Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Rhinochimaera is added to the LRT as another ratfish

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


Adding taxa continues to clarify hypothetical interrelationships
among all included taxa in the LRT. especially in the shark grade/clade where skull elements are cartilaginous and tend to fuse together leaving fewer clues/landmarks in the more derived taxa.

Didier 1995 reports,
“There are two hypotheses on the origin of Holocephali (Bonaparte 1832). The first and most generally accepted scenario is that holocephalans have evolved from some lineage of bradyodont sharks. The second hypothesis suggests that holocephalans are most closely related to placoderms.”

In the LRT placoderms are not basal to sharks, but nest with bony fish in a clade that reverted to a cartilaginous internal skeleton while keeping a bony dermal skeleton. So the second hypothesis is falsified.

According to Wikipedia, “Most Bradyodonti fossils consist of jaws and teeth. These indicate that Bradyodonti ate mollusks and other shelled invertebrates. Their bodies were probably broad and flattened, like modern rays.”Bradyodonti” can also refer to the present-day Chimaera or ratfish of the order Chimaeriformes, which have an upper jaw fused to the braincase and a flap of skin covering the gill slits.”

So, once again suprageneric taxon labels leave us all a little confused since Bradyodonti = Chimaeriformes in some circles.

Figure 5. Shark skull evolution according to the LRT. Compare to figure 1. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/shark-skull-evolution588-2.jpg?w=117″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/shark-skull-evolution588-2.jpg?w=398″ class=”wp-image-51700 size-full” src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/shark-skull-evolution588-2.jpg?w=584&h=1502″ alt=”Updated shark skull evolution according to the LRT. ” width=”584″ height=”1502″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/shark-skull-evolution588-2.jpg?w=584&h=1502 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/shark-skull-evolution588-2.jpg?w=58&h=150 58w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/shark-skull-evolution588-2.jpg?w=117&h=300 117w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/shark-skull-evolution588-2.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 1. Updated shark skull evolution according to the LRT. Sawfish arise close to Rhinobatos.

By adding taxa
to the large reptile tree (LRT, 1776 taxa, subset Figs. 1, 2) holocephali (= chimaera, ratfish) arise from taxa near Squalus and Heterodontus (Fig. 8) close to the shark/ray split where marginal teeth become like paving stones.

By adding colors to skulls,
fused and obscure elements may be identified with tetrapod homologs. That makes scoring and identifying errors easier.

Earlier we looked at
a dorsal view of the skull of the dogfish shark, Squalus (Fig. 1) here. You’ll note that there is much more fusion in the skull cartilage of ratfsh (Figs. 5–7) including the fusion of the lacrimal complex (= traditional palatoquadrate) with the neurocranium and dermocranium.

Figure y. Basal Gnathostomata with the addition of Rhinochimaera. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/gnathostomata588-3.jpg?w=237″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/gnathostomata588-3.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-51707″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/gnathostomata588-3.jpg?w=584&h=740″ alt=”Figure y. Basal Gnathostomata with the addition of Rhinochimaera.” width=”584″ height=”740″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/gnathostomata588-3.jpg?w=584&h=740 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/gnathostomata588-3.jpg?w=118&h=150 118w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/gnathostomata588-3.jpg?w=237&h=300 237w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/gnathostomata588-3.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 2. Basal Gnathostomata with the addition of Rhinochimaera.

Didier 1995 reports,
“The adductor muscles of Heterodontus also lie anterior to the eye and superficially they resemble chimaeroid fishes in this respect. I interpret this as a convergent feature of heterodontids and chimaeroids.” That is the only mention of Heterodontus (Fig. 1) in the text. Squalus is the outgroup taxon in Didier’s figure 46 cladogram (Fig. 3).

Figure 1. Cladogram from Didier 1995, colors added to reflect taxon inclusion, exclusion according to the LRT (see figure 2). ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/phylogeny_chimaeroids.didier1995-588.jpg?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/phylogeny_chimaeroids.didier1995-588.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-51732″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/phylogeny_chimaeroids.didier1995-588.jpg?w=584&h=478″ alt=”Figure 1. Cladogram from Didier 1995, colors added to reflect taxon inclusion, exclusion according to the LRT (see figure 2). ” width=”584″ height=”478″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/phylogeny_chimaeroids.didier1995-588.jpg?w=584&h=478 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/phylogeny_chimaeroids.didier1995-588.jpg?w=150&h=123 150w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/phylogeny_chimaeroids.didier1995-588.jpg?w=300&h=245 300w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/phylogeny_chimaeroids.didier1995-588.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 3. Cladogram from Didier 1995, colors added to reflect taxon inclusion, exclusion according to the LRT (see figure 2).

Getting back to Rhinochimaera
(Fig. 4–6). It should come as no surprise that, with its long rubbery snout, Rhinochimaera is among the most derived chimaeras in the LRT (subset Fig. 2). That proboscis is supported by a single slender nasal cartilage articulating on a joint with the rest of the smaller, underlying nasal cartilages (Fig. 6), homologs with similar, smaller elements in Callorhinchus (Fig. 7).

Figure 1. The long-nosed chimaera (Rhinochimaera africana?). ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/longnosed-chimaera-onfloor588.jpg?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/longnosed-chimaera-onfloor588.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-51257″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/longnosed-chimaera-onfloor588.jpg?w=584&h=266″ alt=”Figure 1. The long-nosed chimaera (Rhinochimaera africana?).” width=”584″ height=”266″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/longnosed-chimaera-onfloor588.jpg?w=584&h=266 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/longnosed-chimaera-onfloor588.jpg?w=150&h=68 150w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/longnosed-chimaera-onfloor588.jpg?w=300&h=137 300w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/longnosed-chimaera-onfloor588.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 4. The long-nosed chimaera (Rhinochimaera africana?).

Figure 5. Fused cartilage skull of Rhinochimaera lacking the tactile/sensory probe supports. Compare to diagram in figure 6. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-photo588-2.jpg?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-photo588-2.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-51748″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-photo588-2.jpg?w=584&h=378″ alt=”Figure 5. Fused cartilage skull of Rhinochimaera lacking the tactile/sensory probe supports. Compare to diagram in figure 6.” width=”584″ height=”378″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-photo588-2.jpg?w=584&h=378 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-photo588-2.jpg?w=150&h=97 150w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-photo588-2.jpg?w=300&h=194 300w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-photo588-2.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 5. Fused cartilage skull of Rhinochimaera lacking the tactile/sensory probe supports. Compare to diagram in figure 6.

Figure 6. Diagram of Rhinochimaera pacifica from Didier 1995. Inverted area and colors added to show interpretations of element boundaries based on Callorhinchus (Fig. 7) and other related taxa. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-didier1995-588-1.gif?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-didier1995-588-1.gif?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-51752″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/rhinochimaera_pacifica_skull-didier1995-588-1.gif?w=584&h=398″ alt=”Figure 6. Diagram of Rhinochimaera pacifica from Didier 1995. Inverted area and colors added to show interpretations of element boundaries based on Callorhinchus (Fig. 7) and other related taxa.” width=”584″ height=”398″ />

Figure 6. Diagram of Rhinochimaera pacifica from Didier 1995. Inverted area and colors added to show interpretations of element boundaries based on Callorhinchus (Fig. 7) and other related taxa.

Rhinochimaera nests with
Callorhinchus (Fig. 6) in the LRT (subset Fig 2), The latter helps identify elements in the former (Figs. 5, 6). Note the lateral rostral rods (l. rost. rod) arises from the lacrimal. The medial rostral rod (m. rost. rod) arises from the nasal.

Figure 7. Callorhinchus milii skull in several views. All the cartilage is fused here, so color identifies elements. Note the tactile rostral elements are smaller and not associated with the premaxilla (contra Didier 1995). ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/callorhinchus-milii-skull588.jpg?w=276″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/callorhinchus-milii-skull588.jpg?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-51738″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/callorhinchus-milii-skull588.jpg?w=584&h=634″ alt=”Figure 7. Callorhinchus milii skull in several views. All the cartilage is fused here, so color identifies elements. Note the tactile rostral elements are smaller and not associated with the premaxilla (contra Didier 1995). ” width=”584″ height=”634″ srcset=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/callorhinchus-milii-skull588.jpg?w=584&h=634 584w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/callorhinchus-milii-skull588.jpg?w=138&h=150 138w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/callorhinchus-milii-skull588.jpg?w=276&h=300 276w, https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/callorhinchus-milii-skull588.jpg 588w” sizes=”(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px” />

Figure 7. Callorhinchus milii skull in several views. All the cartilage is fused here, so color identifies elements. Note the tactile rostral elements are smaller and not associated with the premaxilla (contra Didier 1995).

Heterodontus
(Fig. 8) likewise helps identify skull elements in chimaeroids prior to the fusion of the lacrimal complex (= traditional palatoquadrate) with the dermocranium and neurocranium.

Figure 8. Heterodontus skull with colors added to identify elements as tetrapod homologs. ” data-medium-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/heterodontus.lateral588.gif?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/heterodontus.lateral588.gif?w=584″ class=”size-full wp-image-51743″ src=”https://pterosaurheresies.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/heterodontus.lateral588.gif?w=584&h=477″ alt=”Figure 8. Heterodontus skull with colors added to identify elements as tetrapod homologs. ” width=”584″ height=”477″ />

Figure 8. Heterodontus skull with colors added to identify elements as tetrapod homologs.

Every added taxon
helps clarify the position of every nested taxon as every included taxon affects every other. Likewise, all included and tested taxa help identify fused elements whenever they appear in taxa like Rhinochimaera (Figs. 4–6). Earlier guesses have been repaired. Current guesses will be repaired as soon as errors are discovered. Sutures may not be visible, but the jaw joint is still the quadrate. The large strut above it is still the hyomandibula. The nasal still extends over the nares. Etc. etc.

Some say I need to look at specimens firsthand.
There’s an answer to that. Although I have examined many specimens firsthand, that’s not my job at present. Precision observations will come, but first a wide-angle view of hundreds of taxa is what is required, because 1) specialists, by definition, are not going to look outside their speciality, and 2) no one has done this before. This one time, just let one guy on the planet do this and the rest of the specialists can benefit from whatever insights are recovered here in this wide-angle view of many taxa at once, the LRT.


References
Bonaparte CL 1832. Iconografia delle fauna italica per le quattro classi degli animali vertebrati. Tomo III. Pesci. Roma. [Issued in puntata (installments), without pagination; total of 556 pp., 78 pls.
Didier DA 1995. 
Phylogenetic Systematics of Extant Chimaeroid Fishes (Holocephali, Chimaeroidei). American Museum Novitates 3119:86pp.
Lund R 1977. New information on the evolution of the bradyodont chondrichthyes. Fieldiana 33(28)521–538.
Venkatesh B et al. 2014. Elephant shark genome provides unique insights into gnathostome evolution. Nature 505:174–179.

https://pterosaurheresies.wordpress.com/2020/01/23/the-origin-of-the-holocephali-chimaeras-ratfish/



Source: https://pterosaurheresies.wordpress.com/2020/12/15/rhinochimaera-is-added-to-the-lrt-as-another-ratfish/


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Immusist Beverage Concentrate - Proprietary blend, formulated to reduce inflammation while hydrating and oxygenating the cells.

Report abuse
Loading...

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.