERTO RICO, the IRS is, without a doubt, a federal government SUBCONTRACTOR that is subject to this Act. See 31 U.S.C. 1321(a)(62).
      The SYSTEMATIC and PREMEDITATED PATTERN of RACKETEERING BY IRS EMPLOYEES also establishes PROBABLE CAUSE to DI$MANTLE the IRS PERMANENTLY for VIOLATING the SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT….first enacted in the year 1890 A.D. See 26 Stat. 209 (1890) (uncodified at 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)


      29. DO FEDERAL INCOME TAX REVENUES PAY FOR AN GOVERNMENT SERVICE$ and, if so, which government services are funded by federal income taxes :?:

      Answer: NO. The MONEY TRAIL IS VERY DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW, in this instance, because the IRS is technically a trust with a DOMICILE IN PUERTO RICO. See 31 U.S.C. 1321(a)(62). As such, THEIR RECORDS ARE PROTECTED BY laws which guarantee the privacy of trust records within THAT TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION……………..
      ………………..PROVIDED THAT the trust is not also VIOLATING the SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT. …

    • beLIEve


      They are technically NOT AN “AGENCY” OF the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, :idea: AS that term is DEFINED IN the Freedom of Information Act and in the ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT. :idea:
      The GOVERNMENTS OF the FEDERAL TERRITORIES…are EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED FROM the definition of “agency” …..IN those ACTS
      Of CONGRESS. See 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C). (See also the Answer to Question 5 above.)

      All evidence indicates that THEY ARE A MONEY LAUNDRY, EXTORTION RACKET, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, :oops: in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq. :oops: :twisted:

      THEY APPEAR TO BE LAUNDERING HUGE SUMS OF MONEY INTO FOREIGN BANKS, :oops: MOSTLY IN EUROPE…AND QUITE POSSIBLY INTO the VATICAN. :idea: See the national policy on money laundering at 31 U.S.C. 5341. :oops:


      The Grace Commission found that those funds were being used to PAY for INTEREST ON the FEDERAL DEBT, and income transfer payments to beneficiaries of entitlement programs like FEDERAL PENSION PLANS.

      :arrow: CLICK on link for the other 28 questions and answers. :idea:

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.