Conspiracy to Deprive the Public of Potential Lifesaving Therapies

Your health is at risk and there is an ongoing conspiracy to deprive you and the public of potential lifesaving measures because the pharmaceutical industry stands to lose massive profits. There are a number of efforts to suppress these potentially lifesaving methods including suppression of advertising, blocking research from appearing in scientific publication, or even blocking research from taking place. There is also harassment of people who manage to go around these blocks and who succeed in getting information published.

There are also a number of propaganda sites such as Quackwatch sites that spread false information. In addition, there are sites that are paid for using government funding and run by government employees that make false claims about these types of products.

These alternative products and methods range from simple fasts and cleansings to products like MSM, Ozone therapy, Colloidal Silver, Nano Silver, IV-vitamin C, various supplements, to electronic devices that output mild and safe electronic pulses that are shown to kill microbes such as bacteria, protozoa, fungi, and virus.

There are several versions of these electronic devices known as a zapper that are used by many to help fight flu, colds, and reportedly other illnesses. There are varying degrees of reported success among the many users but while there has been some studies that support claims, there has not been any peer reviewed scientific studies published to verify the actual effectiveness of these types of products. This lack of peer reviewed studies is mostly the result of the above mentioned suppression.

These products range from downright out cheap, $10.00 US to expensive, costing thousands of dollars, depending on the seller as well as the level of sophistication. Since the  industry is basically a black market industry with little regulation, an interested buyer must use caution. Some products costing $200 to $300 are not much better than ones costing less than $100, while there are others that stand out with very high levels of customer satisfaction.

Most important is the question, do these products actually work or are they just placebos? It is important to note that the FDA has published a white paper on the subject of PEMF, Pulse Electro-Magnitic Fields, which is used in the juice industry to kill microbes such as bacteria, fungi, and virus in fluids. The difference is that in this application they use high voltage pulses but only pulse once or twice. The report does acknowledge that lower voltages can be used if more pulses are applied over a longer period of time.

The problem is that the FDA’s rules for approval are to extreme and stringent for economic viability in meeting their requirements. While their fees are not extreme, they require an IRB, independent review board, which must be hired at a cost of one hundred thousand to possibly over one million US dollars. And that cost is independent of approval. There are many other costs involved so that if ever approved for use on humans or animals, the cost could be up to twenty million dollars. That cost would be for only one specific usage, for example to treat a Staph aureus skin infection, or possibly to stop a cold. The cost would not be such a problem if a product could be patented but since these tupes of products have existed since the late 1800′s, obtaining a patent is not likely.

This extreme financial burden is the main reason that medical devices that should only cost a few dollars can end up costing a hundred thousand dollars for one unit. An example is the early pacemakers. In the case of the pacemaker, this was neccessary as this was an unexplored field.

However, since this industry can not bear the burden of such costs, there has been a tendency to rely on anecdotal reports or customer testimonials. This has now been blocked in the US and some other countries as well. So, what the industry now has to rely on is demonstration pictures and videos that have been produced by customers or other methods of demonstration. An example shows a product successfully killing all the microbes in a jar of water with only 2 usages of 1 hour each..

The demonstration shows that certain advanced products can kill a very wide variety of microbes in water with only a couple of hours usage. Would is not be an amazing thing if the same effect was found in treating a person with sepsis or any extreme bacterial, fungal, or viral infection such as Ebola.

It would certainly seem that if a product like this can safely and quickly eliminate a large number of microbes in such a short period of time, then surely it would have significant value in saving lives from some very deadly illnesses.

This being the case, you might think that a caring medical industry would jump at the opportunity  to try to save lives with products such as this. Right? No! For several reasons, these products are being suppressed and oppressed by the powers that be, especially the pharmaceutical leg of the medical industry.

The truth is is if this information gains public acceptance, the pharmaceutical industry stands to experience tremendous financial losses and a resulting upheaval. Heaven forbid, with all the problems that we are experiencing with antibiotic resistance and also a growing antibiotic sensitivity as well, we certainly would not want to reduce antibiotic usage would we?

Whenever a discussion is brought up about these types of products, the immediate response is “unproven”, “not shown to work”, “not approved”, “quackery”, and a lot of other name calling. In fact, they even lie and mis-represent information in order to steer the public away from trying these products, including the use of scare tactics. They would have you think that there is not any supporting scientific evidence for the zapper. The problem here is that much of the evidence has been suppressed. That is because the pharmaceutical industry either owns or controls the periodicals that report such studies. If the pharmaceutical industry does not want information out, it does not get published.

The point that I would like to present as most supportive is this: A leading company that produces this type of product does not make claims for healing or curing disease or illness for its products but does provide a 30 day money back guarantee to its customers and has a top rating with the BBB. How could they achieve this if their product did not provide significant benefits and good quality? You also might want to note that they also provide a 5 year parts and labor warranty for their products which in itself is a rarity.

While these companies can not claim any effect that this product may or may not have on a disease caused by something like the Ebola virus, many customers are happy that they own one of these and some have even mentioned the potential use of these product in many different applications.

Just imagine someone taken ill by some virus like Ebola, being able to sit in a chair for a couple of hours and then be able to walk back to isolation, almost free of the virus. This does not mean cured and does not mean non-contagious. This would only mean that due to a lower viral load, the patient would have a better chance of surviving and a possibility of quicker recovery.

Contacts have been made with the NIH, CDC, WHO, MSF, and many other agencies in an attempt to just have these alternatives tried but these efforts are basically ignored.

The WHO has ruled that anything can be tried in the effort to save lives from Ebola, why are these alternatives being excluded? The only answer is that the medical system is still trying to maintain its profits. The cure is less important than the money and has this not been the case all along?